This brings back the Node.js language plugin's GetRequiredPlugins
function, reimplemented in Go now that the language host has been
rewritten from JavaScript. Fairly rote translation, along with
some random fixes required to get tests passing again.
This change implements the Node.js language host's GetRequiredPlugins
function. This merely scans all node_modules/*/package.json files in
the program directory, looking for those that have associated plugins.
It returns a list of any found along with their version numbers.
This change adds a GetRequiredPlugins RPC method to the language
host, enabling us to query it for its list of plugin requirements.
This is language-specific because it requires looking at the set
of dependencies (e.g., package.json files).
It also adds a call up front during any update/preview operation
to compute the set of plugins and require that they are present.
These plugins are populated in the cache and will be used for all
subsequent plugin-related operations during the engine's activity.
We now cache the language plugins, so that we may load them
eagerly too, which we never did previously due to the fact that
we needed to pass the monitor address at load time. This was a
bit bizarre anyhow, since it's really the Run RPC function that
needs this information. So, to enable caching and eager loading
-- which we need in order to invoke GetRequiredPlugins -- the
"phone home" monitor RPC address is passed at Run time.
In a subsequent change, we will switch to faulting in the plugins
that are missing -- rather than erroring -- in addition to
supporting the `pulumi plugin install` CLI command.
This change introduces a workspace.GetPluginPath function that probes
the central workspace cache of plugins for a matching plugin binary that
matches the desired kind, name, and, optionally, version. It also permits
overriding this with $PATH for developer scenarios.
The analyzer, language, and resource plugin logic now uses this function
for deciding which binary path to load at runtime.
Fixes#356. Instead of downloading a node binary with our closure
serialization code linked-in, this PR instead publishes the
`nativeruntime.node` produced by the NodeJS SDK build as part of the SDK.
This has a number of advantages. First, it is vastly more easy to
develop closure.cc in this configuration. Second, we have the ability
to ship different `nativeruntime.node`s side-by-side, paving the way
for enabling future versions of Node. Third, we don't have to stay
in the business of shipping custom builds of Node, although we do still
need to ship a version of Node with minor modifications in order for
Windows to still work.
The windows build was still on the old plan from way back when where
we had binaries littered in the build tree and you had to add parts of
your build-tree to the `%PATH%` for the integration tests to work.
This cleans that up and moves all of our scripts that invoke
javascript to be on the same plan. They invoke our specially named
node with a relative path to the JS code we want to run.
We no longer have a node_modules folder in the SDK (since all
packages now come from NPM) so we need to adjust the shell script we
use to launch our runner to use a relative path.
This improves the failure messages in two circumstances:
1) If the resource monitor RPC connection is missing. This can happen
two ways: either you run a Pulumi program using vanilla Node.js, instead
of the CLI, or you've accidentally loaded the Pulumi SDK more than once.
2) Failure to load the custom Pulumi SDK Node.js extension. This is a new
addition and would happen if you tried running a Pulumi program using a
vanilla Node.js, rather than using the Pulumi CLI.
In order to begin publishing our core SDK package to NPM, we will
need it to be underneath the @pulumi scope so that it may remain
private. Eventually, we can alias pulumi back to it.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi#915.
* experimental: separate language host from node
* Remove langhost details from the NodeJS SDK runtime
* Cleanup
* Work around an issue where Node sometimes loads the same module twice in two different contexts, resulting in two distinct module objects. Some additional cleanup.
* Add some tests
* Fix up the Windows script
* Fix up the install scripts and Windows build
* Code review feedback
* Code review feedback: error capitalization
As it stands, we serialize more than is correct when registering
resources: in addition to serializing the RegisterResource RPC, we also
wait for input properties to resolve in the same context. Unfortunately,
this means that we can create cycles in the promise graph when a
resource A is constructed in an earlier turn than some resource B and
one of B's output properties is an input to resource A. These changes
fix this issue by allowing input properties to resolve *before*
serializing the RegisterResource RPC.
Some integration tests had taken a dependency on the ordering of resources in
either the output of the `pulumi` command or the checkpoint file. The
only test that took a dependency on command output was updated s.t. its
resources have exactly one legal topographical sort (and therefore their
ordering is deterministic). The other tests were updated s.t. their
validation did not depend on resource ordering.
Our scripts currently copy the package.json that does *not* have
the expanded semver, so its version is simply "${VERSION}", and NPM
is very much not happy with that. We can just stop copying the
package.json explicitly since it's inside of the bin/ directory.
It was possiblef for the finally for a stack to complete before all
other resources had been created. In this case, we would put these new
resources at top level, instead of having them as children of the
stack resource.
Since we do not use the langhost across stacks, we can simply set the
stack resource at top level and never remove it.
Fixes#818
This change implements resource protection, as per pulumi/pulumi#689.
The overall idea is that a resource can be marked as "protect: true",
which will prevent deletion of that resource for any reason whatsoever
(straight deletion, replacement, etc). This is expressed in the
program. To "unprotect" a resource, one must perform an update setting
"protect: false", and then afterwards, they can delete the resource.
For example:
let res = new MyResource("precious", { .. }, { protect: true });
Afterwards, the resource will display in the CLI with a lock icon, and
any attempts to remove it will fail in the usual ways (in planning or,
worst case, during an actual update).
This was done by adding a new ResourceOptions bag parameter to the
base Resource types. This is unfortunately a breaking change, but now
is the right time to take this one. We had been adding new settings
one by one -- like parent and dependsOn -- and this new approach will
set us up to add any number of additional settings down the road,
without needing to worry about breaking anything ever again.
This is related to protected stacks, as described in
pulumi/pulumi-service#399. Most likely this will serve as a foundational
building block that enables the coarser grained policy management.
At the moment, we swallow and log errors for rejected promises during
resolution of resource input properties. This is clearly wrong, and
we should instead let them go rejected so that the unhandled rejected
promise logic triggers, and leads to program failure as expected.
This change adds rudimentary delete-before-create support (see
pulumi/pulumi#450). This cannot possibly be complete until we also
implement pulumi/pulumi#624, becuase we may try to delete a resource
while it still has dependent resources (which almost certainly will
fail). But until then, we can use this to manually unwedge ourselves
for leaf-node resources that do not support old and new resources
living side-by-side.
