* Make `async:true` the default for `invoke` calls (#3750)
* Switch away from native grpc impl. (#3728)
* Remove usage of the 'deasync' library from @pulumi/pulumi. (#3752)
* Only retry as long as we get unavailable back. Anything else continues. (#3769)
* Handle all errors for now. (#3781)
* Do not assume --yes was present when using pulumi in non-interactive mode (#3793)
* Upgrade all paths for sdk and pkg to v2
* Backport C# invoke classes and other recent gen changes (#4288)
Adjust C# generation
* Replace IDeployment with a sealed class (#4318)
Replace IDeployment with a sealed class
* .NET: default to args subtype rather than Args.Empty (#4320)
* Adding system namespace for Dotnet code gen
This is required for using Obsolute attributes for deprecations
```
Iam/InstanceProfile.cs(142,10): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'ObsoleteAttribute' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/stack72/code/go/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/dotnet/Pulumi.Aws.csproj]
Iam/InstanceProfile.cs(142,10): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'Obsolete' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/stack72/code/go/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/dotnet/Pulumi.Aws.csproj]
```
* Fix the nullability of config type properties in C# codegen (#4379)
This change removes the need to `pulumi init` when targeting the local
backend. A fair amount of the change lays the foundation that the next
set of changes to stop having `pulumi init` be used for cloud stacks
as well.
Previously, `pulumi init` logically did two things:
1. It created the bookkeeping directory for local stacks, this was
stored in `<repository-root>/.pulumi`, where `<repository-root>` was
the path to what we belived the "root" of your project was. In the
case of git repositories, this was the directory that contained your
`.git` folder.
2. It recorded repository information in
`<repository-root>/.pulumi/repository.json`. This was used by the
cloud backend when computing what project to interact with on
Pulumi.com
The new identity model will remove the need for (2), since we only
need an owner and stack name to fully qualify a stack on
pulumi.com, so it's easy enough to stop creating a folder just for
that.
However, for the local backend, we need to continue to retain some
information about stacks (e.g. checkpoints, history, etc). In
addition, we need to store our workspace settings (which today just
contains the selected stack) somehere.
For state stored by the local backend, we change the URL scheme from
`local://` to `local://<optional-root-path>`. When
`<optional-root-path>` is unset, it defaults to `$HOME`. We create our
`.pulumi` folder in that directory. This is important because stack
names now must be unique within the backend, but we have some tests
using local stacks which use fixed stack names, so each integration
test really wants its own "view" of the world.
For the workspace settings, we introduce a new `workspaces` directory
in `~/.pulumi`. In this folder we write the workspace settings file
for each project. The file name is the name of the project, combined
with the SHA1 of the path of the project file on disk, to ensure that
multiple pulumi programs with the same project name have different
workspace settings.
This does mean that moving a project's location on disk will cause the
CLI to "forget" what the selected stack was, which is unfortunate, but
not the end of the world. If this ends up being a big pain point, we
can certianly try to play games in the future (for example, if we saw
a .git folder in a parent folder, we could store data in there).
With respect to compatibility, we don't attempt to migrate older files
to their newer locations. For long lived stacks managed using the
local backend, we can provide information on where to move things
to. For all stacks (regardless of backend) we'll require the user to
`pulumi stack select` their stack again, but that seems like the
correct trade-off vs writing complicated upgrade code.
Tests now target managed stacks instead of local stacks.
The existing logged in user and target backend API are used unless PULUMI_ACCES_TOKEN is defined, in which case tests are run under that access token and against the PULUMI_API backend.
For developer machines, we will now need to be logged in to Pulumi to run tests, and whichever default API backend is logged in (the one listed as current in ~/.pulumi/credentials.json) will be used. If you need to override these, provide PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN and possibly PULUMI_API.
For Travis, we currently target the staging service using the Pulumi Bot user.
We have decided to run tests in the pulumi organization. This can be overridden for local testing (or in Travis in the future) by defining PULUMI_API_OWNER_ORGANIZATION and using an access token with access to that organization.
Part of pulumi/home#195.
This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for
doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081):
* The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update
functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the
way we can plug in new sources of resource information during
planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh
is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which
will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same
way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort.
This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to
take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating
a source specific to the kind of plan being requested.
Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by
the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling
things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic
and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need.
* Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations.
This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some
reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some
`if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource.
I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at
least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant.
* Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own
pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work.
* I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I
suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed
generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At
least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide
whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as
a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards.
* I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like
comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
The first exception relates to how we launch plugins. Plugin paths are
calculated using a well-known set of rules; this makes `gas` suspicious
due to the need to use a variable to store the path of the plugin.
The second and third are in test code and aren't terribly concerning.
The latter exception asks `gas` to ignore the access key we hard-code
into the integration tests for our Pulumi test account.
The fourth exception allows use to use more permissive permissions for
the `.pulumi` directory than `gas` would prefer. We use `755`; `gas`
wants `700` or stricter. `755` is the default for `mkdir` and `.git` and
so seems like a reasonable choice for us.
This PR adds integration tests for exercising `pulumi init` and the `pulumi stack *` commands. The only functional change is merging in https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/492 , which I found while writing the tests and (of course 😁 ) wrote a regression for.
To do this I introduce a new test driver called `PulumiProgram`. This is different from the one found in the `testing/integration`package in that it doesn't try to prescribe a workflow. It really just deals in executing commands, and confirming strings are in the output.
While it doesn't hurt to have more tests for `pulumi`, my motivation here was so that I could reuse these to ensure I keep the same behavior for my pending PR that implements Cloud-enabled variants of some of these commands.
