The langauge SDKs will use this function to fetch the state required to
deserialize a resource reference. SDK support will be added as a follow-up
change.
Contributes to #2430.
Resources are serialized as their URN, ID, and package version. Each
Pulumi package is expected to register itself with the SDK. The package
will be invoked to construct appropriate instances of rehydrated
resources. Packages are distinguished by their name and their version.
This is the foundation of cross-process resources.
Related to #2430.
Co-authored-by: Mikhail Shilkov <github@mikhail.io>
Co-authored-by: Luke Hoban <luke@pulumi.com>
Co-authored-by: Levi Blackstone <levi@pulumi.com>
Move these tests to a new package, `lifecycletest`, that also exposes
APIs that allow consumers to implement their own lifecycle tests. This
is intended to ease the burden of testing plugin implementations and to
set the stage for cleaning up the lifecycle tests themselves.
This involves two changes to the public API, only one of which is
strictly necessary:
- The `host` field of `UpdateOptions` is now exported
- The `Journal` type has been moved from test-only code to the package
proper
The former change is necessary, as it is the mechanism by which package
consumers may inject their own plugin loaders. I was reluctant to expose
this field originally because I wanted to ensure that the behavior of
packages that embed Pulumi is consistent with that of the Pulumi CLI
with respect to plugin loading. I now believe that the risk of consumers
changing this behavior outside of test scenarios is low enough that we
can expose this field. This may also be useful for future scenarios,
e.g. statically linking providers and Pulumi programs.
The latter change is not necessary, but fleshes out the engine package
into a more complete toolkit. Downstream consumers may use the Journal
type to conveniently implement snapshotting.
Fixes: #5509
When changing from a passphrase provider to a cloud secrets provider,
the encryptionsalt is not required, so we should ensure this is removed
These changes add support for provider-side previews of create and
update operations, which allows resource providers to supply output
property values for resources that are being created or updated during a
preview.
If a plugin supports provider-side preview, its create/update methods
will be invoked during previews with the `preview` property set to true.
It is the responsibility of the provider to fill in any output
properties that are known before returning. It is a best practice for
providers to only fill in property values that are guaranteed to be
identical if the preview were instead an update (i.e. only those output
properties whose values can be conclusively determined without
actually performing the create/update operation should be populated).
Providers that support previews must accept unknown values in their
create and update methods.
If a plugin does not support provider-side preview, the inputs to a
create or update operation will be propagated to the outputs as they are
today.
Fixes#4992.
* fix pulumi bot token and env var
* use commit hash non-marketplace actions
* fix goreleaser binaries
foo
* fix goreleaser archive format
* update workflows to use repo-dispatch
* fixing tag naming
* add support for beta tags
* add prerelease workflow
* remove windows builds
* only use travis for tags
* remove prerelease steps
* fix container build indentation
* check the policy tempdir exists
Fixes: https://github.com/pulumi/docs/issues/4340
The deprecated message sits below the examples so it is not clear
to the user that the resource / datasource is deprecated
The logic for validating prompted values in 'new' wasn't quite right,
leading to the possibility of creating Pulumi.yaml files with blank
project names.
This manifests in various ways and I've hit it a number of times
over the past few months because of the way we handle project/stack
name conflicts in 'new' -- which itself is a bit annoying too:
https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/blob/master/pkg/cmd/pulumi/new.go#L206-L207
Because we substitue a default value of "", and because the prompting
logic assumed default values are always valid, we would skip validation
and therefore accept a blank Pulumi.yaml file.
This generates an invalid project which causes errors elsewhere, such as
error: failed to load Pulumi project located at ".../Pulumi.yaml":
project is missing a 'name' attribute
I hit this all the time with our getting started guide because I've
gone through it so many times and have leftover stacks from prior
run-throughs. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people hit this.
The solution here validates all values, including the default.
Note also that we failed to validate the value used by 'new --yes'
which meant you could bypass all validation by passing --yes, leading
to similar outcomes.
I've added a couple new tests for these cases. There is a risk we
depend on illegal default values somewhere which will now be rejected,
but that would seem strange, and assuming the tests pass, I would
assume that's not true. Let me know if that's wrong.
Fixespulumi/pulumi#3255.
