[Defapp] Use real HPCON for PTY management; Have Monarch always listen for connections
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9464
* [x] Related to #9475 - incomplete fix
* [x] I work here.
* [x] Manual test
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
- Sometimes peasants can't manage to accept a connection appropriately because I wrote defterm before @zadjii-msft's monarch/peasant architecture. The simple solution here is to just make the monarch always be listening for inbound connections. Then COM won't start a peasant with -Embedding just to ask the monarch where it should go. It'll just join the active window. I didn't close 9475 because it should follow monarch policies on which window to join... and it doesn't yet.
- A lot of interesting things are happening because this didn't have a real HPCON. So I passed through the remaining handles (and re-GUID-ed the interface) that made it possible for me to pack the right process handles and such into an HPCON on the inbound connection and monitor that like any other ConptyConnection. This should resolve some of the process exit behaviors and signal channel things like resizing.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is a redux of #8882.
From the original:
> This is really similar to what we're doing with the `CommandPalette`. We're adding a ~~Preview~~`KeyDown` handler to the SUI `MainPage`, that connects to `TerminalPage::_HandleKey`. That allows the SUI a chance to search the keymap to dispatch actions for keybindings, similar to how the command palette does it.
>
> This also means it's now possible for the SUI to invoke _all_ the actions available to the Terminal. This includes the ones like `IncreaseFontSize`, which require a _Terminal_ to actually do something. So we have to make sure all the calls to `_GetActiveControl` actually check that the result is non-null before using it.
>
> A bunch of the actions do nothing now from a SUI tab, others behave _weird_. Like "Rename tab" / "Open Tab Renamer" do nothing. "Duplicate Tab" again does nothing - we try making a new settings tab, which just focuses the settings tab again. "Copy text" definitely does nothing, same with paste.
I don't know why I thought this wouldn't work. I thought we'd have to do this in `PreviewKeyDown` or something, which led to [weirdness](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8882#issuecomment-767088554). Turns out, we don't need it to be in `PreviewKeyDown`. It can just be in the SUI's `KeyDown`.
## References
* Original: #8882
* Workaround was in #8885
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#8767
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The special case handler from #8885 is no longer needed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Switching tabs with Ctrl+Tab works
* Command palette works
* fullscreen, focus mode works
* close window works
* copy paste on Ctrl+C/V works, even when bound
* Select all text in textboxes works
* tab navigation through UI elements works
This entirely removes `KeyMapping` from the settings model, and builds on the work done in #9543 to consolidate all actions (key bindings and commands) into a unified data structure (`ActionMap`).
## References
#9428 - Spec
#6900 - Actions page
Closes#7441
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The important thing here is to remember that we're shifting our philosophy of how to interact/represent actions. Prior to this, the actions arrays in the JSON would be deserialized twice: once for key bindings, and again for commands. By thinking of every entry in the relevant JSON as a `Command`, we can remove a lot of the context switching between working with a key binding vs a command palette item.
#9543 allows us to make that shift. Given the work in that PR, we can now deserialize all of the relevant information from each JSON action item. This allows us to simplify `ActionMap::FromJson` to simply iterate over each JSON action item, deserialize it, and add it to our `ActionMap`.
Internally, our `ActionMap` operates as discussed in #9428 by maintaining a `_KeyMap` that points to an action ID, and using that action ID to retrieve the `Command` from the `_ActionMap`. Adding actions to the `ActionMap` automatically accounts for name/key-chord collisions. A `NameMap` can be constructed when requested; this is for the Command Palette.
Querying the `ActionMap` is fairly straightforward. Helper functions were needed to be able to distinguish an explicit unbinding vs the command not being found in the current layer. Internally, we store explicitly unbound names/key-chords as `ShortcutAction::Invalid` commands. However, we return `nullptr` when a query points to an unbound command. This is done to hide this complexity away from any caller.
The command palette still needs special handling for nested and iterable commands. Thankfully, the expansion of iterable commands is performed on an `IMapView`, so we can just expose `NameMap` as a consolidation of `ActionMap`'s `NameMap` with its parents. The same can be said for exposing key chords in nested commands.
## Validation Steps Performed
All local tests pass.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds some special behavior to the window named "\_quake".
