This adds [`XamlStyler.Console`] to our solution, and calls it when we
format the code, to also format
our .xaml files.
* `XamlStyler.Console` is a dotnet tool so it needs to be restored with
`dotnet tool restore`
* I've added a set of rules to approximately follow [@cmaneu's XAML guidelines].
Those guidelines also recommend things based on the code-behind, which
this tool can't figure out, but also _don't matter that much_.
* There's an extra step to strip BOMs from the output, since Xaml Styler
adds a BOM by default. Some had them before and others didn't. BOMs
have been nothing but trouble though.
[`XamlStyler.Console`]: https://github.com/Xavalon/XamlStyler
[@cmaneu's XAML guidelines]: https://github.com/cmaneu/xaml-coding-guidelines
This is entirely self-serving. In my go-to config, I like having some of
the panes for a given profile in a different color scheme. This will let
a user pass `--colorScheme <scheme name>` to manually override the
scheme for that profile. Neat!
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently, when the MRU is enabled we lose the keybinding allowing us to
go forward/backward (aka right/left in LTR) in the tab view.
To fix that, this PR introduces "tabSwitcherMode" optional parameter to
the prevTab / nextTab commands.
If it is not provided the global setting will be used.
So if you want to go to adjacent tabs, even if MRU is enabled on the
system level you can use:
```
{ "command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
or even
```
{"command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
if you don't want tab switcher to show up
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9330
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated - not yet. Waiting for approval.
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
**BE NOT AFRAID**. I know that there's 107 files in this PR, but almost
all of it is just find/replacing `TerminalControl` with `Control`.
This is the start of the work to move TermControl into multiple pieces,
for #5000. The PR starts this work by:
* Splits `TerminalControl` into separate lib and dll projects. We'll
want control tests in the future, and for that, we'll need a lib.
* Moves `ICoreSettings` back into the `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`
namespace. We'll have other types in there soon too.
* I could not tell you why this works suddenly. New VS versions? New
cppwinrt version? Maybe we're just better at dealing with mdmerge
bugs these days.
* RENAMES `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to
`Microsoft.Terminal.Control`. This touches pretty much every file in
the sln. Sorry about that (not sorry).
An upcoming PR will move much of the logic in TermControl into a new
`ControlCore` class that we'll add in `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`.
`ControlCore` will then be unittest-able in the
`UnitTests_TerminalCore`, which will help prevent regressions like #9455
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
You're really gonna want to clean the sln first, then merge this into
your branch, then rebuild. It's very likely that old winmds will get
left behind. If you see something like
```
Error MDM2007 Cannot create type
Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.KeyModifiers in read-only metadata
file Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.
```
then that's what happened to you.
This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string
as the "name" of the window. So you can say
```sh
wt -w foo new-tab
wt -w foo split-pane
```
and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named
"foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs
of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and
displaying these names.
> #### `--window,-w <window-id>`
> Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening
> new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows.
> * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_.
> * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the
> commands in a _new_ Terminal window.
> * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the
> commandline in that window.
> * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new
> window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the
> commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window.
> * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when
> determining which window to run the command in.
Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning
the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new
window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345.
## References
* #4472, #8135
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## Validation Steps Performed
Ran tests
Messed with naming windows, working as expected.
Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
This accomplishes the first step towards embedding a preview on the Profiles/ColorSchemes page, by moving the `TerminalSettings` object over to the Terminal Settings Model project. We'll leverage this in a later PR to construct an embedded terminal in the settings UI.
`TerminalSettings` had to see a few more functions exposed in the IDL
(including some inheritance stuff).
Refresh the JSON to make TerminalSettings do it's thing across all the
open terminals.
References #9122 - Terminal Preview
References #6800 - SUI Epic
When the user executes `--help`, make sure we force the creation of a new window, so that the `MessageBox` will actually appear.
Add tests too.
* [x] I work here
* [x] Fixes#9230
* [x] Tests added
I'm gonna have to immediately rewrite those tests for https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478, but this issue is ship-blocking so I don't care
Fixes exception in FilteredCommandTests, caused due to
an attempt to instantiate PropertyChangedEventArgs on non-UI thread.
