Upgrades our SDK from 19041 (Windows 10 20H1) to 22000 (Windows 11 RTM).
The newer SDK is more compatible with /Zc:preprocessor
and will allow us to use newer Windows 11 APIs directly.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Compiles ✔️
* Runs ✔️
Implements `_MakePane` in `TerminalPage`, which creates a pane that then can be used to pass into another pane to split or to create a new tab with. Places where we split pane or create a new tab now use `_MakePane`.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#11021
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] I work here
## Validation Steps Performed
Stands up to manual testing with multiple new pane/new tab commands as well as startup actions
This commit fixes various failing TestHostApp unit tests.
Most of these broke as part of 168d28b (#11184).
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#11339
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
This commit adds the ability to interact with subtrees of panes.
Have you ever thought that you don't have enough regression testing to
do? Boy do I have the PR for you! This breaks all kinds of assumptions
about what is or is not focused, largely complicated by the fact that a
pane is not a proper control. I did my best to cover as many cases as I
could, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some things broken that
I am unaware of.
Done:
- Add `parent` and `child` movement directions to move up and down the
tree respectively
- When a parent pane is selected it will have borders all around it in
addition to any borders the children have.
- Fix focus, swap, split, zoom, toggle orientation, resize, and move to
all handle interacting with more than one pane.
- Similarly the actions for font size changing, closing, read-only, clearing
buffer, and changing color scheme will distribute to all children.
- This technically leaves control focus on the original control in the
focused subtree because panes aren't proper controls themselves. This
is also used to make sure we go back down the same path with the
`child` movement.
- You can zoom a parent pane, and click between different zoomed
sub-panes and it won't unzoom you until you use moveFocus or another
action. This wasn't explicitly programmed behavior so it is probably
buggy (I've quashed a couple at least). It is a natural consequence of
showing multiple terminals and allowing you to focus a terminal and a
parent separately, since changing the active pane directly does not
unzoom. This also means there can be a disconnect between what pane is
zoomed and what pane is active.
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested focus movement, swapping, moving panes, and zooming.
Closes#10733
This commit reduces the code surface that interacts with raw JSON data,
reducing code complexity and improving maintainability.
Files that needed to be changed drastically were additionally
cleaned up to remove any code cruft that has accrued over time.
In order to facility this the following changes were made:
* Move JSON handling from `CascadiaSettings` into `SettingsLoader`
This allows us to use STL containers for data model instances.
For instance profiles are now added to a hashmap for O(1) lookup.
* JSON parsing within `SettingsLoader` doesn't differentiate between user,
inbox and fragment JSON data, reducing code complexity and size.
It also centralizes common concerns, like profile deduplication and
ensuring that all profiles are assigned a GUID.
* Direct JSON modification, like the insertion of dynamic profiles into
settings.json were removed. This vastly reduces code complexity,
but unfortunately removes support for comments in JSON on first start.
* `ColorScheme`s cannot be layered. As such its `LayerJson` API was replaced
with `FromJson`, allowing us to remove JSON-based color scheme validation.
* `Profile`s used to test their wish to layer using `ShouldBeLayered`, which
was replaced with a GUID-based hashmap lookup on previously parsed profiles.
Further changes were made as improvements upon the previous changes:
* Compact the JSON files embedded binary, saving 28kB
* Prevent double-initialization of the color table in `ColorScheme`
* Making `til::color` getters `constexpr`, allow better optimizations
The result is a reduction of:
* 48kB binary size for the Settings.Model.dll
* 5-10% startup duration
* 26% code for the `CascadiaSettings` class
* 1% overall code in this project
Furthermore this results in the following breaking changes:
* The long deprecated "globals" settings object will not be detected and no
warning will be created during load.
* The initial creation of a new settings.json will not produce helpful comments.
Both cases are caused by the removal of manual JSON handling and the
move to representing the settings file with model objects instead
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5276
* [x] Closes#7421
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Out-of-box-experience is identical to before ✔️
(Except for the settings.json file lacking comments.)