* When creating the quake window, it ignores "initialRows" and "initialCols" and opens on the top half of the monitor.
- It uses `initialPosition` to determine which monitor this is
* It cannot be moved
* It can only be vertically resized on the bottom border.
* It's always in focus mode.
- We should probably have an issue tracking "Allow showing tabs in focus mode"? Maybe?
- This one element is maybe the one I'm least attached to
When renaming a window to "\_quake", it adopts all those behaviors as well. It does not exit focus mode when leaving QM, nor does it resize back. That seemed unnecessary.
## References
* As spec'ed in #9274
* See also #8888
## PR Checklist
* [x] In the pursuit of #653
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated, but I'm not gonna do any of that till quake mode is totally done.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Note that this doesn't do things like:
* dropdown
* global hotkey summon
* summon to the current monitor
* summon to the current desktop
I'm doing #653 _very_ piecemeal, to try and make the PRs less egregious.
## Validation Steps Performed
* validated that center on launch still works
* validated that QM works on different monitors based on `initialPosition`
* validated entering/exiting QM behaves as expected
## TODO!
* [ ] When snapping the quake window between desktops with <kbd>win+shift+arrow</kbd>, the window doesn't horizontally re-size to the new monitor dimensions. It should.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/8374
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The majority of the work was already done earlier.
The fix is only in _SetFocusedTab, that runs asynchronously
and thus might result in a race or even overflow.
All other changes are decorative.
## Validation Steps Performed
UT and manual tests
I added a `RenameSucceededText` property to the `TerminalPage` which returns the
formatted message `Successfully renamed window to "{WindowNameForDisplay()}"`
This _doesn't_ pop the dialog when you `wt -w foo` for the first time. Only
_subsequent_ renames.
## References
* Added in #9662
* Closes#9804
## Summary of the Pull Request
Allow schemes to be previewed as the user hovers over them in the Command Palette.
## References
* Branched off of #8392, which is why the commit history is so polluted. 330a8e8 : 544b2fd has the interesting commits
* #5400: cmdpal megathread
### Potential follow-ups
* changing the font size
* changing the font face
* changing the opacity of acrylic
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6689, a last straggling FHL PR
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated - I don't think so
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This works by inserting a "preview" `TerminalSettings` into the settings hierarchy, before the `TermControl`'s runtime settings, and after the ones from the actual `CascadiaSettings`. This allows us to modify that preview settings object, then discard it when we're done with the preview.
This could also be used for other settings in the future - I built it to be extensible to other `ShortcutAction`s, though I haven't implemented those yet.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Select a colorscheme - it becomes the active one
* `colortool -x <scheme>` after selecting a scheme - colortool overrides the selected scheme
* Select a colorscheme after a `colortool -x <scheme>` after selecting a scheme - the scheme in the palette becomes the active one
* Pressing <kbd>esc</kbd> at any point to dismiss the command palette - scheme returns to the previous one
* reloading the settings - returns to the scheme in the settings
This pull request adds an appearance configuration object to our
settings model and app lib, allowing the control to be rendered
differently depending on its state, and then uses it to add support for
an "unfocused" appearance that the terminal will use when it's not in
focus.
To accomplish this, we isolated the appearance-related settings from
Profile (into AppearanceConfig) and TerminalSettings (into the
IControlAppearance and ICoreAppearance interfaces). A bunch of work was
done to make inheritance work.
The unfocused appearance inherits from the focused one _for that
profile_. This is important: If you define a
defaults.unfocusedAppearance, it will apply all of defaults' settings to
any leaf profile when a terminal in that profile is out of focus.
Specified in #8345Closes#3062Closes#2316
## Summary of the Pull Request
Make sure that the window renamer and other toasts follow the requested app theme. We accomplish this by doing something similar to what we do with ContentDialogs. Since TeachingTips aren't in the same XAML root, we have to traverse the entire tree upwards setting RequestedTheme. If we don't, then we'll update the background color of the TeachingTip, but not the text inside it.
## References
* Added in #9662 and #9523
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9717
* [x] I work here
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested with system theme light & dark, and `theme` set to `light, dark, and unset, and verified that they worked as expected.
## Summary of the Pull Request
In exactly the same fashion as the tab renamer, handle <kbd>Enter</kbd> for committing the rename, and <kbd>Escape</kbd> for dismissing the rename.
