Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Clemmer
93cd089428 Print help message when too few arguments
Fixes pulumi/pulumi-policy#61.
2019-08-12 12:45:48 -07:00
joeduffy
5967259795 Add license headers 2018-05-22 15:02:47 -07:00
Pat Gavlin
a23b10a9bf
Update the copyright end date to 2018. (#1068)
Just what it says on the tin.
2018-03-21 12:43:21 -07:00
joeduffy
1c4e41b916 Improve the overall cloud CLI experience
This improves the overall cloud CLI experience workflow.

Now whether a stack is local or cloud is inherent to the stack
itself.  If you interact with a cloud stack, we transparently talk
to the cloud; if you interact with a local stack, we just do the
right thing, and perform all operations locally.  Aside from sometimes
seeing a cloud emoji pop-up ☁️, the experience is quite similar.

For example, to initialize a new cloud stack, simply:

    $ pulumi login
    Logging into Pulumi Cloud: https://pulumi.com/
    Enter Pulumi access token: <enter your token>
    $ pulumi stack init my-cloud-stack

Note that you may log into a specific cloud if you'd like.  For
now, this is just for our own testing purposes, but someday when we
support custom clouds (e.g., Enterprise), you can just say:

    $ pulumi login --cloud-url https://corp.acme.my-ppc.net:9873

The cloud is now the default.  If you instead prefer a "fire and
forget" style of stack, you can skip the login and pass `--local`:

    $ pulumi stack init my-faf-stack --local

If you are logged in and run `pulumi`, we tell you as much:

    $ pulumi
    Usage:
      pulumi [command]

    // as before...

    Currently logged into the Pulumi Cloud ☁️
        https://pulumi.com/

And if you list your stacks, we tell you which one is local or not:

    $ pulumi stack ls
    NAME            LAST UPDATE       RESOURCE COUNT   CLOUD URL
    my-cloud-stack  2017-12-01 ...    3                https://pulumi.com/
    my-faf-stack    n/a               0                n/a

And `pulumi stack` by itself prints information like your cloud org,
PPC name, and so on, in addition to the usuals.

I shall write up more details and make sure to document these changes.

This change also fairly significantly refactors the layout of cloud
versus local logic, so that the cmd/ package is resonsible for CLI
things, and the new pkg/backend/ package is responsible for the
backends.  The following is the overall resulting package architecture:

* The backend.Backend interface can be implemented to substitute
  a new backend.  This has operations to get and list stacks,
  perform updates, and so on.

* The backend.Stack struct is a wrapper around a stack that has
  or is being manipulated by a Backend.  It resembles our existing
  Stack notions in the engine, but carries additional metadata
  about its source.  Notably, it offers functions that allow
  operations like updating and deleting on the Backend from which
  it came.

* There is very little else in the pkg/backend/ package.

* A new package, pkg/backend/local/, encapsulates all local state
  management for "fire and forget" scenarios.  It simply implements
  the above logic and contains anything specific to the local
  experience.

* A peer package, pkg/backend/cloud/, encapsulates all logic
  required for the cloud experience.  This includes its subpackage
  apitype/ which contains JSON schema descriptions required for
  REST calls against the cloud backend.  It also contains handy
  functions to list which clouds we have authenticated with.

* A subpackage here, pkg/backend/state/, is not a provider at all.
  Instead, it contains all of the state management functions that
  are currently shared between local and cloud backends.  This
  includes configuration logic -- including encryption -- as well
  as logic pertaining to which stacks are known to the workspace.

This addresses pulumi/pulumi#629 and pulumi/pulumi#494.
2017-12-02 14:34:42 -08:00
Matt Ellis
8f076b7cb3 Argument validation for CLI commands
Previously, we were inconsistent on how we handled argument validation
in the CLI. Many commands used cobra.Command's Args property to
provide a validator if they took arguments, but commands which did not
rarely used cobra.NoArgs to indicate this.

This change does two things:

1. Introduce `cmdutil.ArgsFunc` which works like `cmdutil.RunFunc`, it
wraps an existing cobra type and lets us control the behavior when an
arguments validator fails.

2. Ensure every command sets the Args property with an instance of
cmdutil.ArgsFunc. The cmdutil package defines wrapers for all the
cobra validators we are using, to prevent us from having to spell out
`cmduitl.ArgsFunc(...)` everywhere.

Fixes #588
2017-11-29 16:10:53 -08:00