## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently when configuring the action
```json
{ "command": { "action": "closeTabsAfter" } }
```
we get a schema error in VSCode: `Matches multiple schemas when only one must validate.`.
The problem is that it matches both `closeTabsAfter` and `closeTab`, since the schema uses regex patterns to match instead of plain strings. I swapped the usage of `"pattern"` with `"const"` for all actions.
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated
* [x] Schema updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
## Validation Steps Performed
I checked and this action configuration no longer errors.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently when configuring the action
```json
{ "command": { "action": "commandPalette", "launchMode": "commandLine" }, "key": "ctrl+shift+p" }
```
or
```json
{ "command": { "action": "multipleActions", "actions": [{ "action": "paste" }] }, "key": "ctrl+shift+v" }
```
we get a schema error in VSCode. These object variants of the actions were not configured properly in the schema, so I fixed it.
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated
* [x] Schema updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
In the schema there is a big `oneOf` for the `command` of an action under `actions`.
Commands that also accept extra arguments have an object type defined for it.
The `commandPalette` and `multipleActions` commands accept extra arguments, and also have matching `CommandPaletteAction` and `MultipleActionsAction` object types defined, but they are unused.
So I added them to the `oneOf` array in the correct placement.
## Validation Steps Performed
## Summary of the Pull Request
The `settings.json` schema had `"default"`s for some boolean settings set as quoted strings (`"true"` / `"false"`), so I removed the quotes.
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated
* [x] Schema updated
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
VSCode autocompletes the default value when you select the setting in intellisense, so it autocompleted a string which caused a schema error. Booleans should be JSON booleans, not quoted.
## Validation Steps Performed
## Summary of the Pull Request
The type of the `"id"` argument of the `focusPane` action under `"actions"` in the `settings.json` schema was incorrectly set to a string.
It's actually expecting a non-negative number, and defaults to 0.
So I fixed the schema.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#11393
* [x] CLA signed
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
## Validation Steps Performed
I've validated that a string makes Windows Terminal complain it's a string and not a number, and that a number works as expected, and that the default is indeed zero.
This fixes two issues with profiles.schema.json:
* The `$schema` should not end in a `#`
* `$defs` is the official reserved keyword for schema re-use
See: http://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Schema updated
## Validation Steps Performed
The previous schema didn't pass https://jschon.dev/, the new schema does.
This commit adds the ability to interact with subtrees of panes.
Have you ever thought that you don't have enough regression testing to
do? Boy do I have the PR for you! This breaks all kinds of assumptions
about what is or is not focused, largely complicated by the fact that a
pane is not a proper control. I did my best to cover as many cases as I
could, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some things broken that
I am unaware of.
Done:
- Add `parent` and `child` movement directions to move up and down the
tree respectively
- When a parent pane is selected it will have borders all around it in
addition to any borders the children have.
- Fix focus, swap, split, zoom, toggle orientation, resize, and move to
all handle interacting with more than one pane.
- Similarly the actions for font size changing, closing, read-only, clearing
buffer, and changing color scheme will distribute to all children.
- This technically leaves control focus on the original control in the
focused subtree because panes aren't proper controls themselves. This
is also used to make sure we go back down the same path with the
`child` movement.
- You can zoom a parent pane, and click between different zoomed
sub-panes and it won't unzoom you until you use moveFocus or another
action. This wasn't explicitly programmed behavior so it is probably
buggy (I've quashed a couple at least). It is a natural consequence of
showing multiple terminals and allowing you to focus a terminal and a
parent separately, since changing the active pane directly does not
unzoom. This also means there can be a disconnect between what pane is
zoomed and what pane is active.
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested focus movement, swapping, moving panes, and zooming.
Closes#10733
Implements the following keyboard selection non-configurable key bindings:
- shift+arrow --> move endpoint by character
- ctrl+shift+left/right --> move endpoint by word
- shift+home/end --> move to beginning/end of line
- ctrl+shift+home/end --> move to beginning/end of buffer
This was purposefully done in the ControlCore layer to make keyboard selection an innate part of how the terminal functions (aka a shared component across terminal consumers).
