fixes#1222
PSReadline calls SetConsoleCursorPosition on each character they emit (go
figure). When that function is called, and we set the cursor position, we'll
try and "snap" the viewport to the location of the cursor, so that the cursor
remains visible.
However, we'd only ever do this with the visible viewport, the viewport
defined by `SCREEN_INFORMATION::_viewport`. When there's a virtual viewport in
Terminal Scrolling mode, we actually need to snap the virtual viewport, so
that this behavior looks more regular.
The `DECSTBM` margins are meant to define the range of lines within which
certain vertical scrolling operations take place. However, we were applying
these margin restrictions in the `ScrollRegion` function, which is also used in
a number of places that shouldn't be affected by `DECSTBM`.
This includes the `ICH` and `DCH` escape sequences (which are only affected by
the horizontal margins, which we don't yet support), the
`ScrollConsoleScreenBuffer` API (which is public Console API, not meant to be
affected by the VT terminal emulation), and the `CSI 3 J` erase scrollback
extension (which isn't really scrolling as such, but uses the `ScrollRegion`
function to manipulate the scrollback buffer).
This commit moves the margin clipping out of the `ScrollRegion` function, so it
can be applied exclusively in the places that need it.
With the margin clipping removed from the `ScrollRegion` function, it now had
to be applied manually in the places it was actually required. This included:
* The `DoSrvPrivateReverseLineFeed` function (for the `RI` control): This was
* just a matter of updating the bottom of the scroll rect to the bottom margin
* (at least when the margins were actually set), since the top of the scroll
* rect would always be the top of the viewport. The
* `DoSrvPrivateModifyLinesImpl` function (for the `IL` and `DL` commands):
* Again this was just a matter of updating the bottom of the scroll rect, since
* the cursor position would always determine the top of the scroll rect. The
* `AdaptDispatch::_ScrollMovement` method (for the `SU` and `SD` commands):
* This required updating both the top and bottom coordinates of the scroll
* rect, and also a simpler destination Y coordinate (the way the `ScrollRegion`
* function worked before, the caller was expected to take the margins into
* account when determining the destination).
On the plus side, there was now no longer a need to override the margins when
calling `ScrollRegion` in the `AdjustCursorPosition` function. In the first
case, the margins had needed to be cleared (_stream.cpp 143-145), but that is
now the default behaviour. In the second case, there had been a more
complicated adjustment of the margins (_stream.cpp 196-209), but that code was
never actually used so could be removed completely (to get to that point either
_fScrollUp_ was true, so _scrollDownAtTop_ couldn't also be true, or
_fScrollDown_ was true, but in that case there is a check to make sure
_scrollDownAtTop_ is false).
While testing, I also noticed that one of the `ScrollRegion` calls in the
`AdjustCursorPosition` function was not setting the horizontal range correctly
- the scrolling should always affect the full buffer width rather than just the
viewport width - so I've fixed that now as well.
## Validation Steps Performed
For commands like `RI`, `IL`, `DL`, etc. where we've changed the implementation
but not the behaviour, there were already unit tests that could confirm that
the new implementation was still producing the correct results.
Where there has been a change in behaviour - namely for the `ICH` and `DCH`
commands, and the `ScrollConsoleScreenBuffer` API - I've extended the existing
unit tests to check that they still function correctly even when the `DECSTBM`
margins are set (which would previously have caused them to fail).
I've also tested manually with the test cases in issues #2543 and #2659, and
confirmed that they now work as expected.
Closes#2543Closes#2659
* fixes#411
* update this comment to actually match
* run this test in isolation so it doesn't break other tests, @dhowett-msft
* This fixes the test that's broken?
Kinda raises more questions tbh
CLS calls two functions:
- `SetConsoleCursorPositionImpl()`
- `ScrollConsoleScreenBufferWImpl()`
Both of these were not checking which buffer to apply to (main vs active buffer).
Now we get the active buffer and apply the changes to that one.
Also, we forgot to switch out of the alt buffer in the previous test. Added that in.
Closes#1189.
* Move cursor position to the left margin after execution of the IL and DL escape sequences.
* Update IL and DL screen buffer tests to account for the cursor moving to the left margin.
