2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the MIT license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "TermControl.g.h"
|
2021-05-25 00:51:03 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "XamlLights.h"
|
2021-03-18 23:02:39 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "EventArgs.h"
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "../../renderer/base/Renderer.hpp"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "../../renderer/dx/DxRenderer.hpp"
|
2019-12-11 22:52:49 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "../../renderer/uia/UiaRenderer.hpp"
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "../../cascadia/TerminalCore/Terminal.hpp"
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "../buffer/out/search.h"
|
Add a Windows.UI.Text.Core IME overlay to TerminalControl (#1919)
TerminalControl doesn't use any of the built in text input and edit
controls provided by XAML for text input, which means TermianlControl
needs to communicate with the Text Services Framework (TSF) in order to
provide Input Method Editor (IME) support. Just like the rest of
Terminal we get to take advantage of newer APIs (Windows.UI.Text.Core)
namespace to provide support vs. the old TSF 1.0.
Windows.UI.Text.Core handles communication between a text edit control
and the text services primarily through a CoreTextEditContext object.
This change introduces a new UserControl TSFInputControl which is a
custom EditControl similar to the CustomEditControl sample[1].
TSFInputControl is similar (overlay with IME text) to how old console
(conimeinfo) handled IME.
# Details
TSFInputControl is a Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.UserControl
TSFInputControl contains a Canvas control for absolution positioning a
TextBlock control within its containing control (TerminalControl).
The TextBlock control is used for displaying candidate text from the
IME. When the user makes a choice in the IME the TextBlock is cleared
and the text is written to the Terminal buffer like normal text.
TSFInputControl creates an instance of the CoreTextEditContext and
attaches appropriate event handlers to CoreTextEditContext in order to
interact with the IME.
A good write-up on how to interact with CoreTextEditContext can be found
here[2].
## Text Updates
Text updates from the IME come in on the TextUpdating event handler,
text updates are stored in an internal buffer (_inputBuffer).
## Completed Text
Once a user selects a text in the IME, the CompositionCompleted handler
is invoked. The input buffer (_inputBuffer) is written to the Terminal
buffer, _inputBuffer is cleared and Canvas and TextBlock controls are
hidden until the user starts a composition session again.
## Positioning
Telling the IME where to properly position itself was the hardest part
of this change. The IME expects to know it's location in screen
coordinates as supposed to client coordinates. This is pretty easy if
you are a pure UWP, but since we are hosted inside a XAMLIsland the
client to screen coordinate translation is a little harder.
### Calculating Screen Coordinates
1. Obtaining the Window position in Screen coordinates.
2. Determining the Client coordinate of the cursor.
3. Converting the Client coordinate of the cursor to Screen coordinates.
4. Offsetting the X and Y coordinate of the cursor by the position of
the TerminalControl within the window (tabs if present, margins, etc..).
5. Applying any scale factor of the display.
Once we have the right position in screen coordinates, this is supplied
in the LayoutBounds of the CoreTextLayoutRequestedEventArgs which lets
the IME know where to position itself on the Screen.
## Font Information/Cursor/Writing to Terminal
3 events were added to the TSFInputControl to create a loosely-coupled
implementation between the TerminalControl and the TSFInputControl.
These events are used for obtaining Font information from the
TerminalControl, getting the Cursor position and writing to the terminal
buffer.
## Known Issues
- Width of TextBlock is hardcoded to 200 pixels and most likely should
adjust to the available width of the current input line on the console
(#3640)
- Entering text in the middle of an existing set of text has TextBlock
render under existing text. Current Console behavior here isn't good
experience either (writes over text)
- Text input at edges of window is clipped versus wrapping around to
next line. This isn't any worse than the original command line, but
Terminal should be better (#3657)
## Future Considerations
Ideally, we'd be able to interact with the console buffer directly and
replace characters as the user types.
## Validation
General steps to try functionality
- Open Console
- Switch to Simplified Chinese (Shortcut: Windows+Spacebar)
- Switch to Chinese mode on language bar
Scenarios validated:
- As user types unformatted candidates appear on command line and IME
renders in correct position under unformatted characters.
- User can dismiss IME and text doesn't appear on command line
- Switch back to English mode, functions like normal
- New tab has proper behavior
- Switching between tabs has proper behavior
- Switching away from Terminal Window with IME present causes IME to
disappear
[1]: https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-universal-samples/tree/master/Samples/CustomEditControl
[2]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/input/custom-text-input
Closes #459
Closes #2213
Closes #3641
2019-11-22 01:25:50 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "cppwinrt_utils.h"
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "SearchBoxControl.h"
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "ControlInteractivity.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-08 01:21:09 +02:00
|
|
|
namespace Microsoft::Console::VirtualTerminal
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct MouseButtonState;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-17 21:47:24 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::implementation
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct TermControl : TermControlT<TermControl>
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-08-07 16:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
TermControl(IControlSettings settings, TerminalConnection::ITerminalConnection connection);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-08 23:01:40 +01:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget UpdateSettings();
|
2021-04-09 00:46:16 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget UpdateAppearance(const IControlAppearance newAppearance);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-28 01:37:56 +01:00
|
|
|
hstring GetProfileName() const;
|
2019-08-17 00:43:51 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Add copyFormatting keybinding arg and array support (#6004)
Adds array support for the existing `copyFormatting` global setting.
This allows users to define which formats they would specifically like
to be copied.
A boolean value is still accepted and is translated to the following:
- `false` --> `"none"` or `[]`
- `true` --> `"all"` or `["html", "rtf"]`
This also adds `copyFormatting` as a keybinding arg for `copy`. As with
the global setting, a boolean value and array value is accepted.
CopyFormat is a WinRT enum where each accepted format is a flag.
Currently accepted formats include `html`, and `rtf`. A boolean value is
accepted and converted. `true` is a conjunction of all the formats.
`false` only includes plain text.
For the global setting, `null` is not accepted. We already have a
default value from before so no worries there.
For the keybinding arg, `null` (the default value) means that we just do
what the global arg says to do. Overall, the `copyFormatting` keybinding
arg is an override of the global setting **when using that keybinding**.
References #5212 - Spec for formatted copying
References #2690 - disable html copy
Validated behavior with every combination of values below:
- `copyFormatting` global: { `true`, `false`, `[]`, `["html"]` }
- `copyFormatting` copy arg:
{ `null`, `true`, `false`, `[]`, `[, "html"]`}
Closes #4191
Closes #5262
2020-08-15 03:02:24 +02:00
|
|
|
bool CopySelectionToClipboard(bool singleLine, const Windows::Foundation::IReference<CopyFormat>& formats);
|
2019-06-25 21:17:02 +02:00
|
|
|
void PasteTextFromClipboard();
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void Close();
|
Enable resizing the panes with the keyboard. (#1207)
Adds the ability to resize panes with the keyboard.
This is accomplished by making the Column/RowDefinitions for a Pane use `GridLengthHelper::FromPixels` to set their size. We store a pair of floats that represents the relative amount that each pane takes out of the parent pane. When the window is resized, we use that percentage to figure out the new size of each child in pixels, and manually size each column.
Then, when the user presses the keybindings for resizePane{Left/Right/Up/Down}, we'll adjust those percentages, and resize the rows/cols as appropriate.
Currently, each pane adjusts the width/height by 5% of the total size at a time. I am not in love with this, but it works for now. I think when we get support for keybindings with arbitrary arg blobs, then we could do either a percent movement, or a number of characters at a time. The number of characters one would be trickier, because we'd have to get the focused control, and get the number of pixels per character, as adjacent panes might not have the same font sizes.
