The intention here is to split the class into the bits that can be done
on workers and the bits that have to be done on the master.
In future there will also be a class that can be run on the worker,
which will delegate work to the master when necessary.
We extract the storage-independent bits of the state group resolution out to a
separate functiom, and stick it in a new handler, in preparation for its use
from the storage layer.
Initial commit; this doesn't work yet - the LIKE filtering seems too aggressive.
It also needs _do_initial_spam to be aware of prepopulating the whole user_directory_search table with all users...
...and it needs a handle_user_signup() or something to be added so that new signups get incrementally added to the table too.
Committing it here as a WIP
Non-functional refactoring to move set_password. This means that we'll be able
to properly deactivate devices and access tokens without introducing a
dependency loop.
Non-functional refactoring to move deactivate_account. This means that we'll be
able to properly deactivate devices and access tokens without introducing a
dependency loop.
This avoids the scenario where we have four different PreviewUrlResources
configured on a single app, each of which have their own caches and cache
clearing jobs.
This was broken when device list updates were implemented, as Mailer
could no longer instantiate an AuthHandler due to a dependency on
federation sending.
Add a 'devices' table to the storage, as well as a 'device_id' column to
refresh_tokens.
Allow the client to pass a device_id, and initial_device_display_name, to
/login. If login is successful, then register the device in the devices table
if it wasn't known already. If no device_id was supplied, make one up.
Associate the device_id with the access token and refresh token, so that we can
get at it again later. Ensure that the device_id is copied from the refresh
token to the access_token when the token is refreshed.
Access it directly from the homeserver itself. It already wasn't
inheriting from BaseHandler storing it on the Handlers object was
already somewhat dubious.