There are a number of VT escape sequences that rely on the `ScrollRegion`
function to scroll the viewport (RI, DL, IL, SU, SD, ICH, and DCH) , and all of
them have got the clipping rect or scroll boundaries wrong in some way,
resulting in content being scrolled off the screen that should have been
clipped, revealed areas not being correctly filled, or parts of the screen not
being moved that should have been. This PR attempts to fix all of those issues.
The `ScrollRegion` function is what ultimately handles the scrolling, but it's
typically called via the `ApiRoutines::ScrollConsoleScreenBufferWImpl` method,
and it's the callers of that method that have needed correcting.
One "mistake" that many of these operations made, was in setting a clipping
rect that was different from the scrolling rect. This should never have been
necessary, since the area being scrolled is also the boundary into which the
content needs to be clipped, so the easiest thing to do is just use the same
rect for both parameters.
Another common mistake was in clipping the horizontal boundaries to the width
of the viewport. But it's really the buffer width that represents the active
width of the screen - the viewport width and offset are merely a window on that
active area. As such, the viewport should only be used to clip vertically - the
horizontal extent should typically be the full buffer width.
On that note, there is really no need to actually calculate the buffer width
when we want to set any of the scrolling parameters to that width. The
`ScrollRegion` function already takes care of clipping everything within the
buffer boundary, so we can simply set the `Left` of the rect to `0` and the
`Right` to `SHORT_MAX`.
More details on individual commands:
* RI (the `DoSrvPrivateReverseLineFeed` function)
This now uses a single rect for both the scroll region and clipping boundary,
and the width is set to `SHORT_MAX` to cover the full buffer width. Also the
bottom of the scrolling region is now the bottom of the viewport (rather than
bottom-1), otherwise it would be off by one.
* DL and IL (the `DoSrvPrivateModifyLinesImpl` function)
Again this uses a single rect for both the scroll region and clipping
boundary, and the width is set to `SHORT_MAX` to cover the full width. The
most significant change, though, is that the bottom boundary is now the
viewport bottom rather than the buffer bottom. Using the buffer bottom
prevented it clipping the content that scrolled off screen when inserting,
and failed to fill the revealed area when deleting.
* SU and SD (the `AdaptDispatch::_ScrollMovement` method)
This was already using a single rect for both the scroll region and clipping
boundary, but it was previously constrained to the width of the viewport
rather than the buffer width, so some areas of the screen weren't correctly
scrolled. Also, the bottom boundary was off by 1, because it was using an
exclusive rect while the `ScrollRegion` function expects inclusive rects.
* ICH and DCH (the `AdaptDispatch::_InsertDeleteHelper` method)
This method has been considerably simplified, because it was reimplementing a
lot of functionality that was already provided by the `ScrollRegion`
function. And like many of the other cases, it has been updated to use a
single rect for both the scroll region and clipping boundary, and clip to the
full buffer width rather than the viewport width.
I should add that if we were following the specs exactly, then the SU and SD
commands should technically be panning the viewport over the buffer instead of
moving the buffer contents within the viewport boundary. So SU would be the
equivalent of a newline at the bottom of the viewport (assuming no margins).
And SD would assumedly do the opposite, scrolling the back buffer back into
view (an RI at the top of the viewport should do the same).
This doesn't seem to be something that is consistently implemented, though.
Some terminals do implement SU as a viewport pan, but I haven't seen anyone
implement SD or RI as a pan. If we do want to do something about this, I think
it's best addressed as a separate issue.
## Validation Steps Performed
There were already existing tests for the SU, SD, ICH, and DCH commands, but
they were implemented as adapter tests, which weren't effectively testing
anything - the `ScrollConsoleScreenBufferW` method used in those tests was just
a mock (an incomplete reimplementation of the `ScrollRegion` function), so
confirming that the mock produced the correct result told you nothing about the
validity of the real code.
To address that, I've now reimplemented those adapter tests as screen buffer
tests. For the most part I've tried to duplicate the functionality of the
original tests, but there are significant differences to account for the fact
that scrolling region now covers the full width of the buffer rather than just
the viewport width.
I've also extended those tests with additional coverage for the RI, DL, and IL
commands, which are really just a variation of the SU and SD functionality.
