The text "Plan applied failed: " is pretty inscrutable given our
current system. While both "plan" and "apply" are concepts inside the
the implementation of the CLI, we usually talk in terms of `preview`
and `update`. I suspect there are some cases where this prefix is not
100% technically correct, and if there's a better short way of saying
something more correct, I would love to adopt that instead, but as is,
I would really love to get rid of the "Plan apply failed" text in our
system, it pains me every time I read it.
- If an untargeted create would not affect the inputs of any targeted
resources, do not fail the update. Untargeted creates that are
directly dependend on by targeted resources will still cause failures
that inform the user to add the untargeted resources to the --target
list.
- Users may now pass the `--target-dependents` flag to allow targeted
destroys to automatically target dependents that must be destroyed in
order to destroy an explicitly targeted resource.
- The length of the text content (i.e. the content of a colorized string
that is not control sequences) was not being correctly tracked. This
caused the "status" column of the progress display to overflow.
- Colorization was unconditionally disabled on Windows. When we were
using loreley, we had set the global colorization flag s.t.
colorization on Windows _should_ have been disabled, but we overrode
this flag each time we actually colorized anything.
Fixes#3378.
Loreley's approach to colorization via Go templates has significant
overhead when colorization is used extensively.
Also, stop parsing colorized text with regexes and use the actual
parser.
Present a warm welcome to users when they interactively login.
Also use this as an opportunity to present a "Tip of the Day" - which for now we will use to highlight auto-naming as this has been a common new user question.
Adds a new resource option `aliases` which can be used to rename a resource. When making a breaking change to the name or type of a resource or component, the old name can be added to the list of `aliases` for a resource to ensure that existing resources will be migrated to the new name instead of being deleted and replaced with the new named resource.
There are two key places this change is implemented.
The first is the step generator in the engine. When computing whether there is an old version of a registered resource, we now take into account the aliases specified on the registered resource. That is, we first look up the resource by its new URN in the old state, and then by any aliases provided (in order). This can allow the resource to be matched as a (potential) update to an existing resource with a different URN.
The second is the core `Resource` constructor in the JavaScript (and soon Python) SDKs. This change ensures that when a parent resource is aliased, that all children implicitly inherit corresponding aliases. It is similar to how many other resource options are "inherited" implicitly from the parent.
Four specific scenarios are explicitly tested as part of this PR:
1. Renaming a resource
2. Adopting a resource into a component (as the owner of both component and consumption codebases)
3. Renaming a component instance (as the owner of the consumption codebase without changes to the component)
4. Changing the type of a component (as the owner of the component codebase without changes to the consumption codebase)
4. Combining (1) and (3) to make both changes to a resource at the same time
* Initial stack history command
* Adding use of color pkg, adding background colors to color pkg, and removing extra stack output
* gofmt-ed colors file
* Fixing format and removing JSON output
* Fixing nits, changing output for environment, and adding some tests
* fixing failing history test
Since I was digging around over the weekend after the change to move
away from light black, and the impact it had on less important
information showing more prominently than it used to, I took a step
back and did a deeper tidying up of things. Another side goal of this
exercise was to be a little more respectful of terminal width; when
we could say things with fewer words, I did so.
* Stylize the preview/update summary differently, so that it stands
out as a section. Also highlight the total changes with bold -- it
turns out this has a similar effect to the bright white colorization,
just without the negative effects on e.g. white terminals.
* Eliminate some verbosity in the phrasing of change summaries.
* Make all heading sections stylized consistently. This includes
the color (bright magenta) and the vertical spacing (always a newline
separating headings). We were previously inconsistent on this (e.g.,
outputs were under "---outputs---"). Now the headings are:
Previewing (etc), Diagnostics, Outputs, Resources, Duration, and Permalink.
* Fix an issue where we'd parent things to "global" until the stack
object later showed up. Now we'll simply mock up a stack resource.
* Don't show messages like "no change" or "unchanged". Prior to the
light black removal, these faded into the background of the terminal.
Now they just clutter up the display. Similar to the elision of "*"
for OpSames in a prior commit, just leave these out. Now anything
that's written is actually a meaningful status for the user to note.
* Don't show the "3 info messages," etc. summaries in the Info column
while an update is ongoing. Instead, just show the latest line. This
is more respectful of width -- I often find that the important
messages scroll off the right of my screen before this change.
