terminal/src/cascadia/Remoting/Peasant.idl

90 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
// Licensed under the MIT license.
namespace Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting
{
runtimeclass CommandlineArgs
{
CommandlineArgs();
CommandlineArgs(String[] args, String cwd);
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
String[] Commandline { get; set; };
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
String CurrentDirectory();
};
Add support for renaming windows (#9662) ## Summary of the Pull Request This PR adds support for renaming windows. ![window-renaming-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034344-9a30be00-9157-11eb-9443-975f3c294f56.gif) ![window-renaming-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034452-b5033280-9157-11eb-9e35-e5ac80fef0bc.gif) It does so through two new actions: * `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd> and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful) * `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a `TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime. In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the rename failed. Nifty! ## References * Builds on the toasts from #9523 * #5000 - process model megathread ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660) * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews. > PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's > not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't > provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in > microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to > click on the text box manually. > We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml > Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses. > Fun! ## Validation Steps Performed I've been playing with ```json { "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" }, { "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" }, { "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" }, { "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } }, { "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } }, ``` and they seem to work as expected
2021-04-02 18:00:04 +02:00
runtimeclass RenameRequestArgs
{
RenameRequestArgs(String newName);
String NewName { get; };
Boolean Succeeded;
};
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
runtimeclass WindowActivatedArgs
{
WindowActivatedArgs(UInt64 peasantID, Guid desktopID, Windows.Foundation.DateTime activatedTime);
WindowActivatedArgs(UInt64 peasantID, UInt64 hwnd, Guid desktopID, Windows.Foundation.DateTime activatedTime);
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
UInt64 PeasantID { get; };
UInt64 Hwnd { get; };
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
Guid DesktopID { get; };
Windows.Foundation.DateTime ActivatedTime { get; };
};
Add `"monitor": "any"|"toCurrent"|"toMouse"` setting to globalSummon (#10092) #### ⚠️ this pr targets #9977 ## Summary of the Pull Request This adds support for part of the `monitor` property for `globalSummon`. It also goes a little off-spec: ```json "monitor": "any"|"toCurrent"|"toMouse" ``` * `monitor`: This controls the monitor that the window will be summoned from/to - `"any"`: Summon the MRU window, regardless of which monitor it's currently on. - `"toCurrent"`/omitted: (_default_): Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor with the current **foreground** window. - [**NEW**] `"toMouse"`: Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor where the **mouse** cursor is. When I was playing with this, It felt like `toMouse` was always what I wanted, not `toCurrent`. We can always just comment that out if we think that's contentious - I'm aware I didn't originally spec that. ## References * Original thread: #653 * Spec: #9274 * megathread: #8888 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-60325291 * [x] I work here * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated 😢 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I made `toMouse` the default because it felt better. fite-me.jpg ## Validation Steps Performed my ever evolving blob: ```jsonc { "keys": "ctrl+`", "command": { "action": "quakeMode" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+1", "command": { "action": "globalSummon" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "toCurrent" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "toggleVisibility": false } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 2000 } }, { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "any" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "onCurrent" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "any" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse", "dropdownDuration": 500 } }, { "keys": "ctrl+5", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 500 } }, ```
2021-05-17 14:57:08 +02:00
enum MonitorBehavior
{
InPlace,
ToCurrent,
ToMouse,
};
[default_interface] runtimeclass SummonWindowBehavior {
SummonWindowBehavior();
Boolean MoveToCurrentDesktop;
Boolean ToggleVisibility;
Add property to control dropdown speed of global summon (#9977) ## Summary of the Pull Request Adds the `dropdownDuration` property to `globalSummon`. This controls how fast the window appears on the screen when summoned from minimized. It similarly controls the speed for sliding out of view when the window is dismissed with `"toggleVisibility": true`. `dropdownDuration` specifies the duration in **milliseconds**. This defaults to `0` for `globalSummon`, and defaults to `200` for `quakeMode`. 200 was picked because, according to [`AnimateWindow`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winuser/nf-winuser-animatewindow): > Typically, an animation takes 200 milliseconds to play. Do note that you won't be able to interact with the window during the animation! Input sent during the dropdown will arrive at the end of the animation, but input sent during the slide-up _won't_. Avoid setting this to large values! The gifs are in Teams. ## References * Original thread: #653 * Spec: #9274 * megathread: #8888 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-59030824 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I had the following previously in the doc comments, but it feels better in the PR body: - This was chosen because it was easier to implement and generally nicer than: * `AnimateWindow`, which would show the window borders for the duration of the animation, and occasionally just plain not work. Additionally, for `AnimateWindow` to work, the window much not be visible, so we'd need to first restore the window, then hide it, then animate it. That would flash the taskbar. * `SetWindowRgn` on the root HWND, which caused the xaml content to shift to the left, and caused a black bar to be drawn on the right of the window. Presumably, `SetWindowRgn` and `DwmExtendFrameIntoClientArea` did not play well with each