## References
* Added in #9662
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9720
* [x] I work here
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
Played with it - this feels good.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds support for renaming windows.
It does so through two new actions:
* `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name
to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd>
and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful)
* `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a
`TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided
value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime.
In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will
reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the
rename failed. Nifty!
## References
* Builds on the toasts from #9523
* #5000 - process model megathread
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660)
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews.
> PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's
> not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't
> provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in
> microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to
> click on the text box manually.
> We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml
> Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses.
> Fun!
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been playing with
```json
{ "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" },
{ "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" },
{ "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" },
{ "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } },
{ "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } },
```
and they seem to work as expected
**Summary of the Pull Request**
This PR adds an X Macro for defining our ShortcutActions. This means that you can add the action in one place, and have the macro synthesize all sorts of boilerplate for you!
From the `AllShortcutActions.h` file:
> For a clearer explanation of how this file should be used, see:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Macro
>
> Include this file to be able to quickly define some code in the exact same
> way for _every single shortcut action_. To use:
>
> 1. Include this file
> 2. Define the ON_ALL_ACTIONS macro with what you want each action to show up
> as. Ex:
>
> #define ON_ALL_ACTIONS(action) void action##Handler();
>
> 3. Then, use the ALL_SHORTCUT_ACTIONS macro to get the ON_ALL_ACTIONS marcro
> repeated once for every ShortcutAction
>
> This is used in KeyMapping.idl, ShortcutAction.*, TerminalPage.*, etc. to
> reduce the number of places where we must copy-paste boiler-plate code for
> each action. This is _NOT_ something that should be used when any individual
> case should be customized.
**PR Checklist**
* [x] Scratches an itch
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
**Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments**
Originally I had this blocked as a follow up to #9662. However, I've grown tired after a month of merging main into this branch, and I'm just shipping it separately. It will inevitably conflict with anyone who has actions in flight currently.
**Validation Steps Performed**
The code still builds exactly as before!
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is a follow up to #9300. Now that we have names on our windows, it would be nice to see who is named what. So this adds two actions:
* `identifyWindow`: This action will pop up a little toast (#8592) displaying the name and ID of the window, and is bound by default.
* `identifyWindows`: This action will request that ALL windows pop up that toast. This is meant to feel like the "Identify" button on the Windows display settings. However, sometimes, it's wonky.
That's being tracked upstream on https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/issues/4382
Because it's so wonky, we won't bind that by default. Maybe if we get that fixed, then we'll change the default binding from `identifyWindow` to `identifyWindows`
## References
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431492
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
You may note that there are some macros to make interacting with lots and lots of actions easier. There's a lot of boilerplate whenever you need to make a new action, so I thought: "Can we make that easier?"
Turns out you can make it a _LOT_ easier, but that work is still behind another PR after this one. Get excited
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently, both when the tab is already closed, and when there is a
request to close a tab (might be rejected), we go through the same flow
in TerminalPage.
This might leave the system in inconsistent state, as the side-effects
of closing will persist even if the closing was aborted.
This PR separates between the two flows, by introducing a CloseRequested
event to the TabBase.
This event is used to inform the upper tier (the terminal page) about
the request and to trigger the same logic that happens when the tab is
closed directly from the terminal page (e.g., by clicking close on the
tab view).
The Closed event will be used only to handle the actual closing of the
tab. It will ensure that the tab gets removed from the terminal page if
required.
As a result, it a read-only pane will be closed non-interactively (aka
connection exits), the tab closed flow will be invoked, and no user
prompt will be shown.
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9572
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
I think we can all agree that `TerminalPage.cpp` is an unruly beast of a
file. It's got everything. It does everything. It can sometimes be a bit
hard to work with, because of simply how big it is. This PR tries to
alleviate this by making `TerminalPage.cpp` just a little smaller. It
does so by moving pretty much everything related to tab management into
its own file, `TabManagement.cpp`. These methods that have moved are all
the same as they were before, and they're still members of
`TerminalPage`. But now they're all in one place.
I tried to move all the references to `_tabs` in `TerminalPage.cpp`, but
there's still a few that I left behind. Mostly because I felt that
moving those would be too gnarly a code change for an otherwise simple
cut&paste PR.
