2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the MIT license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
2019-06-07 23:56:44 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "Pane.h"
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "ColorPickupFlyout.h"
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "TabBase.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "TerminalTab.g.h"
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 03:30:05 +01:00
|
|
|
static constexpr double HeaderRenameBoxWidthDefault{ 165 };
|
|
|
|
|
static constexpr double HeaderRenameBoxWidthTitleLength{ std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity() };
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process actions sync. on startup; don't dupe nonexistent profile (#5090)
This PR has evolved to encapsulate two related fixes that I can't really
untie anymore.
#2455 - Duplicating a tab that doesn't exist anymore
This was the bug I was originally fixing in #4429.
When the user tries to `duplicateTab` with a profile that doesn't exist
anymore (like might happen after a settings reload), don't crash.
As I was going about adding tests for this, got blocked by the fact that
the Terminal couldn't open _any_ panes while the `TerminalPage` was size
0x0. This had two theoretical solutions:
* Fake the `TerminalPage` into thinking it had a real size in the test -
probably possible, though I'm unsure how it would work in practice.
* Change `Pane`s to not require an `ActualWidth`, `ActualHeight` on
initialization.
Fortuately, the second option was something else that was already on my
backlog of bugs.
#4618 - `wt` command-line can't consistently parse more than one arg
Presently, the Terminal just arbitrarily dispatches a bunch of handlers
to try and handle all the commands provided on the commandline. That's
lead to a bunch of reports that not all the commands will always get
executed, nor will they all get executed in the same order.
This PR also changes the `TerminalPage` to be able to dispatch all the
commands sequentially, all at once in the startup. No longer will there
be a hot second where the commands seem to execute themselves in from of
the user - they'll all happen behind the scenes on startup.
This involved a couple other changes areound the `TerminalPage`
* I had to make sure that panes could be opened at a 0x0 size. Now they
use a star sizing based off the percentage of the parent they're
supposed to consume, so that when the parent _does_ get laid out,
they'll take the appropriate size of that parent.
* I had to do some math ahead of time to try and calculate what a
`SplitState::Automatic` would be evaluated as, despite the fact that
we don't actually know how big the pane will be.
* I had to ensure that `focus-tab` commands appropriately mark a single
tab as focused while we're in startup, without roundtripping to the
Dispatcher thread and back
## References
#4429 - the original PR for #2455
#5047 - a follow-up task from discussion in #4429
#4953 - a PR for making panes use star sizing, which was immensly
helpful for this PR.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
`CascadiaSettings::BuildSettings` can throw if the GUID doesn't exist.
This wraps those calls up with a try/catch.
It also adds a couple tests - a few `SettingsTests` for try/catching
this state. It also adds a XAML-y test in `TabTests` that creates a
`TerminalPage` and then performs som UI-like actions on it. This test
required a minor change to how we generate the new tab dropdown - in the
tests, `Application::Current()` is _not_ a `TerminalApp::App`, so it
doesn't have a `Logic()` to query. So wrap that in a try/catch as well.
While working on these tests, I found that we'd crash pretty agressively
for mysterious reasons if the TestHostApp became focused while the test
was running. This was due to a call in
`TSFInputControl::NotifyFocusEnter` that would callback to
`TSFInputControl::_layoutRequested`, which would crash on setting the
`MaxSize` of the canvas to a negative value. This PR includes a hotfix
for that bug as well.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing with a _lot_ of commands in a commandline
* run the tests
* Team tested in selfhost
Closes #2455
Closes #4618
2020-03-26 01:03:32 +01:00
|
|
|
// fwdecl unittest classes
|
|
|
|
|
namespace TerminalAppLocalTests
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
class TabTests;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace winrt::TerminalApp::implementation
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
struct TerminalTab : TerminalTabT<TerminalTab, TabBase>
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
public:
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
TerminalTab(std::shared_ptr<Pane> rootPane);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
// Called after construction to perform the necessary setup, which relies on weak_ptr
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void Initialize();
|
Fixed self reference capture in Tab and TerminalPage (#3835)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Every lambda capture in `Tab` and `TerminalPage` has been changed from capturing raw `this` to `std::weak_ptr<Tab>` or `winrt::weak_ref<TerminalPage>`. Lambda bodies have been changed to check the weak reference before use.
