Right now, we store GUIDs in panes and most of the functions for interacting
with profiles on the settings model take GUIDs and look up profiles.
This pull request changes how we store and look up profiles to prefer profile
objects. Panes store strong references to their originating profiles, which
simplifies settings lookup for CloseOnExit and the bell settings. In fact,
deleting a pane's profile no longer causes it to forget which CloseOnExit
setting applies to it. Duplicating a pane that is hosting a deleted profile
(#5047) now duplicates the profile, even though it is otherwise unreachable.
This makes the world more consistent and allows us to _eventually_ support panes
hosting profiles that do not have GUIDs that can be looked up in the profile
list. This is a gateway to #6776 and #10669, and consolidating the profile
lookup logic will help with #10952.
PR #10588 introduced TerminalSettings::CreateWithProfile and made
...CreateWithProfileByID a thin wrapper over top it, which looked up the profile
by GUID before proceeding. It has also been removed, as its last caller is gone.
Closes#5047
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
- Monarch no longer sets itself up as a `CTerminalHandoff` multi instance server by default
- In fact, `CTerminalHandoff` will only ever be a single instance server
- When COM needs a `CTerminalHandoff`, it launches `wt.exe -embedding`, which gets picked up by the Monarch and then gets handed off to itself/peasant depending on user settings.
- Peasant now recognizes the `-embedding` commandline and will start a `CTerminalHandoff` single instance listener, and receives the connection into a new tab.
Closes#10358
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds the Split Tab option to the tab context menu.
Clicking this option will `auto` split the active pane of the tab into a duplicate pane.
Clicking on an unfocused tab and splitting it will bring that tab into focus and split its active pane.
We could make this a flyout from the context menu to let people choose horizontal/vertical split in the future if it's requested.
I'm also wondering if this should be called Split Pane instead of Split Tab?
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#1912
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5025
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/127691919-aae4683a-212a-4525-a0eb-a61c877461ed.mp4
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
- For tabs started from the Terminal, the initial sizing information is
passed into the connection and used to establish the PTY. Those
parameters are given over to the `OpenConsole.exe` acting as PTY to
establish the initial buffer/window size.
- However, for tabs started from outside, the PTY is created with some
default buffer information FIRST as the Terminal hasn't even been
involved yet. As such, when the Terminal gets that connection, it must
tell the PTY to resize just as it connects to match the window size
it's about to use.
- Ongoing resize operations in the Terminal did and still work fine
because they transmitted the updated size with the
`ResizePseudoConsole` API.
## Validation Steps Performed
- [x] Confirmed existing tabs opening have correct initial size in PTY
(like with CMD `mode con` command)
- [x] Confirmed inbound cmd tabs have correct initial size in PTY via
`mode con` command per bug repro
Closes#9811
## Summary of the Pull Request
When we perform a `focusTab` action, we currently do nothing if the parameter was greater than the number of tabs. This PR changes that behavior. Now, `focus-tab -t 999999` will always focus the last tab, instead of silently doing nothing.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9369
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
* [x] ran tests
* [x] validated commandline manually
## Summary of the Pull Request
Updates the `closeTab` action to optionally take an index.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7180
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#347
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
## Validation Steps Performed
Added the following configuration to `settings.json` and validated both key combinations behaved as expected. Also opened the command palette and ensured that the actions were displayed.
```json
{ "command": "closeTab", "keys": "ctrl+shift+delete" },
{ "command": { "action": "closeTab", "index": 0 }, "keys": "ctrl+shift+end" }
```
A redo of #6290. That PR was overkill. In that one, we'd toss focus back to the active control any time that the tab view item got focus. That's maybe not the _best_ solution.
Instead, this PR is precision strikes. We're re-using a lot of what we already have from #9260.
* When the context menu is closed, yeet focus to the control.
* When the renamer is dismissed, yeet focus to the control.
* When the TabViewItem is tapped (meaning no one else handled it), yeet focus to the control.
### checklist
* [x] I work here
* [ ] This is UI so it doesn't have tests
* [x] Closes#3609
* [x] Closes#5750
* [x] Closes#6680
### scenarios:
* [x] focus the window by clicking on the tab -> Control is focused.
* [x] Open the color picker with the context menu, can move the focus inside the picker with the arrow keys.
* [x] Dismiss the picker with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the picker with enter -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the renamer with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the renamer with enter -> Control is focused.
* [x] Dismiss the context menu with esc -> Control is focused.
* [x] Start renaming, then click on the tab -> Rename is committed, Control is focused.
* [x] Start renaming, then click on the text box -> focus is still in the text box
This entirely removes `KeyMapping` from the settings model, and builds on the work done in #9543 to consolidate all actions (key bindings and commands) into a unified data structure (`ActionMap`).
## References
#9428 - Spec
#6900 - Actions page
Closes#7441
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The important thing here is to remember that we're shifting our philosophy of how to interact/represent actions. Prior to this, the actions arrays in the JSON would be deserialized twice: once for key bindings, and again for commands. By thinking of every entry in the relevant JSON as a `Command`, we can remove a lot of the context switching between working with a key binding vs a command palette item.
#9543 allows us to make that shift. Given the work in that PR, we can now deserialize all of the relevant information from each JSON action item. This allows us to simplify `ActionMap::FromJson` to simply iterate over each JSON action item, deserialize it, and add it to our `ActionMap`.
Internally, our `ActionMap` operates as discussed in #9428 by maintaining a `_KeyMap` that points to an action ID, and using that action ID to retrieve the `Command` from the `_ActionMap`. Adding actions to the `ActionMap` automatically accounts for name/key-chord collisions. A `NameMap` can be constructed when requested; this is for the Command Palette.