Though the diff might look scary it is just wrapping with `RunOnUIThread`
Support for fragment extensions, according to the implementation
outlined in #7584 (which calls them proto extensions.)
See #7584 for more information.
## Validation Steps Performed
Self-testing by creating the folder
`%LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows Terminal\Fragments`
and adding a json file into it to modify and add profiles
Also self-tested with an app extension
Closes#1690
A bunch of our local tests regressed recently. I'm unsure as to when
this happened. Clearly, we all do a super good job of running these
tests 😄.
* I had to make sure the call to `AppLogic::CurrentAppSettings` was
try/caught, because that doesn't work in the tests
* I had to make the `Pointer*` events take a weak pointer to the
`TerminalPage` because for whatever reason, they'd be called at a
weird point in the test init, causing the tests to fail. It was weird.
Almost as if the TerminalPage had been released, but the test logs
showed it hadn't barely been set up yet? Whatever, this fixes it.
* The `VerifyCommandPaletteTabSwitcherOrder` test needed to take a time
out, for reasons that are not totally clear to me. That one was flakey
and I hate it.
### Checklist:
* [x] Doesn't close anything, this is just something I noticed.
* [x] Doesn't require docs to be updated, it's test fixes
* [x] Yea, I ran the tests
/cc @Don-Vito: The `FilteredCommandTests` all crashed immediately for
me. I'm not sure what's causing that - I _think_ everything we need for
those tests is set up right? The generated `AppxManifest.xml` had all
the right classes listed in it, I really can't be sure what was wrong
there. These tests aren't run in CI so it's not a super big deal, but I
thought I'd let you know.
(cherry picked from commit ccda434f69)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
The TerminalSettings object we create from profiles no longer gets passed into the control, instead, a child of that object gets passed into the control. Any overrides the control makes to the settings then live in the child. So, when we do a settings reload, we simply update the child's parent and the overrides will remain.
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing
## Summary of the Pull Request
I forgot to reset the `--size` argument to `split-pane` when I added it. This PR fixes that, and adds a test so I don't regress it again.
## References
* Missed in #8543
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for the `move-focus` subcommand to `wt.exe`. This subcommand works _exactly_ like `moveFocus(up|down|left|right)`.
## References
* Will surely conflict with #8183
* Is goodness even in the world where #5464 exists
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6580
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Docs PR: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#209
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Bear with me, I wrote this before paternity leave, so code might be a bit stale.
Oddly, after startup, this _does not_ leave the focus on the pane you moved to. If you `move-focus` during startup, at the end of startup, we'll still focus a _random_ pane. This is because the terminal still auto-focus a TermControl when it's done with layout. While we'll maintain the active control just fine during the startup, at the end of startup, all the controls will complete layout in a random order.
This is no different than the startup right now. `wt sp ; sp ; sp` will focus a random pane at the end. This is left for a future someone to fix
This is also subject to #2398 / #4692. Moving in a direction isn't _totally_ reliable currently. `focus-pane -t ID` will certainly be more reliable, but this will work in the meantime?
## Validation Steps Performed
Opened probably 100 terminals, confirmed that the layout was always correct. Final focused pane was random, but the layout was right.
This commit iontroduces another `target` to the `openSettings` binding:
`settingsUI`. It opens the settings UI introduced in the previous
commit.
Closes#1564Closes#8048 (PR)
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000Closes#2871
There's a handful of small changes in these updates:
The Win32 Toolkit is now built with CFG (I think), and
the VCRT forwarders are now the (second) non-RC version.
First step towards #8415:
* Introduce `PaletteItem` and derive from it to provide native support
for tabs and command lines (`ActionPaletteItem` / `TabPaletteItem`,
`CommandLinePaltteItem`)
* Remove business logic behind PaletteItem from palette (aka dispatch
commands and preview tabs externally)
This commit moves us to the Xaml prerelease (201202003) that is
equivalent to public stable release 2.5.
Remember, we need to use prereleases for some silly reason.
* Add a tabColor parameter to the `new-tab` and `split-panes` command
* Add --tabColor to the command line, to allow bootstrapping with tabs
of different colors
Add another field to NewTerminalArgs. Use this field to set
StartingTabColor in Terminal. This color gets overridden by the color
defined by the profile / VT, however can be overridden with the color
picker.
