fix spell things I forced into master.
This commit is contained in:
parent
038d6e5faf
commit
c3ea7310c1
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ We'll change the TermControl class to derive from the
|
|||
* Otherwise, it might be possible that we could just remove that fake control
|
||||
entirely.
|
||||
* We'll remove the `GetControl` method from the `TermControl`, as the
|
||||
`TermControl` itslef will now be used as the control.
|
||||
`TermControl` itself will now be used as the control.
|
||||
|
||||
We'll change the Pane class to accept a `Windows.UI.Xaml.Controls.Control`
|
||||
instead of a `TermControl`.
|
||||
|
@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ is a bigger discussion than the feature at hand, however.
|
|||
|
||||
### Performance, Power, and Efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
decide to host a WebView in a pane, then it surely could impact these measures.
|
||||
I don't believe this will have a noticable impact _on its own_. Should the user
|
||||
decide to host a WebView in a pane, then it surely could impact these measuress.
|
||||
However, I leave that discussion to the implementation of the actual alternative
|
||||
pane content itself.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ should the control provide some sort of accessibility pattern.
|
|||
keybindings model has the `TermControl` call into the App layer to see if a
|
||||
keystroke should be handled by the app first. We may want to make sure that
|
||||
for non-terminal controls, we add a event handler to try and have the
|
||||
`AppKeyBindings` handle the keypress ifthe control doesn't. This won't solve
|
||||
`AppKeyBindings` handle the keypress if the control doesn't. This won't solve
|
||||
the case where the control wants to use a keybinding that is mapped by the
|
||||
Terminal App. In that case, non-terminal controls will actually behave
|
||||
differently from the `TermControl`. The `TermControl` will give the app the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue