* Make Python StackReference test similar to others (with two steps)
* Include new Python StackReference integration test that uses multiple stacks
* Expose various life cycle methods for ProgramTester
The provider plugin protocol is to write a port number followed by `\n`. We must guarantee we do that even on Windows, so must avoid Python `print` statements which implicitly rewrite newlines to platform specific character sequences.
Fixes#3807.
Fixes: #3248
Before, we got a panic. in the createStack, when we had a non-default
secrets provider, we were assuming the name of the stack was correct
if we were in non-interactive mode
This commit adds a guard against this by doing a final validation of
the stack name *before* we even get into the createStack func
This means, that we get the following (and not the panic)
```
▶ pulumi stack init -s "org/" --secrets-provider="gcpkms://"
error: A stack name may only contain alphanumeric, hyphens, underscores, and periods
```
These changes restore a more-correct version of the behavior that was
disabled with #3014. The original implementation of this behavior was
done in the SDKs, which do not have access to the complete inputs for a
resource (in particular, default values filled in by the provider during
`Check` are not exposed to the SDK). This lack of information meant that
the resolved output values could disagree with the typings present in
a provider SDK. Exacerbating this problem was the fact that unknown
values were dropped entirely, causing `undefined` values to appear in
unexpected places.
By doing this in the engine and allowing unknown values to be
represented in a first-class manner in the SDK, we can attack both of
these issues.
Although this behavior is not _strictly_ consistent with respect to the
resource model--in an update, a resource's output properties will come
from its provider and may differ from its input properties--this
behavior was present in the product for a fairly long time without
significant issues. In the future, we may be able to improve the
accuracy of resource outputs during a preview by allowing the provider
to dry-run CRUD operations and return partially-known values where
possible.
These changes also introduce new APIs in the Node and Python SDKs
that work with unknown values in a first-class fashion:
- A new parameter to the `apply` function that indicates that the
callback should be run even if the result of the apply contains
unknown values
- `containsUnknowns` and `isUnknown`, which return true if a value
either contains nested unknown values or is exactly an unknown value
- The `Unknown` type, which represents unknown values
The primary use case for these APIs is to allow nested, properties with
known values to be accessed via the lifted property accessor even when
the containing property is not fully know. A common example of this
pattern is the `metadata.name` property of a Kubernetes `Namespace`
object: while other properties of the `metadata` bag may be unknown,
`name` is often known. These APIs allow `ns.metadata.name` to return a
known value in this case.
In order to avoid exposing downlevel SDKs to unknown values--a change
which could break user code by exposing it to unexpected values--a
language SDK must indicate whether or not it supports first-class
unknown values as part of each `RegisterResourceRequest`.
These changes also allow us to avoid breaking user code with the new
behavior introduced by the prior commit.
Fixes#3190.
This change adds support for lists and maps in config. We now allow
lists/maps (and nested structures) in `Pulumi.<stack>.yaml` (or
`Pulumi.<stack>.json`; yes, we currently support that).
For example:
```yaml
config:
proj:blah:
- a
- b
- c
proj:hello: world
proj:outer:
inner: value
proj:servers:
- port: 80
```
While such structures could be specified in the `.yaml` file manually,
we support setting values in maps/lists from the command line.
As always, you can specify single values with:
```shell
$ pulumi config set hello world
```
Which results in the following YAML:
```yaml
proj:hello world
```
And single value secrets via:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --secret token shhh
```
Which results in the following YAML:
```yaml
proj:token:
secure: v1:VZAhuroR69FkEPTk:isKafsoZVMWA9pQayGzbWNynww==
```
Values in a list can be set from the command line using the new
`--path` flag, which indicates the config key contains a path to a
property in a map or list:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --path names[0] a
$ pulumi config set --path names[1] b
$ pulumi config set --path names[2] c
```
Which results in:
```yaml
proj:names
- a
- b
- c
```
Values can be obtained similarly:
```shell
$ pulumi config get --path names[1]
b
```
Or setting values in a map:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --path outer.inner value
```
Which results in:
```yaml
proj:outer:
inner: value
```
Of course, setting values in nested structures is supported:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --path servers[0].port 80
```
Which results in:
```yaml
proj:servers:
- port: 80
```
If you want to include a period in the name of a property, it can be
specified as:
```
$ pulumi config set --path 'nested["foo.bar"]' baz
```
Which results in:
```yaml
proj:nested:
foo.bar: baz
```
Examples of valid paths:
- root
- root.nested
- 'root["nested"]'
- root.double.nest
- 'root["double"].nest'
- 'root["double"]["nest"]'
- root.array[0]
- root.array[100]
- root.array[0].nested
- root.array[0][1].nested
- root.nested.array[0].double[1]
- 'root["key with \"escaped\" quotes"]'
- 'root["key with a ."]'