Capturing raw `this` in `Tab`'s [title change event handler](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Tab.cpp#L299) was the root cause of #3776, and is fixed in this PR among other instance of raw `this` capture.
The lambda fixes to `TerminalPage` are unrelated to the core issue addressed in the PR checklist. Because I was already editing `TerminalPage`, figured I'd do a [weak_ref pass](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/3776#issuecomment-560575575).
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #3776, potentially #2248, likely closes others
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #3776
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
`Tab` now inherits from `enable_shared_from_this`, which enable accessing `Tab` objects as `std::weak_ptr<Tab>` objects. All instances of lambdas capturing `this` now capture `std::weak_ptr<Tab>` instead. `TerminalPage` is a WinRT type which supports `winrt::weak_ref<TerminalPage>`. All previous instance of `TerminalPage` lambdas capturing `this` has been replaced to capture `winrt::weak_ref<TerminalPage>`. These weak pointers/references can only be created after object construction necessitating for `Tab` a new function called after construction to bind lambdas.
Any anomalous crash related to the following functionality during closing a tab or WT may be fixed by this PR:
- Tab icon updating
- Tab text updating
- Tab dragging
- Clicking new tab button
- Changing active pane
- Closing an active tab
- Clicking on a tab
- Creating the new tab flyout menu
Sorry about all the commits. Will fix my fork after this PR! 😅
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Attempted to repro the steps indicated in issue #3776 with the new changes and failed. When before the changes, the issue could consistently be reproed.
2019-12-06 00:18:22 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-17 21:47:24 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::TermControl GetActiveTerminalControl() const;
|
2021-08-23 19:11:53 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::Profile GetFocusedProfile() const noexcept;
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
void Focus(winrt::Windows::UI::Xaml::FocusState focusState) override;
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget Scroll(const int delta);
|
2019-08-28 16:40:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> DetachRoot();
|
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> DetachPane();
|
|
|
|
|
void AttachPane(std::shared_ptr<Pane> pane);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-15 22:14:57 +02:00
|
|
|
void SplitPane(winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::SplitDirection splitType,
|
Add `size` param to `splitPane` action, `split-pane` subcommand (#8543)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a `size` parameter to `splitPane`. This takes a `float`, and specifies the portion of the parent pane that should be used to create the new one.
This also adds the param to the `split-pane` subcommand.
### Examples
| commandline | result |
| -- | -- |
| `wt ; sp -s .25` |  |
| `wt ; sp -s .8` |  |
| `wt ; sp -s .8 ; sp -H -s .3` |  |
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6298
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Docs PR: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#208
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I went with `size`, `--size,-s` rather than `percent`, because the arg is the (0,1) version of the size, not the (0%,100%) version.
## Validation Steps Performed
Added actions, played with the commandline, ran tests
2020-12-18 04:51:53 +01:00
|
|
|
const float splitSize,
|
2021-11-04 23:29:58 +01:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> newPane);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-02 23:04:57 +02:00
|
|
|
void ToggleSplitOrientation();
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget UpdateIcon(const winrt::hstring iconPath);
|
2020-12-16 03:45:15 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget HideIcon(const bool hide);
|
2020-01-08 22:19:23 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-23 00:48:20 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget ShowBellIndicator(const bool show);
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget ActivateBellIndicatorTimer();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
float CalcSnappedDimension(const bool widthOrHeight, const float dimension) const;
|
2021-09-15 22:14:57 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::SplitDirection PreCalculateAutoSplit(winrt::Windows::Foundation::Size rootSize) const;
|
|
|
|
|
bool PreCalculateCanSplit(winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::SplitDirection splitType,
|
Add `size` param to `splitPane` action, `split-pane` subcommand (#8543)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a `size` parameter to `splitPane`. This takes a `float`, and specifies the portion of the parent pane that should be used to create the new one.