* Existing user settings load correctly ✔️
* New WSL instances are added to user settings ✔️
* New fragments are added to user settings ✔️
* All profiles are assigned GUIDs ✔️
* this is the same thing as #10996, but with the fix that caused us to #11031
* This includes https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/pull/3769, so we had to make some adjustments to how we handle tab colors. It works the same as before.
* Should enable #11231 to be started
* [x] Closes#10508
* [x] Closes#7133
* [x] Closes#8948
* [ ] I need to finish letting my 19H1 VM boot to make sure unpackaged still works
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds directional modifiers for SplitState and convert those to the appropriate horizontal/vertical when splitting a pane.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#4340
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
"vertical" and "horizontal" splits were removed from `defaults.json`, but code was added to parse those as `right` and `down` respectively. It is also the case that if a user has a custom hotkey for `split: vertical` it will override the default for `split: right`.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Split the pane using each of the new directional movements
Right now, we store GUIDs in panes and most of the functions for interacting
with profiles on the settings model take GUIDs and look up profiles.
This pull request changes how we store and look up profiles to prefer profile
objects. Panes store strong references to their originating profiles, which
simplifies settings lookup for CloseOnExit and the bell settings. In fact,
deleting a pane's profile no longer causes it to forget which CloseOnExit
setting applies to it. Duplicating a pane that is hosting a deleted profile
(#5047) now duplicates the profile, even though it is otherwise unreachable.
This makes the world more consistent and allows us to _eventually_ support panes
hosting profiles that do not have GUIDs that can be looked up in the profile
list. This is a gateway to #6776 and #10669, and consolidating the profile
lookup logic will help with #10952.
PR #10588 introduced TerminalSettings::CreateWithProfile and made
...CreateWithProfileByID a thin wrapper over top it, which looked up the profile
by GUID before proceeding. It has also been removed, as its last caller is gone.
Closes#5047
This commit moves us from MUX 2.5 to MUX 2.6. I have temporarily
disabled the new control styles in `TerminalApp\App.xaml` by setting
`ControlsResourcesVersion` to `Version1`. There is no significant expected
visual impact.
Closes#10508
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to move a pane to another tab. If the tab index is greater than the number of current tabs a new tab will be created with the pane as its root. Similarly, if the last pane on a tab is moved to another tab, the original tab will be closed.
This is largely complete, but I know that I'm messing around with things that I am unfamiliar with, and would like to avoid footguns where possible.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#4587
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#7075
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Things done:
- Moving a pane to a new tab appears to work. Moving a pane to an existing tab mostly works. Moving a pane back to its original tab appears to work.
- Set up {Attach,Detach}Pane methods to add or remove a pane from a pane. Detach is slightly different than Close in that we want to persist the tree structure and terminal controls.
- Add `Detached` event on a pane that can be subscribed to to remove other event handlers if desired.
- Added simple WalkTree abstraction for one-off recursion use cases that calls a provided function on each pane in order (and optionally terminates early).
- Fixed an in-prod bug with closing panes. Specifically, if you have a tree (1; 2 3) and close the 1 pane, then 3 will lose its borders because of these lines clearing the border on both children https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/src/cascadia/TerminalApp/Pane.cpp#L1197-L1201 .
To do:
- Right now I have `TerminalTab` as a friend class of `Pane` so I can access some extra properties in my `WalkTree` callbacks, but there is probably a better choice for the abstraction boundary.
Next Steps:
- In a future PR Drag & Drop handlers could be added that utilize the Attach/Detach infrastructure to provide a better UI.
- Similarly once this is working, it should be possible to convert an entire tab into a pane on an existing tab (Tab::DetachRoot on original tab followed by Tab::AttachPane on the target tab).
- Its been 10 years, I just really want to use concepts already.
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing by creating pane(s), and moving them between tabs and creating new tabs and destroying tabs by moving the last remaining pane.