- '["root key with \"escaped\" quotes"].nested'
- '["root key with a ."][100]'
Note: paths that contain quotes can be surrounded by single quotes.
When setting values with `--path`, if the value is `"false"` or
`"true"`, it will be saved as the boolean value, and if it is
convertible to an integer, it will be saved as an integer.
Secure values are supported in lists/maps as well:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --path --secret tokens[0] shh
```
Will result in:
```yaml
proj:tokens:
- secure: v1:wpZRCe36sFg1RxwG:WzPeQrCn4n+m4Ks8ps15MxvFXg==
```
Note: maps of length 1 with a key of “secure” and string value are
reserved for storing secret values. Attempting to create such a value
manually will result in an error:
```shell
$ pulumi config set --path parent.secure foo
error: "secure" key in maps of length 1 are reserved
```
**Accessing config values from the command line with JSON**
```shell
$ pulumi config --json
```
Will output:
```json
{
"proj:hello": {
"value": "world",
"secret": false,
"object": false
},
"proj:names": {
"value": "[\"a\",\"b\",\"c\"]",
"secret": false,
"object": true,
"objectValue": [
"a",
"b",
"c"
]
},
"proj:nested": {
"value": "{\"foo.bar\":\"baz\"}",
"secret": false,
"object": true,
"objectValue": {
"foo.bar": "baz"
}
},
"proj:outer": {
"value": "{\"inner\":\"value\"}",
"secret": false,
"object": true,
"objectValue": {
"inner": "value"
}
},
"proj:servers": {
"value": "[{\"port\":80}]",
"secret": false,
"object": true,
"objectValue": [
{
"port": 80
}
]
},
"proj:token": {
"secret": true,
"object": false
},
"proj:tokens": {
"secret": true,
"object": true
}
}
```
If the value is a map or list, `"object"` will be `true`. `"value"` will
contain the object as serialized JSON and a new `"objectValue"` property
will be available containing the value of the object.
If the object contains any secret values, `"secret"` will be `true`, and
just like with scalar values, the value will not be outputted unless
`--show-secrets` is specified.
**Accessing config values from Pulumi programs**
Map/list values are available to Pulumi programs as serialized JSON, so
the existing
`getObject`/`requireObject`/`getSecretObject`/`requireSecretObject`
functions can be used to retrieve such values, e.g.:
```typescript
import * as pulumi from "@pulumi/pulumi";
interface Server {
port: number;
}
const config = new pulumi.Config();
const names = config.requireObject<string[]>("names");
for (const n of names) {
console.log(n);
}
const servers = config.requireObject<Server[]>("servers");
for (const s of servers) {
console.log(s.port);
}
```
Adds Python support for resource transformations aligned with the existing NodeJS support in #3174.
This PR also moves processing of transformations to earlier in the resource construction process (for both NodeJS and Python) to ensure that invariants established in the constructor cannot be violated by transformations. This change can technically be a breaking change, but given that (a) the transformations features was just released in 1.3.0 and (b) the cases where this is a breaking change are uncommon and unlikely to have been reliable anyway - it feels like a change we should make now.
Fixes#3283.
These changes restore a more-correct version of the behavior that was
disabled with #3014. The original implementation of this behavior was
done in the SDKs, which do not have access to the complete inputs for a
resource (in particular, default values filled in by the provider during
`Check` are not exposed to the SDK). This lack of information meant that
the resolved output values could disagree with the typings present in
a provider SDK. Exacerbating this problem was the fact that unknown
values were dropped entirely, causing `undefined` values to appear in
unexpected places.
By doing this in the engine and allowing unknown values to be
represented in a first-class manner in the SDK, we can attack both of
these issues.