There are a few new methods I introduced:
* `_TabDragStarted` and `_TabDragCompleted`: These were lambdas before,
promoted to full methods.
* `_DismissTabContextMenus`: Remove all the right-click context menus
from the tabs
* `_FocusCurrentTab`: This one's a bit trickier, we were actually doing
this in a few different places, so I tried consolidating.
* `_HasMultipleTabs`: This doesn't need explaining.
* `_RemoveAllTabs`: Really, just encapsulation for the sake of removing
a `_tabs` from `TerminalPage.cpp`
* `_ResizeTabContent`: Really, just encapsulation for the sake of
removing a `_tabs` from `TerminalPage.cpp`
In the future, some enterprising young soul could try promoting that
file to its own class, and hiding `_tabs` (and `_mruTabs`) inside it.
Probably would need to take a reference to TerminalPage's `_tabView` and
`_newTabButton`. I'm not doing that right now, because I already hate
the idea of the ...
> 920 additions and 847 deletions.
... I'm making you look at already.
## Other thoughts
Some of the calls might be a little arbitrary - `_OpenNewTab` and
`_CreateNewTabFromSettings` probably should stay in `TerminalPage`? Or
at least elements of those might need to get split up better. Similarly
`TerminalPage::_OpenSettingsUI` stayed in `TerminalPage.cpp`, but it
does a lot of the same work as `_CreateNewTabFromSettings`. I'm not
saying this is the definitive places for these methods - it's code we're
working with, not stone ☺️
- Implements the default application behavior and handoff mechanisms
between console and terminal. The inbox portion is done already. This
adds the ability for our OpenConsole.exe to accept the incoming server
connection from the Windows OS, stand up a PTY session, start the
Windows Terminal as a listener for an incoming connection, and then
send it the incoming PTY connection for it to launch a tab.
- The tab is launched with default settings at the moment.
- You must configure the default application using the `conhost.exe`
propsheet or with the registry keys. Finishing the setting inside
Windows Terminal will be a todo after this is complete. The OS
Settings panel work to surface this setting is a dependency delivered
by another team and you will not see it here.
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Manual adjust of registry keys to the delegation conhost/terminal
behavior
- [x] Adjustment of the delegation options with the propsheet
- [x] Launching things from the run box manually and watching them show
in Terminal
- [x] Launching things from shortcuts and watching them show in the
Terminal
Documentation on how it works will be a TODO post completion in #9462
References #7414 - Default Terminal spec
Closes#492
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently, when the MRU is enabled we lose the keybinding allowing us to
go forward/backward (aka right/left in LTR) in the tab view.
To fix that, this PR introduces "tabSwitcherMode" optional parameter to
the prevTab / nextTab commands.
If it is not provided the global setting will be used.
So if you want to go to adjacent tabs, even if MRU is enabled on the
system level you can use:
```
{ "command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
or even
```
{"command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
if you don't want tab switcher to show up
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9330
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated - not yet. Waiting for approval.
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
This is a small refactor on my way to much bigger, more painful refactors. This PR does five things:
* `TermControl.*` has historically had all the control-relevant EventArgs defined in the same file as TermControl. That's just added clutter to the files, clutter that could have been in it's own place. We'll move all those event arg to their own files.
* We'll also move `IDirectKeyListener` to its own file while we're at it.
* We'll update some of `TermControl`'s old `DEFINE`/`DECLARE_TYPED_EVENT` macros to the newer `TYPED_EVENT` macro, which is a bit nicer.
* We'll change `TermControl.TitleChanged` to a typed event. I needed that for a future PR, so let's just do it here
* While we're updating `TYPED_EVENT` macros, let's do `TerminalPage` too.
### checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] This is work for #1256, but we've got a long way to go before that works.
**BE NOT AFRAID**. I know that there's 107 files in this PR, but almost
all of it is just find/replacing `TerminalControl` with `Control`.
This is the start of the work to move TermControl into multiple pieces,
for #5000. The PR starts this work by:
* Splits `TerminalControl` into separate lib and dll projects. We'll
want control tests in the future, and for that, we'll need a lib.
* Moves `ICoreSettings` back into the `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`
namespace. We'll have other types in there soon too.