## References
#715 - Keyboard Selection
#2840 - Spec
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comment
The most relevant section is `TerminalSelection.cpp`, where we define how each movement operates. It's basically a giant embedded switch-case statement. We leverage a lot of the work done in a11y to perform the movements.
## Validation Steps Performed
- General cases:
- test all of the key bindings added
- Corner cases:
- `char`: wide glyph support
- `word`: move towards, away, and across the selection pivot
- automatically scroll viewport
- ESC (and other key combos) are still clearing the selection properly
This introduces a spec for keyboard selection. This enables the user to create and update a selection without the use of a mouse or stylus.
## References
Contributes to #715
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for vintage style opacity, on Windows 11+. The API we're using for this exists since the time immemorial, but there's a bug in XAML Islands that prevents it from working right until Windows 11 (which we're working on backporting).
Replaces the `acrylicOpacity` setting with `opacity`, which is a uint between 0 and 100 (inclusive), default to 100.
`useAcrylic` now controls whether acrylic is used or not. Setting an opacity < 100 with `"useAcrylic": false` will use vintage style opacity.
Mouse wheeling adjusts opacity. Whether acrylic is used or not is dependent upon `useAcrylic`.
`opacity` will stealthily default to 50 if `useAcrylic:true` is set.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#603
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/416
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Opacity was moved to AppearanceConfig. In the future, I have a mind to allow unfocused acrylic, so that'll be important then.
## Validation Steps Performed
_just look at it_
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds directional modifiers for SplitState and convert those to the appropriate horizontal/vertical when splitting a pane.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#4340
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
"vertical" and "horizontal" splits were removed from `defaults.json`, but code was added to parse those as `right` and `down` respectively. It is also the case that if a user has a custom hotkey for `split: vertical` it will override the default for `split: right`.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Split the pane using each of the new directional movements
This PR simply replaces all uses of "TrayIcon" and "Tray" with "NotificationIcon" and "NotificationArea" to be more accurate. Originally I kinda wanted to only replace all occurrences of it in settings and user facing things, but I figured I might as well make it consistent throughout all of our code.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Basically undoes #10988 in favour of implementing it as described in #11018
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#11018
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [X] Tests added/passed
* [X] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [X] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
## Validation Steps Performed
- alt+space opens the system menu by default
- when alt+space is bound, the keys do not get send to terminal
- right-click on the tab bar didn't break (still opens system menu at the location of the cursor)
Add the ability to quit all terminal instances. Doing this separately from the window layout saving ones to lessen the number of 1k+ line monsters I make y'all review.
## References
#11083
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#11081
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
- Warn the user before they do so to give a chance to cancel
- Percolate a QuitAll event up to the monarch who then directs each peasant to clsoe.
- Leave a window-layout-saving-sized hole to add that feature on top
## Validation Steps Performed
- quit with one window (from the monarch)
- quit from the monarch with multiple windows
- quit from a peasant
- cancel the quit dialog
This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application
close.
Done:
- Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained.
- Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and
then save if you are the last window closing.
- Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button.
- If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x
button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved
state.
- Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can
perform to restore its layout and the window size/position
information.
- This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't
actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it
does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a
different pane selected.
Todo:
- multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one
window.
- PR #11083 will save multiple windows.
- This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs
appear to be focused on opening.
Next Steps:
- The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as
necessary.
- Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state
as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way
saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking
schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple
windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now.
- One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can
be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the
nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on
first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the
windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous
window (if it is in the saved state).
- Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user
editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't
know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and
startupActions.
Validation Steps Performed:
- The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal
-> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows.
- That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved
session.
- Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window
closed saves its state.
The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to
restore the terminal to its saved form.
References #8324
This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000Closes#766
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add a new action that can contain multiple other actions.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#3992
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Creates a shortcut action that allows a list of actions to be specified as arguments. Steals a bunch of the serialization code from my other pr. Overall, because I had the serialization code written already, this was remarkably easy.
