This change supports displaying manifest information for a stack and
changes the way we handle Snapshots in our backend.
Previously, every call to GetStack would synthesize a Snapshot by
taking the set of resources returned from the
`/api/stacks/<owner>/<name>` endpoint, combined with an empty
manfiest (since the service was not returning the manifest).
This wasn't great for two reasons:
1. We didn't have manifest information, so we couldn't display any of
its information (most important the last updated time).
2. This strategy required that the service return all the resources
for a stack anytime GetStack was called. While the CLI did not
often need this detailed information the fact that we forced the
Service to produce it (which in the case of stack managed PPC would
require the service to talk to yet another service) creates a bunch
of work that we end up ignoring.
I've refactored the code such that `backend.Stack`'s `Snapshot()` method
now lazily requests the information from the service such that we can
construct a `Snapshot()` on demand and only pay the cost when we
actually need it.
I think making more of this stuff lazy is the long term direction we
want to follow.
Unfortunately, right now, it means in cases where we do need this data
we end up fetching it twice. The service does it once when we call
GetStack and then we do it again when we actually need to get at the
Snapshot. However, once we land this change, we can update the
service to no longer return resources on the apistack.Stack type. The
CLI no longer needs this property. We'll likely want to continue in a
direction where `apistack.Stack` can be created quickly by the
service (without expensive database queries or fetching remote
resources) and just add additional endpoints that let us get at the
specific information we want in the specific cases when we want it
instead of forcing us to return a bunch of data that we often ignore.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-service#371
These changes enable tracing of Pulumi API calls.
The span with which to associate an API call is passed via a
`context.Context` parameter. This required plumbing a
`context.Context` parameter through a rather large number of APIs,
especially in the backend.
In general, all API calls are associated with a new root span that
exists for essentially the entire lifetime of an invocation of the
Pulumi CLI. There were a few places where the plumbing got a bit hairier
than I was willing to address with these changes; I've used
`context.Background()` in these instances. API calls that receive this
context will create new root spans, but will still be traced.
This changes the CLI interface in a few ways:
* `pulumi preview` is back! The alternative of saying
`pulumi update --preview` just felt awkward, and it's a common
operation to want to perform. Let's just make it work.
* There are two flags consistent across all update commands,
`update`, `refresh`, and `destroy`:
- `--skip-preview` will skip the preview step. Note that this
does *not* skip the prompt to confirm that you'd like to proceed.
Indeed, it will still prompt, with a little warning text about
the fact that the preview has been skipped.
* `--yes` will auto-approve the updates.
This lands us in a simpler and more intuitive spot for common scenarios.
I found the flag --force to be a strange name for skipping a preview,
since that name is usually reserved for operations that might be harmful
and yet you're coercing a tool to do it anyway, knowing there's a chance
you're going to shoot yourself in the foot.
I also found that what I almost always want in the situation where
--force was being used is to actually just run a preview and have the
confirmation auto-accepted. Going straight to --force isn't the right
thing in a CI scenario, where you actually want to run a preview first,
just to ensure there aren't any issues, before doing the update.
In a sense, there are four options here:
1. Run a preview, ask for confirmation, then do an update (the default).
2. Run a preview, auto-accept, and then do an update (the CI scenario).
3. Just run a preview with neither a confirmation nor an update (dry run).
4. Just do an update, without performing a preview beforehand (rare).
This change enables all four workflows in our CLI.
Rather than have an explosion of flags, we have a single flag,
--preview, which can specify the mode that we're operating in. The
following are the values which correlate to the above four modes:
1. "": default (no --preview specified)
2. "auto": auto-accept preview confirmation
3. "only": only run a preview, don't confirm or update
4. "skip": skip the preview altogether
As part of this change, I redid a bit of how the preview modes
were specified. Rather than booleans, which had some illegal
combinations, this change introduces a new enum type. Furthermore,
because the engine is wholly ignorant of these flags -- and only the
backend understands them -- it was confusing to me that
engine.UpdateOptions stored this flag, especially given that all
interesting engine options _also_ accepted a dryRun boolean. As of
this change, the backend.PreviewBehavior controls the preview options.
hese changes plumb basic support for cancellation through the engine.
Two types of cancellation are supported for all engine operations:
- Cancellation, which waits for the operation to drive itself to a safe
point before the operation returns, and
- Termination, which does not wait for the operation to drive itself
to a safe opint for the operation returns.
When updating local or managed stacks, a single ^C triggers cancellation
of any running operation; a second ^C will trigger termination.
Fixes#513, #1077.
This change implements a `pulumi refresh` command. It operates a bit
like `pulumi update`, and friends, in that it supports `--preview` and
`--diff`, along with the usual flags, and will update your checkpoint.
It works through substitution of the deploy.Source abstraction, which
generates a sequence of resource registration events. This new
deploy.RefreshSource takes in a prior checkpoint and will walk it,
refreshing the state via the associated resource providers by invoking
Read for each resource encountered, and merging the resulting state with
the prior checkpoint, to yield a new resource.Goal state. This state is
then fed through the engine in the usual ways with a few minor caveats:
namely, although the engine must generate steps for the logical
operations (permitting us to get nice summaries, progress, and diffs),
it mustn't actually carry them out because the state being imported
already reflects reality (a deleted resource has *already* been deleted,
so of course the engine need not perform the deletion). The diffing
logic also needs to know how to treat the case of refresh slightly
differently, because we are going to be diffing outputs and not inputs.