This also adds the param to the `split-pane` subcommand.
### Examples
| commandline | result |
| -- | -- |
| `wt ; sp -s .25` |  |
| `wt ; sp -s .8` |  |
| `wt ; sp -s .8 ; sp -H -s .3` |  |
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6298
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Docs PR: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#208
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I went with `size`, `--size,-s` rather than `percent`, because the arg is the (0,1) version of the size, not the (0%,100%) version.
## Validation Steps Performed
Added actions, played with the commandline, ran tests
2020-12-18 04:51:53 +01:00
|
|
|
const float splitSize,
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::Windows::Foundation::Size availableSpace) const;
|
2019-08-15 01:12:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
void ResizeContent(const winrt::Windows::Foundation::Size& newSize);
|
Support for navigating panes by MRU (#8183)
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000
Closes #2871
2020-12-11 19:36:05 +01:00
|
|
|
void ResizePane(const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::ResizeDirection& direction);
|
2021-07-29 00:05:32 +02:00
|
|
|
bool NavigateFocus(const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::FocusDirection& direction);
|
2021-08-17 00:33:23 +02:00
|
|
|
bool SwapPane(const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::FocusDirection& direction);
|
2021-05-21 23:55:57 +02:00
|
|
|
bool FocusPane(const uint32_t id);
|
2019-06-07 23:56:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-23 21:20:08 +02:00
|
|
|
void UpdateSettings();
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget UpdateTitle();
|
2019-06-07 23:56:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
void Shutdown() override;
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
void ClosePane();
|
2019-07-19 02:23:40 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-24 22:07:41 +02:00
|
|
|
void SetTabText(winrt::hstring title);
|
2021-04-21 12:54:18 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::hstring GetTabText() const;
|
2020-06-24 22:07:41 +02:00
|
|
|
void ResetTabText();
|
2020-10-28 20:36:30 +01:00
|
|
|
void ActivateTabRenamer();
|
2020-06-24 22:07:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
std::optional<winrt::Windows::UI::Color> GetTabColor();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-08 01:07:42 +02:00
|
|
|
void SetRuntimeTabColor(const winrt::Windows::UI::Color& color);
|
|
|
|
|
void ResetRuntimeTabColor();
|
Add `setTabColor` and `openTabColorPicker` actions (#6567)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a pair of `ShortcutAction`s for setting the tab color.
* `setTabColor`: This changes the color of the current tab to the provided color, or can be used to clear the color.
* `openTabColorPicker`: This keybinding immediately activates the tab color picker for the currently focused tab.
## References
## PR Checklist
* [x] scratches my own itch
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/69
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
## Validation Steps Performed
* hey look there are tests
* Tested with the following:
```json
// { "command": "setTabColor", "keys": [ "alt+c" ] },
{ "keys": "ctrl+alt+c", "command": { "action": "setTabColor", "color": "#123456" } },
{ "keys": "alt+shift+c", "command": { "action": "setTabColor", "color": null} },
{ "keys": "alt+c", "command": "openTabColorPicker" },
```
2020-06-25 15:06:21 +02:00
|
|
|
void ActivateColorPicker();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-02 16:36:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void UpdateZoom(std::shared_ptr<Pane> newFocus);
|
2020-08-08 01:11:44 +02:00
|
|
|
void ToggleZoom();
|
|
|
|
|
bool IsZoomed();
|
|
|
|
|
void EnterZoom();
|
|
|
|
|
void ExitZoom();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Persist window layout on window close (#10972)
This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application
close.
Done:
- Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained.
- Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and
then save if you are the last window closing.
- Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button.
- If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x
button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved
state.
- Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can
perform to restore its layout and the window size/position
information.
- This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't
actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it
does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a
different pane selected.
Todo:
- multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one
window.
- PR #11083 will save multiple windows.
- This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs
appear to be focused on opening.
Next Steps:
- The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as
necessary.
- Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state
as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way
saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking
schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple
windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now.
- One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can
be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the
nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on
first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the
windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous
window (if it is in the saved state).
- Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user
editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't
know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and
startupActions.
Validation Steps Performed:
- The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal
-> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows.
- That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved
session.
- Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window
closed saves its state.
The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to
restore the terminal to its saved form.
References #8324
This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000
Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
|
|
|
std::vector<Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model::ActionAndArgs> BuildStartupActions() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-13 21:17:58 +02:00
|
|
|
int GetLeafPaneCount() const noexcept;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-08 19:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
void TogglePaneReadOnly();
|
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> GetActivePane() const;
|
2021-08-10 13:16:17 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::TaskbarState GetCombinedTaskbarState() const;
|
2021-02-08 19:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-23 21:20:08 +02:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> GetRootPane() const { return _rootPane; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-09 18:57:46 +01:00
|
|
|
void ReplaceControl(std::shared_ptr<Pane> pane,
|
|
|
|
|
const winrt::Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::UserControl& control);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-10 12:27:29 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::TerminalTabStatus TabStatus()
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return _tabStatus;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(ActivePaneChanged, _ActivePaneChangedHandlers, winrt::delegate<>);
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(ColorSelected, _colorSelected, winrt::delegate<winrt::Windows::UI::Color>);
|
|
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(ColorCleared, _colorCleared, winrt::delegate<>);
|
2020-11-18 23:55:10 +01:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(TabRaiseVisualBell, _TabRaiseVisualBellHandlers, winrt::delegate<>);
|
2021-03-08 13:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(DuplicateRequested, _DuplicateRequestedHandlers, winrt::delegate<>);
|
2021-08-05 15:46:24 +02:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(SplitTabRequested, _SplitTabRequestedHandlers, winrt::delegate<>);
|
2021-08-31 21:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
DECLARE_EVENT(ExportTabRequested, _ExportTabRequestedHandlers, winrt::delegate<>);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(TaskbarProgressChanged, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> _rootPane{ nullptr };
|
|
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> _activePane{ nullptr };
|
2020-08-08 01:11:44 +02:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<Pane> _zoomedPane{ nullptr };
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::hstring _lastIconPath{};
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::ColorPickupFlyout _tabColorPickup{};
|
2020-08-08 01:07:42 +02:00
|
|
|
std::optional<winrt::Windows::UI::Color> _themeTabColor{};
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<winrt::Windows::UI::Color> _runtimeTabColor{};
|
2020-11-20 18:16:38 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::TabHeaderControl _headerControl{};
|
2021-02-10 12:27:29 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::TerminalTabStatus _tabStatus{};
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ControlEventTokens
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token titleToken;
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token fontToken;
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token colorToken;
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token taskbarToken;
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token readOnlyToken;
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token focusToken;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
std::unordered_map<uint32_t, ControlEventTokens> _controlEvents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::event_token _rootClosedToken{};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-21 23:55:57 +02:00
|
|
|
std::vector<uint32_t> _mruPanes;
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t _nextPaneId{ 0 };
|
Support for navigating panes by MRU (#8183)
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000
Closes #2871
2020-12-11 19:36:05 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-28 20:36:30 +01:00
|
|
|
bool _receivedKeyDown{ false };
|
2020-12-16 03:45:15 +01:00
|
|
|
bool _iconHidden{ false };
|
Add the ability to interact with subtrees of panes (#11153)
This commit adds the ability to interact with subtrees of panes.
Have you ever thought that you don't have enough regression testing to
do? Boy do I have the PR for you! This breaks all kinds of assumptions
about what is or is not focused, largely complicated by the fact that a
pane is not a proper control. I did my best to cover as many cases as I
could, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some things broken that
I am unaware of.