other. * `SetWindowPos(..., SWP_NOSENDCHANGING)`, which worked the absolute best for longer animations, and is the closest to the actual implementation of `AnimateWindow`. This would resize the ROOT window, without sending resizes to the XAML island, allowing the content to _not_ reflow. but for a duration of 200ms, would only ever display ~2 frames. That's basically not even animation anymore, it's now just an "appear". Since that's how long the default animation is, if felt silly to have it basically not work by default. - If a future reader would like to implement this better, **they should feel free to**, and not mistake my notes here as expertise. These are research notes into the dark and terrible land that is Win32 programming. I'm no expert. ## Validation Steps Performed This is the blob of json I'm testing with these days: ```jsonc { "keys": "ctrl+`", "command": { "action": "quakeMode" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+1", "command": { "action": "globalSummon" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "toCurrent" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "toggleVisibility": false } }, { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 2000 } }, { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "onCurrent" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "any" } }, ``` * <kbd>ctrl+\`</kbd> will summon the quake window with a _quick_ animation * <kbd>ctrl+2</kbd> will summon the window with a s l o w animation
2021-05-17 14:28:46 +02:00
UInt32 DropdownDuration;
Add `"monitor": "any"|"toCurrent"|"toMouse"` setting to globalSummon (#10092) #### ⚠️ this pr targets #9977 ## Summary of the Pull Request This adds support for part of the `monitor` property for `globalSummon`. It also goes a little off-spec: ```json "monitor": "any"|"toCurrent"|"toMouse" ``` * `monitor`: This controls the monitor that the window will be summoned from/to - `"any"`: Summon the MRU window, regardless of which monitor it's currently on. - `"toCurrent"`/omitted: (_default_): Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor with the current **foreground** window. - [**NEW**] `"toMouse"`: Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor where the **mouse** cursor is. When I was playing with this, It felt like `toMouse` was always what I wanted, not `toCurrent`. We can always just comment that out if we think that's contentious - I'm aware I didn't originally spec that. ## References * Original thread: #653 * Spec: #9274 * megathread: #8888 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-60325291 * [x] I work here * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated 😢 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I made `toMouse` the default because it felt better. fite-me.jpg ## Validation Steps Performed my ever evolving blob: ```jsonc { "keys": "ctrl+`", "command": { "action": "quakeMode" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+1", "command": { "action": "globalSummon" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "toCurrent" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "toggleVisibility": false } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 2000 } }, { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "any" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "onCurrent" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse" } }, // { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "any" } }, { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse", "dropdownDuration": 500 } }, { "keys": "ctrl+5", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 500 } }, ```
2021-05-17 14:57:08 +02:00
MonitorBehavior ToMonitor;
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
interface IPeasant
{
CommandlineArgs InitialArgs { get; };
void AssignID(UInt64 id);
UInt64 GetID();
UInt64 GetPID();
Boolean ExecuteCommandline(CommandlineArgs args);
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
void ActivateWindow(WindowActivatedArgs args);
WindowActivatedArgs GetLastActivatedArgs();
2021-04-29 00:13:28 +02:00
Add an action for identifying windows (#9523) ## Summary of the Pull Request This is a follow up to #9300. Now that we have names on our windows, it would be nice to see who is named what. So this adds two actions: * `identifyWindow`: This action will pop up a little toast (#8592) displaying the name and ID of the window, and is bound by default. ![identify-window-toast-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/111529085-bf710580-872f-11eb-8880-b0b617596cfc.gif) * `identifyWindows`: This action will request that ALL windows pop up that toast. This is meant to feel like the "Identify" button on the Windows display settings. However, sometimes, it's wonky. ![teaching-tip-dismiss-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/111529292-fe06c000-872f-11eb-8d4a-5688e4ce1175.gif) That's being tracked upstream on https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/issues/4382 Because it's so wonky, we won't bind that by default. Maybe if we get that fixed, then we'll change the default binding from `identifyWindow` to `identifyWindows` ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431492 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments You may note that there are some macros to make interacting with lots and lots of actions easier. There's a lot of boilerplate whenever you need to make a new action, so I thought: "Can we make that easier?" Turns out you can make it a _LOT_ easier, but that work is still behind another PR after this one. Get excited
2021-03-30 18:08:03 +02:00
void DisplayWindowId(); // Tells us to display its own ID (which causes a DisplayWindowIdRequested to be raised)
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
2021-04-29 00:13:28 +02:00
String WindowName { get; };
String ActiveTabTitle { get; };
2021-04-29 00:13:28 +02:00
void RequestIdentifyWindows(); // Tells us to raise a IdentifyWindowsRequested
Add support for renaming windows (#9662) ## Summary of the Pull Request This PR adds support for renaming windows. ![window-renaming-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034344-9a30be00-9157-11eb-9443-975f3c294f56.gif) ![window-renaming-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034452-b5033280-9157-11eb-9e35-e5ac80fef0bc.gif) It does so through two new actions: * `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd> and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful) * `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a `TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime. In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the rename failed. Nifty! ## References * Builds on the toasts from #9523 * #5000 - process model megathread ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660) * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews. > PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's > not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't > provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in > microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to > click on the text box manually. > We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml > Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses. > Fun! ## Validation Steps Performed I've been playing with ```json { "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" }, { "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" }, { "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" }, { "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } }, { "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } }, ``` and they seem to work as expected