## Summary of the Pull Request
When we perform a `focusTab` action, we currently do nothing if the parameter was greater than the number of tabs. This PR changes that behavior. Now, `focus-tab -t 999999` will always focus the last tab, instead of silently doing nothing.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9369
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Validation Steps Performed
* [x] ran tests
* [x] validated commandline manually
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add functionality to swap a pane with an adjacent (Up/Down/Left/Right) neighbor.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
This work potentially touches on: #1000#2398 and #4922
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes a component of #1000 (partially, comment), #4922 (partially, `SwapPanes` function is added but not hooked up, no detach functionality)
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Its been a while since I've written C++ code, and it is my first time working on a Windows application. I hope that I have not made too many mistakes.
Work currently done:
- Add boilerplate/infrastructure for argument parsing, hotkeys, event handling
- Adds the `MovePane` function that finds the focused pane, and then tries to find
a pane that is visually adjacent to according to direction.
- First pass at the `SwapPanes` function that swaps the tree location of two panes
- First working version of helpers `_FindFocusAndNeighbor` and `_FindNeighborFromFocus`
that search the tree for the currently focused pane, and then climbs back up the tree
to try to find a sibling pane that is adjacent to it.
- An `_IsAdjacent' function that tests whether two panes, given their relative offsets, are adjacent to each other according to the direction.
Next steps:
- Once working these functions (`_FindFocusAndNeighbor`, etc) could be utilized to also solve #2398 by updating the `NavigateFocus` function.
- Do we want default hotkeys for the new actions?
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
At this point, compilation and manual testing of functionality (with hotkeys) by creating panes, adding distinguishers to each pane, and then swapping them around to confirm they went to the right location.
This commit is a preparation for upcoming changes to KeyChordSerialization for #7539 and #10203.
In order to support variadic macros, /Zc:preprocessor was enabled, which required changing unrelated parts of the project.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Project still compiles ✔️
Restore embedded manifests to say 18362 or unpackaged activation won't work (for helix testing.)
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#10265
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests now pass
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
- Unpackaged activation uses the embedded manifest inside the exe. We use unpackaged activation to run our tests in Helix as it's easier that way. Turns out the 1903/19h1 OS thinks 19041 isn't greater than the minimum XAML islands version of 18226 and blocks the load of `TerminalApp.dll` causing a crash (fail fast) on launch. For **REASONS**, 18362 is considered greater than 18226.
- Packaged activation will use the value in the .appxmanifest and everything is somehow still fine there even with it saying 19041 now.
## Validation Steps Performed
- Kicking a Helix-run off on this branch: https://dev.azure.com/ms/terminal/_build/results?buildId=177336&view=results
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for the `focusPane` action, and the `focus-pane` subcommand. These allow the user to focus a pane by it's ID.
* `focusPane` accepts an `id`, identifying the id of the pane to focus.
* `focus-pane`, `fp` requires the parameter `--target,-t` to ID the pane it's going to focus.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5803
* [x] Closes#5464
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - oh no
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The ID isn't _totally_ useful right now, since users can't see them. But they're there, and used in-order. This is just slightly more ergonomic for complicated commandlines than `mf up; mf left`
## Validation Steps Performed
Tested in command palette
Tested a variety of commandlines. `wtd -w 0 mf down ; sp` and `wtd -w 0 fp -t 1 ; sp` gave me special difficulty.
## Summary of the Pull Request
Upgrade the Windows SDK to 19041 by setting `WindowsTargetPlatformMinVersion` to 17763 and `WindowsTargetPlatformVersion` to 19041.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
General usage of the Windows Terminal application appears fine.
This entirely removes `KeyMapping` from the settings model, and builds on the work done in #9543 to consolidate all actions (key bindings and commands) into a unified data structure (`ActionMap`).
