Commit graph

19 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Clemmer
dea68b8b37 Implement status sinks
This commit reverts most of #1853 and replaces it with functionally
identical logic, using the notion of status message-specific sinks.

In other words, where the original commit implemented ephemeral status
messages by adding an `isStatus` parameter to most of the logging
methdos in pulumi/pulumi, this implements ephemeral status messages as a
parallel logging sink, which emits _only_ ephemeral status messages.

The original commit message in that PR was:

> Allow log events to be marked "status" events
>
> This commit will introduce a field, IsStatus to LogRequest. A "status"
> logging event will be displayed in the Info column of the main
> display, but will not be printed out at the end, when resource
> operations complete.
>
> For example, for complex resource initialization, we'd like to display
> a series of intermediate results: [1/4] Service object created, for
> example. We'd like these to appear in the Info column, but not at the
> end, where they are not helpful to the user.
2018-08-31 15:56:53 -07:00
Alex Clemmer
9e58fd1aaa Revert "Plumb LogRequest.IsStatus through the logging subsystem"
This reverts commit 3066cbcbd7.
2018-08-31 15:56:53 -07:00
Alex Clemmer
3066cbcbd7 Plumb LogRequest.IsStatus through the logging subsystem 2018-08-30 17:17:20 -07:00
Pat Gavlin
73f4f2c464
Reimplement refresh. (#1814)
Replace the Source-based implementation of refresh with a phase that
runs as the first part of plan execution and rewrites the snapshot in-memory.

In order to fit neatly within the existing framework for resource operations,
these changes introduce a new kind of step, RefreshStep, to represent
refreshes. RefreshSteps operate similar to ReadSteps but do not imply that
the resource being read is not managed by Pulumi.

In addition to the refresh reimplementation, these changes incorporate those
from #1394 to run refresh in the integration test framework.

Fixes #1598.
Fixes pulumi/pulumi-terraform#165.
Contributes to #1449.
2018-08-22 17:52:46 -07:00
Pat Gavlin
a222705143
Implement first-class providers. (#1695)
### First-Class Providers
These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class
providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the
Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply
instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured
differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the
outputs of other resources.

### Provider Plugin Changes
In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider
configuration and configure providers without complete configuration
information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin
interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration
and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and
`DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag
accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`.

These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC
interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then,
these methods are implemented by adapters:
- `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string
  or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins
  only accept string-typed configuration values.
- `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration
  values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is
  unknown. The justification for this behavior is given
  [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106)
- `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and
  configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any
  config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and
  the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of
  which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is
  only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we
  can manage with the existing gRPC interface.

### Resource Model Changes
Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's
dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created,
may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other
resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which
are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design
addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not
yet been physically created and therefore have no ID.

All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a
single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be
used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's
provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its
URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider
should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically
sorting the dependency graph.

Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the
invocation via a provider reference.

### Engine Changes
First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine:
- The engine must have some way to map from provider references to
  provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's
  checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during
  the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider
  resources.
- In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi
  programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine
  must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package
  referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for
  a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data.

The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is
responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In
addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability
to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves
as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the
"provider provider").

The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to
plan setup and the eval source.

During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources
that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of
packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been
computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and
prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that
requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default
provider for its package.

While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration,
resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped
before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider
for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source
synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and
records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected
into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a
default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is
used and no new registration occurs.

### SDK Changes
These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK.
- A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used
  to instantiate first-class providers.
- A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply
  a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD
  operations.
- A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that
  control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type
  includes a `provider` field that is analogous to
  `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-06 17:50:29 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
3d063e200c
Properly display multi-step replaces in the progress UI. (#1679) 2018-08-02 00:48:14 -04:00
CyrusNajmabadi
2e9a2e8a91
When printing message in non-interactive mode, do not keep printing out the worst diagnostic. (#1640) 2018-07-17 13:00:10 -07:00
joeduffy
5967259795 Add license headers 2018-05-22 15:02:47 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
3e787779e5
Fix issue where replacements were not shown in the progress view. (#1357) 2018-05-11 16:48:05 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
e94e358ddf
Fix small logic bug when printing out messages. (#1348) 2018-05-09 14:25:03 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
092696948d
Restore streaming of plugin outputs to the progress display. (#1333) 2018-05-07 15:11:52 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
aaca79ab16
Print stack outputs at the end of an update. (#1327) 2018-05-05 12:54:57 -07:00
Joe Duffy
088d6800d9
Improve two minor UX things in the CLI (#1293)
This changes three minor UX things in the CLI's update flow:

1. Use bright blue for column headers, since the dark blue is nearly
   invisible on a black background.

2. Move the operation symbol to the far left, as a sort of "bullet
   point" for each line of output.  This was how they initial symbols
   were designed and this helps to glance at the summary to see what's
   going on.

3. Shorten some of the column headers that didn't add extra clarity.
2018-04-30 12:31:57 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
42d7174c70
Add a new tree-view form for the progress view. (#1260) 2018-04-24 11:13:22 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
7807edc166
Simplifying progress code (#1253) 2018-04-22 18:10:19 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
41dbd9a62e
Cleanup work before putting in the ability to have system messages shown in hte progress view. (#1234) 2018-04-19 12:31:47 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
4a5e72fb16
Progress tweaks (#1219) 2018-04-16 23:41:00 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
0bd3036115
Small progress tweaks. (#1218) 2018-04-16 19:46:57 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
541b8b3f4e
Switch to a new grid-view for the progress display. (#1201) 2018-04-15 12:47:53 -07:00