Previously we used the word "Environment" as the term for a deployment
target, but since then we've started to use the term Stack. Adopt this
across the CLI.
From a user's point of view, there are a few changes:
1. The `env` verb has been renamed to `stack`
2. The `-e` and `--env` options to commands which operate on an
environment now take `-s` or `--stack` instead.
3. Becase of (2), the commands that used `-s` to display a summary now
only support passing the full option name (`--summary`).
On the local file system, we still store checkpoint data in the `env`
sub-folder under `.pulumi` (so we can reuse existing checkpoint files
that were written to the old folder)
Now that we no longer recursively call yarn via yarn run and scripts,
we can use a `--mutex network` directive in a .yarnrc file at the root
of the repository to prevent multiple copies of yarn running
concurrently.
This changes a few things about "components":
* Rename what was previously ExternalResource to CustomResource,
and all of the related fields and parameters that this implies.
This just seems like a much nicer and expected name for what
these represent. I realize I am stealing a name we had thought
about using elsewhere, but this seems like an appropriate use.
* Introduce ComponentResource, to make initializing resources
that merely aggregate other resources easier to do correctly.
* Add a withParent and parentScope concept to Resource, to make
allocating children less error-prone. Now there's no need to
explicitly adopt children as they are allocated; instead, any
children allocated as part of the withParent callback will
auto-parent to the resource provided. This is used by
ComponentResource's initialization function to make initialization
easier, including the distinction between inputs and outputs.
This change implements core support for "components" in the Pulumi
Fabric. This work is described further in pulumi/pulumi#340, where
we are still discussing some of the finer points.
In a nutshell, resources no longer imply external providers. It's
entirely possible to have a resource that logically represents
something but without having a physical manifestation that needs to
be tracked and managed by our typical CRUD operations.
For example, the aws/serverless/Function helper is one such type.
It aggregates Lambda-related resources and exposes a nice interface.
All of the Pulumi Cloud Framework resources are also examples.
To indicate that a resource does participate in the usual CRUD resource
provider, it simply derives from ExternalResource instead of Resource.
All resources now have the ability to adopt children. This is purely
a metadata/tagging thing, and will help us roll up displays, provide
attribution to the developer, and even hide aspects of the resource
graph as appropriate (e.g., when they are implementation details).
Our use of this capability is ultra limited right now; in fact, the
only place we display children is in the CLI output. For instance:
+ aws:serverless:Function: (create)
[urn=urn:pulumi:demo::serverless::aws:serverless:Function::mylambda]
=> urn:pulumi:demo::serverless::aws:iam/role:Role::mylambda-iamrole
=> urn:pulumi:demo::serverless::aws:iam/rolePolicyAttachment:RolePolicyAttachment::mylambda-iampolicy-0
=> urn:pulumi:demo::serverless::aws:lambda/function:Function::mylambda
The bit indicating whether a resource is external or not is tracked
in the resulting checkpoint file, along with any of its children.
* Remove the bitrotted and useless basic/abc/ test.
* No need for the basic/ subdirectory. Move minimal to the top.
* Update TypeScript to 2.5.3.
* Check in lockfiles to ensure repeatability in Travis tests.
This change adds environment variable fallbacks for configuration
variables, such that you can either set them explicitly, as a specific
variable PULUMI_CONFIG_<K>, or an entire JSON serialized bag via
PULUMI_CONFIG.
This is convenient when simply invoking programs at the command line,
via node, e.g.
PULUMI_CONFIG_AWS_CONFIG_REGION=us-west-2 node bin/index.js
Our language host also now uses this to communicate config when invoking
a Run RPC, rather than at the command line. This fixespulumi/pulumi#336.
This arose during a conversation with @CyrusNajmabadi, where he
suggested it would be useful in user code to have a "name" for these,
since they show up so frequently during resource property consumption.
This resource provider accepts a single configuration parameter, `testing:provider:module`, that is the path to a Javascript module that implements CRUD operations for a set of resource types. This allows e.g. a test case to provide its own implementation of these operations that may succeed or fail in interesting ways.
Fixes#338.
Our checkpoint file is now in a shape such that go's built in
marshalling and unmarshalling is sufficent, so we can remove the code
we had on our decode path to do extra validation
Unlike go binaries (where we can cross compile) the node module that
we publish needs to be built on the platform we publish for. Update
our `.travis.yml` file to also build on macOS and fix the publishing
script so we don't don't cross publish Darwin from Linux. Once we have
CI working for Windows, we'll remove the loop over PUBLISH_GOOS and
each build will publish just the artifacts for the host OS.
Previously, the engine would write to io.Writer's to display output.
When hosted in `pulumi` these writers were tied to os.Stdout and
os.Stderr, but other applications hosting the engine could send them
other places (e.g. a log to be sent to an another application later).
While much better than just using the ambient streams, this was still
not the best. It would be ideal if the engine could just emit strongly
typed events and whatever is hosting the engine could care about
displaying them.
As a first step down that road, we move to a model where operations on
the engine now take a `chan engine.Event` and during the course of the
operation, events are written to this channel. It is the
responsibility of the caller of the method to read from the channel
until it is closed (singifying that the operation is complete).
The events we do emit are still intermingle presentation with data,
which is unfortunate, but can be improved over time. Most of the
events today are just colorized in the client and printed to stdout or
stderr without much thought.
The checkpoint is an implementation detail of the storage of an
environment. Instead of interacting with it, make sure that all the
data we need from it either hangs off the Snapshot or Target
objects (which you can get from a Checkpoint) and then start consuming
that data.
140 characters still fits on the screen on my laptop (with VS Code and
a wideish explorer pane so I'm bumping this up because I hit it and
others have often)
This let's you set things like YARNFLAGS==--offline which is helpful
when you are on an airplane. Yarn can still pick up stuff that you had
pulled down recently from its local cache
This exposes the existing runtime logging functionality in a way meant
for 3rd-parties to consume. This can be useful if we want to introduce
debug logging, warnings, or other things, that fit nicely with the
Pulumi CLI and overall developer workflow.
This logic was previously in the `@pulumi/aws` pacakge. Moving it into the `pulumi` SDK as part of the overall closure serialization logic to make it more broadly accessible, and to centralize this functionality.
Now that it's all in one place, we may decide to remove the publically exposed `Closure` abstraction completely, which may also enable significant simplicifcation to the logic in closure serialization.
Also add one initial test case for this code.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-aws#14.
Internally we end up using flag to parse our command lines because of
our dependency on glog. When flag does not know about -C, if someone
passes -C before the sub command name (as is common for folks coming
from Git) the flag package terminates the program because -C was not
defined. So just teach flag this exists until we takle #301 and rid
ourselves of glog.
Previously, you could pass an explicit path to a Pulumi program when
running preview or update and the tool would use that program when
planning or deploying, but continue to write state in the cwd. While
being able to operate on a specific package without having to cd'd all
over over the place is nice, this specific implemntation was a little
scary because it made it easier to run two different programs with the
same local state (e.g config and checkpoints) which would lead to
surprising results.
Let's move to a model that some tools have where you can pass a
working directory and the tool chdir's to that directory before
running. This way any local state that is stored will be stored
relative to the package we are operating on instead of whatever the
current working directory is.
Fixes#398