Done:
- Add `parent` and `child` movement directions to move up and down the
tree respectively
- When a parent pane is selected it will have borders all around it in
addition to any borders the children have.
- Fix focus, swap, split, zoom, toggle orientation, resize, and move to
all handle interacting with more than one pane.
- Similarly the actions for font size changing, closing, read-only, clearing
buffer, and changing color scheme will distribute to all children.
- This technically leaves control focus on the original control in the
focused subtree because panes aren't proper controls themselves. This
is also used to make sure we go back down the same path with the
`child` movement.
- You can zoom a parent pane, and click between different zoomed
sub-panes and it won't unzoom you until you use moveFocus or another
action. This wasn't explicitly programmed behavior so it is probably
buggy (I've quashed a couple at least). It is a natural consequence of
showing multiple terminals and allowing you to focus a terminal and a
parent separately, since changing the active pane directly does not
unzoom. This also means there can be a disconnect between what pane is
zoomed and what pane is active.
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested focus movement, swapping, moving panes, and zooming.
Closes #10733
2021-09-28 21:16:05 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _changingActivePane{ false };
|
Decouple "Active Terminal" and "Focused Control" (#3540)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Unties the concept of "focused control" from "active control".
Previously, we were exclusively using the "Focused" state of `TermControl`s to determine which one was active. This was fraught with gotchas - if anything else became focused, then suddenly there was _no_ pane focused in the Tab. This happened especially frequently if the user clicked on a tab to focus the window. Furthermore, in experimental branches with more UI added to the Terminal (such as [dev/migrie/f/2046-command-palette](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/tree/dev/migrie/f/2046-command-palette)), when these UIs were added to the Terminal, they'd take focus, which again meant that there was no focused pane.
This fixes these issue by having each Tab manually track which Pane is active in that tab. The Tab is now the arbiter of who in the tree is "active". Panes still track this state, for them to be able to MoveFocus appropriately.
It also contains a related fix to prevent the tab separator from stealing focus from the TermControl. This required us to set the color of the un-focused Pane border to some color other that Transparent, so I went with the TabViewBackground. Panes now look like the following:
## References
See also: #2046
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #1205
* [x] Closes #522
* [x] Closes #999
* [x] I work here
* [😢] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested manually opening panes, closing panes, clicking around panes, the whole dance.
---------------------------------------------------
* this is janky but is close for some reason?
* This is _almost_ right to solve #1205
If I want to double up and also fix #522 (which I do), then I need to also
* when a tab GetsFocus, send the focus instead to the Pane
* When the border is clicked on, focus that pane's control
And like a lot of cleanup, because this is horrifying
* hey this autorevoker is really nice
* Encapsulate Pane::pfnGotFocus
* Propogate the events back up on close
* Encapsulate Tab::pfnFocusChanged, and clean up TerminalPage a bit
* Mostly just code cleanup, commenting
* This works to hittest on the borders
If the border is `Transparent`, then it can't hittest for Tapped events, and it'll fall through (to someone)
THis at least works, but looks garish
* Match the pane border to the TabViewHeader
* Fix a bit of dead code and a bad copy-pasta
* This _works_ to use a winrt event, but it's dirty
* Clean up everything from the winrt::event debacle.
* This is dead code that shouldn't have been there
* Turn Tab's callback into a winrt::event as well
2019-11-18 22:41:25 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Enable tab renaming at runtime from the UI (#5775)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for setting, from the UI, a runtime override for the tab title text. The user can use this to effectively "rename" a tab.
If set, the tab will _always_ use the runtime override string. If the user has multiple panes with different titles in a pane, then the tab's override text will be used _regardless_ of which pane was focused when the tab was renamed.
The override text can be removed by just deleting the entire contents of the box. Then, the tab will revert to using the terminal's usual title.
