7ae34336da
The table that we refer to in `CodepointWidthDetector.cpp` to determine whether or not a codepoint should be rendered as Wide vs Narrow was based off EastAsianWidth[1]. If a codepoint wasn't included in this table, they're considered Narrow. Many emojis aren't specified in the EAW list, so this PR supplements our table with emoji codepoints from emoji-data[2] in order to render most, if not all, emojis as full-width. There are certain codepoints I've added to the comments (in case we want to add them officially to the table in the future) that Microsoft decided to give an emoji presentation even if it's specified as Narrow/Ambiguous in the EAW list and are _not_ specified in the Unicode emoji list. These include all of the Mahjong Tiles block, different direction pencils (✎✐), different pointing index fingers (☜, ☞) among others. I have no idea if I've captured all of them, as I don't know of an easy way to detect which are Microsoft specific emojis. ## Validation Steps Performed I have looked at so many emojis that I dream emoji. These screenshots aren't encompassing _all_ emoji but I've tried to grab a couple from all across the codepoint ranges: Before:  After:  [1] http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCD/latest/ucd/EastAsianWidth.txt [2] https://www.unicode.org/Public/13.0.0/ucd/emoji/emoji-data.txt Closes #900 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| spell-check | ||
