Instead of db.TruncateBeans(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Review{}), reviews are deleted using issue.DeleteReview
(cherry picked from commit 6b857193ff)
- Reading the code of this delay writer implemenation, it looks like
that it should only actually write content to the `io.Writer` if x
amount of time has passed by. However in practice it was always printing
the buffer even if the X amount of time didn't pass yet. This is in line
with what was being said in the issue that this was to help with
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9610.
- This was caused by the extra `Close()` calls which in turn caused that
when the second `Close` is called (which is done in a defer already) it
would've printed the buffer anyway. So remove the extra calls to `Close()`.
- Add unit test.
(cherry picked from commit 9320ffd2b5)
Move the signed tag verification line above the release notes, don't
disable the bottom margin, and make sure the verification line's box is
properly rounded like other boxes.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- If the database returns a error in integration tests, it should be
marked as a failure of the test.
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2962 (this should
help with logging the SQL that is resulting in the error).
- Use the correct template that was given when there's an error in
retrieving which git identity should be used.
- Remove the error from the exception list.
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves#65
They are bound to change. The worst that can happen is that the same
error happens somewhere else and is ignored although it should
not. Which is not worse than the previous situation which was to
ignore all errors anyway.
Also be more liberal about what is ignored. Some error messages are
very long and may contain elements with some variance. It is enough to
have an ignored that is specific.
(cherry picked from commit a60b34a451)
This is, in large part, a refactoring: we rename `CommitVerification` to
`ObjectVerification`, and adjust `ParseObjectWithSignature` (previously
`ParseCommitWithSignature`) to work on an object, rather than a commit.
This in turn, lets us implement `ParseTagWithSignature` on top of it, so
commit & tag signature verification will share most of the code.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
This makes signed tags show a badge in the tag list similar to signed
commits in the commit list, and a more verbose block when viewing a
single tag. Works for both GPG and SSH signed tags.
Fixes#1316.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2906
Following #2763 (refactor of git check-attr)
and #2866 (wrong log.Error format in check-attr)
- refactors the `nul-byte` reader to be used in both the streaming and one-off cases.
- add test for some failure cases
- don't log the error returned by `cmd.Run`, but return it to the `CheckPath` caller (which can then decide what to do with it).
This should solve the following flaky `log.Error` (or at least move it to the caller, instead of being inside a random goroutine):
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/9541/jobs/5#jobstep-7-839
> FATAL ERROR: log.Error has been called: 2024/03/28 14:30:33 ...it/repo_attribute.go:313:func2() [E] Unable to open checker for 3fa2f829675543ecfc16b2891aebe8bf0608a8f4. Error: failed to run attr-check. Error: exit status 128
Stderr: fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2939
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
