DeepLearningExamples/PyTorch/Classification/ConvNets

Convolutional Network for Image Classification in PyTorch

In this repository you will find implementations of various image classification models.

Detailed information on each model can be found here:

Table Of Contents

• Models
• Validation accuracy results
• Training performance results
  • Training performance: NVIDIA DGX A100 (8x A100 80GB)
  • Training performance: NVIDIA DGX-1 16GB (8x V100 16GB)
  • Training performance: NVIDIA DGX-2 (16x V100 32GB)
• Model comparison
  • Accuracy vs FLOPS
  • Latency vs Throughput on different batch sizes

Models

The following table provides links to where you can find additional information on each model:

Model	Link
resnet50	README
resnext101-32x4d	README
se-resnext101-32x4d	README
EfficientNet	README

Validation accuracy results

Our results were obtained by running the applicable training scripts in the [framework-container-name] NGC container on NVIDIA DGX-1 with (8x V100 16GB) GPUs. The specific training script that was run is documented in the corresponding model's README.

The following table shows the validation accuracy results of the three classification models side-by-side.

Model	Mixed Precision Top1	Mixed Precision Top5	32 bit Top1	32 bit Top5
efficientnet-b0	77.63	93.82	77.31	93.76
efficientnet-b4	82.98	96.44	82.92	96.43
efficientnet-widese-b0	77.89	94.00	77.97	94.05
efficientnet-widese-b4	83.28	96.45	83.30	96.47
resnet50	78.60	94.19	78.69	94.16
resnext101-32x4d	80.43	95.06	80.40	95.04
se-resnext101-32x4d	81.00	95.48	81.09	95.45

Training performance results

Training performance: NVIDIA DGX A100 (8x A100 80GB)

Our results were obtained by running the applicable training scripts in the pytorch-20.12 NGC container on NVIDIA DGX A100 with (8x A100 80GB) GPUs. Performance numbers (in images per second) were averaged over an entire training epoch. The specific training script that was run is documented in the corresponding model's README.

The following table shows the training accuracy results of the three classification models side-by-side.

Model	Mixed Precision	TF32	Mixed Precision Speedup
efficientnet-b0	14391 img/s	8225 img/s	1.74 x
efficientnet-b4	2341 img/s	1204 img/s	1.94 x
efficientnet-widese-b0	15053 img/s	8233 img/s	1.82 x
efficientnet-widese-b4	2339 img/s	1202 img/s	1.94 x
resnet50	15977 img/s	7365 img/s	2.16 x
resnext101-32x4d	7399 img/s	3193 img/s	2.31 x
se-resnext101-32x4d	5248 img/s	2665 img/s	1.96 x

Training performance: NVIDIA DGX-1 16G (8x V100 16GB)

Our results were obtained by running the applicable training scripts in the pytorch-20.12 NGC container on NVIDIA DGX-1 with (8x V100 16GB) GPUs. Performance numbers (in images per second) were averaged over an entire training epoch. The specific training script that was run is documented in the corresponding model's README.

The following table shows the training accuracy results of the three classification models side-by-side.

Model	Mixed Precision	FP32	Mixed Precision Speedup
efficientnet-b0	7664 img/s	4571 img/s	1.67 x
efficientnet-b4	1330 img/s	598 img/s	2.22 x
efficientnet-widese-b0	7694 img/s	4489 img/s	1.71 x
efficientnet-widese-b4	1323 img/s	590 img/s	2.24 x
resnet50	7608 img/s	2851 img/s	2.66 x
resnext101-32x4d	3742 img/s	1117 img/s	3.34 x
se-resnext101-32x4d	2716 img/s	994 img/s	2.73 x

Model Comparison

Accuracy vs FLOPS

Plot describes relationship between floating point operations needed for computing forward pass on a 224px x 224px image, for the implemented models. Dot size indicates number of trainable parameters.

Latency vs Throughput on different batch sizes

Plot describes relationship between inference latency, throughput and batch size for the implemented models.