Note that support for managed stacks is not yet complete, since that
requires updates to the service to support a refresh endpoint. That
will be coming soon ...
Long term, a stack name alone will not be sufficent to address a
stack. Introduce a new `backend.StackReference` interface that allows
each backend to give an opaque stack reference that can be used across
operations.
By using untyped deployment structures via `json.RawMessage`, we can
support round-tripping between old CLI clients and newer servers, without
dropping possibly-important information on the floor. I hadn't realized
this design goal with the original system, and after talking to @pgavlin,
I better realized the intent and that we want to preserve this.
Despite our good progress moving towards having an apitype package,
where our exchange types live and can be shared among the engine and
our services, there were a few major types that were still duplciated.
Resource was the biggest example -- and indeed, the apitype varirant
was missing the new Dependencies property -- but there were others,
like Manfiest, PluginInfo, etc. These too had semi-random omissions.
This change merges all of these types into the apitype package. This
not only cleans up the redundancy and missing properties, but will
"force the issue" with respect to keeping them in sync and properly
versioning the information in a backwards compatible way.
The resource/stack package still exists as a simple marshaling layer
to and from the engine's core data types.
Finally, I've made the controversial change to share the actual
Deployment data structure at the apitype layer also. This will force
us to confront differences in that data structure similarly, and will
allow us to leverage the strong typing throughout to catch issues.
This addresses pulumi/pulumi#446: what we used to call "package" is
now called "project". This has gotten more confusing over time, now
that we're doing real package management.
Also fixespulumi/pulumi#426, while in here.
The existing logic would flow colorization information into the
engine, so depending on the settings in the CLI, the engine may or may
not have emitted colorized events. This coupling is not great and we
want to start moving to a world where the presentation happens
exclusively at the CLI level.
With this change, the engine will always produce strings that have the
colorization formatting directives (i.e. the directives that
reconquest/loreley understands) and the CLI will apply
colorization (which could mean either running loreley to turn the
directives into ANSI escape codes, or drop them or retain them, for
debuging purposes).
Fixes#742
This PR adds a new `pulumi history` command, which prints the update history for a stack.
The local backend stores the update history in a JSON file on disk, next to the checkpoint file. The cloud backend simply provides the update metadata, and expects to receive all the data from a (NYI) `/history` REST endpoint.
`pkg/backend/updates.go` defines the data that is being persisted. The way the data is wired through the system is adding a new `backend.UpdateMetadata` parameter to a Stack/Backend's `Update` and `Destroy` methods.
I use `tests/integration/stack_outputs/` as the simple app for the related tests, hence the addition to the `.gitignore` and fixing the name in the `Pulumi.yaml`.
Fixes#636.
This PR surfaces the configuration options available to updates, previews, and destroys to the Pulumi Service. As part of this I refactored the options to unify them into a single `engine.UpdateOptions`, since they were all overlapping to various degrees.
With this PR we are adding several new flags to commands, e.g. `--summary` was not available on `pulumi destroy`.
There are also a few minor breaking changes.
- `pulumi destroy --preview` is now `pulumi destroy --dry-run` (to match the actual name of the field).
- The default behavior for "--color" is now `Always`. Previously it was `Always` or `Never` based on the value of a `--debug` flag. (You can specify `--color always` or `--color never` to get the exact behavior.)
Fixes#515, and cleans up the code making some other features slightly easier to add.
These changes refactor the engine's entrypoints--Deploy, Destroy, and
Preview--to be update-centric rather than stack-centric. Each of these
methods now takes a value of a new type, Update, that abstracts away the
vagaries of fetching and maintaining the update's state. This
refactoring also reinforces Pulumi.yaml as a CLI concept rather than an
engine concept; the CLI is now the only reader/writer of this format.
These changes will smooth the way for a few refactorings on the service
side that will aid in update isolation.
These changes add the ability to export a stack's latest deployment or
import a new deployment to a stack via the Pulumi CLI. These
capabilities are exposed by two new verbs under `stack`:
- export, which writes the current stack's latest deployment to stdout
- import, which reads a new deployment from stdin and applies it to the
current stack.
In the local case, this simply involves reading/writing the stack's
latest checkpoint file. In the cloud case, this involves hitting two new
endpoints on the service to perform the export or import.
This change implements some feedback from @ellismg.
* Make backend.Stack an interface and let backends implement it,
enabling dynamic type testing/casting to access information
specific to that backend. For instance, the cloud.Stack conveys
the cloud URL, org name, and PPC name, for each stack.
* Similarly expose specialized backend.Backend interfaces,
local.Backend and cloud.Backend, to convey specific information.
* Redo a bunch of the commands in terms of these.
* Keeping with this theme, turn the CreateStack options into an
opaque interface{}, and let the specific backends expose their
own structures with their own settings (like PPC name in cloud).
* Show both the org and PPC names in the cloud column printed in
the stack ls command, in addition to the Pulumi Cloud URL.
Unrelated, but useful:
* Special case the 401 HTTP response and make a friendly error,
to tell the developer they must use `pulumi login`. This is
better than tossing raw "401: Unauthorized" errors in their face.
* Change the "Updating stack '..' in the Pulumi Cloud" message to
use the correct action verb ("Previewing", "Destroying", etc).