2019-07-10 15:27:12 +02:00
|
|
|
Windows::Foundation::Size CharacterDimensions() const;
|
2020-02-27 01:35:16 +01:00
|
|
|
Windows::Foundation::Size MinimumSize();
|
|
|
|
|
float SnapDimensionToGrid(const bool widthOrHeight, const float dimension);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
#pragma region ICoreState
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
const uint64_t TaskbarState() const noexcept;
|
|
|
|
|
const uint64_t TaskbarProgress() const noexcept;
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hstring Title();
|
|
|
|
|
Windows::Foundation::IReference<winrt::Windows::UI::Color> TabColor() noexcept;
|
|
|
|
|
hstring WorkingDirectory() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TerminalConnection::ConnectionState ConnectionState() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
int ScrollOffset() const;
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
int ViewHeight() const;
|
|
|
|
|
int BufferHeight() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool BracketedPasteEnabled() const noexcept;
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma endregion
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void ScrollViewport(int viewTop);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-30 15:18:05 +02:00
|
|
|
void AdjustFontSize(int fontSizeDelta);
|
2019-11-25 18:35:10 +01:00
|
|
|
void ResetFontSize();
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
til::point GetFontSize() const;
|
2019-09-30 15:18:05 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-12 15:46:53 +02:00
|
|
|
void SendInput(const winrt::hstring& input);
|
2021-09-02 16:59:42 +02:00
|
|
|
void ClearBuffer(Control::ClearBufferType clearType);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement user-specified pixel shaders, redux (#8565)
Co-authored-by: mrange <marten_range@hotmail.com>
I loved the pixel shaders in #7058, but that PR needed a bit of polish
to be ready for ingestion. This PR is almost _exactly_ that PR, with
some small changes.
* It adds a new pre-profile setting `"experimental.pixelShaderPath"`,
which lets the user set a pixel shader to use with the Terminal.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: It does _not_ add any built-in shaders.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: it will _override_
`experimental.retroTerminalEffect`
* It adds a bunch of sample shaders in `samples/shaders`. Included:
- A NOP shader as a base to build from.
- An "invert" shader that inverts the colors, as a simple example
- An "grayscale" shader that converts all colors to grayscale, as a
simple example
- An "raster bars" shader that draws some colored bars on the screen
with a drop shadow, as a more involved example
- The original retro terminal effects, as a more involved example
- It also includes a broken shader, as an example of what heppens
when the shader fails to compile
- CHANGED FROM #7058: It does _not_ add the "retroII" shader we were
all worried about.
* When a shader fails to be found or fails to compile, we'll display an
error dialog to the user with a relevant error message.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: Originally, #7058 would display "error bars"
on the screen. I've removed that, and had the Terminal disable the
shader entirely then.
* Renames the `toggleRetroEffect` action to `toggleShaderEffect`.
(`toggleRetroEffect` is now an alias to `toggleShaderEffect`). This
action will turn the shader OR the retro effects on/off.
`toggleShaderEffect` works the way you'd expect it to, but the mental
math on _how_ is a little weird. The logic is basically:
```
useShader = shaderEffectsEnabled ?
(pixelShaderProvided ?
pixelShader :
(retroEffectEnabled ?
retroEffect : null
)
) :
null
```
and `toggleShaderEffect` toggles `shaderEffectsEnabled`.
* If you've got both a shader and retro enabled, `toggleShaderEffect`
will toggle between the shader on/off.
* If you've got a shader and retro disabled, `toggleShaderEffect` will
toggle between the shader on/off.
References #6191
References #7058
Closes #7013
Closes #3930 "Add setting to retro terminal shader to control blur
radius, color"
Closes #3929 "Add setting to retro terminal shader to enable drawing
scanlines"
- At this point, just roll your own version of the shader.
2020-12-15 21:40:22 +01:00
|
|
|
void ToggleShaderEffects();
|
2020-07-02 01:17:43 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget RenderEngineSwapChainChanged(IInspectable sender, IInspectable args);
|
Use DComp surface handle for Swap Chain management (#10023)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR changes the DxEngine to create a swapchain HANDLE, then have the TermControl attach _that_ handle to the SwapChainPanel, rather than returning the swapchain via a `IDXGISwapChain1`.
I didn't write this code originally, @miniksa helped me out. The original commit was so succinct that I didn't think there was anything else to add or take away.
I'm going to need this for tear-out (#1256), so that I can have the content process create swap chain handles, then duplicate those handles out to the window process that will end up embedding the content.
## References
* [`DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dcomp/nf-dcomp-dcompositioncreatesurfacehandle)
* [`CreateSwapChainForCompositionSurfaceHandle`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dxgi1_3/nf-dxgi1_3-idxgifactorymedia-createswapchainforcompositionsurfacehandle)
* [`CreateSwapChainForComposition`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dxgi1_2/nf-dxgi1_2-idxgifactory2-createswapchainforcomposition)
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This reverts commit c113b65d9b15028281f6383909a73dba6af55bfc.
That commit reverted 30b833547928d6dcbf88d49df0dbd5b3f6a7c879
## Validation Steps Performed
* [x] Built and ran the Terminal, it still seems to work
* [x] Does a TDR still work? or do we need to recreate the handle, or something.
* [x] Does this work on Win7? I honestly have no idea how DX compatibility works. Presumably, the WPF version uses the `ForHwnd` path, so this will still work, but I don't know if this will suddenly fail to launch on Win7 or something. Tagging in @miniksa.
2021-05-12 18:54:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _AttachDxgiSwapChainToXaml(HANDLE swapChainHandle);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _RendererEnteredErrorState(IInspectable sender, IInspectable args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-14 22:11:47 +02:00
|
|
|
void _RenderRetryButton_Click(IInspectable const& button, IInspectable const& args);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _RendererWarning(IInspectable sender,
|
|
|
|
|
Control::RendererWarningArgs args);
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void CreateSearchBoxControl();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `findNext`, `findPrev` actions (#8917)
This PR is a resurrection of #8522. @Hegunumo has apparently deleted
their account, but the contribution was still valuable. I'm just here to
get it across the finish line.
This PR adds new action for navigating to the next & previous search
results. These actions are unbound by default. These actions can be used
from directly within the search dialog also, to immediately navigate the
results.
Furthermore, if you have a search started, and close the search box,
then press this keybinding, _it will still perform the search_. So you
can just hit <kbd>F3</kbd> repeatedly with the dialog closed to keep
searching new results. Neat!
If you dispatch the action on the key down, then dismiss a selection on
a key up, we'll end up immediately destroying the selection when you
release the bound key. That's annoying. It also bothers @carlos-zamora
in #3758. However, I _think_ we can just only dismiss the selection on a
key up. I _think_ that's fine. It _seems_ fine so far. We've got an
entire release cycle to futz with it.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've played with it all day and it seems _crisp_.
Closes #7695
Co-authored-by: Kiminori Kaburagi <yukawa_hidenori@icloud.com>
2021-02-18 20:21:35 +01:00
|
|
|
void SearchMatch(const bool goForward);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-15 01:44:39 +02:00
|
|
|
bool OnDirectKeyEvent(const uint32_t vkey, const uint8_t scanCode, const bool down);
|
2020-03-05 21:35:46 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-08 01:21:09 +02:00
|
|
|
bool OnMouseWheel(const Windows::Foundation::Point location, const int32_t delta, const bool leftButtonDown, const bool midButtonDown, const bool rightButtonDown);
|
Manually pass mouse wheel messages to TermControls (#5131)
## Summary of the Pull Request
As we've learned in #979, not all touchpads are created equal. Some of them have bad drivers that makes scrolling inactive windows not work. For whatever reason, these devices think the Terminal is all one giant inactive window, so we don't get the mouse wheel events through the XAML stack. We do however get the event as a `WM_MOUSEWHEEL` on those devices (a message we don't get on devices with normally functioning trackpads).
This PR attempts to take that `WM_MOUSEWHEEL` and manually dispatch it to the `TermControl`, so we can at least scroll the terminal content.