## References
#9428 - Spec
#6900 - Actions page
Closes#7441
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The important thing here is to remember that we're shifting our philosophy of how to interact/represent actions. Prior to this, the actions arrays in the JSON would be deserialized twice: once for key bindings, and again for commands. By thinking of every entry in the relevant JSON as a `Command`, we can remove a lot of the context switching between working with a key binding vs a command palette item.
#9543 allows us to make that shift. Given the work in that PR, we can now deserialize all of the relevant information from each JSON action item. This allows us to simplify `ActionMap::FromJson` to simply iterate over each JSON action item, deserialize it, and add it to our `ActionMap`.
Internally, our `ActionMap` operates as discussed in #9428 by maintaining a `_KeyMap` that points to an action ID, and using that action ID to retrieve the `Command` from the `_ActionMap`. Adding actions to the `ActionMap` automatically accounts for name/key-chord collisions. A `NameMap` can be constructed when requested; this is for the Command Palette.
Querying the `ActionMap` is fairly straightforward. Helper functions were needed to be able to distinguish an explicit unbinding vs the command not being found in the current layer. Internally, we store explicitly unbound names/key-chords as `ShortcutAction::Invalid` commands. However, we return `nullptr` when a query points to an unbound command. This is done to hide this complexity away from any caller.
The command palette still needs special handling for nested and iterable commands. Thankfully, the expansion of iterable commands is performed on an `IMapView`, so we can just expose `NameMap` as a consolidation of `ActionMap`'s `NameMap` with its parents. The same can be said for exposing key chords in nested commands.
## Validation Steps Performed
All local tests pass.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/8374
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated.
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The majority of the work was already done earlier.
The fix is only in _SetFocusedTab, that runs asynchronously
and thus might result in a race or even overflow.
All other changes are decorative.
## Validation Steps Performed
UT and manual tests
## Summary of the Pull Request
Allow schemes to be previewed as the user hovers over them in the Command Palette.
## References
* Branched off of #8392, which is why the commit history is so polluted. 330a8e8 : 544b2fd has the interesting commits
* #5400: cmdpal megathread
### Potential follow-ups
* changing the font size
* changing the font face
* changing the opacity of acrylic
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6689, a last straggling FHL PR
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated - I don't think so
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This works by inserting a "preview" `TerminalSettings` into the settings hierarchy, before the `TermControl`'s runtime settings, and after the ones from the actual `CascadiaSettings`. This allows us to modify that preview settings object, then discard it when we're done with the preview.
This could also be used for other settings in the future - I built it to be extensible to other `ShortcutAction`s, though I haven't implemented those yet.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Select a colorscheme - it becomes the active one
* `colortool -x <scheme>` after selecting a scheme - colortool overrides the selected scheme
* Select a colorscheme after a `colortool -x <scheme>` after selecting a scheme - the scheme in the palette becomes the active one
* Pressing <kbd>esc</kbd> at any point to dismiss the command palette - scheme returns to the previous one
* reloading the settings - returns to the scheme in the settings
## Summary of the Pull Request
Clearly, I didn't run these tests on my last commit where I made the toasts lazy-load.
## References
* broken in in #9662
*
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#9769
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
For whatever reason, these tests are unhappy running back to back, but are just fine running isolated.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR adds support for renaming windows.
It does so through two new actions:
* `renameWindow` takes a `name` parameter, and attempts to set the window's name
to the provided name. This is useful if you always want to hit <kbd>F3</kbd>
and rename a window to "foo" (READ: probably not that useful)
* `openWindowRenamer` is more interesting: it opens a `TeachingTip` with a
`TextBox`. When the user hits Ok, it'll request a rename for the provided
value. This lets the user pick a new name for the window at runtime.
In both cases, if there's already a window with that name, then the monarch will
reject the rename, and pop a `Toast` in the window informing the user that the
rename failed. Nifty!
## References
* Builds on the toasts from #9523
* #5000 - process model megathread
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-50771747
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests addded (and pass with the help of #9660)
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I'm sending this PR while finishing up the tests. I figured I'll have time to sneak them in before I get the necessary reviews.