## References
* Wouldn't be possible without the context menu from #3789
* Focus doesn't return to the active terminal after hitting <kbd>enter</kbd>/<kbd>esc</kbd>, but that's tracked by #5750
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #1079
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## TODO
* [x] `Tab::SetTabText` might be able to be greatly simplified/removed?
* [x] I'm _pretty sure_ if they set an override title, we won't bubble that up to set the window title.
* [x] I'm unsure how this behaves when the terminal's title changes _while_ the TextBox is visible. I don't think it should change the current contents of the box, but it might currently.
* [ ] **for discussion**: If the user doesn't actually change the text of the tab, then we probably shouldn't set the override text, right?
- EX: if they open the box and the text is "cmd", and immediately hit <kbd>enter</kbd>, then run `title foo`, should the text change to "foo" or stay "cmd"?
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
2020-05-28 23:06:17 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::hstring _runtimeTabText{};
|
|
|
|
|
bool _inRename{ false };
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::TextBox::LayoutUpdated_revoker _tabRenameBoxLayoutUpdatedRevoker;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-15 13:40:44 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::TerminalApp::ShortcutActionDispatch _dispatch;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _Setup();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-23 00:48:20 +01:00
|
|
|
std::optional<Windows::UI::Xaml::DispatcherTimer> _bellIndicatorTimer;
|
|
|
|
|
void _BellIndicatorTimerTick(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
|
In specific scenarios, focus the active control (#10048)
A redo of #6290. That PR was overkill. In that one, we'd toss focus back to the active control any time that the tab view item got focus. That's maybe not the _best_ solution.
Instead, this PR is precision strikes. We're re-using a lot of what we already have from #9260.
* When the context menu is closed, yeet focus to the control.
* When the renamer is dismissed, yeet focus to the control.
* When the TabViewItem is tapped (meaning no one else handled it), yeet focus to the control.
### checklist
* [x] I work here
* [ ] This is UI so it doesn't have tests
* [x] Closes #3609
* [x] Closes #5750
* [x] Closes #6680
### scenarios:
* [x] focus the window by clicking on the tab -> Control is focused.
* [x] Open the color picker with the context menu, can move the focus inside the picker with the arrow keys.
* [x] Dismiss the picker with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the picker with enter -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the renamer with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the renamer with enter -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the context menu with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Start renaming, then click on the tab -> Rename is committed, Control is focused.
* [x] Start renaming, then click on the text box -> focus is still in the text box
2021-05-12 01:55:49 +02:00
|
|
|
void _MakeTabViewItem() override;
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 03:30:05 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _UpdateHeaderControlMaxWidth();
|
2020-12-17 15:22:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
void _CreateContextMenu() override;
|
2021-01-25 23:50:21 +01:00
|
|
|
virtual winrt::hstring _CreateToolTipTitle() override;
|
2020-10-15 13:40:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-04 22:57:12 +02:00
|
|
|
void _RefreshVisualState();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move Pane to Tab (GH7075) (#10780)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
2021-08-12 18:41:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _DetachEventHandlersFromControl(const uint32_t paneId, const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::TermControl& control);
|
|
|
|
|
void _AttachEventHandlersToControl(const uint32_t paneId, const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::TermControl& control);
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
void _AttachEventHandlersToPane(std::shared_ptr<Pane> pane);
|
Process actions sync. on startup; don't dupe nonexistent profile (#5090)
This PR has evolved to encapsulate two related fixes that I can't really
untie anymore.
#2455 - Duplicating a tab that doesn't exist anymore
This was the bug I was originally fixing in #4429.
When the user tries to `duplicateTab` with a profile that doesn't exist
anymore (like might happen after a settings reload), don't crash.
As I was going about adding tests for this, got blocked by the fact that
the Terminal couldn't open _any_ panes while the `TerminalPage` was size
0x0. This had two theoretical solutions:
* Fake the `TerminalPage` into thinking it had a real size in the test -
probably possible, though I'm unsure how it would work in practice.