Unfortunately, this solution is not very general purpose. This only works to scroll controls that manually implement our own `IMouseWheelListener` interface. As we add more controls, we'll need to continue manually implementing this interface, until the underlying XAML Islands bug is fixed. **I don't love this**. I'd rather have a better solution, but it seems that we can't synthesize a more general-purpose `PointerWheeled` event that could get routed through the XAML tree as normal.
## References
* #2606 and microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#2101 - these bugs are also tracking a similar "inactive windows" / "scaled mouse events" issue in XAML
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #979
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I've also added a `til::point` conversion _to_ `winrt::Windows::Foundation::Point`, and some scaling operators for `point`
## Validation Steps Performed
* It works on my HP Spectre 2017 with a synaptics trackpad
- I also made sure to test that `tmux` works in panes on this laptop
* It works on my slaptop, and DOESN'T follow this hack codepath on this machine.
2020-04-01 18:58:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
~TermControl();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accessibility: TermControl Automation Peer (#2083)
Builds on the work of #1691 and #1915
Let's start with the easy change:
- `TermControl`'s `controlRoot` was removed. `TermControl` is a `UserControl`
now.
Ok. Now we've got a story to tell here....
### TermControlAP - the Automation Peer
Here's an in-depth guide on custom automation peers:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/accessibility/custom-automation-peers
We have a custom XAML element (TermControl). So XAML can't really hold our
hands and determine an accessible behavior for us. So this automation peer is
responsible for enabling that interaction.
We made it a FrameworkElementAutomationPeer to get as much accessibility as
possible from it just being a XAML element (i.e.: where are we on the screen?
what are my dimensions?). This is recommended. Any functions with "Core" at the
end, are overwritten here to tweak this automation peer into what we really
need.
But what kind of interactions can a user expect from this XAML element?
Introducing ControlPatterns! There's a ton of interfaces that just define "what
can I do". Thankfully, we already know that we're supposed to be
`ScreenInfoUiaProvider` and that was an `ITextProvider`, so let's just make the
TermControlAP an `ITextProvider` too.
So now we have a way to define what accessible actions can be performed on us,
but what should those actions do? Well let's just use the automation providers
from ConHost that are now in a shared space! (Note: this is a great place to
stop and get some coffee. We're about to hop into the .cpp file in the next
section)
### Wrapping our shared Automation Providers
Unfortunately, we can't just use the automation providers from ConHost. Or, at
least not just hook them up as easily as we wish. ConHost's UIA Providers were
written using UIAutomationCore and ITextRangeProiuder. XAML's interfaces
ITextProvider and ITextRangeProvider are lined up to be exactly the same.
So we need to wrap our ConHost UIA Providers (UIAutomationCore) with the XAML
ones. We had two providers, so that means we have two wrappers.
#### TermControlAP (XAML) <----> ScreenInfoUiaProvider (UIAutomationCore)
Each of the functions in the pragma region `ITextProvider` for
TermControlAP.cpp is just wrapping what we do in `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`, and
returning an acceptable version of it.
Most of `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`'s functions return `UiaTextRange`s. So we need
to wrap that too. That's this next section...
#### XamlUiaTextRange (XAML) <----> UiaTextRange (UIAutomationCore)
Same idea. We're wrapping everything that we could do with `UiaTextRange` and
putting it inside of `XamlUiaTextRange`.
### Additional changes to `UiaTextRange` and `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`
If you don't know what I just said, please read this background:
- #1691: how accessibility works and the general responsibility of these two
classes
- #1915: how we pulled these Accessibility Providers into a shared area
TL;DR: `ScreenInfoUiaProvider` lets you interact with the displayed text.
`UiaTextRange` is specific ranges of text in the display and navigate the text.
Thankfully, we didn't do many changes here. I feel like some of it is hacked
together but now that we have a somewhat working system, making changes
shouldn't be too hard...I hope.
#### UiaTextRange
We don't have access to the window handle. We really only need it to draw the
bounding rects using WinUser's `ScreenToClient()` and `ClientToScreen()`. I
need to figure out how to get around this.
In the meantime, I made the window handle optional. And if we don't have
one....well, we need to figure that out. But other than that, we have a
`UiaTextRange`.
#### ScreenInfoUiaProvider
At some point, we need to hook up this automation provider to the
WindowUiaProvider. This should help with navigation of the UIA Tree and make
everything just look waaaay better. For now, let's just do the same approach
and make the pUiaParent optional.
This one's the one I'm not that proud of, but it works. We need the parent to
get a bounding rect of the terminal. While we figure out how to attach the
WindowUiaProvider, we should at the very least be able to get a bunch of info
from our xaml automation peer. So, I've added a _getBoundingRect optional
function. This is what's called when we don't have a WindowUiaProvider as our
parent.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been using inspect.exe to see the UIA tree.
I was able to interact with the terminal mostly fine. A few known issues below.
Unfortunately, I tried running Narrator on this and it didn't seem to like it
(by that I mean WT crashed). Then again, I don't really know how to use
narrator other than "click on object" --> "listen voice". I feel like there's a
way to get the other interactions with narrator, but I'll be looking into more
of that soon. I bet if I fix the two issues below, Narrator will be happy.
## Miscellaneous Known Issues
- `GetSelection()` and `GetVisibleRanges()` crashes. I need to debug through
these. I want to include them in this PR.
Fixes #1353.
2019-07-31 01:43:10 +02:00
|
|
|
Windows::UI::Xaml::Automation::Peers::AutomationPeer OnCreateAutomationPeer();
|
2020-02-27 01:35:16 +01:00
|
|
|
const Windows::UI::Xaml::Thickness GetPadding();
|
Accessibility: TermControl Automation Peer (#2083)
Builds on the work of #1691 and #1915
Let's start with the easy change:
- `TermControl`'s `controlRoot` was removed. `TermControl` is a `UserControl`
now.
Ok. Now we've got a story to tell here....
### TermControlAP - the Automation Peer
Here's an in-depth guide on custom automation peers:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/accessibility/custom-automation-peers
We have a custom XAML element (TermControl). So XAML can't really hold our
hands and determine an accessible behavior for us. So this automation peer is
responsible for enabling that interaction.
We made it a FrameworkElementAutomationPeer to get as much accessibility as
possible from it just being a XAML element (i.e.: where are we on the screen?
what are my dimensions?). This is recommended. Any functions with "Core" at the
end, are overwritten here to tweak this automation peer into what we really
need.
But what kind of interactions can a user expect from this XAML element?
Introducing ControlPatterns! There's a ton of interfaces that just define "what
can I do". Thankfully, we already know that we're supposed to be
`ScreenInfoUiaProvider` and that was an `ITextProvider`, so let's just make the
TermControlAP an `ITextProvider` too.
So now we have a way to define what accessible actions can be performed on us,
but what should those actions do? Well let's just use the automation providers
from ConHost that are now in a shared space! (Note: this is a great place to
stop and get some coffee. We're about to hop into the .cpp file in the next
section)
### Wrapping our shared Automation Providers
Unfortunately, we can't just use the automation providers from ConHost. Or, at
least not just hook them up as easily as we wish. ConHost's UIA Providers were
written using UIAutomationCore and ITextRangeProiuder. XAML's interfaces
ITextProvider and ITextRangeProvider are lined up to be exactly the same.
So we need to wrap our ConHost UIA Providers (UIAutomationCore) with the XAML
ones. We had two providers, so that means we have two wrappers.
#### TermControlAP (XAML) <----> ScreenInfoUiaProvider (UIAutomationCore)
Each of the functions in the pragma region `ITextProvider` for
TermControlAP.cpp is just wrapping what we do in `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`, and
returning an acceptable version of it.
Most of `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`'s functions return `UiaTextRange`s. So we need
to wrap that too. That's this next section...
#### XamlUiaTextRange (XAML) <----> UiaTextRange (UIAutomationCore)
Same idea. We're wrapping everything that we could do with `UiaTextRange` and
putting it inside of `XamlUiaTextRange`.
