We do it this way round so that only the "owner" can delete the access token (i.e. `/logout/all` by the "owner" also deletes that token, but `/logout/all` by the "target user" doesn't).
A future PR will add an API for creating such a token.
When the target user and authenticated entity are different the `Processed request` log line will be logged with a: `{@admin:server as @bob:server} ...`. I'm not convinced by that format (especially since it adds spaces in there, making it harder to use `cut -d ' '` to chop off the start of log lines). Suggestions welcome.
* Create a new function to verify that the length of a device name is
under a certain threshold.
* Refactor old code and tests to use said function.
* Verify device name length during registration of device
* Add a test for the above
Signed-off-by: Dionysis Grigoropoulos <dgrig@erethon.com>
* Reject device display names that are too long.
Too long is currently defined as 100 characters in length.
* Add a regression test for rejecting a too long device display name.
implement a GET /devices endpoint which lists all of the user's devices.
It also returns the last IP where we saw that device, so there is some dancing
to fish that out of the user_ips table.
Add a 'devices' table to the storage, as well as a 'device_id' column to
refresh_tokens.
Allow the client to pass a device_id, and initial_device_display_name, to
/login. If login is successful, then register the device in the devices table
if it wasn't known already. If no device_id was supplied, make one up.
Associate the device_id with the access token and refresh token, so that we can
get at it again later. Ensure that the device_id is copied from the refresh
token to the access_token when the token is refreshed.