I can't think of any combined action to be added to the defaults, so I think this is just a thing for the documentation unless someone else has a good example. I know there are lot of times when the recommended workaround is "make an action with commandline wt.exe ..." and this could be a good replacement for that, but that is all personalized.
I didn't add this to the command line parsing, since the command line is already a way to run multiple actions.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Created a new command, confirmed that "Move right->down" showed up in the command palette, and that running it did the correct behavior (moving right one pane, then down one pane).
```
{
"command": {
"action": "multipleActions",
"name": "Move right->down",
"actions": [
{"action": "moveFocus", "direction": "right" },
{"action": "moveFocus", "direction": "down" },
]
}
}
```
This commit adds the ability to target the first pane in the tree,
always.
I wasn't able to find an existing issue for this, it is just a personal
feature for me. I won't be heartbroken if it does not get merged.
As motivation, I frequently have setups where the thing I am primarily
working on is a large pane on the left and everything else is in smaller
panes positioned elsewhere. I like to have one hotkey where I can go to
any pane and then make it the "primary" pane if I am changing what I am
working on or need to focus on another set of code/documentation/etc.
## Validation Steps Performed
Confirmed that the move focus and swap pane variants both affect the
correct pane.
### ⇒ [doc link](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/dev/migrie/s/1032-elevation-qol/doc/specs/%235000%20-%20Process%20Model%202.0/%231032%20-%20Elevation%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Improvements.md) ⇐
## Summary of the Pull Request
Despite my best efforts to mix elevation levels in a single Terminal window, it seems that there's no way to do that safely. With the dream of mixed elevation dead, this spec outlines a number of quality-of-life improvements we can make to the Terminal today. These should make using the terminal in elevated scenarios better, since we can't have M/E.
### Abstract
> For a long time, we've been researching adding support to the Windows Terminal
> for running both unelevated and elevated (admin) tabs side-by-side, in the same
> window. However, after much research, we've determined that there isn't a safe
> way to do this without opening the Terminal up as a potential
> escalation-of-privilege vector.
>
> Instead, we'll be adding a number of features to the Terminal to improve the
> user experience of working in elevated scenarios. These improvements include:
>
> * A visible indicator that the Terminal window is elevated ([#1939])
> * Configuring the Terminal to always run elevated ([#632])
> * Configuring a specific profile to always open elevated ([#632])
> * Allowing new tabs, panes to be opened elevated directly from an unelevated
> window
> * Dynamic profile appearance that changes depending on if the Terminal is
> elevated or not. ([#1939], [#8311])
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #1032, #632
* [x] References: #5000, #4472, #2227, #7240, #8135, #8311
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
### Why are these two separate documents?
I felt that the spec that is currently in review in #7240 and this doc should remain separate, yet closely related documents. #7240 is more about showing how this large set of problems discussed in #5000 can all be solved technically, and how those solutions can be used together. It establishes that none of the proposed solutions for components of #5000 will preclude the possibility of other components being solved. What it does _not_ do however is drill too deeply on the user experience that will be built on top of those architectural changes.
This doc on the other hand focuses more closely on a pair of scenarios, and establishes how those scenarios will work technically, and how they'll be exposed to the user.
Adds new in-order traversal for MoveFocus and SwapPane actions.
Refactors the Pane methods to share a `NavigateDirection`
implementation.
Closes#10909
A large amount of the churn here is just renaming some of the things for
directional movement to reflect that it might not always be based on the
focused pane. `NextPane` and `PreviousPane` are the functions that
actually select the next/previous pane respectively and are the core
component of this PR.
VALIDATION
Created multiple panes on a tab, and tried both forward and backwards
movements with move-focus and swap-pane.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This adds a new setting `intenseTextStyle`. It's a per-appearance, control setting, defaulting to `"all"`.
* When set to `"all"` or `["bold", "bright"]`, then we'll render text as both **bold** and bright (1.10 behavior)
* When set to `"bold"`, `["bold"]`, we'll render text formatted with `^[[1m` as **bold**, but not bright
* When set to `"bright"`, `["bright"]`, we'll render text formatted with `^[[1m` as bright, but not bold. This is the pre 1.10 behavior
* When set to `"none"`, we won't do anything special for it at all.