Closes#2174
## Summary of the Pull Request
When a user had "Disable Scroll Forward" enabled and switched to the alt buffer and maximized the console, then restored down, we'd crash. Now we don't.
## References
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#1206
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The problem is that we'd previously try to "anchor" the viewport to the virtual bottom when resizing like this. This would also cause us to move the top of the viewport down, into the buffer. However, if the alt buffer is getting smaller, we don't want to do this - if we anchor to the old _virtualBottom, the bottom of the viewport will actually be outside the current buffer.
This could theoretically happen with the main buffer too, but it's much easier to repro with the alt buffer.
When the scrollback buffer is empty, the RIS escape sequence (Reset to Initial
State) will fail to clear the screen, or reset any of the state. And when there
is something in the scrollback, it doesn't get cleared completely, and the
screen may get filled with the wrong background color (it should use the
default color, but it actually uses the previously active background color).
This commit attempts to fix those issues.
The initial failure is caused by the `SCREEN_INFORMATION::WriteRect` method
throwing an exception when passed an empty viewport. And the reason it's passed
an empty viewport is because that's what the `Viewport::Subtract` method
returns when the result of the subtraction is nothing. The PR fixes the
problem by making the `Viewport::Subtract` method actually return nothing in
that situation.
This is a change in the defined behavior that also required the associated
viewport tests to be updated. However, it does seem a sensible change, since
the `Subtract` method never returns empty viewports under any other
circumstances. And the only place the method seems to be used is in the
`ScrollRegion` implementation, where the previous behavior is guaranteed to
throw an exception.
The other issues are fixed simply by changing the order in which things are
reset in the `AdaptDispatch::HardReset` method. The call to `SoftReset` needed
to be made first, so that the SGR attributes would be reset before the screen
was cleared, thus making sure that the default background color would be used.
And the screen needed to be cleared before the scrollback was erased, otherwise
the last view of the screen would be retained in the scrollback buffer.
These changes also required existing adapter tests to be updated, but not
because of a change in the expected behaviour. It's just that certain tests
relied on the `SoftReset` happening later in the order, so weren't expecting it
to be called if say the scrollback erase had failed. It doesn't seem like the
tests were deliberately trying to verify that the SoftReset _hadn't_ been
called.
In addition to the updates to existing tests, this PR also add a new screen
buffer test which verifies the display and scrollback are correctly cleared
under the conditions that were previously failing.
Fixes#2307.
* Fix margin boundary tests in the RI, DL, and IL sequences.
* Refactor the margin boundary tests into a reusable SCREEN_INFORMATION method.
* Add screen buffer unit tests for the RI, DL, and IL sequences.
* Add support for origin mode (DECOM).
* Added a state machine unit test for the origin mode.
* Prevent the cursor position moving below the bottom margin of the scrolling region if the origin mode is relative.
* Only adjust the relative cursor position for origin mode if the scrolling region is actually set.
* Add some screenbuffer unit tests for the origin mode.
* Enhance the soft reset screenbuffer tests to verify the origin mode is reset.
* Move the origin mode flag constructor assignments into the intializer list.
* Implement XTerm's private mode escape sequence for enabling DECCOLM support.
* Add output engine and screen buffer units test for the private mode 40 escape sequence.
* Removed using namespace directive from header files and put these in cpp files where they are used
* Fixed tabbing issues by replacing them with spaces.
Also regrouped the using directives.
* Update src/host/exemain.cpp
Co-Authored-By: Mike Griese <migrie@microsoft.com>
* Update src/interactivity/win32/find.cpp
Co-Authored-By: Mike Griese <migrie@microsoft.com>
* Support OSC to set default background and foreground colors
* Update the Terminal theme when the background changes
* Fix whitespace per code-review
* Add Documentation Comments
Also fix a few outdated comments and whitespace
* Update Telemetry codes per code review
* Add Unit Tests for OSC ForegroundColor and BackgroundColor
* Add a couple additional test cases
* Minor doc and whitespace change per PR review
* Update comment help per code review
* Add another OSC 10 & 11 test case, improve output
* Comments and syntax cleanup per code reviews