Since the color is the property of the Terminal, when defined for the
tab this color is associated only with the first pane/terminal of the
tab. Additional panes will not inherit this color (to prevent advanced
resolution, where we need to resolve between the inherited color and the
one specified for the pane).
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT for parameters parsing
* Running system with several tabs of different colors.
* Adding custom actions with colors
* Performing operations like split pane, duplicate and so on
Closes#8075
Currently when implicit tab command is specified (i.e., we have
parameters for new-tab, but don't have the explicit subcommand name) we
fallback to parsing the entire arg list as new tab command.
However, if we also have a launch profile (or anything else that might in
the future belong to the upper scope) it is passed as a parameter to the
new tab command, failing the parsing.
The idea behind my solution is to run the parser as a prefix command -
i.e., as long as we succeed to parse [options] / [subcommand] we will
parse them (populating the fields like a launch mode), but once we will
discover something unfamiliar, like profile, we will know that the
prefix is over and will handle the remaining suffix as a new tab
command.
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT added
* Manual run of different options
Closes#7318
In introduced a bug in #8185, due to which Command Palette sorts items
alphabetically in the tab switcher mode. This PR fixes it.
Validation:
Created tabs with different names and verified that the MRU order is
preserved
Closes#8185
By adding these target Inputs/Outputs to TestHostApp's AfterBuild, we
can ensure that new versions of the test libraries are properly
detected. No longer will we have to delete them from disk and rebuild
TestHostApp and hope that it picks up the latest test binaries.
Oh, and I turned on a couple other optimizations (hard links, skipping
unchanged files) that were really just low-hanging fruit.
* Created a ViewModel class in the Command Palette called
FilteredCommand, aggregating the Command, the filter and the
highlighted presentation of the command name
* This ListView of the filtered commands is bound to the vector of
FilteredCommands
* Introduced HighlightedTextControl user control with HighlightedText
view model
* Added this control to the ListView Item's grid
* Bound the FilteredCommand's highlighted command name to the user
control
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT for matching algorithm
* Only manual tests
* Searching in CommandLine, SwitchTab and Nested Command modes
* Checking for bot matching an non matching filters
* Dogfooding
Closes#6646
## Summary of the Pull Request
Changes the way the `useTabSwitcher` setting works. It now accepts either a boolean or a string:
* `true`, `"mru"`: Use the tab switcher with MRU tab switching
* `"inOrder"`: Use the tab switcher, with in-order tab switching
* `false`, `"disabled"`: Don't use the tab switcher. Tabs will switch in-order.
This is following the discussion chronicled in #8025, as well as the follow-up investigation in that thread.
## References
* #7952 introduced MRU tab switching
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#8025 - there's also discussion of using a parameter in an action to override this setting, but that should get punted to a follow-up task
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed - YOU BET THEY WERE
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been switching tabs all day and all night, with different settings values, and hot-reloading the setting.
I also _ran the test_ I added.
In preparation for the Settings UI, we needed to make some changes to
Tab to abstract out shared, common functionality between different types
of tab. This is the result of that work. All code references to the
settings have been removed or reverted.
Contains changes from #8053, #7802.
The messages below only make sense in the context of the Settings UI,
which this pull request does not bring in. They do, however, provide
valuable information.
From #7802 (@leonMSFT):
> This PR's goal was to add an option to the `OpenSettings` keybinding to
> open the Settings UI in a tab. In order to implement that, a couple of
> changes had to be made to `Tab`, specifically:
>
> - Introduce a tab interface named `ITab`
> - Create/Rename two new Tab classes that implement `ITab` called
> `SettingsTab` and `TerminalTab`
>
From #8053:
> `TerminalTab` and `SettingsTab` share some implementation details. The
> close submenu introduced in #7728 is a good example of functionality
> that is consistent across all tabs. This PR transforms `ITab` from an
> interface, into an [unsealed runtime class] to de-duplicate some
> functionality. Most of the logic from `SettingsTab` was moved there
> because I expect the default behavior of a tab to resemble the
> `SettingsTab` over a `TerminalTab`.
