## Summary of the Pull Request
Upgrade the Windows SDK to 19041 by setting `WindowsTargetPlatformMinVersion` to 17763 and `WindowsTargetPlatformVersion` to 19041.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
General usage of the Windows Terminal application appears fine.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Brace yourselves, it's finally here. This PR does the dirty work of splitting the monolithic `TermControl` into three components. These components are:
* `ControlCore`: This encapsulates the `Terminal` instance, the `DxEngine` and `Renderer`, and the `Connection`. This is intended to everything that someone might need to stand up a terminal instance in a control, but without any regard for how the UX works.
* `ControlInteractivity`: This is a wrapper for the `ControlCore`, which holds the logic for things like double-click, right click copy/paste, selection, etc. This is intended to be a UI framework-independent abstraction. The methods this layer exposes can be called the same from both the WinUI TermControl and the WPF control.
* `TermControl`: This is the UWP control. It's got a Core and Interactivity inside it, which it uses for the actual logic of the terminal itself. TermControl's main responsibility is now
By splitting into smaller pieces, it will enable us to
* write unit tests for the `Core` and `Interactivity` bits, which we desparately need
* Combine `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity` in an out-of-proc core process in the future, to enable tab tearout.
However, we're not doing that work quite yet. There's still lots of work to be done to enable that, thought this is likely the biggest portion.
Ideally, this would just be methods moved wholesale from one file to another. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of cases where that didn't work as well as expected. Especially when trying to better enforce the boundary between the classes.
We've got a couple tests here that I've added. These are partially examples, and partially things I ran into while implementing this. A bunch of things from #7001 can go in now that we have this.
This PR is gonna be a huge pain to review - 38 files with 3,730 additions and 1,661 deletions is nothing to scoff at. It will also conflict 100% with anything that's targeting `TermControl`. I'm hoping we can review this over the course of the next week and just be done with it, and leave plenty of runway for 1.9 bugs in post.
## References
* In pursuit of #1256
* Proc Model: #5000
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6842
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760249
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50760258
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
* I don't love the names `ControlCore` and `ControlInteractivity`. Open to other names.
* I added a `ICoreState` interface for "properties that come from the `ControlCore`, but consumers of the `TermControl` need to know". In the future, these will all need to be handled specially, because they might involve an RPC call to retrieve the info from the core (or cache it) in the window process.
* I've added more `EventArgs` to make more events proper `TypedEvent`s.
* I've changed how the TerminalApp layer requests updated TaskbarProgress state. It doesn't need to pump TermControl to raise a new event anymore.
* ~~Something that snuck into this branch in the very long history is the switch to `DCompositionCreateSurfaceHandle` for the `DxEngine`. @miniksa wrote this originally in 30b8335, I'm just finally committing it here. We'll need that in the future for the out-of-proc stuff.~~
* I reverted this in c113b65d9. We can revert _that_ commit when we want to come back to it.
* I've changed the acrylic handler a decent amount. But added tests!
* All the `ThrottledFunc` things are left in `TermControl`. Some might be able to move down into core/interactivity, but once we figure out how to use a different kind of Dispatcher (because a UI thread won't necessarily exist for those components).
* I've undoubtably messed up the merging of the locking around the appearance config stuff recently
## Validation Steps Performed
I've got a rolling list in https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/6842#issuecomment-810990460 that I'm updating as I go.
Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will
be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in
#7240 & #8135.
This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any
significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project
layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the
actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also
give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're
doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them
selfhosted, before building on them too much.
This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When
windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new
window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please
make a new window".
Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here:
* `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a
static lib.
* `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL,
for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`.
* `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static
lib.
There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of
this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using
[`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my
notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the
whole Process Model 2.0 work.
## References
* #5000 - this is the process model megathread
* #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec.
* #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3
signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢)
* #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2)
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
