terminal/src/cascadia/LocalTests_TerminalApp/TestHostApp/TestHostApp.vcxproj

174 lines
7.7 KiB
XML
Raw Normal View History

Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="15.0" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup Label="Globals">
<ProjectGuid>{A021EDFF-45C8-4DC2-BEF7-36E1B3B8CFE8}</ProjectGuid>
<ProjectName>TestHostApp</ProjectName>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<RootNamespace>TestHostApp</RootNamespace>
<DefaultLanguage>en-US</DefaultLanguage>
<MinimumVisualStudioVersion>14.0</MinimumVisualStudioVersion>
<AppContainerApplication>true</AppContainerApplication>
<WindowsStoreApp>true</WindowsStoreApp>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<ApplicationType>Windows Store</ApplicationType>
<ApplicationTypeRevision>10.0</ApplicationTypeRevision>
<OutputSubDir>Tests\Data</OutputSubDir>
<UseWmXml>true</UseWmXml>
<ConfigurationType>Application</ConfigurationType>
<OpenConsoleCppWinRTProject>true</OpenConsoleCppWinRTProject>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<!--
These two properties are very important!
Without them, msbuild will stomp MinVersion and MaxVersionTested in the
Package.appxmanifest and replace them with whatever our values for
TargetPlatformMinVersion and TargetPlatformVersion are.
-->
<AppxOSMinVersionReplaceManifestVersion>false</AppxOSMinVersionReplaceManifestVersion>
<AppxOSMaxVersionTestedReplaceManifestVersion>false</AppxOSMaxVersionTestedReplaceManifestVersion>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(SolutionDir)\common.openconsole.props" Condition="'$(OpenConsoleDir)'==''" />
<Import Project="$(OpenConsoleDir)\src\common.build.pre.props" />
<!-- This project is _heavily_ cribbed directly from the TAEF samples. In
order to avoid breaking this project, it's been left largely unmodified. The
only modifications are those near the bottom of the file:
* References to our dependent winrt projects (Connection, Settings, Control,
App)
* Manual copy steps to copy the actual test code (TerminalApp.LocalTests.dll)
and the dlls that TerminalConnection is dependent upon, but don't roll up
here for whatever reason.
-->
<!-- This is important: It somehow convinces the CI to not validate that
"taef.png" is actually in the package. taef.png will get copied to the
OutputPath when taef is run, but if this isn't set to false, then the CI
will try and make sure taef.png is in the OutputPath at build time.-->
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<PropertyGroup Label="UserMacros">
<GenerateAppxPackageOnBuild>false</GenerateAppxPackageOnBuild>
</PropertyGroup>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ClCompile>
<DisableSpecificWarnings>4453;%(DisableSpecificWarnings)</DisableSpecificWarnings>
<AdditionalIncludeDirectories>%(AdditionalIncludeDirectories)
;$(IntermediateOutputPath)
</AdditionalIncludeDirectories>
<PreprocessorDefinitions>INLINE_TEST_METHOD_MARKUP;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
</ClCompile>
<Link>
<AdditionalDependencies>$(AdditionalDependencies);windowsapp.lib</AdditionalDependencies>
<IgnoreAllDefaultLibraries>false</IgnoreAllDefaultLibraries>
</Link>
</ItemDefinitionGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<ClInclude Include="pch.h" />
<ClInclude Include="UnitTestApp.xaml.h">
<DependentUpon>UnitTestApp.xaml</DependentUpon>
</ClInclude>
</ItemGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<ApplicationDefinition Include="UnitTestApp.xaml">
<SubType>Designer</SubType>
</ApplicationDefinition>
</ItemGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<AppxManifest Include="Package.appxmanifest">
<SubType>Designer</SubType>
</AppxManifest>
</ItemGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<ClCompile Include="UnitTestApp.xaml.cpp">
<DependentUpon>UnitTestApp.xaml</DependentUpon>
</ClCompile>
<ClCompile Include="pch.cpp">
<PrecompiledHeader>Create</PrecompiledHeader>
</ClCompile>
</ItemGroup>
<!-- Reference all the WinRT projects that we want to role up into this test project. -->
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="$(OpenConsoleDir)src\cascadia\TerminalConnection\TerminalConnection.vcxproj">
<Project>{CA5CAD1A-C46D-4588-B1C0-40F31AE9100B}</Project>
</ProjectReference>
<ProjectReference Include="$(OpenConsoleDir)src\cascadia\TerminalSettingsEditor\Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.Editor.vcxproj" />
Rename `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to `.Control`; Split into dll & lib (#9472) **BE NOT AFRAID**. I know that there's 107 files in this PR, but almost all of it is just find/replacing `TerminalControl` with `Control`. This is the start of the work to move TermControl into multiple pieces, for #5000. The PR starts this work by: * Splits `TerminalControl` into separate lib and dll projects. We'll want control tests in the future, and for that, we'll need a lib. * Moves `ICoreSettings` back into the `Microsoft.Terminal.Core` namespace. We'll have other types in there soon too. * I could not tell you why this works suddenly. New VS versions? New cppwinrt version? Maybe we're just better at dealing with mdmerge bugs these days. * RENAMES `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to `Microsoft.Terminal.Control`. This touches pretty much every file in the sln. Sorry about that (not sorry). An upcoming PR will move much of the logic in TermControl into a new `ControlCore` class that we'll add in `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`. `ControlCore` will then be unittest-able in the `UnitTests_TerminalCore`, which will help prevent regressions like #9455 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments You're really gonna want to clean the sln first, then merge this into your branch, then rebuild. It's very likely that old winmds will get left behind. If you see something like ``` Error MDM2007 Cannot create type Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.KeyModifiers in read-only metadata file Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl. ``` then that's what happened to you.