* I could not tell you why this works suddenly. New VS versions? New
cppwinrt version? Maybe we're just better at dealing with mdmerge
bugs these days.
* RENAMES `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to
`Microsoft.Terminal.Control`. This touches pretty much every file in
the sln. Sorry about that (not sorry).
An upcoming PR will move much of the logic in TermControl into a new
`ControlCore` class that we'll add in `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`.
`ControlCore` will then be unittest-able in the
`UnitTests_TerminalCore`, which will help prevent regressions like #9455
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
You're really gonna want to clean the sln first, then merge this into
your branch, then rebuild. It's very likely that old winmds will get
left behind. If you see something like
```
Error MDM2007 Cannot create type
Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.KeyModifiers in read-only metadata
file Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.
```
then that's what happened to you.
This accomplishes the first step towards embedding a preview on the Profiles/ColorSchemes page, by moving the `TerminalSettings` object over to the Terminal Settings Model project. We'll leverage this in a later PR to construct an embedded terminal in the settings UI.
`TerminalSettings` had to see a few more functions exposed in the IDL
(including some inheritance stuff).
Refresh the JSON to make TerminalSettings do it's thing across all the
open terminals.
References #9122 - Terminal Preview
References #6800 - SUI Epic
Since #8602 merged, we need to pass a child of the settings object to
the TermControl upon initializing it. Since this happens in a few places
in `TerminalPage`, its probably best to use a helper.
Closes#9292
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Shift+click on a profile to open a new wt window with that profile. Or, shift+click on the '+' button to open a new wt window with the default profile.
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9395
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing
Finally implements the `newWindow` action. It does so by
`ShellExecute`ing `wt.exe` with commandline args corresponding to the
ones that would create the same `NewTerminalArgs`. This works with #8898
and #9118 to allow new windows (even with `windowingBehavior:
useExisting`)
This is taken from my auto-elevate branch, hence the references to
elevation
References #5000
References projects/5
References #8898
References #9118Closes#1051
This PR is a resurrection of #8522. @Hegunumo has apparently deleted
their account, but the contribution was still valuable. I'm just here to
get it across the finish line.
This PR adds new action for navigating to the next & previous search
results. These actions are unbound by default. These actions can be used
from directly within the search dialog also, to immediately navigate the
results.
Furthermore, if you have a search started, and close the search box,
then press this keybinding, _it will still perform the search_. So you
can just hit <kbd>F3</kbd> repeatedly with the dialog closed to keep
searching new results. Neat!
If you dispatch the action on the key down, then dismiss a selection on
a key up, we'll end up immediately destroying the selection when you
release the bound key. That's annoying. It also bothers @carlos-zamora
in #3758. However, I _think_ we can just only dismiss the selection on a
key up. I _think_ that's fine. It _seems_ fine so far. We've got an
entire release cycle to futz with it.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've played with it all day and it seems _crisp_.
Closes#7695
Co-authored-by: Kiminori Kaburagi <yukawa_hidenori@icloud.com>
## Summary of the Pull Request
**If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.**
This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely:
* We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window.
* If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_.
* If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window.
* If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window.
* If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window.
* If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window.
## References
* Spec: #8135
* Megathread: #5000
* Project: projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#4472
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does**
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change
There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future:
* [ ] We don't support names for windows yet
* [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that.
* [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from.
* [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5.
I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain.
# TODOs
* [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬
- [x] `Monarch.cpp`
- [x] `Peasant.cpp`
- [x] `WindowManager.cpp`
- [x] `AppHost.cpp`
* [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully.
- Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID.
- Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though.
- Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant?
- After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Introduces read-only panes.
When pane is marked as read-only:
1. Attempt to provide user input results in a warning
2. Attempt to close pane - shows dialog
3. Attempt to close hosting tab shows dialog
4. The hosting tab has no close button
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6981
* [x] CLA signed.
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated - not yet.
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
1. The readonly logic implemented in `TermControl`
(and prevents any send input)
2. Special handling is required to allow key-bindings
3. The "close-readonly" protections are in TerminalPage.
4. The indication that the pane is readonly is done using lock glyph
5. The indication that the tab contains readonly pane
is done by hiding the close button of the tab
6. The readonly mode is enabled by keyboard shortcut
(the followup might add this to the context menu)
## Validation Steps Performed
A part of the #8415.