* Change `Pane`s to not require an `ActualWidth`, `ActualHeight` on
initialization.
Fortuately, the second option was something else that was already on my
backlog of bugs.
#4618 - `wt` command-line can't consistently parse more than one arg
Presently, the Terminal just arbitrarily dispatches a bunch of handlers
to try and handle all the commands provided on the commandline. That's
lead to a bunch of reports that not all the commands will always get
executed, nor will they all get executed in the same order.
This PR also changes the `TerminalPage` to be able to dispatch all the
commands sequentially, all at once in the startup. No longer will there
be a hot second where the commands seem to execute themselves in from of
the user - they'll all happen behind the scenes on startup.
This involved a couple other changes areound the `TerminalPage`
* I had to make sure that panes could be opened at a 0x0 size. Now they
use a star sizing based off the percentage of the parent they're
supposed to consume, so that when the parent _does_ get laid out,
they'll take the appropriate size of that parent.
* I had to do some math ahead of time to try and calculate what a
`SplitState::Automatic` would be evaluated as, despite the fact that
we don't actually know how big the pane will be.
* I had to ensure that `focus-tab` commands appropriately mark a single
tab as focused while we're in startup, without roundtripping to the
Dispatcher thread and back
## References
#4429 - the original PR for #2455
#5047 - a follow-up task from discussion in #4429
#4953 - a PR for making panes use star sizing, which was immensly
helpful for this PR.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
`CascadiaSettings::BuildSettings` can throw if the GUID doesn't exist.
This wraps those calls up with a try/catch.
It also adds a couple tests - a few `SettingsTests` for try/catching
this state. It also adds a XAML-y test in `TabTests` that creates a
`TerminalPage` and then performs som UI-like actions on it. This test
required a minor change to how we generate the new tab dropdown - in the
tests, `Application::Current()` is _not_ a `TerminalApp::App`, so it
doesn't have a `Logic()` to query. So wrap that in a try/catch as well.
While working on these tests, I found that we'd crash pretty agressively
for mysterious reasons if the TestHostApp became focused while the test
was running. This was due to a call in
`TSFInputControl::NotifyFocusEnter` that would callback to
`TSFInputControl::_layoutRequested`, which would crash on setting the
`MaxSize` of the canvas to a negative value. This PR includes a hotfix
for that bug as well.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing with a _lot_ of commands in a commandline
* run the tests
* Team tested in selfhost
Closes #2455
Closes #4618
2020-03-26 01:03:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void _UpdateActivePane(std::shared_ptr<Pane> pane);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make Tab an unsealed runtimeclass (and rename it to TabBase) (#8153)
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes #7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
2020-11-04 19:15:05 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::hstring _GetActiveTitle() const;
|
Enable tab renaming at runtime from the UI (#5775)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for setting, from the UI, a runtime override for the tab title text. The user can use this to effectively "rename" a tab.
If set, the tab will _always_ use the runtime override string. If the user has multiple panes with different titles in a pane, then the tab's override text will be used _regardless_ of which pane was focused when the tab was renamed.
The override text can be removed by just deleting the entire contents of the box. Then, the tab will revert to using the terminal's usual title.
## References
* Wouldn't be possible without the context menu from #3789
* Focus doesn't return to the active terminal after hitting <kbd>enter</kbd>/<kbd>esc</kbd>, but that's tracked by #5750
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #1079
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## TODO
* [x] `Tab::SetTabText` might be able to be greatly simplified/removed?
* [x] I'm _pretty sure_ if they set an override title, we won't bubble that up to set the window title.
* [x] I'm unsure how this behaves when the terminal's title changes _while_ the TextBox is visible. I don't think it should change the current contents of the box, but it might currently.
* [ ] **for discussion**: If the user doesn't actually change the text of the tab, then we probably shouldn't set the override text, right?