### Additional changes to `UiaTextRange` and `ScreenInfoUiaProvider`
If you don't know what I just said, please read this background:
- #1691: how accessibility works and the general responsibility of these two
classes
- #1915: how we pulled these Accessibility Providers into a shared area
TL;DR: `ScreenInfoUiaProvider` lets you interact with the displayed text.
`UiaTextRange` is specific ranges of text in the display and navigate the text.
Thankfully, we didn't do many changes here. I feel like some of it is hacked
together but now that we have a somewhat working system, making changes
shouldn't be too hard...I hope.
#### UiaTextRange
We don't have access to the window handle. We really only need it to draw the
bounding rects using WinUser's `ScreenToClient()` and `ClientToScreen()`. I
need to figure out how to get around this.
In the meantime, I made the window handle optional. And if we don't have
one....well, we need to figure that out. But other than that, we have a
`UiaTextRange`.
#### ScreenInfoUiaProvider
At some point, we need to hook up this automation provider to the
WindowUiaProvider. This should help with navigation of the UIA Tree and make
everything just look waaaay better. For now, let's just do the same approach
and make the pUiaParent optional.
This one's the one I'm not that proud of, but it works. We need the parent to
get a bounding rect of the terminal. While we figure out how to attach the
WindowUiaProvider, we should at the very least be able to get a bunch of info
from our xaml automation peer. So, I've added a _getBoundingRect optional
function. This is what's called when we don't have a WindowUiaProvider as our
parent.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been using inspect.exe to see the UIA tree.
I was able to interact with the terminal mostly fine. A few known issues below.
Unfortunately, I tried running Narrator on this and it didn't seem to like it
(by that I mean WT crashed). Then again, I don't really know how to use
narrator other than "click on object" --> "listen voice". I feel like there's a
way to get the other interactions with narrator, but I'll be looking into more
of that soon. I bet if I fix the two issues below, Narrator will be happy.
## Miscellaneous Known Issues
- `GetSelection()` and `GetVisibleRanges()` crashes. I need to debug through
these. I want to include them in this PR.
Fixes #1353.
2019-07-31 01:43:10 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-10 18:21:56 +02:00
|
|
|
IControlSettings Settings() const;
|
2021-05-17 04:26:47 +02:00
|
|
|
void Settings(IControlSettings newSettings);
|
2019-11-25 23:22:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-07 16:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
static Windows::Foundation::Size GetProposedDimensions(IControlSettings const& settings, const uint32_t dpi);
|
Add support for running a `wt` commandline in the curent window WITH A KEYBINDING (#6537)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a execute commandline action (`wt`), which lets a user bind a key to a specific `wt` commandline. This commandline will get parsed and run _in the current window_.
## References
* Related to #4472
* Related to #5400 - I need this for the commandline mode of the Command Palette
* Related to #5970
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes oh, there's not actually an issue for this.
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - yes it does
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
One important part of this change concerns how panes are initialized at runtime. We've had some persistent trouble with initializing multiple panes, because they rely on knowing how big they'll actually be, to be able to determine if they can split again.
We previously worked around this by ignoring the size check when we were in "startup", processing an initial commandline. This PR however requires us to be able to know the initial size of a pane at runtime, but before the parents have necessarily been added to the tree, or had their renderer's set up.
This led to the development of `Pane::PreCalculateCanSplit`, which is very highly similar to `Pane::PreCalculateAutoSplit`. This method attempts to figure out how big a pane _will_ take, before the parent has necessarily laid out.
This also involves a small change to `TermControl`, because if its renderer hasn't been set up yet, it'll always think the font is `{0, fontHeight}`, which will let the Terminal keep splitting in the x direction. This change also makes the TermControl set up a renderer to get the real font size when it hasn't yet been initialized.
## Validation Steps Performed
This was what the json blob I was using for testing evolved into
```json
{
"command": {
"action":"wt",
"commandline": "new-tab cmd.exe /k #work 15 ; split-pane cmd.exe /k #work 15 ; split-pane cmd.exe /k media-commandline ; new-tab powershell dev\\symbols.ps1 ; new-tab -p \"Ubuntu\" ; new-tab -p \"haunter.gif\" ; focus-tab -t 0",
},
"keys": ["ctrl+shift+n"]
}
```
I also added some tests.
# TODO
* [x] Creating a `{ "command": "wt" }` action without a commandline will spawn a new `wt.exe` process?
- Probably should just do nothing for the empty string
2020-07-17 23:05:29 +02:00
|
|
|
static Windows::Foundation::Size GetProposedDimensions(const winrt::Windows::Foundation::Size& initialSizeInChars,
|
|
|
|
|
const int32_t& fontSize,
|
|
|
|
|
const winrt::Windows::UI::Text::FontWeight& fontWeight,
|
|
|
|
|
const winrt::hstring& fontFace,
|
2020-08-07 16:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
const ScrollbarState& scrollState,
|
Add support for running a `wt` commandline in the curent window WITH A KEYBINDING (#6537)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a execute commandline action (`wt`), which lets a user bind a key to a specific `wt` commandline. This commandline will get parsed and run _in the current window_.
## References
* Related to #4472
* Related to #5400 - I need this for the commandline mode of the Command Palette
* Related to #5970
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes oh, there's not actually an issue for this.
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - yes it does
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
One important part of this change concerns how panes are initialized at runtime. We've had some persistent trouble with initializing multiple panes, because they rely on knowing how big they'll actually be, to be able to determine if they can split again.
We previously worked around this by ignoring the size check when we were in "startup", processing an initial commandline. This PR however requires us to be able to know the initial size of a pane at runtime, but before the parents have necessarily been added to the tree, or had their renderer's set up.
This led to the development of `Pane::PreCalculateCanSplit`, which is very highly similar to `Pane::PreCalculateAutoSplit`. This method attempts to figure out how big a pane _will_ take, before the parent has necessarily laid out.
This also involves a small change to `TermControl`, because if its renderer hasn't been set up yet, it'll always think the font is `{0, fontHeight}`, which will let the Terminal keep splitting in the x direction. This change also makes the TermControl set up a renderer to get the real font size when it hasn't yet been initialized.
## Validation Steps Performed
This was what the json blob I was using for testing evolved into
```json
{
"command": {
"action":"wt",
"commandline": "new-tab cmd.exe /k #work 15 ; split-pane cmd.exe /k #work 15 ; split-pane cmd.exe /k media-commandline ; new-tab powershell dev\\symbols.ps1 ; new-tab -p \"Ubuntu\" ; new-tab -p \"haunter.gif\" ; focus-tab -t 0",
},
"keys": ["ctrl+shift+n"]
}
```
I also added some tests.
# TODO
* [x] Creating a `{ "command": "wt" }` action without a commandline will spawn a new `wt.exe` process?
