The wording for refresh doesn't accurately convey that the operations
aren't actually mutating your resources, but instead are simply changing
your checkpoint state. This change (hopefully) helps in two ways:
First, put text just before the prompt:
Do you want to perform this refresh?
No resources will be modified as part of this refresh; just your stack's state will be.
Second, alter the summary ever-so-slightly, from:
info: 2 changes performed:
~ 2 resources updated
3 resources unchanged
to:
info: 2 changes refreshed:
~ 2 resources updated
3 resources unchanged
This reads just slightly better, and removes any sense of panic I might
have otherwise had that my refresh just did something wrong.
As I was in here, since I had to pass UpdateKind information to new
places, I cleaned up the situation where we had three mostly-similar
enums (but which actually diverged) and several areas where we were
using untyped strings for this same information. Now there's just one.
This fixespulumi/pulumi#1551.
This covers most of the transitive closure of the types that appear in a
checkpoint. A breaking change to any of these types implies a bump in
the checkpoint version number.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046.
This PR adds a new `pulumi history` command, which prints the update history for a stack.
The local backend stores the update history in a JSON file on disk, next to the checkpoint file. The cloud backend simply provides the update metadata, and expects to receive all the data from a (NYI) `/history` REST endpoint.
`pkg/backend/updates.go` defines the data that is being persisted. The way the data is wired through the system is adding a new `backend.UpdateMetadata` parameter to a Stack/Backend's `Update` and `Destroy` methods.
I use `tests/integration/stack_outputs/` as the simple app for the related tests, hence the addition to the `.gitignore` and fixing the name in the `Pulumi.yaml`.
Fixes#636.