> PAIN: We can't immediately focus the textbox in the TeachingTip. It's
> not technically focusable until it is opened. However, it doesn't
> provide an even tto tell us when it is opened. That's tracked in
> microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml#1607. So for now, the user _needs_ to
> click on the text box manually.
> We're also not using a ContentDialog for this, because in Xaml
> Islands a text box in a ContentDialog won't recieve _any_ keypresses.
> Fun!
## Validation Steps Performed
I've been playing with
```json
{ "keys": "f1", "command": "identifyWindow" },
{ "keys": "f2", "command": "identifyWindows" },
{ "keys": "f3", "command": "openWindowRenamer" },
{ "keys": "f4", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "foo" } },
{ "keys": "f5", "command": { "action": "renameWindow", "name": "bar" } },
```
and they seem to work as expected
Broadly, the tests were broken by #7489 because there were no `_startupActions`. They relied on the removed codepath that assumed `wt.exe` always set actions, or `AppCommandlineArgs::ValidateStartupCommands` created one by default.
* [x] fixes#9659
* [x] I work here
* [x] the tests pass again
Change TAEF nuget package to use new Microsoft.Taef name; Update to 10.58 release build version.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes email from Phil letting us know TAEF has a new release build and a rename.
* [x] Closes annoying duplicate TAEF import warning in `Parser.UnitTests.vcxproj`
* [x] I work here.
* [ ] Need to see the tests run off CI to confirm this is fine for those environments and Helix
## Validation Steps Performed
* [x] Build/run tests locally
* [ ] Build/run unit and feature tests in CI
* [ ] Build/run Helix-lab tests in CI
This adds [`XamlStyler.Console`] to our solution, and calls it when we
format the code, to also format
our .xaml files.
* `XamlStyler.Console` is a dotnet tool so it needs to be restored with
`dotnet tool restore`
* I've added a set of rules to approximately follow [@cmaneu's XAML guidelines].
Those guidelines also recommend things based on the code-behind, which
this tool can't figure out, but also _don't matter that much_.
* There's an extra step to strip BOMs from the output, since Xaml Styler
adds a BOM by default. Some had them before and others didn't. BOMs
have been nothing but trouble though.
[`XamlStyler.Console`]: https://github.com/Xavalon/XamlStyler
[@cmaneu's XAML guidelines]: https://github.com/cmaneu/xaml-coding-guidelines
This is entirely self-serving. In my go-to config, I like having some of
the panes for a given profile in a different color scheme. This will let
a user pass `--colorScheme <scheme name>` to manually override the
scheme for that profile. Neat!
## Summary of the Pull Request
Currently, when the MRU is enabled we lose the keybinding allowing us to
go forward/backward (aka right/left in LTR) in the tab view.
To fix that, this PR introduces "tabSwitcherMode" optional parameter to
the prevTab / nextTab commands.
If it is not provided the global setting will be used.
So if you want to go to adjacent tabs, even if MRU is enabled on the
system level you can use:
```
{ "command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "inOrder" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
or even
```
{"command": { "action": "prevTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f1"}
{ "command": { "action": "nextTab", "tabSwitcherMode": "disabled" }, "keys": "ctrl+f2"}
```
if you don't want tab switcher to show up
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9330
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated - not yet. Waiting for approval.
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
**BE NOT AFRAID**. I know that there's 107 files in this PR, but almost
all of it is just find/replacing `TerminalControl` with `Control`.
This is the start of the work to move TermControl into multiple pieces,
for #5000. The PR starts this work by:
* Splits `TerminalControl` into separate lib and dll projects. We'll
want control tests in the future, and for that, we'll need a lib.
* Moves `ICoreSettings` back into the `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`
namespace. We'll have other types in there soon too.