- Probably should just do nothing for the empty string
2020-07-17 23:05:29 +02:00
|
|
|
const winrt::hstring& padding,
|
|
|
|
|
const uint32_t dpi);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-25 00:51:03 +02:00
|
|
|
void BellLightOn();
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-08 19:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
bool ReadOnly() const noexcept;
|
|
|
|
|
void ToggleReadOnly();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
static Control::MouseButtonState GetPressedMouseButtons(const winrt::Windows::UI::Input::PointerPoint point);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
static unsigned int GetPointerUpdateKind(const winrt::Windows::UI::Input::PointerPoint point);
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
static Windows::UI::Xaml::Thickness ParseThicknessFromPadding(const hstring padding);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-31 21:36:43 +02:00
|
|
|
hstring ReadEntireBuffer() const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
// -------------------------------- WinRT Events ---------------------------------
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
// clang-format off
|
|
|
|
|
WINRT_CALLBACK(FontSizeChanged, Control::FontSizeChangedEventArgs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(CopyToClipboard, IInspectable, Control::CopyToClipboardEventArgs, _core, CopyToClipboard);
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(TitleChanged, IInspectable, Control::TitleChangedEventArgs, _core, TitleChanged);
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(TabColorChanged, IInspectable, IInspectable, _core, TabColorChanged);
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(SetTaskbarProgress, IInspectable, IInspectable, _core, TaskbarProgressChanged);
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(ConnectionStateChanged, IInspectable, IInspectable, _core, ConnectionStateChanged);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTED_FORWARDED_TYPED_EVENT(PasteFromClipboard, IInspectable, Control::PasteFromClipboardEventArgs, _interactivity, PasteFromClipboard);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(OpenHyperlink, IInspectable, Control::OpenHyperlinkEventArgs);
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(RaiseNotice, IInspectable, Control::NoticeEventArgs);
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(HidePointerCursor, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(RestorePointerCursor, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(ReadOnlyChanged, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
2021-02-18 18:15:44 +01:00
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(FocusFollowMouseRequested, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(Initialized, Control::TermControl, Windows::UI::Xaml::RoutedEventArgs);
|
|
|
|
|
TYPED_EVENT(WarningBell, IInspectable, IInspectable);
|
2019-06-11 22:27:09 +02:00
|
|
|
// clang-format on
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-09 00:46:16 +02:00
|
|
|
WINRT_PROPERTY(IControlAppearance, UnfocusedAppearance);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
private:
|
2020-02-27 01:35:16 +01:00
|
|
|
friend struct TermControlT<TermControl>; // friend our parent so it can bind private event handlers
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-12 01:03:08 +02:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: _uiaEngine must be ordered before _core.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// ControlCore::AttachUiaEngine receives a IRenderEngine as a raw pointer, which we own.
|
|
|
|
|
// We must ensure that we first destroy the ControlCore before the UiaEngine instance
|
|
|
|
|
// in order to safely resolve this unsafe pointer dependency. Otherwise a deallocated
|
|
|
|
|
// IRenderEngine is accessed when ControlCore calls Renderer::TriggerTeardown.
|
|
|
|
|
// (C++ class members are destroyed in reverse order.)
|
2021-05-19 00:36:40 +02:00
|
|
|
// Further, the TermControlAutomationPeer must be destructed after _uiaEngine!
|
Only access ControlInteractivity through the projection (#10051)
## Summary of the Pull Request
This forces the `TermControl` to only use `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` via their WinRT projections. We want this, because WinRT projections can be used across process boundaries. In the future, `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` are going to be living in a different process entirely from `TermControl`. By enforcing this boundary now, we can make sure that they will work seamlessly in the future.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760270
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most all this was just converting pure c++ types to winrt types when possible. I've added a couple helper projections with `til` converters, which made most of this really easy.
The "`MouseButtonState` needs to be composed of `Int32`s instead of `bool`s" is MENTAL. I have no idea why this is, but when I had the control OOP in the sample, that would crash when trying to de-marshal the bools. BODGY.
The biggest changes are in the way the UIA stuff is hooked up. The UiaEngine needs to be attached directly to the `Renderer`, and it can't be easily projected, so it needs to live next to the `ControlCore`. But the `TermControlAutomationPeer` needed the `UiaEngine` to help implement some interfaces.
Now, there's a new layer we've introduced. `InteractivityAutomationPeer` does the `ITextProvider`, `IControlAccessibilityInfo` and the `IUiaEventDispatcher` thing. `TermControlAutomationPeer` now has a
`InteractivityAutomationPeer` stashed inside itself, so that it can ask the interactivity layer to do the real work. We still need the `TermControlAutomationPeer` though, to be able to attach to the real UI tree.
## Validation Steps Performed
The terminal behaves basically the same as before.
Most importantly, I whipped out Accessibility Insights, and the Terminal looks the same as before.
2021-07-19 18:59:30 +02:00
|
|
|
Control::TermControlAutomationPeer _automationPeer{ nullptr };
|
|
|
|
|
Control::ControlInteractivity _interactivity{ nullptr };
|
|
|
|
|
Control::ControlCore _core{ nullptr };
|
2021-05-12 01:03:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::com_ptr<SearchBoxControl> _searchBox;
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-07 16:46:52 +02:00
|
|
|
IControlSettings _settings;
|
2021-07-06 23:59:44 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _closing{ false };
|
|
|
|
|
bool _focused{ false };
|
|
|
|
|
bool _initializedTerminal{ false };
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-20 19:31:47 +02:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<ThrottledFuncLeading> _playWarningBell;
|
2021-04-14 19:11:19 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-12 21:51:37 +02:00
|
|
|
struct ScrollBarUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<double> newValue;
|
|
|
|
|
double newMaximum;
|
|
|
|
|
double newMinimum;
|
|
|
|
|
double newViewportSize;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
Allow `ThrottledFunc` to work on different types of dispatcher (#10187)
#### ⚠️ targets #10051
## Summary of the Pull Request
This updates our `ThrottledFunc`s to take a dispatcher parameter. This means that we can use the `Windows::UI::Core::CoreDispatcher` in the `TermControl`, where there's always a `CoreDispatcher`, and use a `Windows::System::DispatcherQueue` in `ControlCore`/`ControlInteractivity`. When running in-proc, these are always the _same thing_. However, out-of-proc, the core needs a dispatcher queue that's not tied to a UI thread (because the content proces _doesn't have a UI thread!_).
This lets us get rid of the output event, because we don't need to bubble that event out to the `TermControl` to let it throttle that update anymore.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] This is a part of #1256
* [x] I work here
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Fortunately, `winrt::resume_foreground` works the same on both a `CoreDispatcher` and a `DispatcherQueue`, so this wasn't too hard!
## Validation Steps Performed
This was validated in `dev/migrie/oop/the-whole-thing` (or `dev/migrie/oop/connection-factory`, I forget which), and I made sure that it worked both in-proc and x-proc. Not only that, _it wasn't any slower_!This reverts commit 04b751faa70680bf0296063deacec4657c6ff9d6.
2021-08-09 17:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-20 19:31:47 +02:00
|
|
|
std::shared_ptr<ThrottledFuncTrailing<ScrollBarUpdate>> _updateScrollBar;
|
Allow `ThrottledFunc` to work on different types of dispatcher (#10187)
#### ⚠️ targets #10051
## Summary of the Pull Request
This updates our `ThrottledFunc`s to take a dispatcher parameter. This means that we can use the `Windows::UI::Core::CoreDispatcher` in the `TermControl`, where there's always a `CoreDispatcher`, and use a `Windows::System::DispatcherQueue` in `ControlCore`/`ControlInteractivity`. When running in-proc, these are always the _same thing_. However, out-of-proc, the core needs a dispatcher queue that's not tied to a UI thread (because the content proces _doesn't have a UI thread!_).
This lets us get rid of the output event, because we don't need to bubble that event out to the `TermControl` to let it throttle that update anymore.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] This is a part of #1256
* [x] I work here
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Fortunately, `winrt::resume_foreground` works the same on both a `CoreDispatcher` and a `DispatcherQueue`, so this wasn't too hard!
## Validation Steps Performed
This was validated in `dev/migrie/oop/the-whole-thing` (or `dev/migrie/oop/connection-factory`, I forget which), and I made sure that it worked both in-proc and x-proc. Not only that, _it wasn't any slower_!This reverts commit 04b751faa70680bf0296063deacec4657c6ff9d6.