Includes:
* Moving `TabSwitcherMode` related decisions into `CommandPalette`
(simplifying the logic of `TerminalPage::SelectNextTab`)
* Fix a bug where the index of first tab switch is incorrect
(since bindings are not updated)
* Removing redundant `CommandPalette` updates
* Preparations for tabs binding
Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will
be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in
#7240 & #8135.
This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any
significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project
layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the
actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also
give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're
doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them
selfhosted, before building on them too much.
This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When
windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new
window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please
make a new window".
Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here:
* `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a
static lib.
* `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL,
for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`.
* `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static
lib.
There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of
this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using
[`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my
notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the
whole Process Model 2.0 work.
## References
* #5000 - this is the process model megathread
* #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec.
* #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3
signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢)
* #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2)
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
This commit introduces direct shortcut dispatch to TerminalPage, which
allows it to respond to key bindings before the command palette.
This allows the user to use shortcuts from the command palette while
it's open.
Closes#6679
Co-authored-by: mrange <marten_range@hotmail.com>
I loved the pixel shaders in #7058, but that PR needed a bit of polish
to be ready for ingestion. This PR is almost _exactly_ that PR, with
some small changes.
* It adds a new pre-profile setting `"experimental.pixelShaderPath"`,
which lets the user set a pixel shader to use with the Terminal.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: It does _not_ add any built-in shaders.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: it will _override_
`experimental.retroTerminalEffect`
* It adds a bunch of sample shaders in `samples/shaders`. Included:
- A NOP shader as a base to build from.
- An "invert" shader that inverts the colors, as a simple example
- An "grayscale" shader that converts all colors to grayscale, as a
simple example
- An "raster bars" shader that draws some colored bars on the screen
with a drop shadow, as a more involved example
- The original retro terminal effects, as a more involved example
- It also includes a broken shader, as an example of what heppens
when the shader fails to compile
- CHANGED FROM #7058: It does _not_ add the "retroII" shader we were
all worried about.
* When a shader fails to be found or fails to compile, we'll display an
error dialog to the user with a relevant error message.
- CHANGED FROM #7058: Originally, #7058 would display "error bars"
on the screen. I've removed that, and had the Terminal disable the
shader entirely then.
* Renames the `toggleRetroEffect` action to `toggleShaderEffect`.
(`toggleRetroEffect` is now an alias to `toggleShaderEffect`). This
action will turn the shader OR the retro effects on/off.
`toggleShaderEffect` works the way you'd expect it to, but the mental
math on _how_ is a little weird. The logic is basically:
```
useShader = shaderEffectsEnabled ?
(pixelShaderProvided ?
pixelShader :
(retroEffectEnabled ?
retroEffect : null
)
) :
null
```
and `toggleShaderEffect` toggles `shaderEffectsEnabled`.
* If you've got both a shader and retro enabled, `toggleShaderEffect`
will toggle between the shader on/off.
* If you've got a shader and retro disabled, `toggleShaderEffect` will
toggle between the shader on/off.
References #6191
References #7058Closes#7013Closes#3930 "Add setting to retro terminal shader to control blur
radius, color"
Closes#3929 "Add setting to retro terminal shader to enable drawing
scanlines"
- At this point, just roll your own version of the shader.
This commit iontroduces another `target` to the `openSettings` binding:
`settingsUI`. It opens the settings UI introduced in the previous
commit.
Closes#1564Closes#8048 (PR)
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000Closes#2871
First step towards #8415:
* Introduce `PaletteItem` and derive from it to provide native support
for tabs and command lines (`ActionPaletteItem` / `TabPaletteItem`,
`CommandLinePaltteItem`)
* Remove business logic behind PaletteItem from palette (aka dispatch
commands and preview tabs externally)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds shortcut action so that users can scroll.
I used `UINT16_MAX` for `rowsToScroll`.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7542
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Have you ever wanted to debug the Terminal, but weren't sure which of
your Terminal windows was the one you needed to attach to? Now you don't
need to worry! Simply execute the `breakIntoDebugger` action, and the
Terminal will `DebugBreak()` for you!