* I could not tell you why this works suddenly. New VS versions? New
cppwinrt version? Maybe we're just better at dealing with mdmerge
bugs these days.
* RENAMES `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to
`Microsoft.Terminal.Control`. This touches pretty much every file in
the sln. Sorry about that (not sorry).
An upcoming PR will move much of the logic in TermControl into a new
`ControlCore` class that we'll add in `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`.
`ControlCore` will then be unittest-able in the
`UnitTests_TerminalCore`, which will help prevent regressions like #9455
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
You're really gonna want to clean the sln first, then merge this into
your branch, then rebuild. It's very likely that old winmds will get
left behind. If you see something like
```
Error MDM2007 Cannot create type
Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.KeyModifiers in read-only metadata
file Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.
```
then that's what happened to you.
This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string
as the "name" of the window. So you can say
```sh
wt -w foo new-tab
wt -w foo split-pane
```
and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named
"foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs
of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and
displaying these names.
> #### `--window,-w <window-id>`
> Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening
> new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows.
> * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_.
> * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the
> commands in a _new_ Terminal window.
> * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the
> commandline in that window.
> * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new
> window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the
> commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window.
> * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when
> determining which window to run the command in.
Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning
the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new
window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345.
## References
* #4472, #8135
* https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5
## Validation Steps Performed
Ran tests
Messed with naming windows, working as expected.
Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
This accomplishes the first step towards embedding a preview on the Profiles/ColorSchemes page, by moving the `TerminalSettings` object over to the Terminal Settings Model project. We'll leverage this in a later PR to construct an embedded terminal in the settings UI.
`TerminalSettings` had to see a few more functions exposed in the IDL
(including some inheritance stuff).
Refresh the JSON to make TerminalSettings do it's thing across all the
open terminals.
References #9122 - Terminal Preview
References #6800 - SUI Epic
When the user executes `--help`, make sure we force the creation of a new window, so that the `MessageBox` will actually appear.
Add tests too.
* [x] I work here
* [x] Fixes#9230
* [x] Tests added
I'm gonna have to immediately rewrite those tests for https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478, but this issue is ship-blocking so I don't care
Fixes exception in FilteredCommandTests, caused due to
an attempt to instantiate PropertyChangedEventArgs on non-UI thread.
Though the diff might look scary it is just wrapping with `RunOnUIThread`
Support for fragment extensions, according to the implementation
outlined in #7584 (which calls them proto extensions.)
See #7584 for more information.
## Validation Steps Performed
Self-testing by creating the folder
`%LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows Terminal\Fragments`
and adding a json file into it to modify and add profiles
Also self-tested with an app extension
Closes#1690
A bunch of our local tests regressed recently. I'm unsure as to when
this happened. Clearly, we all do a super good job of running these
tests 😄.
* I had to make sure the call to `AppLogic::CurrentAppSettings` was
try/caught, because that doesn't work in the tests
* I had to make the `Pointer*` events take a weak pointer to the
`TerminalPage` because for whatever reason, they'd be called at a
weird point in the test init, causing the tests to fail. It was weird.
Almost as if the TerminalPage had been released, but the test logs
showed it hadn't barely been set up yet? Whatever, this fixes it.
* The `VerifyCommandPaletteTabSwitcherOrder` test needed to take a time
out, for reasons that are not totally clear to me. That one was flakey
and I hate it.
### Checklist:
* [x] Doesn't close anything, this is just something I noticed.
* [x] Doesn't require docs to be updated, it's test fixes
* [x] Yea, I ran the tests
/cc @Don-Vito: The `FilteredCommandTests` all crashed immediately for
me. I'm not sure what's causing that - I _think_ everything we need for
those tests is set up right? The generated `AppxManifest.xml` had all
the right classes listed in it, I really can't be sure what was wrong
there. These tests aren't run in CI so it's not a super big deal, but I
thought I'd let you know.