2021-08-09 17:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-12 21:51:37 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _isInternalScrollBarUpdate;
|
2020-01-06 18:39:02 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2021-07-29 00:27:09 +02:00
|
|
|
// Auto scroll occurs when user, while selecting, drags cursor outside
|
|
|
|
|
// viewport. View is then scrolled to 'follow' the cursor.
|
2019-07-24 18:37:17 +02:00
|
|
|
double _autoScrollVelocity;
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<Windows::UI::Input::PointerPoint> _autoScrollingPointerPoint;
|
|
|
|
|
Windows::UI::Xaml::DispatcherTimer _autoScrollTimer;
|
|
|
|
|
std::optional<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point> _lastAutoScrollUpdateTime;
|
2021-07-29 00:27:09 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _pointerPressedInBounds{ false };
|
2019-07-24 18:37:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-02 20:49:33 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::Windows::UI::Composition::ScalarKeyFrameAnimation _bellLightAnimation{ nullptr };
|
|
|
|
|
Windows::UI::Xaml::DispatcherTimer _bellLightTimer{ nullptr };
|
2021-05-25 00:51:03 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 03:25:54 +02:00
|
|
|
std::optional<Windows::UI::Xaml::DispatcherTimer> _cursorTimer;
|
Add support for the "blink" graphic rendition attribute (#7490)
This PR adds support for the _blink_ graphic rendition attribute. When a
character is output with this attribute set, it "blinks" at a regular
interval, by cycling its color between the normal rendition and a dimmer
shade of that color.
The majority of the blinking mechanism is encapsulated in a new
`BlinkingState` class, which is shared between the Terminal and Conhost
implementations. This class keeps track of the position in the blinking
cycle, which determines whether characters are rendered as normal or
faint.
In Windows Terminal, the state is stored in the `Terminal` class, and in
Conhost it's stored in the `CONSOLE_INFORMATION` class. In both cases,
the `IsBlinkingFaint` method is used to determine the current blinking
rendition, and that is passed on as a parameter to the
`TextAttribute::CalculateRgbColors` method when these classes are
looking up attribute colors.
Prior to calculating the colors, the current attribute is also passed to
the `RecordBlinkingUsage` method, which keeps track of whether there are
actually any blink attributes in use. This is used to determine whether
the screen needs to be refreshed when the blinking cycle toggles between
the normal and faint renditions.
The refresh itself is handled by the `ToggleBlinkingRendition` method,
which is triggered by a timer. In Conhost this is just piggybacking on
the existing cursor blink timer, but in Windows Terminal it needs to
have its own separate timer, since the cursor timer is reset whenever a
key is pressed, which is not something we want for attribute blinking.
Although the `ToggleBlinkingRendition` is called at the same rate as the
cursor blinking, we actually only want the cells to blink at half that
frequency. We thus have a counter that cycles through four phases, and
blinking is rendered as faint for two of those four. Then every two
cycles - when the state changes - a redraw is triggered, but only if
there are actually blinking attributes in use (as previously recorded).
As mentioned earlier, the blinking frequency is based on the cursor
blink rate, so that means it'll automatically be disabled if a user has
set their cursor blink rate to none. It can also be disabled by turning
off the _Show animations in Windows_ option. In Conhost these settings
take effect immediately, but in Windows Terminal they only apply when a
new tab is opened.
This PR also adds partial support for the `SGR 6` _rapid blink_
attribute. This is not used by DEC terminals, but was defined in the
ECMA/ANSI standards. It's not widely supported, but many terminals just
it implement it as an alias for the regular `SGR 5` blink attribute, so
that's what I've done here too.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've checked the _Graphic rendition test pattern_ in Vttest, and
compared our representation of the blink attribute to that of an actual
DEC VT220 terminal as seen on [YouTube]. With the right color scheme
it's a reasonably close match.
[YouTube]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Pz5AmxbE4&t=1m55s
Closes #7388
2020-09-22 01:21:33 +02:00
|
|
|
std::optional<Windows::UI::Xaml::DispatcherTimer> _blinkTimer;
|
2019-05-14 03:25:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 07:41:43 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::SwapChainPanel::LayoutUpdated_revoker _layoutUpdatedRevoker;
|
2019-06-11 21:37:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2021-07-06 23:59:44 +02:00
|
|
|
inline bool _IsClosing() const noexcept
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-08-16 15:32:05 +02:00
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
2021-07-06 23:59:44 +02:00
|
|
|
// _closing isn't atomic and may only be accessed from the main thread.
|
2021-08-16 15:32:05 +02:00
|
|
|
if (const auto dispatcher = Dispatcher())
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert(dispatcher.HasThreadAccess());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2021-07-06 23:59:44 +02:00
|
|
|
return _closing;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
void _UpdateSettingsFromUIThread(IControlSettings newSettings);
|
|
|
|
|
void _UpdateAppearanceFromUIThread(IControlAppearance newAppearance);
|
2021-02-22 22:01:51 +01:00
|
|
|
void _ApplyUISettings(const IControlSettings&);
|
2021-10-25 13:17:18 +02:00
|
|
|
void _SetBackgroundImage(const IControlAppearance& newAppearance);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-29 20:35:46 +02:00
|
|
|
void _InitializeBackgroundBrush();
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
void _BackgroundColorChangedHandler(const IInspectable& sender, const IInspectable& args);
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _changeBackgroundColor(const til::color bg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 07:41:43 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _InitializeTerminal();
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
void _SetFontSize(int fontSize);
|
2020-02-27 01:35:16 +01:00
|
|
|
void _TappedHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::TappedRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2020-01-08 22:19:23 +01:00
|
|
|
void _KeyDownHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::KeyRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2020-06-09 00:31:28 +02:00
|
|
|
void _KeyUpHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::KeyRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void _CharacterHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::CharacterReceivedRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2019-06-18 02:27:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _PointerPressedHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
void _PointerMovedHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void _PointerReleasedHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2021-02-17 22:33:53 +01:00
|
|
|
void _PointerExitedHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void _MouseWheelHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
void _ScrollbarChangeHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::Primitives::RangeBaseValueChangedEventArgs const& e);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-14 03:25:54 +02:00
|
|
|
void _GotFocusHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::RoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
void _LostFocusHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::RoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _DragDropHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::DragEventArgs e);
|
2020-01-30 21:13:57 +01:00
|
|
|
void _DragOverHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::DragEventArgs const& e);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _HyperlinkHandler(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable sender, Control::OpenHyperlinkEventArgs e);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-27 00:25:11 +01:00
|
|
|
void _CursorTimerTick(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& e);
|
Add support for the "blink" graphic rendition attribute (#7490)
This PR adds support for the _blink_ graphic rendition attribute. When a
character is output with this attribute set, it "blinks" at a regular
interval, by cycling its color between the normal rendition and a dimmer
shade of that color.
The majority of the blinking mechanism is encapsulated in a new
`BlinkingState` class, which is shared between the Terminal and Conhost
implementations. This class keeps track of the position in the blinking
cycle, which determines whether characters are rendered as normal or
faint.
In Windows Terminal, the state is stored in the `Terminal` class, and in
Conhost it's stored in the `CONSOLE_INFORMATION` class. In both cases,
the `IsBlinkingFaint` method is used to determine the current blinking
rendition, and that is passed on as a parameter to the
`TextAttribute::CalculateRgbColors` method when these classes are
looking up attribute colors.
Prior to calculating the colors, the current attribute is also passed to
the `RecordBlinkingUsage` method, which keeps track of whether there are
actually any blink attributes in use. This is used to determine whether
the screen needs to be refreshed when the blinking cycle toggles between
the normal and faint renditions.
The refresh itself is handled by the `ToggleBlinkingRendition` method,
which is triggered by a timer. In Conhost this is just piggybacking on
the existing cursor blink timer, but in Windows Terminal it needs to
have its own separate timer, since the cursor timer is reset whenever a
key is pressed, which is not something we want for attribute blinking.
Although the `ToggleBlinkingRendition` is called at the same rate as the
cursor blinking, we actually only want the cells to blink at half that
frequency. We thus have a counter that cycles through four phases, and
blinking is rendered as faint for two of those four. Then every two
cycles - when the state changes - a redraw is triggered, but only if
there are actually blinking attributes in use (as previously recorded).