This requires that the user has set `"debugFeatures": true`
Validated by adding a command:
{
"command": "breakIntoDebugger",
"keys": "ctrl+alt+shift+f1",
"name": "DebugBreak()"
},
...and verifying that it pops open the post-mortem debugger (windbg).
This commit moves us to the Xaml prerelease (201202003) that is
equivalent to public stable release 2.5.
Remember, we need to use prereleases for some silly reason.
This fixes the issue with the settings UI where clicking the browse
buttons would cause an exception to be thrown when we tried to display a
picker without an originating HWND.
It turns out that pickers need a hosting/parent window, and Xaml Islands
doesn't furnish us with a CoreWindow that's set up for that use case.
Alas!
Raymond Chen's [blog post on the matter] suggests that we should
hand the HWND off through some classic COM interface. To do that
properly, Terminal's various components need to implement that interface
and propagate the HWND down where it's needed.
Thanks to a [Xaml compiler issue], we can't actually do that. To work
around that, we've begged and borrowed different methods for pushing
HWNDs around:
1. Using IInitializeWithWindow in secret
2. A member that takes a uint64
3. An interface that offers a function that will "wire up" the HWND.
I chose (1) because AppHost can implement IInitializeWithWindow, but
TerminalPage cannot. We're just pretending that TerminalPage _can_.
I chose (2) because none of the Xaml types in TerminalSettingsEditor can
implement the interface thanks to the aforementioned compiler issue, but
we don't have an escape hatch like AppHost that lives in the same module
and can help us do the propagation.
I chose (3) because I didn't want to commit the same sin as (2) _seven
times_ for every different type of settings page that exists. (3) is
backed by "IHostedInWindow", and anybody who knows they have to use
IInitializeWithWindow to tie an HWND to an object can call
IHostedInWindow.TryPropagateHostingWindow() on that object.
House of cards.
[Xaml compiler issue]: https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/issues/3331
[blog post on the matter]: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20190412-00/?p=102413
(cherry picked from commit f9fc9861a1)
## Summary of the Pull Request
Introduces a new command called `moveTab`
This command has a single mandatory argument with values of `forward` and `backward`
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/3593
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/198
* [x] Schema updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Went for the straightforward solution of moving the tab and the tabViewItem.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing
The CloseWarningDialog is now "awaitable"/async, as suggested in PR #7871.
As opening the dialog is async, the flag can be reset in the same
method. This way the flag operations occur in the same method. The
event handlers of the buttons became obsolete and are removed.
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested manually.
The terminal taskbar icon can now flash when the BEL sequence is
emitted, to let the user know something needs their attention.
The `BellStyle` setting can now be set to `audible`, `visual` or both or
none. When the pane receives a BEL event and the `bellStyle` includes
`visual`, we bubble the event up all the way to `AppHost` to handle
flashing the taskbar.
Closes#1608
This commit implements the OSC 9;4 sequence per the [ConEmu style].
| sequence | description |
| ------------ | ------------ |
| `ESC ] 9 ; 4 ; st ; pr ST` | Set progress state on taskbar and tab. |
| | When `st` is: |
| | |
| | `0`: remove progress. |
| | `1`: set progress value to `pr` (number, 0-100). |
| | `2`: set the taskbar to the "Error" state |
| | `3`: set the taskbar to the "Indeterminate" state |
| | `4`: set the taskbar to the "Warning" state |
We've also extended this with:
* st 3: set indeterminate state
* st 4: set paused state
We handle multiple tabs sending the sequence by using the the last focused
control's taskbar state/progress.
Upon receiving the sequence in `TerminalApi`, we send an event that gets caught
by `TerminalPage`. `TerminalPage` then fires another event that gets caught by
`AppHost` and that's where we set the taskbar progress.
Closes#3004
[ConEmu style]: https://conemu.github.io/en/AnsiEscapeCodes.html#ConEmu_specific_OSC
Display a warning message when the DirectX renderer resolves a font that
isn't the one you selected to warn that it couldn't be found.
Also I wrote the dialog event chain out of `TermControl` to be reusable
in the future for other messages the control might want to tell a host
about and various levels.
## Validation Steps Performed
- Manual validation, setting bad font name, fixing font name with
`settings.json`.
Closes#1017