## references
* I last did this in #10648. This time it's an enum, so we can add bright in the future. It's got positive wording this time.
* ~We will want to add `"bright"` as a value in the future, to disable the auto intense->bright conversion.~ I just did that now.
* #5682 is related
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#10576
* [x] I seriously don't think we have an issue for "disable intense is bright", but I'm not crazy, people wanted that, right? https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/2916#issuecomment-544880423 was the closest
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/381
## Validation Steps Performed
<!--  -->
Yea that works. Printed some bold text, toggled it on, the text was no longer bold. hooray.
### EDIT, 10 Aug
```json
"intenseTextStyle": "none",
"intenseTextStyle": "bold",
"intenseTextStyle": "bright",
"intenseTextStyle": "all",
"intenseTextStyle": ["bold", "bright"],
```
all work now. Repro script:
```sh
printf "\e[1m[bold]\e[m[normal]\e[34m[blue]\e[1m[bold blue]\e[m\n"
```
A brief summary of the behavior of the tray icon:
- There will only ever be one tray icon representing all windows.
- Left-Click on a Tray Icon brings up the MRU window.
- Right-Click on a Tray Icon brings up a Context Menu:
```
Focus Terminal
----------------
Windows --> Window ID 1 - <unnamed window>
Named Window
Named Window Again
```
- Focus Terminal will bring up the MRU window.
- Clicking on any of the Window "names" in the submenu will summon the window.
## Settings Changes
Two new global settings are introduced: `alwaysShowTrayIcon` and `minimizeToTray`. Here's a chart explaining the behavior with the two settings.
| | `alwaysShowTrayIcon:true` | `alwaysShowTrayIcon:false` |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `minimizeToTray:true` | tray icon is always shown. minimize button will hide the window. | tray icon is always shown. minimize button will hide the window. |
| `minimizeToTray:false` | tray icon is always shown. | tray icon is not shown ever. |
Closes#5727
## References
[Spec for Minimize to Tray](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%23653%20-%20Quake%20Mode/%23653%20-%20Quake%20Mode.md#minimize-to-tray)
Docs PR - MicrosoftDocs/terminal#352
#10448 - My list of TODOs
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add the ability to toggle a pane's split direction
- Switch from horizontal to vertical split (and vice versa)
- Propogate new borders through to children.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#10665
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#10665
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Ran terminal, created multiple panes in different orientations, ran command through command palate and verified that they displayed properly in the new orientation.
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Fixes/implements #10058 according to directions in that issue: added support for browser navigation keys to be used in actions.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#10058
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated: . If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/371
* [x] Schema updated.
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. According to instructions in #10058
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The mouse back/forward keys do not correspond to the keys added here. That would be a nice (but more complicated) addition, I'll add an issue for it.
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to swap a pane with an adjacent (Up/Down/Left/Right) neighbor.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
This work potentially touches on: #1000#2398 and #4922
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes a component of #1000 (partially, comment), #4922 (partially, `SwapPanes` function is added but not hooked up, no detach functionality)
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Its been a while since I've written C++ code, and it is my first time working on a Windows application. I hope that I have not made too many mistakes.
Work currently done:
- Add boilerplate/infrastructure for argument parsing, hotkeys, event handling
- Adds the `MovePane` function that finds the focused pane, and then tries to find
a pane that is visually adjacent to according to direction.
- First pass at the `SwapPanes` function that swaps the tree location of two panes
- First working version of helpers `_FindFocusAndNeighbor` and `_FindNeighborFromFocus`
that search the tree for the currently focused pane, and then climbs back up the tree
to try to find a sibling pane that is adjacent to it.
- An `_IsAdjacent' function that tests whether two panes, given their relative offsets, are adjacent to each other according to the direction.
Next steps:
- Once working these functions (`_FindFocusAndNeighbor`, etc) could be utilized to also solve #2398 by updating the `NavigateFocus` function.
- Do we want default hotkeys for the new actions?
