This is the smallest possible thing that could work for both the local
development case and the case where we are targeting the Pulumi
Service.
Pulling down the pulumiframework and component packages here is a bit
of a feel bad, but we plan to rework the model soon enough to a
provider model which will remove the need for us to hold on to this
code (and will bring back the factoring where the CLI does not have
baked in knowledge of the Pulumi Cloud Framework).
Fixes#527
These changes introduce a new field, `Raw`, to `diag.Message`. This
field indicates that the contents of the message are not a format string
and should not be rendered via `Sprintf` during stringification.
The plugin std{out,err} readers have been updated to use raw messages,
and the event reader in `pulumi` has been fixed s.t. it does not format
event payloads before display.
Fixes#551.
Adds OpenTracing in the Pulumi engine and plugin + langhost subprocesses.
We currently create a single root span for any `Enging.plan` operation - which is a single `preview`, `update`, `destroy`, etc.
The only sub-spans we currently create are at gRPC boundaries, both on the client and server sides and on both the langhost and provider plugin interfaces.
We could extend this to include spans for any other semantically meaningful sections of compute inside the engine, though initial examples show we get pretty good granularity of coverage by focusing on the gRPC boundaries.
In the future, this should be easily extensible to HTTP boundaries and to track other bulky I/O like datastore read/writes once we hook up to the PPC and Pulumi Cloud.
We expose a `--trace <endpoint>` option to enable tracing on the CLI, which we will aim to thread through to subprocesses.
We currently support sending tracing data to a Zipkin-compatible endpoint. This has been validated with both Zipkin and Jaeger UIs.
We do not yet have any tracing inside the TypeScript side of the JS langhost RPC interface. There is not yet automatic gRPC OpenTracing instrumentation (though it looks like it's in progress now) - so we would need to manually create meaningful spans on that side of the interface.
This code was swallowing an error incorrectly, rather than returning
it. As a result, certain commands would fail with assertions rather
than the intended error message (like trying to config without a stack).
Rework the polling code for `pulumi` when targeting hosted scenarios. (i.e. absorb https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/pull/282.) We now return an `updateID` for update, preview, and destroy. And use bake that into the URL.
This PR also silently ignores 504 errors which are now returned from the Pulumi Service if the PPC request times out.
Combined, this should ameliorate some of the symptoms we see from https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-ppc/issues/60. Though we'll continue to try to identify and fix the root cause.
Previously, we stored configuration information in the Pulumi.yaml
file. This was a change from the old model where configuration was
stored in a special section of the checkpoint file.
While doing things this way has some upsides with being able to flow
configuration changes with your source code (e.g. fixed values for a
production stack that version with the code) it caused some friction
for the local development scinerio. In this case, setting
configuration values would pend changes to Pulumi.yaml and if you
didn't want to publish these changes, you'd have to remember to remove
them before commiting. It also was problematic for our examples, where
it was not clear if we wanted to actually include values like
`aws:config:region` in our samples. Finally, we found that for our
own pulumi service, we'd have values that would differ across each
individual dev stack, and publishing these values to a global
Pulumi.yaml file would just be adding noise to things.
We now adopt a hybrid model, where by default configuration is stored
locally, in the workspace's settings per project. A new flag `--save`
tests commands to actual operate on the configuration information
stored in Pulumi.yaml.
With the following change, we have have four "slots" configuration
values can end up in:
1. In the Pulumi.yaml file, applies to all stacks
2. In the Pulumi.yaml file, applied to a specific stack
3. In the local workspace.json file, applied to all stacks
4. In the local workspace.json file, applied to a specific stack
When computing the configuration information for a stack, we apply
configuration in the above order, overriding values as we go
along.
We also invert the default behavior of the `pulumi config` commands so
they operate on a specific stack (i.e. how they did before
e3610989). If you want to apply configuration to all stacks, `--all`
can be passed to any configuration command.
This change introduces an abstraction for a `backend` which manages
the implementation of some CLI commands. As part of defining the
interface, we introduce a new local backend implementation that just
uses data local to the machine.
This will let us share argument parsing and some display information
between the local case and the pulumi.com case in the CLI. We can
continue to refine this interface over time (e.g. today we have the
implementation of the Destroy/Update/Preview actually writing output
but instead they should be returning strongly typed data that the CLI
knows how to display and is unified across Pulumi.com deploys and
local deploys).
But this is a good first step.
Add `Name` (Pulumi project name) and `Runtime` (Pulumi runtime, e.g. "nodejs") properties to `UpdateProgramRequest`; as they are now required.
The long story is that as part of the PPC enabling destroy operations, data that was previously obtained from `Pulumi.yaml` is now required as part of the update request. This PR simply provides that data from the CLI.
This is the final step of a line of breaking changes.
pulumi-ppc 8ddce15b29
pulumi-service 8941431d57 (diff-05a07bc54b30a35b10afe9674747fe53)
This PR removes three command line parameters from Cloud-enabled Pulumi commands (`update` and `stack init`). Previously we required users to pass in `--organization`, `--repository`, and `--project`. But with the recent "Pulumi repository" changes, we can now get that from the Pulumi workspace. And the project name from the `Pulumi.yaml`.
This PR also fixes a bugs that block the Cloud-enabled CLI path: `update` was getting the stack name via `explicitOrCurrent`, but that fails if the current stack (e.g. the one just initialized in the cloud) doesn't exist on the local disk.
As for better handling of "current stack" and and Cloud-enabled commands, https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/493 and the PR to enable `stack select`, `stack rm`, and `stack ls` do a better job of handling situations like this.