Although this behavior is not _strictly_ consistent with respect to the
resource model--in an update, a resource's output properties will come
from its provider and may differ from its input properties--this
behavior was present in the product for a fairly long time without
significant issues. In the future, we may be able to improve the
accuracy of resource outputs during a preview by allowing the provider
to dry-run CRUD operations and return partially-known values where
possible.
These changes also introduce new APIs in the Node and Python SDKs
that work with unknown values in a first-class fashion:
- A new parameter to the `apply` function that indicates that the
callback should be run even if the result of the apply contains
unknown values
- `containsUnknowns` and `isUnknown`, which return true if a value
either contains nested unknown values or is exactly an unknown value
- The `Unknown` type, which represents unknown values
The primary use case for these APIs is to allow nested, properties with
known values to be accessed via the lifted property accessor even when
the containing property is not fully know. A common example of this
pattern is the `metadata.name` property of a Kubernetes `Namespace`
object: while other properties of the `metadata` bag may be unknown,
`name` is often known. These APIs allow `ns.metadata.name` to return a
known value in this case.
In order to avoid exposing downlevel SDKs to unknown values--a change
which could break user code by exposing it to unexpected values--a
language SDK must indicate whether or not it supports first-class
unknown values as part of each `RegisterResourceRequest`.
These changes also allow us to avoid breaking user code with the new
behavior introduced by the prior commit.
Fixes#3190.
Adds the ability to provide `transformations` to modify the properties and resource options that will be used for any child resource of a component or stack.
This offers an "escape hatch" to modify the behaviour of a component by peeking behind it's abstraction. For example, it can be used to add a resource option (`additionalSecretOutputs`, `aliases`, `protect`, etc.) to a specific known child of a component, or to modify some input property to a child resource if the component does not (yet) expose the ability to control that input directly. It could also be used for more interesting scenarios - such as:
1. Automatically applying tags to all resources that support them in a stack (or component)
2. Injecting real dependencies between stringly-referenced resources in a Helm Chart
3. Injecting explicit names using a preferred naming convention across all resources in a stack
4. Injecting `import` onto all resources by doing a lookup into a name=>id mapping
Because this feature makes it possible to peek behind a component abstraction, it must be used with care in cases where the component is versioned independently of the use of transformations. Also, this can result in "spooky action at a distance", so should be used judiciously. That said - this can be used as an escape hatch to unblock a wide variety of common use cases without waiting on changes to be made in a component implementation.
Each transformation is passed the `resource`, `name`, `type`, `props` and `opts` that are passed into the `Resource` constructor for any resource descended from the resource that has the transformation applied. The transformation callback can optionally return alternate versions of the `props` and `opts` to be used in place of the original values provided to the resource constructor.
Fixes#2068.
Adds test coverage for cloud-backed secrets combined with filestate backend. This combination (for example, S3 + KMS) is likely to be common.
Fixes#3189.
* Add the ability to log all engine events to a file.
The path to the file can be specified using the `--event-log` flag to
the CLI. The file will be truncated if it exists. Events are written as
a list of JSON values using the schema described by `pkg/apitype`.
* Expose update engine events to ExtraRuntimeValidation.
Just what it says on the tin. Events from previews are not exposed.
Since we now include output from `go test` (so we can see progress
from our integration tests as they run) we shouldn't print large blobs
of uninteresting JSON data.
Adds support for additional cloud secrets providers (AWS KMS, Azure KeyVault, Google Cloud KMS, and HashiCorp Vault) as the encryption backend for Pulumi secrets. This augments the previous choice between using the app.pulumi.com-managed secrets encryption or a fully-client-side local passphrase encryption.
This is implemented using the Go Cloud Development Kit support for pluggable secrets providers.
Like our cloud storage backend support which also uses Go Cloud Development Kit, this PR also bleeds through to users the URI scheme's that the Go CDK defines for specifying each of secrets providers - like `awskms://alias/LukeTesting?region=us-west-2` or `azurekeyvault://mykeyvaultname.vault.azure.net/keys/mykeyname`.
Also like our cloud storage backend support, this PR doesn't solve for how to configure the cloud provider client used to resolve the URIs above - the standard ambient credentials are used in both cases. Eventually, we will likely need to provide ways for both of these features to be configured independently of each other and of the providers used for resource provisioning.