2021-03-17 21:47:24 +01:00
<ProjectReference Include="$(OpenConsoleDir)src\cascadia\TerminalControl\dll\TerminalControl.vcxproj" />
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<ProjectReference Include="$(OpenConsoleDir)src\cascadia\TerminalApp\dll\TerminalApp.vcxproj">
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<Project>{ca5cad1a-44bd-4ac7-ac72-f16e576fdd12}</Project>
</ProjectReference>
Introduce TerminalSettingsModel project (#7667) Introduces a new TerminalSettingsModel (TSM) project. This project is responsible for (de)serializing and exposing Windows Terminal's settings as WinRT objects. ## References #885: TSM epic #1564: Settings UI is dependent on this for data binding and settings access #6904: TSM Spec In the process of ripping out TSM from TerminalApp, a few other changes were made to make this possible: 1. AppLogic's `ApplicationDisplayName` and `ApplicationVersion` was moved to `CascadiaSettings` - These are defined as static functions. They also no longer check if `AppLogic::Current()` is nullptr. 2. `enum LaunchMode` was moved from TerminalApp to TSM 3. `AzureConnectionType` and `TelnetConnectionType` were moved from the profile generators to their respective TerminalConnections 4. CascadiaSettings' `SettingsPath` and `DefaultSettingsPath` are exposed as `hstring` instead of `std::filesystem::path` 5. `Command::ExpandCommands()` was exposed via the IDL - This required some of the warnings to be saved to an `IVector` instead of `std::vector`, among some other small changes. 6. The localization resources had to be split into two halves. - Resource file linked in init.cpp. Verified at runtime thanks to the StaticResourceLoader. 7. Added constructors to some `ActionArgs` 8. Utils.h/cpp were moved to `cascadia/inc`. `JsonKey()` was moved to `JsonUtils`. Both TermApp and TSM need access to Utils.h/cpp. A large amount of work includes moving to the new namespace (`TerminalApp` --> `Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model`). Fixing the tests had its own complications. Testing required us to split up TSM into a DLL and LIB, similar to TermApp. Discussion on creating a non-local test variant can be found in #7743. Closes #885
2020-10-06 18:56:59 +02:00
<ProjectReference Include="$(OpenConsoleDir)src\cascadia\TerminalSettingsModel\dll\Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.Model.vcxproj">
<Project>{CA5CAD1A-082C-4476-9F33-94B339494076}</Project>
</ProjectReference>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
</ItemGroup>
<PropertyGroup>
<!-- Some helper paths to find our test code -->
<_TAEFPlatformName>$(Platform)</_TAEFPlatformName>
<_TAEFPlatformName Condition="'$(Platform)'=='Win32'">x86</_TAEFPlatformName>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<Reference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestPlatform.TestExecutor.WinRTCore">
<HintPath>$(OpenConsoleDir)\packages\Microsoft.Taef.10.58.210305002\lib\Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestPlatform.TestExecutor.WinRTCore.winmd</HintPath>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<IsWinMDFile>true</IsWinMDFile>
<!-- This path is _relative to the .winmd_ -->
<Implementation>..\build\Binaries\$(_TAEFPlatformName)\TE.AppxUnitTestClient.dll</Implementation>
</Reference>
</ItemGroup>
<Import Project="$(OpenConsoleDir)\packages\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.2.5.0-prerelease.201202003\build\native\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.targets" Condition="Exists('$(OpenConsoleDir)\packages\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.2.5.0-prerelease.201202003\build\native\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.targets')" />
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<Import Project="$(OpenConsoleDir)\src\common.build.post.props" />
<ItemGroup>
<TestDll Include="$(OpenConsoleCommonOutDir)\LocalTests_TerminalApp\TerminalApp.LocalTests.dll" />
<TestDll Include="$(OpenConsoleCommonOutDir)\LocalTests_SettingsModel\SettingsModel.LocalTests.dll" />
</ItemGroup>
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Inputs="@(TestDll)" Outputs="@(TestDll->'$(TargetDir)'\%(Filename)%(Extension)')">
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<!-- Use this to auto-find all the dll's that TerminalConnection produces. We
don't roll these up automatically, so we'll need to copy them manually
(below)
The dependencies from TerminalConnection get rolled up in the
GetPackagingOutputs step, when it produces the "appx recipe". This means
they only show up when the build produces an AppX\ folder for either running
or packaging.