>
> ## References
> Verified that Close submenu work was transferred over (#7728, #7961, #8010).
>
> ## Validation Steps Performed
> Check close submenu on first/last tab when multiple tabs are open.
>
> Closes#7969
>
> [unsealed runtime class]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/midl-3/intro#base-classes
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR replaces `CascadiaSettings::_profiles` with...
- `_allProfiles`: the list of all available profiles in the settings model (i.e. settings.json, dynamic profiles, etc...)
- `_activeProfiles`: the list of all non-hidden profiles (used for the new tab dropdown)
## References
#8018: maintaining a list of all profiles allows us to serialize hidden profiles
#1564: Settings UI can link to `AllProfiles()` instead of `ActiveProfiles()` to expose hidden profiles
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#4139
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
Deploy and testing succeeded
This commit fixes our longstanding build artifact output issues and
finally unifies all C++ project output into bin/ and obj/.
In light of that, I've removed NoOutputRedirection.
I've also updated WTU and U8U16Test to use our common build props and
fixed any warnings/compilation errors that popped out.
I validated this change by running repeated incremental builds after
changing individual .cpp files in many of our C++/WinRT projects.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Introduces `IInheritable` as an interface that helps move cascading settings into the Terminal Settings Model. `GlobalAppSettings` and `Profile` both are now `IInheritable`. `CascadiaSettings` was updated to `CreateChild()` for globals and each profile when we are loading the JSON data.
IInheritable does most of the heavy lifting. It introduces a two new macros and the interface. The macros help implement the fallback functionality for nullable and non-nullable settings.
## References
#7876 - Spec Addendum
#6904 - TSM Spec
#1564 - Settings UI
#7876 - `Copy()` needs to be updated to include _parent
## Summary of the Pull Request
Fixes the bug where `exit`ing inside a closed pane would leave the Terminal blank.
Additionally, removes `Tab::GetRootElement` and replaces it with the _observable_ `Tab::Content`. This should be more resilient in the future.
Also adds some tests, though admittedly not for this exact scenario. This scenario requires a cooperating TerminalConnection that I can drive for the sake of testing, and _ain't nobody got time for that_.
## References
* Introduced in #6989
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7252
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed 🎉
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
From notes I had left in `Tab.cpp` while I was working on this:
```
OKAY I see what's happening here the ActivePaneChanged Handler in TerminalPage
doesn't re-attach the tab content to the tree, it just updates the title of the
window.
So when the pane is `exit`ed, the pane's control is removed and re-attached to
the parent grid, which _isn't in the XAML tree_. And no one can go tell the
TerminalPage that it needs to re set up the tab content again.
The Page _manually_ does this in a few places, when various pane actions are
about to take place, it'll unzoom. It would be way easier if the Tab could just
manage the content of the page.
Or if the Tab just had a Content that was observable, that when that changed,
the page would auto readjust. That does sound like a LOT of work though.
```
## Validation Steps Performed
Opened panes, closed panes, exited panes, zoomed panes, moved focus between panes, panes, panes, panes
This commit introduces two new launch modes: focus and maximizedFocus.
* Focused mode, behaves like a default mode, but with the Focus Mode
enabled.
* Maximized focused mode, behaves like a Maximized mode, but with the
Focus Mode enabled.
There two ways to invoke these new modes:
* In the settings file: you set the "launchMode" to either "focus" or
"maximizedFocus"
* In the command line options, you can path -f / --focus, which is
mutually exclusive with the --fullscreen, but can be combined with the
--maximized:
* Passing -f / --focus will launch the terminal in the "focus" mode
* Passing -fM / --focus --maximized will launch the terminal in the
"maximizedFocus" mode
This should resolve a relevant part in the command line arguments
mega-thread #4632Closes#7124Closes#7825Closes#7875
Introduces a new TerminalSettingsModel (TSM) project. This project is
responsible for (de)serializing and exposing Windows Terminal's settings
as WinRT objects.
## References
#885: TSM epic
#1564: Settings UI is dependent on this for data binding and settings access
#6904: TSM Spec
In the process of ripping out TSM from TerminalApp, a few other changes
were made to make this possible:
1. AppLogic's `ApplicationDisplayName` and `ApplicationVersion` was
moved to `CascadiaSettings`
- These are defined as static functions. They also no longer check if
`AppLogic::Current()` is nullptr.