2021-04-02 18:00:04 +02:00
void RequestRename(RenameRequestArgs args); // Tells us to raise a RenameRequested
void Summon(SummonWindowBehavior behavior);
void RequestShowNotificationIcon();
void RequestHideNotificationIcon();
void RequestQuitAll();
void Quit();
Add support for renaming windows (#9662) ## Summary of the Pull Request This PR adds support for renaming windows. ![window-renaming-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034344-9a30be00-9157-11eb-9443-975f3c294f56.gif) ![window-renaming-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034452-b5033280-9157-11eb-9e35-e5ac80fef0bc.gif) It does so through two new actions: * `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd> and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful) * `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a `TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime. In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the rename failed. Nifty! ## References * Builds on the toasts from #9523 * #5000 - process model megathread ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660) * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews. > PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's > not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't > provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in > microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to > click on the text box manually. > We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml > Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses. > Fun! ## Validation Steps Performed I've been playing with ```json { "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" }, { "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" }, { "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" }, { "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } }, { "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } }, ``` and they seem to work as expected
2021-04-02 18:00:04 +02:00
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, WindowActivatedArgs> WindowActivated;
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, CommandlineArgs> ExecuteCommandlineRequested;
Add an action for identifying windows (#9523) ## Summary of the Pull Request This is a follow up to #9300. Now that we have names on our windows, it would be nice to see who is named what. So this adds two actions: * `identifyWindow`: This action will pop up a little toast (#8592) displaying the name and ID of the window, and is bound by default. ![identify-window-toast-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/111529085-bf710580-872f-11eb-8880-b0b617596cfc.gif) * `identifyWindows`: This action will request that ALL windows pop up that toast. This is meant to feel like the "Identify" button on the Windows display settings. However, sometimes, it's wonky. ![teaching-tip-dismiss-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/111529292-fe06c000-872f-11eb-8d4a-5688e4ce1175.gif) That's being tracked upstream on https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/issues/4382 Because it's so wonky, we won't bind that by default. Maybe if we get that fixed, then we'll change the default binding from `identifyWindow` to `identifyWindows` ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431492 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments You may note that there are some macros to make interacting with lots and lots of actions easier. There's a lot of boilerplate whenever you need to make a new action, so I thought: "Can we make that easier?" Turns out you can make it a _LOT_ easier, but that work is still behind another PR after this one. Get excited
2021-03-30 18:08:03 +02:00
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> IdentifyWindowsRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> DisplayWindowIdRequested;
Add support for renaming windows (#9662) ## Summary of the Pull Request This PR adds support for renaming windows. ![window-renaming-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034344-9a30be00-9157-11eb-9443-975f3c294f56.gif) ![window-renaming-001](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/113034452-b5033280-9157-11eb-9e35-e5ac80fef0bc.gif) It does so through two new actions: * `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd> and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful) * `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a `TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime. In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the rename failed. Nifty! ## References * Builds on the toasts from #9523 * #5000 - process model megathread ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660) * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews. > PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's > not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't > provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in > microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to > click on the text box manually. > We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml > Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses. > Fun! ## Validation Steps Performed I've been playing with ```json { "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" }, { "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" }, { "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" }, { "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } }, { "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } }, ``` and they seem to work as expected
2021-04-02 18:00:04 +02:00
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, RenameRequestArgs> RenameRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, SummonWindowBehavior> SummonRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> ShowNotificationIconRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> HideNotificationIconRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> QuitAllRequested;
event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<Object, Object> QuitRequested;
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
};
[default_interface] runtimeclass Peasant : IPeasant
{
Peasant();
};
}