This PR adds support for the Send v2 API.
It should prevent 404 errors which could cause some issues with some
configurations on some reverse proxies.
In the long run, we can probably remove the old file upload API, but for
now lets leave it there, since Bitwarden also still has this endpoint in
the code.
Might fixes#2753
This PR adds a the new v2022.8.x revoke feature which allows an
organization owner or admin to revoke access for one or more users.
This PR also fixes several permissions and policy checks which were faulty.
- Modified some functions to use DB Count features instead of iter/count aftwards.
- Rearanged some if statements (faster matching or just one if instead of nested if's)
- Added and fixed several policy checks where needed
- Some small updates on some response models
- Made some functions require an enum instead of an i32
This PR attends to mitigate (not fix) #2644.
There seems to be an issue when uploading files either as attachment or
via send via the mobile (Android) client.
The binary data gets transfered correctly to Vaultwarden (Checked via
Wireshark), but the data is not parsed correctly for some reason.
Since the parsing is not done by Vaultwarden it self, i think we should
at least try to prevent saving the data and letting users think all
fine.
Further investigation is needed to actually fix this issue.
This is just a quick patch.
A bit inspired by @paolobarbolini from this commit at lettre https://github.com/lettre/lettre/pull/784 .
I added a few more clippy lints here, and fixed the resulted issues.
Overall i think this could help in preventing future issues, and maybe
even peformance problems. It also makes some code a bit more clear.
We could always add more if we want to, i left a few out which i think
arn't that huge of an issue. Some like the `unused_async` are nice,
which resulted in a few `async` removals.
Some others are maybe a bit more estatic, like `string_to_string`, but i
think it looks better to use `clone` in those cases instead of `to_string` while they already are a string.
This is to support scenarios where the attachments and sends folder are to be stored on a separate device from the tmp_folder (i.e. fuse-mounted S3 storage), due to having the tmp_dir on the same device being undesirable.
Example being fuse-mounted S3 storage with the reasoning that because S3 basically requires a copy+delete operations to rename files, it's inefficient to rename files on device, if it's even allowed.
This PR fixes#2566
If Organizational syncs returned a FolderId it would cause the web-vault
to hide the cipher because there is a FolderId set. Upstream seems to
not return FolderId and Favorite. When set to null/false it will behave
the same.
In this PR I have added a new CipherSyncType enum to select which type
of sync to execute, and return an empty list for both Folders and Favorites if this is for Orgs.
This also reduces the database load a bit since it will not execute those queries.
Improved sync speed by resolving the N+1 query issues.
Solves #1402 and Solves #1453
With this change there is just one query done to retreive all the
important data, and matching is done in-code/memory.
With a very large database the sync time went down about 3 times.
Also updated misc crates and Github Actions versions.
This is a rather large PR which updates the async branch to have all the
database methods as an async fn.
Some iter/map logic needed to be changed to a stream::iter().then(), but
besides that most changes were just adding async/await where needed.
The user and org attachment limit use `size` as wording while it should
have been `storage` since it isn't per attachment, but the sum of all attachments.
- Changed the wording in the config/env
- Changed the wording of the error messages.
Resolves#1818
When creating a new cipher, the mobile clients seem to set this field to an
invalid value, which causes a warning to be logged:
Error parsing LastKnownRevisionDate '0001-01-01T00:00:00': premature end of input
Avoid this by dropping the `LastKnownRevisionDate` field on cipher creation.
Upstream will soon auto-delete trashed items after 30 days, but some people
use the trash as an archive folder, so to avoid unexpected data loss, this
implementation requires the user to explicitly enable auto-deletion.
Updated several json response models.
Also fixed a few small bugs.
ciphers.rs:
- post_ciphers_create:
* Prevent cipher creation to organization without a collection.
- update_cipher_from_data:
* ~~Fixed removal of user_uuid which prevent user-owned shared-cipher to be not editable anymore when set to read-only.~~
* Cleanup the json_data by removing the `Response` key/values from several objects.
- delete_all:
* Do not delete all Collections during the Purge of an Organization (same as upstream).
cipher.rs:
- Cipher::to_json:
* Updated json response to match upstream.
* Return empty json object if there is no type_data instead of values which should not be set for the type_data.
organizations.rs:
* Added two new endpoints to prevent Javascript errors regarding tax
organization.rs:
- Organization::to_json:
* Updated response model to match upstream
- UserOrganization::to_json:
* Updated response model to match upstream
collection.rs:
- Collection::{to_json, to_json_details}:
* Updated the json response model, and added a detailed version used during the sync
- hide_passwords_for_user:
* Added this function to return if the passwords should be hidden or not for the user at the specific collection (used by `to_json_details`)
Update 1: Some small changes after comments from @jjlin.
Update 2: Fixed vault purge by user to make sure the cipher is not part of an organization.
Resolves#971Closes#990, Closes#991
Prevent clients from updating a cipher if the local copy is stale.
Validation is only performed when the client provides its last known
revision date; this date isn't provided when using older clients,
or when the operation doesn't involve updating an existing cipher.
Upstream PR: https://github.com/bitwarden/server/pull/994
If org owners/admins set their org access to only include selected
collections, then ciphers from non-selected collections shouldn't
appear in "My Vault". This matches the upstream behavior.
Currently, favorites are tracked at the cipher level. For org-owned ciphers,
this means that if one user sets it as a favorite, it automatically becomes a
favorite for all other users that the cipher has been shared with.