2. `enum LaunchMode` was moved from TerminalApp to TSM
3. `AzureConnectionType` and `TelnetConnectionType` were moved from the
profile generators to their respective TerminalConnections
4. CascadiaSettings' `SettingsPath` and `DefaultSettingsPath` are
exposed as `hstring` instead of `std::filesystem::path`
5. `Command::ExpandCommands()` was exposed via the IDL
- This required some of the warnings to be saved to an `IVector`
instead of `std::vector`, among some other small changes.
6. The localization resources had to be split into two halves.
- Resource file linked in init.cpp. Verified at runtime thanks to the
StaticResourceLoader.
7. Added constructors to some `ActionArgs`
8. Utils.h/cpp were moved to `cascadia/inc`. `JsonKey()` was moved to
`JsonUtils`. Both TermApp and TSM need access to Utils.h/cpp.
A large amount of work includes moving to the new namespace
(`TerminalApp` --> `Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model`).
Fixing the tests had its own complications. Testing required us to split
up TSM into a DLL and LIB, similar to TermApp. Discussion on creating a
non-local test variant can be found in #7743.
Closes#885
Add `ToJson()` to the `ConversionTrait`s in JsonUtils. This can be used
to serialize settings objects into JSON.
As a proof of concept, `ToJson` and `UpdateJson` were added to
`ColorScheme`.
Getters and setters for members and colors in the color table were added
and polished.
## References
#1564 - Settings UI
`ColorScheme` is a particularly easy example of serialization because it
has _no fallback_.
Added a few tests for JSON serializers.
`KeyMapping` was introduced to break up `AppKeyBindings`. `KeyMapping`
records the keybindings from the JSON and lets you query them.
`AppKeyBindings` now just holds a `ShortcutActionDispatcher` to run
actions, and a `KeyMapping` to record/query your existing keybindings.
This refactor allows `KeyMapping` to be moved to the
TerminalSettingsModel, and `ShortcutActionDispatcher` and
`AppKeyBindings` will stay in TerminalApp.
`AppKeyBindings` had to be passed down to a terminal via
`TerminalSettings`. Since each settings object had its own
responsibility to update/create a `TerminalSettings` object, I moved all
of that logic to `TerminalSettings`. This helps with the
TerminalSettingsModel refactor, and makes the construction of
`TerminalSettings` a bit cleaner and more centralized.
## References
#885 - this is all in preparation for the TerminalSettingsModel
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Tests passed
- [X] Deployment succeeded
Now that CascadiaSettings is a WinRT object, we need to update the error
handling a bit. Making it a WinRT object limits our errors to be
hresults. So we moved all the error handling down a layer to when we
load the settings object.
- Warnings encountered during validation are saved to `Warnings()`.
- Errors encountered during validation are saved to `GetLoadingError()`.
- Deserialization errors (mainly from JsonUtils) are saved to
`GetDeserializationErrorMessage()`.
## References
#7141 - CascadiaSettings is a settings object
#885 - this makes ripping out CascadiaSettings into
TerminalSettingsModel much easier
## Validation Steps Performed
* [x] Tests passed
- [x] Deployment succeeded
- tested with invalid JSON (deserialization error)
- tested with missing DefaultProfile (validation error)
CascadiaSettings is now a WinRT object in the TerminalApp project.
## References
#7141 - CascadiaSettings is a settings object
#885 - this new settings object will be moved to a new TerminalSettingsModel project
This one _looks_ big, but most of it is really just propagating the
changes to the tests. In fact, you can probably save yourself some time
because the tests were about an hour of Find&Replace.
`CascadiaSettings::GetCurrentAppSettings()` was only being used in
Pane.cpp. So I ripped out the 3 lines of code and stuffed them in there.
Follow-up work:
- There's a few places in AppLogic where I `get_self` to be able to get
the warnings out. This will go away in the next PR (wrapping up #885)
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Tests passed
- [X] Deployment succeeded
Closes#7141
GlobalAppSettings is now a WinRT object in the TerminalApp project.