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
At this point, compilation and manual testing of functionality (with hotkeys) by creating panes, adding distinguishers to each pane, and then swapping them around to confirm they went to the right location.
This commit introduces an alternative to specifying key bindings as a combination of key modifiers and a character. It allows you to specify an explicit virtual key as `vk(nnn)`.
Additionally this commit makes it possible to bind actions to scan codes. As scan code 41 appears to be the button below the Escape key on virtually all keyboards, we'll be able to bind the quake mode hotkey to `win+sc(41)` and have it work consistently across most if not all keyboard layouts.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7539, Closes#10203
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
The following was tested both on US and DE keyboard layouts:
* Ctrl+, opens settings ✔️
* Win+` opens quake mode window ✔️
* Ctrl+plus/minus increase/decrease font size ✔️
Introduces `FontConfig`, an object that isolates font-related settings
in our profiles
Users can now define font settings in their json as so:
```
"font":{
"face": "Consolas",
"size": 12
}
```
Backwards compatible with the currently expected way of defining font
settings in the json, note however that upon hitting 'Save' in the SUI,
these settings **will be rewritten to the font-object style in the json
(as above)**.
## Validation Steps Performed
Existing functionality works, new functionality works
References #1790Closes#6049
This commit introduces a basic ApplicationState class, without being used for anything yet to aid reviewers. At a later point actual usages of this new class may be added separately.
## References
This commit is an initial step towards implementing #8324.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Creating a `state.json` with `{"generatedProfiles":["{53e75ed9-2b63-4118-856d-0510c4f6b97e}"]}` updates the ApplicationState, as observed through a debugger ✔️
* Deleting the "generatedProfiles" field sets the corresponding field back to nullopt ✔️
## Summary of the Pull Request
Updates the `closeTab` action to optionally take an index.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7180
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#347
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
## Validation Steps Performed
Added the following configuration to `settings.json` and validated both key combinations behaved as expected. Also opened the command palette and ensured that the actions were displayed.
```json
{ "command": "closeTab", "keys": "ctrl+shift+delete" },
{ "command": { "action": "closeTab", "index": 0 }, "keys": "ctrl+shift+end" }
```
Noticed the json schema was listing the option as invalid even though it's accepted by WT. So added it to schema to remove the error.
## PR Checklist
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] Schema updated.
## Validation Steps Performed
No longer shows as invalid in VSCode.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds a global "language" setting, which may be set to any supported BCP 47 tag.
Additionally a ComboBox is added to the settings UI under "Appearance", listing all languages with their localized names.
This PR introduces one new issue: If you change the language while the app is running, the UI will be in a torn state, as not all UI elements refresh automatically if the `PrimaryLanguageOverride` is changed.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5497
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated
## Validation Steps Performed
* UI language changes when changing the "language" in settings.json before starting WT / while WT is running. ✔️
* "language" field is removed from settings.json if "Use system default" is selected. ✔️
* "language" field is added or updated in settings.json if any other language is selected. ✔️
* Removes qps- languages if debugFeatures is false. ✔️
* Correctly refreshes all UI elements with the new language. ❌
This pull request implements a "feature flagging" system that will let
us turn Terminal and conhost features on/off by branch, "release" status
or branding (Dev, Preview, etc.).
It's loosely modelled after the Windows OS concept of "Velocity," but
only insofar as it is driven by an XML document and there's a tool that
emits a header file for you to include.
It only supports toggling features at compile time, and the feature flag
evaluators are intended to be fully constant expressions.
Features are added to `src\features.xml` and marked with a "stage". For
now, the only stages available are `AlwaysDisabled` and `AlwaysEnabled`.
Features can be toggled to different states using branch and branding
tokens, as documented in the included feature flag docs.
For a given feature Feature_XYZ, we will emit two fixtures visible to
the compiler:
1. A preprocessor define `TIL_FEATURE_XYZ_ENABLED` (usable from MIDL,
C++ and C)
2. A feature class type `Feature_XYZ` with a static constexpr member
`IsEnabled()` (usable from C++, designed for `if constexpr()`).