(cherry picked from commit ccda434f69)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
The TerminalSettings object we create from profiles no longer gets passed into the control, instead, a child of that object gets passed into the control. Any overrides the control makes to the settings then live in the child. So, when we do a settings reload, we simply update the child's parent and the overrides will remain.
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Manual testing
## Summary of the Pull Request
I forgot to reset the `--size` argument to `split-pane` when I added it. This PR fixes that, and adds a test so I don't regress it again.
## References
* Missed in #8543
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds support for the `move-focus` subcommand to `wt.exe`. This subcommand works _exactly_ like `moveFocus(up|down|left|right)`.
## References
* Will surely conflict with #8183
* Is goodness even in the world where #5464 exists
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#6580
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Docs PR: MicrosoftDocs/terminal#209
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Bear with me, I wrote this before paternity leave, so code might be a bit stale.
Oddly, after startup, this _does not_ leave the focus on the pane you moved to. If you `move-focus` during startup, at the end of startup, we'll still focus a _random_ pane. This is because the terminal still auto-focus a TermControl when it's done with layout. While we'll maintain the active control just fine during the startup, at the end of startup, all the controls will complete layout in a random order.
This is no different than the startup right now. `wt sp ; sp ; sp` will focus a random pane at the end. This is left for a future someone to fix
This is also subject to #2398 / #4692. Moving in a direction isn't _totally_ reliable currently. `focus-pane -t ID` will certainly be more reliable, but this will work in the meantime?
## Validation Steps Performed
Opened probably 100 terminals, confirmed that the layout was always correct. Final focused pane was random, but the layout was right.
This commit iontroduces another `target` to the `openSettings` binding:
`settingsUI`. It opens the settings UI introduced in the previous
commit.
Closes#1564Closes#8048 (PR)
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <lelian@microsoft.com>
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000Closes#2871
There's a handful of small changes in these updates:
The Win32 Toolkit is now built with CFG (I think), and
the VCRT forwarders are now the (second) non-RC version.
First step towards #8415:
* Introduce `PaletteItem` and derive from it to provide native support
for tabs and command lines (`ActionPaletteItem` / `TabPaletteItem`,
`CommandLinePaltteItem`)
* Remove business logic behind PaletteItem from palette (aka dispatch
commands and preview tabs externally)
This commit moves us to the Xaml prerelease (201202003) that is
equivalent to public stable release 2.5.
Remember, we need to use prereleases for some silly reason.
* Add a tabColor parameter to the `new-tab` and `split-panes` command
* Add --tabColor to the command line, to allow bootstrapping with tabs
of different colors
Add another field to NewTerminalArgs. Use this field to set
StartingTabColor in Terminal. This color gets overridden by the color
defined by the profile / VT, however can be overridden with the color
picker.
Since the color is the property of the Terminal, when defined for the
tab this color is associated only with the first pane/terminal of the
tab. Additional panes will not inherit this color (to prevent advanced
resolution, where we need to resolve between the inherited color and the
one specified for the pane).
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT for parameters parsing
* Running system with several tabs of different colors.
* Adding custom actions with colors
* Performing operations like split pane, duplicate and so on
Closes#8075
Currently when implicit tab command is specified (i.e., we have
parameters for new-tab, but don't have the explicit subcommand name) we
fallback to parsing the entire arg list as new tab command.
However, if we also have a launch profile (or anything else that might in
the future belong to the upper scope) it is passed as a parameter to the
new tab command, failing the parsing.
The idea behind my solution is to run the parser as a prefix command -
i.e., as long as we succeed to parse [options] / [subcommand] we will
parse them (populating the fields like a launch mode), but once we will
discover something unfamiliar, like profile, we will know that the
prefix is over and will handle the remaining suffix as a new tab
command.
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT added
* Manual run of different options
Closes#7318
In introduced a bug in #8185, due to which Command Palette sorts items
alphabetically in the tab switcher mode. This PR fixes it.
Validation:
Created tabs with different names and verified that the MRU order is
preserved
Closes#8185