As mentioned earlier, the blinking frequency is based on the cursor
blink rate, so that means it'll automatically be disabled if a user has
set their cursor blink rate to none. It can also be disabled by turning
off the _Show animations in Windows_ option. In Conhost these settings
take effect immediately, but in Windows Terminal they only apply when a
new tab is opened.
This PR also adds partial support for the `SGR 6` _rapid blink_
attribute. This is not used by DEC terminals, but was defined in the
ECMA/ANSI standards. It's not widely supported, but many terminals just
it implement it as an alias for the regular `SGR 5` blink attribute, so
that's what I've done here too.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've checked the _Graphic rendition test pattern_ in Vttest, and
compared our representation of the blink attribute to that of an actual
DEC VT220 terminal as seen on [YouTube]. With the right color scheme
it's a reasonably close match.
[YouTube]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03Pz5AmxbE4&t=1m55s
Closes #7388
2020-09-22 01:21:33 +02:00
|
|
|
void _BlinkTimerTick(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& e);
|
2021-05-25 00:51:03 +02:00
|
|
|
void _BellLightOff(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& e);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-24 18:37:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _SetEndSelectionPointAtCursor(Windows::Foundation::Point const& cursorPosition);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
void _SwapChainSizeChanged(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::SizeChangedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
void _SwapChainScaleChanged(Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::SwapChainPanel const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& args);
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-08 01:07:42 +02:00
|
|
|
void _TerminalTabColorChanged(const std::optional<til::color> color);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
void _ScrollPositionChanged(const IInspectable& sender, const Control::ScrollPositionChangedArgs& args);
|
Allow `ThrottledFunc` to work on different types of dispatcher (#10187)
#### ⚠️ targets #10051
## Summary of the Pull Request
This updates our `ThrottledFunc`s to take a dispatcher parameter. This means that we can use the `Windows::UI::Core::CoreDispatcher` in the `TermControl`, where there's always a `CoreDispatcher`, and use a `Windows::System::DispatcherQueue` in `ControlCore`/`ControlInteractivity`. When running in-proc, these are always the _same thing_. However, out-of-proc, the core needs a dispatcher queue that's not tied to a UI thread (because the content proces _doesn't have a UI thread!_).
This lets us get rid of the output event, because we don't need to bubble that event out to the `TermControl` to let it throttle that update anymore.
## References
* Tear-out: #1256
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] This is a part of #1256
* [x] I work here
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Fortunately, `winrt::resume_foreground` works the same on both a `CoreDispatcher` and a `DispatcherQueue`, so this wasn't too hard!
## Validation Steps Performed
This was validated in `dev/migrie/oop/the-whole-thing` (or `dev/migrie/oop/connection-factory`, I forget which), and I made sure that it worked both in-proc and x-proc. Not only that, _it wasn't any slower_!This reverts commit 04b751faa70680bf0296063deacec4657c6ff9d6.
2021-08-09 17:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _CursorPositionChanged(const IInspectable& sender, const IInspectable& args);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-18 02:27:17 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _CapturePointer(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
bool _ReleasePointerCapture(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::PointerRoutedEventArgs const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-24 18:37:17 +02:00
|
|
|
void _TryStartAutoScroll(Windows::UI::Input::PointerPoint const& pointerPoint, const double scrollVelocity);
|
|
|
|
|
void _TryStopAutoScroll(const uint32_t pointerId);
|
|
|
|
|
void _UpdateAutoScroll(Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& sender, Windows::Foundation::IInspectable const& e);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 00:31:28 +02:00
|
|
|
void _KeyHandler(Windows::UI::Xaml::Input::KeyRoutedEventArgs const& e, const bool keyDown);
|
2019-07-16 20:09:29 +02:00
|
|
|
::Microsoft::Terminal::Core::ControlKeyStates _GetPressedModifierKeys() const;
|
2020-10-20 01:55:56 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _TryHandleKeyBinding(const WORD vkey, const WORD scanCode, ::Microsoft::Terminal::Core::ControlKeyStates modifiers) const;
|
|
|
|
|
void _ClearKeyboardState(const WORD vkey, const WORD scanCode) const noexcept;
|
2020-06-09 00:31:28 +02:00
|
|
|
bool _TrySendKeyEvent(const WORD vkey, const WORD scanCode, ::Microsoft::Terminal::Core::ControlKeyStates modifiers, const bool keyDown);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
const til::point _toTerminalOrigin(winrt::Windows::Foundation::Point cursorPosition);
|
2019-07-24 18:37:17 +02:00
|
|
|
double _GetAutoScrollSpeed(double cursorDistanceFromBorder) const;
|
Add a Windows.UI.Text.Core IME overlay to TerminalControl (#1919)
TerminalControl doesn't use any of the built in text input and edit
controls provided by XAML for text input, which means TermianlControl
needs to communicate with the Text Services Framework (TSF) in order to
provide Input Method Editor (IME) support. Just like the rest of
Terminal we get to take advantage of newer APIs (Windows.UI.Text.Core)
namespace to provide support vs. the old TSF 1.0.
Windows.UI.Text.Core handles communication between a text edit control
and the text services primarily through a CoreTextEditContext object.
This change introduces a new UserControl TSFInputControl which is a
custom EditControl similar to the CustomEditControl sample[1].
TSFInputControl is similar (overlay with IME text) to how old console
(conimeinfo) handled IME.
# Details
TSFInputControl is a Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.UserControl
TSFInputControl contains a Canvas control for absolution positioning a
TextBlock control within its containing control (TerminalControl).
The TextBlock control is used for displaying candidate text from the
IME. When the user makes a choice in the IME the TextBlock is cleared
and the text is written to the Terminal buffer like normal text.
TSFInputControl creates an instance of the CoreTextEditContext and
attaches appropriate event handlers to CoreTextEditContext in order to
interact with the IME.
A good write-up on how to interact with CoreTextEditContext can be found
here[2].
## Text Updates
Text updates from the IME come in on the TextUpdating event handler,
text updates are stored in an internal buffer (_inputBuffer).
## Completed Text
Once a user selects a text in the IME, the CompositionCompleted handler
is invoked. The input buffer (_inputBuffer) is written to the Terminal
buffer, _inputBuffer is cleared and Canvas and TextBlock controls are
hidden until the user starts a composition session again.
## Positioning
Telling the IME where to properly position itself was the hardest part
of this change. The IME expects to know it's location in screen
coordinates as supposed to client coordinates. This is pretty easy if
you are a pure UWP, but since we are hosted inside a XAMLIsland the
client to screen coordinate translation is a little harder.
### Calculating Screen Coordinates
1. Obtaining the Window position in Screen coordinates.
2. Determining the Client coordinate of the cursor.
3. Converting the Client coordinate of the cursor to Screen coordinates.
4. Offsetting the X and Y coordinate of the cursor by the position of
the TerminalControl within the window (tabs if present, margins, etc..).
5. Applying any scale factor of the display.
Once we have the right position in screen coordinates, this is supplied
in the LayoutBounds of the CoreTextLayoutRequestedEventArgs which lets
the IME know where to position itself on the Screen.
## Font Information/Cursor/Writing to Terminal
3 events were added to the TSFInputControl to create a loosely-coupled
implementation between the TerminalControl and the TSFInputControl.
These events are used for obtaining Font information from the
TerminalControl, getting the Cursor position and writing to the terminal
buffer.
## Known Issues
- Width of TextBlock is hardcoded to 200 pixels and most likely should
adjust to the available width of the current input line on the console
(#3640)
- Entering text in the middle of an existing set of text has TextBlock
render under existing text. Current Console behavior here isn't good
experience either (writes over text)
- Text input at edges of window is clipped versus wrapping around to
next line. This isn't any worse than the original command line, but
Terminal should be better (#3657)
## Future Considerations
Ideally, we'd be able to interact with the console buffer directly and
replace characters as the user types.