The last status message from the PPC doesn't include a newline. So the `pulumi` CLI renders any error messages on the same line as the last diagnostic message. Not ideal.
Now, instead of having a .pulumi folder next to each project, we have
a single .pulumi folder in the root of the repository. This is created
by running `pulumi init`.
When run in a git repository, `pulumi init` will place the .pulumi
file next to the .git folder, so it can be shared across all projects
in a repository. When not in a git repository, it will be created in
the current working directory.
We also start tracking information about the repository itself, in a
new `repo.json` file stored in the root of the .pulumi folder. The
information we track are "owner" and "name" which map to information
we use on pulumi.com.
When run in a git repository with a remote named origin pointing to a
GitHub project, we compute the owner and name by deconstructing
information from the remote's URL. Otherwise, we just use the current
user's username and the name of the current working directory as the
owner and name, respectively.
- `pulumi config ls` now does not prompt for a passphrase if there are
secrets, instead ******'s are shown. `--show-secrets` can be passed
to force decryption. The behavior of `pulumi config ls <key>` is
unchanged, if the key is secure, we will prompt for a passphrase.
- `pulumi config secret <key>` now prompts for the passphrase and verifies
it before asking for the secret value.
Fixes#465
This PR enables the `pulumi stack init` to work against the Pulumi Cloud. Of note, I using the approach described in https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/issues/240. The command takes an optional `--cloud` parameter, but otherwise will use the "default cloud" for the target organization.
I also went back and revised `pulumi update` to do this as well. (Removing the `--cloud` parameter.)
Note that neither of the commands will not work against `pulumi-service` head, as they require some API refactorings I'm working on right now.
Fixes panic when the output from the PPC doesn't have a "text" property. (Still need to unify the way the PPC emits event data with the types that the Pulumi codebase uses internally.)
Adds `pulumi update` so you can deploy to the Pulumi Console (via PPC on the backend).
As per an earlier discussion (now lost because I rebased/squashed the commits), we want to be more deliberate about how to bifurcate "local" and "cloud" versions of every Pulumi command.
We can block this PR until we do the refactoring to have `pulumi` commands go through a generic "PulumiCloud" interface. But it would be nice to commit this so I can do more refining of the `pulumi` -> Console -> PPC workflow.
Another known area that will need to be revisited is how we render the PPC events on the CLI. Update events from the PPC are generated in a different format than the `engine.Event`, and we'll probably want to change the PPC to emit messages in the same format. (e.g. how we handle coloring, etc.)
We now encrypt secrets at rest based on a key derived from a user
suplied passphrase.
The system is designed in a way such that we should be able to have a
different decrypter (either using a local key or some remote service
in the Pulumi.com case in the future).
Care is taken to ensure that we do not leak decrypted secrets into the
"info" section of the checkpoint file (since we currently store the
config there).
In addtion, secrets are "pay for play", a passphrase is only needed
when dealing with a value that's encrypted. If secure config values
are not used, `pulumi` will never prompt you for a
passphrase. Otherwise, we only prompt if we know we are going to need
to decrypt the value. For example, `pulumi config <key>` only prompts
if `<key>` is encrypted and `pulumi deploy` and friends only prompt if
you are targeting a stack that has secure configuration assoicated
with it.
Secure values show up as unecrypted config values inside the language
hosts and providers.
When `PULUMI_RETAIN_CHECKPOINTS` is set in the environment, also write
the checkpoint file to <stack-name>.<ext>.<timestamp>.
This ensures we have historical information about every snapshot, which
would aid in debugging issues like #451. We set this to true for our
integration tests.
Fixes#453
The event diagnostic goroutines could error out sometimes during
early program exits, due to a race between the goroutine writing to
the channel and the early exiting goroutine which closed the channel.
This change stops closing the channels entirely on the abrupt exit
paths, since it's not necessary and we want to exit immediately.
This improves a few things about assets:
* Compute and store hashes as input properties, so that changes on
disk are recognized and trigger updates (pulumi/pulumi#153).
* Issue explicit and prompt diagnostics when an asset is missing or
of an unexpected kind, rather than failing late (pulumi/pulumi#156).
* Permit raw directories to be passed as archives, in addition to
archive formats like tar, zip, etc. (pulumi/pulumi#240).
* Permit not only assets as elements of an archive's member list, but
also other archives themselves (pulumi/pulumi#280).
The existing `SnapshotProvider` interface does not sufficiently lend
itself to reliable persistence of snapshot data. For example, consider
the following:
- The deployment engine creates a resource
- The snapshot provider fails to save the updated snapshot
In this scenario, we have no mechanism by which we can discover that the
existing snapshot (if any) does not reflect the actual state of the
resources managed by the stack, and future updates may operate
incorrectly. To address this, these changes split snapshotting into two
phases: the `Begin` phase and the `End` phase. A provider that needs to
be robust against the scenario described above (or any other scenario
that allows for a mutation to the state of the stack that is not
persisted) can use the `Begin` phase to persist the fact that there are
outstanding mutations to the stack. It would then use the `End` phase to
persist the updated snapshot and indicate that the mutation is no longer
outstanding. These steps are somewhat analogous to the prepare and
commit phases of two-phase commit.
I sometimes revert back to some ancient version of the system, and
I figure with so many other tools using different verbs here, it's
worth at least improving our help text with the SuggestFors.
The change to use a Goroutine for pumping output causes a hang
when an error occurs. This is because we unconditionally block
on the <-done channel, even though the failure means the done
will actually never occur. This changes the logic to only wait
on the channel if we successfully began the operation in question.
