Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
joeduffy
c2258be408 Adopt code review feedback for config constraints
This change adopts the code review suggestion to use a bag of options
for config constraints rather than having overloaded function names.
This is a much cleaner approach, lets us use more descriptive names,
and is far more future proof in case we decide to add more capabilities.
2018-08-28 18:07:26 -07:00
joeduffy
834987bcd3 Add more config helpers
Everytime I convert a CloudFormation template to Pulumi, I inevitably
run into the fact that CloudFormation has advanced "schema" capabilities
for input variables, like min/max for numbers and string lengths, enums,
and regex pattern matching. This is always cumbersome to convert.

In this change, I've added a number of config helpers for these cases:

For string enums:

    getEnum(key: string, values: string[]): string | undefined;
    requireEnum(key: string: values: string[]): string;

For min/max strlen:

    getMinMax(key: string, min: number, max: number): string | undefined;
    requireMinMax(key: string, min: number, max: number): string;

For regex patterns:

    getPattern(key: string, regexp: string | RegExp): string | undefined;
    requirePattern(key: string, regexp: string | RegExp): string;

For min/max strlen _and_ regex patterns:

    getMinMaxPattern(key: string, min: number, max: number,
        regexp: string | RegExp): string | undefined;
    requireMinMaxPattern(key: string, min: number, max: number,
        regexp: string | RegExp): string;

For min/max numbers:

    getNumberMinMax(key: string, min: number, max: number): number | undefined;
    requireNumberMinMax(key: string, min: number, max: number): number;

Each function throws a detailed RunError-derived exception type if the
configuration value doesn't meet the constraint.

This fixes pulumi/pulumi#1671.
2018-08-28 13:22:53 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
d19942f2b0
Go back to capturing *non-user* modules by 'require' reference. (#1655) 2018-07-31 11:37:46 -04:00
joeduffy
5967259795 Add license headers 2018-05-22 15:02:47 -07:00
Pat Gavlin
a23b10a9bf
Update the copyright end date to 2018. (#1068)
Just what it says on the tin.
2018-03-21 12:43:21 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi
d929c169de Enable tslinting of the nodejs sdk. (#433) 2017-10-18 15:03:56 -07:00
joeduffy
97c5f0a568 Take an initial stab at closure serialization
This change contains an initial implementation of closure serialization
built atop V8, rather than our own custom runtime.  This requires that
we use a Node.js dynamic C++ module, so that we can access the V8
APIs directly.  No build magic is required beyond node-gyp.

For the most part, this was straight forward, except for one part: we
have to use internal V8 APIs.  This is required for two reasons:

1) We need access to the function's lexical closure environment, so
   that we may look up closure variables.  Although there is a
   tantalizingly-close v8::Object::CreationContext, its implementation
   intentionally pokes through closure contexts in order to recover
   the Function constructor context instead.  That's not what we
   want.  We want the raw, unadulterated Function::context.

2) We need to control the lexical lookups of free variables so that
   they can look past chained contexts, lexical contexts, withs, and
   eval-style context extensions.  Simply runing a v8::Script, or
   simulating an eval, doesn't do the trick.  Hence, we need to access
   the unexported v8::internal::Context::Lookup function.

There is a third reason which is not yet implemented: free variable
calculation.  I could use Esprima, or do my own scanner for free
variables, but I'd prefer to simply use the V8 parser so that we're
using the same JavaScript parser across all components.  That too
is not part of the v8.h API, so we'll need to crack it open more.

To be clear, these are still exported public APIs, in proper headers
that are distributed with both Node and V8.  They simply aren't part
of the "stable" v8.h surface area.  As a result, I do expect that
maintaining this will be tricky, and I'd like to keep exploring how
to do this without needing the internal dependency.  For instance,
although this works with node-gyp just fine, we will probably be
brittle across versions of Node/V8, when the internal APIs might be
changing.  This will introduce unfortunate versioning headaches (all,
hopefully and thankfully, caught at compile-time).
2017-09-04 11:35:21 -07:00
joeduffy
d8635fd4f3 Move modules to package root
The organization of packages underneath lib/ breaks the easy consumption
of submodules, a la

    import {FileAsset} from "@pulumi/pulumi-fabric/asset";

We will go back to having everything hanging off the module root directory.
2017-09-04 11:35:21 -07:00
joeduffy
b827f1e95c Add config helpers
This change adds getX and requireX helper functions for configuration,
making it easy for packages to convert from Lumi's current weakly typed
config system, where everything is a string, into the internal JavaScript
representation, which is often a boolean, number, or complex array/object.
2017-09-04 11:35:21 -07:00