For discussion:
- I actually wonder if we should eliminate the summary
altogether and always just show the latest line. Or even
blank it out. The summary feels better suited for the
Diagnostics section, and the Status concisely tells us
how a resource's update ended up (failed, succeeded, etc).
- Similarly, I question the idea of showing only the "worst"
message. I'd vote for always showing the latest, and again
leaving it to the Status column for concisely telling the
user about the final state a resource ended up in.
* Stop prepending "info: " to every stdout/stderr message. It adds
no value, clutters up the display, and worsens horizontal usage.
* Lessen the verbosity of update headline messages, so we now instead
of e.g. "Previewing update of stack 'x':", we just say
"Previewing update (x):".
* Eliminate vertical whitespace in the Diagnostics section. Every
independent console.out previously was separated by an entire newline,
which made the section look cluttered to my eyes. These are just
streams of logs, there's no reason for the extra newlines.
* Colorize the resource headers in the Diagnostic section light blue.
Note that this will change various test baselines, which I will
update next. I didn't want those in the same commit.
This change makes it a little easier to do the style of highlighting
we are doing now with the login prompt, cleaning up some of the
padding calculations that were otherwise complicated due to ANSI
escape sequences.
This change makes our login prompt a little "friendlier", especially
important since this will be the first thing a new user sees.
The new message is:
$ pulumi new
We need your Pulumi account to identify you.
Enter your access token from https://app.pulumi.com/account
or hit <ENTER> to log in using your browser :
* Improve error messages output by the CLI
This fixes a couple known issues with the way that we present errors
from the Pulumi CLI:
1. Any errors from RPC endpoints were bubbling up as they were to
the top-level, which was unfortunate because they contained
RPC-specific noise that we don't want to present to the user. This
commit unwraps errors from resource providers.
2. The "catastrophic error" message often got printed twice
3. Fatal errors are often printed twice, because our CLI top-level
prints out the fatal error that it receives before exiting. A lot of
the time this error has already been printed.
4. Errors were prefixed by PU####.
* Feedback: Omit the 'catastrophic' error message and use a less verbose error message as the final error
* Code review feedback: interpretRPCError -> resourceStateAndError
* Code review feedback: deleting some commented-out code, error capitalization
* Cleanup after rebase
Most of the errors in this package are holdovers from our previous
syetem where we had our own custom compiler and evaluator and are no
longer needed. The few we still use during plan applicaton (via the
diagnostics system, which is another component from the old system
that we still use) have been promoted into the diag package. Doing so,
allows us to not have to import "github.com/pkg/errors" as "goerr" in
some parts of the engine, a nice cleaup.
Our recent changes to colorization changed from a boolean to a tri-valued
enum (Always, Never, Raw). The events from the service, however, are still
boolean-valued. This changes the message payload to carry the full values.
Part of the work to make it easier to tests of diff output. Specifically, we now allow users to pass --color=option for several pulumi commands. 'option' can be one of 'always', 'never', 'raw', and 'auto' (the default).
The meaning of these flags are:
1. auto: colorize normally, unless in --debug
2. always: always colorize no matter what
3. never: never colorize no matter what.
4. raw: colorize, but preserve the original "<{%%}>" style control codes and not the translated platform specific codes. This is for testing purposes and ensures we can have test for this stuff across platform.
This change adds back component output properties. Doing so
requires splitting the RPC interface for creating resources in
half, with an initial RegisterResource which contains all of the
input properties, and a final CompleteResource which optionally
contains any output properties synthesized by the component.
These changes introduce a new field, `Raw`, to `diag.Message`. This
field indicates that the contents of the message are not a format string
and should not be rendered via `Sprintf` during stringification.
The plugin std{out,err} readers have been updated to use raw messages,
and the event reader in `pulumi` has been fixed s.t. it does not format
event payloads before display.
Fixes#551.
I noticed in our Docker builds, we often end up seeing %(MISSING)!
style messages, which were an indication we were trying to format
them. The reason was the presence of %c's in the stream, and the
fact that we passed said messages to Fprintf. We were careful in
all other layers to use the message on the "right hand side" of
any *f calls, but in this instance, we used Fprintf and passed the
message on the "left hand side", triggering formatting. It turns
out we've already formatted everything by the time we get here,
so there's no need -- we can just use Fprint instead.