## Validation
General steps to try functionality
- Open Console
- Switch to Simplified Chinese (Shortcut: Windows+Spacebar)
- Switch to Chinese mode on language bar
Scenarios validated:
- As user types unformatted candidates appear on command line and IME
renders in correct position under unformatted characters.
- User can dismiss IME and text doesn't appear on command line
- Switch back to English mode, functions like normal
- New tab has proper behavior
- Switching between tabs has proper behavior
- Switching away from Terminal Window with IME present causes IME to
disappear
[1]: https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-universal-samples/tree/master/Samples/CustomEditControl
[2]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/input/custom-text-input
Closes #459
Closes #2213
Closes #3641
2019-11-22 01:25:50 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-12-21 02:35:31 +01:00
|
|
|
void _Search(const winrt::hstring& text, const bool goForward, const bool caseSensitive);
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
void _CloseSearchBoxControl(const winrt::Windows::Foundation::IInspectable& sender, Windows::UI::Xaml::RoutedEventArgs const& args);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a Windows.UI.Text.Core IME overlay to TerminalControl (#1919)
TerminalControl doesn't use any of the built in text input and edit
controls provided by XAML for text input, which means TermianlControl
needs to communicate with the Text Services Framework (TSF) in order to
provide Input Method Editor (IME) support. Just like the rest of
Terminal we get to take advantage of newer APIs (Windows.UI.Text.Core)
namespace to provide support vs. the old TSF 1.0.
Windows.UI.Text.Core handles communication between a text edit control
and the text services primarily through a CoreTextEditContext object.
This change introduces a new UserControl TSFInputControl which is a
custom EditControl similar to the CustomEditControl sample[1].
TSFInputControl is similar (overlay with IME text) to how old console
(conimeinfo) handled IME.
# Details
TSFInputControl is a Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.UserControl
TSFInputControl contains a Canvas control for absolution positioning a
TextBlock control within its containing control (TerminalControl).
The TextBlock control is used for displaying candidate text from the
IME. When the user makes a choice in the IME the TextBlock is cleared
and the text is written to the Terminal buffer like normal text.
TSFInputControl creates an instance of the CoreTextEditContext and
attaches appropriate event handlers to CoreTextEditContext in order to
interact with the IME.
A good write-up on how to interact with CoreTextEditContext can be found
here[2].
## Text Updates
Text updates from the IME come in on the TextUpdating event handler,
text updates are stored in an internal buffer (_inputBuffer).
## Completed Text
Once a user selects a text in the IME, the CompositionCompleted handler
is invoked. The input buffer (_inputBuffer) is written to the Terminal
buffer, _inputBuffer is cleared and Canvas and TextBlock controls are
hidden until the user starts a composition session again.
## Positioning
Telling the IME where to properly position itself was the hardest part
of this change. The IME expects to know it's location in screen
coordinates as supposed to client coordinates. This is pretty easy if
you are a pure UWP, but since we are hosted inside a XAMLIsland the
client to screen coordinate translation is a little harder.
### Calculating Screen Coordinates
1. Obtaining the Window position in Screen coordinates.
2. Determining the Client coordinate of the cursor.
3. Converting the Client coordinate of the cursor to Screen coordinates.
4. Offsetting the X and Y coordinate of the cursor by the position of
the TerminalControl within the window (tabs if present, margins, etc..).
5. Applying any scale factor of the display.
Once we have the right position in screen coordinates, this is supplied
in the LayoutBounds of the CoreTextLayoutRequestedEventArgs which lets
the IME know where to position itself on the Screen.
## Font Information/Cursor/Writing to Terminal
3 events were added to the TSFInputControl to create a loosely-coupled
implementation between the TerminalControl and the TSFInputControl.
These events are used for obtaining Font information from the
TerminalControl, getting the Cursor position and writing to the terminal
buffer.
## Known Issues
- Width of TextBlock is hardcoded to 200 pixels and most likely should
adjust to the available width of the current input line on the console
(#3640)
- Entering text in the middle of an existing set of text has TextBlock
render under existing text. Current Console behavior here isn't good
experience either (writes over text)
- Text input at edges of window is clipped versus wrapping around to
next line. This isn't any worse than the original command line, but
Terminal should be better (#3657)
## Future Considerations
Ideally, we'd be able to interact with the console buffer directly and
replace characters as the user types.
## Validation
General steps to try functionality
- Open Console
- Switch to Simplified Chinese (Shortcut: Windows+Spacebar)
- Switch to Chinese mode on language bar
Scenarios validated:
- As user types unformatted candidates appear on command line and IME
renders in correct position under unformatted characters.
- User can dismiss IME and text doesn't appear on command line
- Switch back to English mode, functions like normal
- New tab has proper behavior
- Switching between tabs has proper behavior
- Switching away from Terminal Window with IME present causes IME to
disappear
[1]: https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-universal-samples/tree/master/Samples/CustomEditControl
[2]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/input/custom-text-input
Closes #459
Closes #2213
Closes #3641
2019-11-22 01:25:50 +01:00
|
|
|
// TSFInputControl Handlers
|
|
|
|
|
void _CompositionCompleted(winrt::hstring text);
|
Search - add search box control and implement search experience (#3590)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
This is the PR for feature Search: #605
This PR includes the newly introduced SearchBoxControl in TermControl dir, which is the search bar for the search experience. And the codes that enable Search in Windows Terminal.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
The PR that migrates the Conhost search module: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3279
Spec (still actively updating): https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/3299
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #605
* [ ] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
These functionalities are included in the search experience.
1. Search in Terminal text buffer.
2. Automatic wrap-around.
3. Search up or down switch by clicking different buttons.
4. Search case sensitively/insensitively by clicking a button. S. Move the search box to the top/bottom by clicking a button.
6. Close by clicking 'X'.
7. Open search by ctrl + F.
When the searchbox is open, the user could still interact with the terminal by clicking the terminal input area.
While I already have the search functionalities, currently there are still some known to-do works and I will keep updating my PR:
1. Optimize the search box UI, this includes:
1) Theme adaptation. The search box background and font color
should change according to the theme,
2) Add background. Currently the elements in search box are all
transparent. However, we need a background.
3) Move button should be highlighted once clicked.
2. Accessibility: search process should be able to performed without mouse. Once the search box is focused, the user should be able to navigate between all interactive elements on the searchbox using keyboard.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
To test:
1. checkout this branch.
2. Build the project.
3. Start Windows Terminal and press Ctrl+F
4. The search box should appear on the top right corner.
2019-12-17 16:52:37 +01:00
|
|
|
void _CurrentCursorPositionHandler(const IInspectable& sender, const CursorPositionEventArgs& eventArgs);
|
|
|
|
|
void _FontInfoHandler(const IInspectable& sender, const FontInfoEventArgs& eventArgs);
|
2021-02-08 19:03:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _hoveredHyperlinkChanged(IInspectable sender, IInspectable args);
|
2021-02-17 22:33:53 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Split `TermControl` into a Core, Interactivity, and Control layer (#9820)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes #6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
2021-04-27 17:50:45 +02:00
|
|
|
void _coreFontSizeChanged(const int fontWidth,
|
|
|
|
|
const int fontHeight,
|
|
|
|
|
const bool isInitialChange);
|
|
|
|
|
winrt::fire_and_forget _coreTransparencyChanged(IInspectable sender, Control::TransparencyChangedEventArgs args);
|
|
|
|
|
void _coreRaisedNotice(const IInspectable& s, const Control::NoticeEventArgs& args);
|
|
|
|
|
void _coreWarningBell(const IInspectable& sender, const IInspectable& args);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-17 21:47:24 +01:00
|
|
|
namespace winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Control::factory_implementation
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-03-18 23:02:39 +01:00
|
|
|
BASIC_FACTORY(TermControl);
|
2019-05-03 00:29:04 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
