186 lines
8.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
186 lines
8.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
Helping Testing PRs
|
|
```````````````````
|
|
|
|
If you're a developer, one of the most valuable things you can do is look at the github issues list and help fix bugs. We almost always prioritize bug fixing over
|
|
feature development, so clearing bugs out of the way is one of the best things you can do.
|
|
|
|
Even if you're not a developer, helping test pull requests for bug fixes and features is still immensely valuable.
|
|
|
|
This goes for testing new features as well as testing bugfixes.
|
|
|
|
In many cases, code should add tests that prove it works but that's not ALWAYS possible and tests are not always comprehensive, especially when a user doesn't have access
|
|
to a wide variety of platforms, or that is using an API or web service.
|
|
|
|
In these cases, live testing against real equipment can be more valuable than automation that runs against simulated interfaces.
|
|
In any case, things should always be tested manually the first time too.
|
|
|
|
Thankfully helping test ansible is pretty straightforward, assuming you are already used to how ansible works.
|
|
|
|
Get Started with A Source Checkout
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
You can do this by checking out ansible, making a test branch off the main one, merging a GitHub issue, testing,
|
|
and then commenting on that particular issue on GitHub. Here's how:
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
Testing source code from GitHub pull requests sent to us does have some inherent risk, as the source code
|
|
sent may have mistakes or malicious code that could have a negative impact on your system. We recommend
|
|
doing all testing on a virtual machine, whether a cloud instance, or locally. Some users like Vagrant
|
|
or Docker for this, but they are optional. It is also useful to have virtual machines of different Linux or
|
|
other flavors, since some features (apt vs. yum, for example) are specific to those OS versions.
|
|
|
|
First, you will need to configure your testing environment with the necessary tools required to run our test
|
|
suites. You will need at least::
|
|
|
|
git
|
|
python-nosetests (sometimes named python-nose)
|
|
python-passlib
|
|
python-mock
|
|
|
|
If you want to run the full integration test suite you'll also need the following packages installed::
|
|
|
|
svn
|
|
hg
|
|
python-pip
|
|
gem
|
|
|
|
Second, if you haven't already, clone the Ansible source code from GitHub::
|
|
|
|
git clone https://github.com/ansible/ansible.git --recursive
|
|
cd ansible/
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
If you have previously forked the repository on GitHub, you could also clone it from there.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
If updating your repo for testing something module related, use "git rebase origin/devel" and then "git submodule update" to fetch
|
|
the latest development versions of modules. Skipping the "git submodule update" step will result in versions that will be stale.
|
|
|
|
Activating The Source Checkout
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
The Ansible source includes a script that allows you to use Ansible directly from source without requiring a
|
|
full installation, that is frequently used by developers on Ansible.
|
|
|
|
Simply source it (to use the Linux/Unix terminology) to begin using it immediately::
|
|
|
|
source ./hacking/env-setup
|
|
|
|
This script modifies the PYTHONPATH enviromnent variables (along with a few other things), which will be temporarily
|
|
set as long as your shell session is open.
|
|
|
|
If you'd like your testing environment to always use the latest source, you could call the command from startup scripts (for example,
|
|
`.bash_profile`).
|
|
|
|
Finding A Pull Request and Checking It Out On A Branch
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Next, find the pull request you'd like to test and make note of the line at the top which describes the source
|
|
and destination repositories. It will look something like this::
|
|
|
|
Someuser wants to merge 1 commit into ansible:devel from someuser:feature_branch_name
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
It is important that the PR request target be ansible:devel, as we do not accept pull requests into any other branch.
|
|
Dot releases are cherry-picked manually by ansible staff.
|
|
|
|
The username and branch at the end are the important parts, which will be turned into git commands as follows::
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b testing_PRXXXX devel
|
|
git pull https://github.com/someuser/ansible.git feature_branch_name
|
|
|
|
The first command creates and switches to a new branch named testing_PRXXXX, where the XXXX is the actual issue number associated
|
|
with the pull request (for example, 1234). This branch is based on the devel branch. The second command pulls the new code from the
|
|
users feature branch into the newly created branch.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
If the GitHub user interface shows that the pull request will not merge cleanly, we do not recommend proceeding if you
|
|
are not somewhat familiar with git and coding, as you will have to resolve a merge conflict. This is the responsibility of
|
|
the original pull request contributor.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
Some users do not create feature branches, which can cause problems when they have multiple, un-related commits in
|
|
their version of `devel`. If the source looks like `someuser:devel`, make sure there is only one commit listed on
|
|
the pull request.
|
|
|
|
For Those About To Test, We Salute You
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
At this point, you should be ready to begin testing!
|
|
|
|
If the PR is a bug-fix pull request, the first things to do are to run the suite of unit and integration tests, to ensure
|
|
the pull request does not break current functionality::
|
|
|
|
# Unit Tests
|
|
make tests
|
|
|
|
# Integration Tests
|
|
cd test/integration
|
|
make
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
Ansible does provide integration tests for cloud-based modules as well, however we do not recommend using them for some users
|
|
due to the associated costs from the cloud providers. As such, typically it's better to run specific parts of the integration battery
|
|
and skip these tests.
|
|
|
|
Integration tests aren't the end all beat all - in many cases what is fixed might not *HAVE* a test, so determining if it works means
|
|
checking the functionality of the system and making sure it does what it said it would do.
|
|
|
|
Pull requests for bug-fixes should reference the bug issue number they are fixing.
|
|
|
|
We encourage users to provide playbook examples for bugs that show how to reproduce the error, and these playbooks should be used to verify the bugfix does resolve
|
|
the issue if available. You may wish to also do your own review to poke the corners of the change.
|
|
|
|
Since some reproducers can be quite involved, you might wish to create a testing directory with the issue # as a sub-
|
|
directory to keep things organized::
|
|
|
|
mkdir -p testing/XXXX # where XXXX is again the issue # for the original issue or PR
|
|
cd testing/XXXX
|
|
<create files or git clone example playbook repo>
|
|
|
|
While it should go without saying, be sure to read any playbooks before you run them. VMs help with running untrusted content greatly,
|
|
though a playbook could still do something to your computing resources that you'd rather not like.
|
|
|
|
Once the files are in place, you can run the provided playbook (if there is one) to test the functionality::
|
|
|
|
ansible-playbook -vvv playbook_name.yml
|
|
|
|
If there's not a playbook, you may have to copy and paste playbook snippets or run a ad-hoc command that was pasted in.
|
|
|
|
Our issue template also included sections for "Expected Output" and "Actual Output", which should be used to gauge the output
|
|
from the provided examples.
|
|
|
|
If the pull request resolves the issue, please leave a comment on the pull request, showing the following information:
|
|
|
|
* "Works for me!"
|
|
* The output from `ansible --version`.
|
|
|
|
In some cases, you may wish to share playbook output from the test run as well.
|
|
|
|
Example!::
|
|
|
|
Works for me! Tested on `Ansible 1.7.1`. I verified this on CentOS 6.5 and also Ubuntu 14.04.
|
|
|
|
If the PR does not resolve the issue, or if you see any failures from the unit/integration tests, just include that output instead::
|
|
|
|
This doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
When I ran this my toaster started making loud noises!
|
|
|
|
Output from the toaster looked like this:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
BLARG
|
|
StrackTrace
|
|
RRRARRGGG
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
When you are done testing a feature branch, you can remove it with the following command::
|
|
|
|
git branch -D someuser-feature_branch_name
|
|
|
|
We understand some users may be inexperienced with git, or other aspects of the above procedure, so feel free to stop by ansible-devel
|
|
list for questions and we'd be happy to help answer them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|