Report an error when Lumi runtime compilation fails.
Also adds a reusable install_release.sh script to use
for installing Lumi package releases, plus expansion
of symlinks in package Makefiles.
This change copies the NPM package files to the installation directory
so that the result is a valid NPM package. This is a temporary workaround
until (😨) the day that we actually publish/consume real NPM packages...
We would like to allow developers to use async/await
on the inside (Node.js) of Lumi programs.
We now support (don't error on) usage of async/await
inside runtime callbacks in Lumi programs. If await is
used during deployment, it will trigger an error.
Also adds support for try/catch in LumiJS, as these are
used more heavily in async/await code.
Since we target Node.js environments without native support
for async/await, we also emit runtime helpers to support TS
transpilation of async/await for Node.js pre-7.6.
This change splits the core Lumi library -- which is meant to be a pure
LumiJS library without any special status -- from the runtime library --
which is really meant to be the underpinnings of "special" functionality
that integrates with the runtime in sophisticated ways.
After this change, LumiRT is at the very bottom, and, despite it using
a subset of LumiJS, it must not trigger any functionality that would
mandate the use of the LumiJS runtime library. Atop that, the LumiJS
library is layered. And finally, above that, Lumi depends on LumiJS.
For lambdas which will execute at runtime,
we want to allow them to reference Node.js
global variables, like `console`.
This change makes Lumijs generated IL
incrementally more dynamic by preferring to
generate `TryLoadDynamic` over `LoadLocation`
for references to global variables (except for
references to imports).
Also introduces `console.log` in LumiJS, though
it is not yet attached to a Lumi global environment.
Fixes#174.
This change keeps the lumi prefix on our CLI tools.
As @lukehoban pointed out in person, as soon as we do pulumi/coconut#98,
most people (other than compiler authors themselves) won't actually be
typing the commands. And, furthermore, the commands aren't all that bad.
Eventually I assume we'll want something like `lumi-js`, or
`lumi-js-compiler`, so that binaries are discovered dynamically in a way
that is extensible for future languages. We can tackle this during #98.