It is literally impossible to produce an AppX\ folder using MSBuild without
packaging an appx, and we don't want to do that anyway, so we use these copy
rules instead.
-->
<ItemGroup>
<TerminalConnectionDlls Include="$(OpenConsoleCommonOutDir)\TerminalConnection\*.dll"/>
</ItemGroup>
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<!-- Copy the AppxManifest.xml to another file, because when TAEF is
deploying the app, it'll delete the AppxManifest.xml file from this
directory when it tries to clean up after itself. -->
<Copy SourceFiles="$(TargetDir)\AppxManifest.xml" DestinationFiles="$(TargetDir)\TestHostAppXManifest.xml" />
<!-- Copy all test code -->
<Copy SourceFiles="@(TestDll)"
DestinationFolder="$(TargetDir)"
UseHardLinksIfPossible="true"
SkipUnchangedFiles="true" />
Introduce TerminalSettingsModel project (#7667) Introduces a new TerminalSettingsModel (TSM) project. This project is responsible for (de)serializing and exposing Windows Terminal's settings as WinRT objects. ## References #885: TSM epic #1564: Settings UI is dependent on this for data binding and settings access #6904: TSM Spec In the process of ripping out TSM from TerminalApp, a few other changes were made to make this possible: 1. AppLogic's `ApplicationDisplayName` and `ApplicationVersion` was moved to `CascadiaSettings` - These are defined as static functions. They also no longer check if `AppLogic::Current()` is nullptr. 2. `enum LaunchMode` was moved from TerminalApp to TSM 3. `AzureConnectionType` and `TelnetConnectionType` were moved from the profile generators to their respective TerminalConnections 4. CascadiaSettings' `SettingsPath` and `DefaultSettingsPath` are exposed as `hstring` instead of `std::filesystem::path` 5. `Command::ExpandCommands()` was exposed via the IDL - This required some of the warnings to be saved to an `IVector` instead of `std::vector`, among some other small changes. 6. The localization resources had to be split into two halves. - Resource file linked in init.cpp. Verified at runtime thanks to the StaticResourceLoader. 7. Added constructors to some `ActionArgs` 8. Utils.h/cpp were moved to `cascadia/inc`. `JsonKey()` was moved to `JsonUtils`. Both TermApp and TSM need access to Utils.h/cpp. A large amount of work includes moving to the new namespace (`TerminalApp` --> `Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model`). Fixing the tests had its own complications. Testing required us to split up TSM into a DLL and LIB, similar to TermApp. Discussion on creating a non-local test variant can be found in #7743. Closes #885
2020-10-06 18:56:59 +02:00
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
<!-- Copy some dlls which TerminalConnection is dependent upon that didn't
get rolled up into this directory -->
<Copy SourceFiles="@(TerminalConnectionDlls)"
DestinationFolder="$(TargetDir)"
UseHardLinksIfPossible="true"
SkipUnchangedFiles="true" />
Fix unittesting our `.xaml` classes (#4105) ## Summary of the Pull Request New year, new unittests. This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3986 * [x] I work here * [x] is Tests * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated * [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems. This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year. So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests. Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in. ## Validation Steps Performed ran the tests yo
2020-01-10 19:55:31 +01:00
</Target>
</Project>