## References
#7141 - GlobalAppSettings is a settings object
#885 - this new settings object will be moved to a new TerminalSettingsModel project
## PR Checklist
* [x] Tests passed
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This one was probably the easiest thus far.
The only weird thing is how we handle InitialPosition. Today, we lose a
little bit of fidelity when we convert from LaunchPosition (int) -->
Point (float) --> RECT (long). The current change converts
LaunchPosition (optional<long>) --> InitialPosition (long) --> RECT
(long).
NOTE: Though I could use LaunchPosition to go directly from TermApp to
AppHost, I decided to introduce InitialPosition because LaunchPosition
will be a part of TerminalSettingsModel soon.
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Tests passed
- [x] Deployment succeeded
Profile is now a WinRT object in the TerminalApp project.
As with ColorScheme, all of the serialization logic is not exposed via
the idl. TerminalSetingsModel will handle it when it's all moved over.
I removed the "Get" and "Set" prefixes from all of the Profile
functions. It just makes more sense to use the `GETSET_PROPERTY` macro
to do most of the work for us.
`CloseOnExitMode` is now an enum off of the Profile.idl.
`std::optional<wstring>` got converted to `hstring` (as opposed to
`IReference<hstring>`). `IReference<hstring>` is not valid to MIDL.
## References
#7141 - Profile is a settings object
#885 - this new settings object will be moved to a new TerminalSettingsModel project
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Tests passed
- [x] Deployment succeeded
Closes#7435
The easiest fix was actually just moving all the source files from
`TerminalApp` to `TerminalApp/lib`, where the appropriate `pch.h`
actually resides.
Closes#6866
In #6532, we thought it would be a good idea to add "bindings" as an
overload for "keybindings", as we were no longer going to use the
keybindings array for just keybindings. We were going to add commands.
So we started secretly treating `"bindings"` the same as
`"keybindings"`.
Then, in #7175, we discussed using "actions" as the key for the list of
commands/keybindings/global actions, instead of using "bindings". We're
going to be using this array as the global list of all actions, so it
makes sense to just call it `"actions"`.
This PR renames "bindings" to "actions". Fortunately, we never
documented the "bindings" overload in the first place, so we can get
away with this safely, and preferably before we ship "bindings" for too
long.
References #6899
## Summary of the Pull Request
Allows for creating commands that iterate over the user's color schemes. Also adds a top-level nested command to `defaults.json` that allows the user to select a color scheme (pictured above). I'm not sure there are really any other use cases that make sense, but it _really_ makes sense for this one.
## References
* #5400 - cmdpal megathread
* made possible by #6856, _and support from viewers like you._
* All this is being done in pursuit of #6689
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes wait what? I could have swore there was an issue for this one...
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - okay maybe now I'll write some docs
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Most of the hard work for this was already done in #6856. This is just another thing to iterate over.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Played with this default command. It works great.
* Added tests.
Use the Helix testing orchestration framework to run our Terminal LocalTests and Console Host UIA tests.
## References
#### Creates the following new issues:
- #7281 - re-enable local tests that were disabled to turn on Helix
- #7282 - re-enable UIA tests that were disabled to turn on Helix
- #7286 - investigate and implement appropriate compromise solution to how Skipped is handled by MUX Helix scripts
#### Consumes from:
- #7164 - The update to TAEF includes wttlog.dll. The WTT logs are what MUX's Helix scripts use to track the run state, convert to XUnit format, and notify both Helix and AzDO of what's going on.
#### Produces for:
- #671 - Making Terminal UIA tests is now possible
- #6963 - MUX's Helix scripts are already ready to capture PGO data on the Helix machines as certain tests run. Presuming we can author some reasonable scenarios, turning on the Helix environment gets us a good way toward automated PGO.
#### Related:
- #4490 - We lost the AzDO integration of our test data when I moved from the TAEF/VSTest adapter directly back to TE. Thanks to the WTTLog + Helix conversion scripts to XUnit + new upload phase, we have it back!
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#3838
* [x] I work here.
* [x] Literally adds tests.
* [ ] Should I update a testing doc in this repo?
* [x] Am core contributor. Hear me roar.
* [ ] Correct spell-checking the right way before merge.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
We have had two classes of tests that don't work in our usual build-machine testing environment:
1. Tests that require interactive UI automation or input injection (a.k.a. require a logged in user)
2. Tests that require the entire Windows Terminal to stand up (because our Xaml Islands dependency requires 1903 or later and the Windows Server instance for the build is based on 1809.)
The Helix testing environment solves both of these and is brought to us by our friends over in https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml.
This PR takes a large portion of scripts and pipeline configuration steps from the Microsoft-UI-XAML repository and adjusts them for Terminal needs.
You can see the source of most of the files in either https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/tree/master/build/Helix or https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/tree/master/build/AzurePipelinesTemplates
Some of the modifications in the files include (but are not limited to) reasons like:
- Our test binaries are named differently than MUX's test binaries
- We don't need certain types of testing that MUX does.
- We use C++ and C# tests while MUX was using only C# tests (so the naming pattern and some of the parsing of those names is different e.g. :: separators in C++ and . separators in C#)
- Our pipeline phases work a bit differently than MUX and/or we need significantly fewer pieces to the testing matrix (like we don't test a wide variety of OS versions).
The build now runs in a few stages:
1. The usual build and run of unit tests/feature tests, packaging verification, and whatnot. This phase now also picks up and packs anything required for running tests in Helix into an artifact. (It also unifies the artifact name between the things Helix needs and the existing build outputs into the single `drop` artifact to make life a little easier.)
2. The Helix preparation build runs that picks up those artifacts, generates all the scripts required for Helix to understand the test modules/functions from our existing TAEF tests, packs it all up, and queues it on the Helix pool.
3. Helix generates a VM for our testing environment and runs all the TAEF tests that require it. The orchestrator at helix.dot.net watches over this and tracks the success/fail and progress of each module and function. The scripts from our MUX friends handle installing dependencies, making the system quiet for better reliability, detecting flaky tests and rerunning them, and coordinating all the log uploads (including for the subruns of tests that are re-run.)
4. A final build phase is run to look through the results with the Helix API and clean up the marking of tests that are flaky, link all the screenshots and console output logs into the AzDO tests panel, and other such niceities.
We are set to run Helix tests on the Feature test policy of only x64 for now.
Additionally, because the set up of the Helix VMs takes so long, we are *NOT* running these in PR trigger right now as I believe we all very much value our 15ish minute PR turnaround (and the VM takes another 15 minutes to just get going for whatever reason.) For now, they will only run as a rolling build on master after PRs are merged. We should still know when there's an issue within about an hour of something merging and multiple PRs merging fast will be done on the rolling build as a batch run (not one per).
In addition to setting up the entire Helix testing pipeline for the tests that require it, I've preserved our classic way of running unit and feature tests (that don't require an elaborate environment) directly on the build machines. But with one bonus feature... They now use some of the scripts from MUX to transform their log data and report it to AzDO so it shows up beautifully in the build report. (We used to have this before I removed the MStest/VStest wrapper for performance reasons, but now we can have reporting AND performance!) See https://dev.azure.com/ms/terminal/_build/results?buildId=101654&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab for an example.
I explored running all of the tests on Helix but.... the Helix setup time is long and the resources are more expensive. I felt it was better to preserve the "quick signal" by continuing to run these directly on the build machine (and skipping the more expensive/slow Helix setup if they fail.) It also works well with the split between PR builds not running Helix and the rolling build running Helix. PR builds will get a good chunk of tests for a quick turn around and the rolling build will finish the more thorough job a bit more slowly.
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Ran the updated pipelines with Pull Request configuration ensuring that Helix tests don't run in the usual CI
- [x] Ran with simulation of the rolling build to ensure that the tests now running in Helix will pass. All failures marked for follow on in reference issues.
ColorScheme is now a WinRT object.
All of the JSON stuff can't be exposed via the idl. So the plan here is
that we'll have the TerminalSettingsModel project handle all of the
serialization when it's moved over. These functions will be exposed off
of the `implementation` namespace, not projected namespace.
References #7141 - ColorScheme is a settings object
References #885 - this new settings object will be moved to a new
TerminalSettingsModel project
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Tests passed
- [x] Deployment succeeded