Querying the `ActionMap` is fairly straightforward. Helper functions were needed to be able to distinguish an explicit unbinding vs the command not being found in the current layer. Internally, we store explicitly unbound names/key-chords as `ShortcutAction::Invalid` commands. However, we return `nullptr` when a query points to an unbound command. This is done to hide this complexity away from any caller.
The command palette still needs special handling for nested and iterable commands. Thankfully, the expansion of iterable commands is performed on an `IMapView`, so we can just expose `NameMap` as a consolidation of `ActionMap`'s `NameMap` with its parents. The same can be said for exposing key chords in nested commands.
## Validation Steps Performed
All local tests pass.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds some special behavior to the window named "\_quake".
* When creating the quake window, it ignores "initialRows" and "initialCols" and opens on the top half of the monitor.
- It uses `initialPosition` to determine which monitor this is
* It cannot be moved
* It can only be vertically resized on the bottom border.
* It's always in focus mode.
- We should probably have an issue tracking "Allow showing tabs in focus mode"? Maybe?
- This one element is maybe the one I'm least attached to
When renaming a window to "\_quake", it adopts all those behaviors as well. It does not exit focus mode when leaving QM, nor does it resize back. That seemed unnecessary.
## References
* As spec'ed in #9274
* See also #8888
## PR Checklist
* [x] In the pursuit of #653
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated, but I'm not gonna do any of that till quake mode is totally done.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Note that this doesn't do things like:
* dropdown
* global hotkey summon
* summon to the current monitor
* summon to the current desktop
I'm doing #653 _very_ piecemeal, to try and make the PRs less egregious.
## Validation Steps Performed
* validated that center on launch still works
* validated that QM works on different monitors based on `initialPosition`
* validated entering/exiting QM behaves as expected
## TODO!
* [ ] When snapping the quake window between desktops with <kbd>win+shift+arrow</kbd>, the window doesn't horizontally re-size to the new monitor dimensions. It should.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/8374
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The majority of the work was already done earlier.
The fix is only in _SetFocusedTab, that runs asynchronously
and thus might result in a race or even overflow.
All other changes are decorative.
## Validation Steps Performed
UT and manual tests
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9836
* [x] CLA signed.
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
Not sure what is the reason for handling right button.
But delaying it to PointerReleased seems not to regress anything.
This pull request adds an appearance configuration object to our
settings model and app lib, allowing the control to be rendered
differently depending on its state, and then uses it to add support for
an "unfocused" appearance that the terminal will use when it's not in
focus.
To accomplish this, we isolated the appearance-related settings from
Profile (into AppearanceConfig) and TerminalSettings (into the
IControlAppearance and ICoreAppearance interfaces). A bunch of work was
done to make inheritance work.
The unfocused appearance inherits from the focused one _for that
profile_. This is important: If you define a
defaults.unfocusedAppearance, it will apply all of defaults' settings to
any leaf profile when a terminal in that profile is out of focus.
Specified in #8345Closes#3062Closes#2316
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently, both when the tab is already closed, and when there is a
request to close a tab (might be rejected), we go through the same flow
in TerminalPage.
This might leave the system in inconsistent state, as the side-effects
of closing will persist even if the closing was aborted.
This PR separates between the two flows, by introducing a CloseRequested
event to the TabBase.
This event is used to inform the upper tier (the terminal page) about
the request and to trigger the same logic that happens when the tab is
closed directly from the terminal page (e.g., by clicking close on the
tab view).
The Closed event will be used only to handle the actual closing of the
tab. It will ensure that the tab gets removed from the terminal page if
required.
As a result, it a read-only pane will be closed non-interactively (aka
connection exits), the tab closed flow will be invoked, and no user
prompt will be shown.
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9572
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
I think we can all agree that `TerminalPage.cpp` is an unruly beast of a
file. It's got everything. It does everything. It can sometimes be a bit
hard to work with, because of simply how big it is. This PR tries to
alleviate this by making `TerminalPage.cpp` just a little smaller. It
does so by moving pretty much everything related to tab management into
its own file, `TabManagement.cpp`. These methods that have moved are all
the same as they were before, and they're still members of
`TerminalPage`. But now they're all in one place.
I tried to move all the references to `_tabs` in `TerminalPage.cpp`, but
there's still a few that I left behind. Mostly because I felt that
moving those would be too gnarly a code change for an otherwise simple
cut&paste PR.
There are a few new methods I introduced:
* `_TabDragStarted` and `_TabDragCompleted`: These were lambdas before,
promoted to full methods.
* `_DismissTabContextMenus`: Remove all the right-click context menus
from the tabs
* `_FocusCurrentTab`: This one's a bit trickier, we were actually doing
this in a few different places, so I tried consolidating.
* `_HasMultipleTabs`: This doesn't need explaining.
* `_RemoveAllTabs`: Really, just encapsulation for the sake of removing
a `_tabs` from `TerminalPage.cpp`
* `_ResizeTabContent`: Really, just encapsulation for the sake of
removing a `_tabs` from `TerminalPage.cpp`
In the future, some enterprising young soul could try promoting that
file to its own class, and hiding `_tabs` (and `_mruTabs`) inside it.
Probably would need to take a reference to TerminalPage's `_tabView` and
`_newTabButton`. I'm not doing that right now, because I already hate
the idea of the ...
> 920 additions and 847 deletions.
... I'm making you look at already.
## Other thoughts
Some of the calls might be a little arbitrary - `_OpenNewTab` and
`_CreateNewTabFromSettings` probably should stay in `TerminalPage`? Or
at least elements of those might need to get split up better. Similarly
`TerminalPage::_OpenSettingsUI` stayed in `TerminalPage.cpp`, but it
does a lot of the same work as `_CreateNewTabFromSettings`. I'm not
saying this is the definitive places for these methods - it's code we're
working with, not stone ☺️
