As mentioned in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9354#issuecomment-790034728
`GETSET_SETTING` is too visually similar to `GETSET_PROPERTY`, but with a _VERY_ different meaning. I think that merely changing the name of the macro would make it harder for us to make this mistake again.
Adds support for the `windowingBehavior` global setting. This setting
controls how mutiple instances of `wt` behave in the absence of the `-w`
parameter. This setting has three values:
* `"useNew"`: (default) Multiple `wt` invocations (without the `-w`
param) always create new windows.
* `"useAnyExisting"`: When starting a new `wt`, we'll instead default to
any existing windows. `wt -w -1` will still create new windows.
* `"useExisting"`: Similar to `useAnyExisting`, but limits to
windows on the current desktop.
The IVirtualDesktopManager interface is _very_ limited. Hence why we
have to track the HWNDs manually, and ask if they're on the current
desktop.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been playing with it for a week now.
References #5000
References projects/5
References #8898
Spec'd in #8135Closes#2227
Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431448
Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431433
## Summary of the Pull Request
**If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.**
![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif)
This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely:
* We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window.
* If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_.
* If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window.
* If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window.
* If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window.
* If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window.
## References
* Spec: #8135
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#4472
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does**
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change
There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future:
* [ ] We don't support names for windows yet
* [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that.
* [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from.
* [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5.
I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain.
# TODOs
* [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬
- [x] `Monarch.cpp`
- [x] `Peasant.cpp`
- [x] `WindowManager.cpp`
- [x] `AppHost.cpp`
* [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully.
- Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID.
- Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though.
- Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant?
- After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.