Like Velocity, we rely on the compiler to eliminate dead code caused by
things that compile down to `if constexpr (false)`. :)
Michael suggested that we could use `WindowsInbox` as a branding to
determine when we were being built inside Windows to supplant our use of
the `__INSIDE_WINDOWS` preprocessor token. It was brilliant.
Design Decisions
----------------
* Emitting the header as part of an MSBuild project
* WHY: This allows the MSBuild engine to ensure that the build is
only run once, even in a parallel build situation.
* Only having one feature flag document for the entire project
* WHY: Ease.
* Forcibly including `TilFeatureStaging` with `/FI` for all CL compiler
invocations.
* WHY: If this is a project-wide feature system, we should make it as
easy as possible to use.
* Emitting preprocessor definitions instead of constexpr/consteval
* WHY: Removing entire functions/includes is impossible with `if
constexpr`.
* WHY: MIDL cannot use a `static constexpr bool`, but it can rely on
the C preprocessor to remove text.
* Using MSBuild to emit the text instead of PowerShell
* WHY: This allows us to leverage MSBuild's `WriteOnlyWhenDifferent`
task parameter to avoid changing the file's modification time when
it would have resulted in the same contents. This lets us use the
same FeatureStaging header across multiple builds and multiple
branches and brandings _assuming that they do not result in a
feature flag change_.
* The risk in using a force-include is always that it, for some
reason, determines that the entire project is out of date. We've
gone to great lengths to make sure that it only does so if the
features _actually materially changed_.
Add missing keys to the schema:
- globalSummon (and args: desktop, monitor, name, dropdownDuration, toggleVisibility)
- quakeMode
- iterateOn
- commands
Also enforces required keys for commands and deprecates "keybindings"
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7443
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] Schema updated.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
There were some other pending keys mentioned on the issue, but I don't think they are pending anymore.
## Validation Steps Performed
Changed the `"$schema"` value in my settings.json to point to the edited one.
Update profiles schema to draft 2020-12 because as mentioned in https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/98724#issuecomment-786502628, OpenAPI Specification 3.1 defines using JSON Schema 2020-12 and VS Code already has early implementation around it.
Basically, this just gets rid of the following error shown by VS Code when editing the settings.json file
```
Draft 2019-09 schemas are not yet fully supported.
```
## PR Checklist
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] Schema updated.
Docs have been updated (for bug fixes/features)
docs update => proper capitalisation would be better. 👍: Github
## PR Checklist
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
### Other information:
Signed-off-by: Ayushman Singh Chauhan <ascb508@gmail.com>
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a new bellStyle called `window`. When `window` is set and a BEL is emitted, we flash the pane that emitted it.
Additionally, changes bellStyle in the SUI to a list of checkboxes instead of radio buttons, to match bellStyle being a flag-enum. Deprecates 'BellStyle::Visual' in the schema, but still allows it to be set in the json (it maps to `Window | Taskbar`)
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#6700
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
GIF in Teams
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for the `focusPane` action, and the `focus-pane` subcommand. These allow the user to focus a pane by it's ID.
* `focusPane` accepts an `id`, identifying the id of the pane to focus.
* `focus-pane`, `fp` requires the parameter `--target,-t` to ID the pane it's going to focus.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5803
* [x] Closes#5464
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - oh no
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The ID isn't _totally_ useful right now, since users can't see them. But they're there, and used in-order. This is just slightly more ergonomic for complicated commandlines than `mf up; mf left`
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested in command palette
Tested a variety of commandlines. `wtd -w 0 mf down ; sp` and `wtd -w 0 fp -t 1 ; sp` gave me special difficulty.
NotWearingPants
Dmitriy Fishman
PankajBhojwani
NotWearingPants
Leonard Hecker
Mike Griese
Schuyler Rosefield
Sujal Gupta
Carlos Zamora
Leon Liang
Kayla Cinnamon
Mahdi Hosseini
Floris Westerman
onerandomusername
Ian O'Neill
WSLUser
Ikko Ashimine
Dustin L. Howett
Luan Vitor Simião Oliveira
Emmanuel Alap
Ayushman Singh Chauhan