- EX: if they open the box and the text is "cmd", and immediately hit <kbd>enter</kbd>, then run `title foo`, should the text change to "foo" or stay "cmd"?
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
2020-05-28 23:06:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-08 01:07:42 +02:00
|
|
|
void _RecalculateAndApplyTabColor();
|
|
|
|
|
void _ApplyTabColor(const winrt::Windows::UI::Color& color);
|
|
|
|
|
void _ClearTabBackgroundColor();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-08 19:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
void _RecalculateAndApplyReadOnly();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
void _UpdateProgressState();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-08 13:16:56 +01:00
|
|
|
void _DuplicateTab();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process actions sync. on startup; don't dupe nonexistent profile (#5090)
This PR has evolved to encapsulate two related fixes that I can't really
untie anymore.
#2455 - Duplicating a tab that doesn't exist anymore
This was the bug I was originally fixing in #4429.
When the user tries to `duplicateTab` with a profile that doesn't exist
anymore (like might happen after a settings reload), don't crash.
As I was going about adding tests for this, got blocked by the fact that
the Terminal couldn't open _any_ panes while the `TerminalPage` was size
0x0. This had two theoretical solutions:
* Fake the `TerminalPage` into thinking it had a real size in the test -
probably possible, though I'm unsure how it would work in practice.
* Change `Pane`s to not require an `ActualWidth`, `ActualHeight` on
initialization.
Fortuately, the second option was something else that was already on my
backlog of bugs.
#4618 - `wt` command-line can't consistently parse more than one arg
Presently, the Terminal just arbitrarily dispatches a bunch of handlers
to try and handle all the commands provided on the commandline. That's
lead to a bunch of reports that not all the commands will always get
executed, nor will they all get executed in the same order.
This PR also changes the `TerminalPage` to be able to dispatch all the
commands sequentially, all at once in the startup. No longer will there
be a hot second where the commands seem to execute themselves in from of
the user - they'll all happen behind the scenes on startup.
This involved a couple other changes areound the `TerminalPage`
* I had to make sure that panes could be opened at a 0x0 size. Now they
use a star sizing based off the percentage of the parent they're
supposed to consume, so that when the parent _does_ get laid out,
they'll take the appropriate size of that parent.
* I had to do some math ahead of time to try and calculate what a
`SplitState::Automatic` would be evaluated as, despite the fact that
we don't actually know how big the pane will be.
* I had to ensure that `focus-tab` commands appropriately mark a single
tab as focused while we're in startup, without roundtripping to the
Dispatcher thread and back
## References
#4429 - the original PR for #2455
#5047 - a follow-up task from discussion in #4429
#4953 - a PR for making panes use star sizing, which was immensly
helpful for this PR.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
`CascadiaSettings::BuildSettings` can throw if the GUID doesn't exist.
This wraps those calls up with a try/catch.
It also adds a couple tests - a few `SettingsTests` for try/catching
this state. It also adds a XAML-y test in `TabTests` that creates a
`TerminalPage` and then performs som UI-like actions on it. This test
required a minor change to how we generate the new tab dropdown - in the
tests, `Application::Current()` is _not_ a `TerminalApp::App`, so it
doesn't have a `Logic()` to query. So wrap that in a try/catch as well.
While working on these tests, I found that we'd crash pretty agressively
for mysterious reasons if the TestHostApp became focused while the test
was running. This was due to a call in
`TSFInputControl::NotifyFocusEnter` that would callback to
`TSFInputControl::_layoutRequested`, which would crash on setting the
`MaxSize` of the canvas to a negative value. This PR includes a hotfix
for that bug as well.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing with a _lot_ of commands in a commandline
* run the tests
* Team tested in selfhost
Closes #2455
Closes #4618
2020-03-26 01:03:32 +01:00
|
|
|
friend class ::TerminalAppLocalTests::TabTests;
|
2020-02-04 22:51:11 +01:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
