csharplang/proposals/intrinsics.md
Joseph Musser 72a4daa853 Fixed typos (#2167)
* Fixed typos in proposals/

* Fixed typos in meetings/2018/
2019-02-12 13:45:25 -08:00

225 lines
7.2 KiB
Markdown

# Compiler Intrinsics
## Summary
This proposal provides language constructs that expose low level IL opcodes that cannot currently
be accessed efficiently, or at all: `ldftn`, `ldvirtftn`, `ldtoken` and `calli`. These low level
opcodes can be important in high performance code and developers need an efficient way to access
them.
## Motivation
The motivations and background for this feature are described in the following issue (as is a
potential implementation of the feature):
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/191
This alternate design proposal comes after reviewing a prototype implementation of the original
proposal by @msjabby as well as the use throughout a significant code base. This design was done
with significant input from @mjsabby, @tmat and @jkotas.
## Detailed Design
### Allow address of to target methods
Method groups will now be allowed as arguments to an address-of expression. The type of such an
expression will be `void*`.
``` csharp
class Util {
public static void Log() { }
}
// ldftn Util.Log
void* ptr = &Util.Log;
```
Given there is no delegate conversion here the only mechanism for filtering members in the method
group is by static / instance access. If that cannot distinguish the members then a compile time
error will occur.
``` csharp
class Util {
public void Log() { }
public void Log(string p1) { }
public static void Log(int i) { };
}
unsafe {
// Error: Method group Log has more than one applicable candidate.
void* ptr1 = &Log;
// Okay: only one static member to consider here.
void* ptr2 = &Util.Log;
}
```
The addressof expression in this context will be implemented in the following manner:
- ldftn: when the method is non-virtual.
- ldvirtftn: when the method is virtual.
Restrictions of this feature:
- Instance methods can only be specified when using an invocation expression on a value
- Local functions cannot be used in `&`. The implementation details of these methods are
deliberately not specified by the language. This includes whether they are static vs. instance or
exactly what signature they are emitted with.
### handleof
The `handleof` contextual keyword will translate a field, member or type into their equivalent
`RuntimeHandle` type using the `ldtoken` instruction. The exact type of the expression will
depend on the kind of the name in `handleof`:
- field: `RuntimeFieldHandle`
- type: `RuntimeTypeHandle`
- method: `RuntimeMethodHandle`
The arguments to `handleof` are identical to `nameof`. It must be a simple name, qualified name,
member access, base access with a specified member, or this access with a specified member. The
argument expression identifies a code definition, but it is never evaluated.
The `handleof` expression is evaluated at runtime and has a return type of `RuntimeHandle`. This
can be executed in safe code as well as unsafe.
```
RuntimeHandle stringHandle = handleof(string);
```
Restrictions of this feature:
- Properties cannot be used in a `handleof` expression.
- The `handleof` expression cannot be used when there is an existing `handleof` name in scope. For
example a type, namespace, etc ...
### calli
The compiler will add support for a new type of `extern` function that efficiently translates into
a `.calli` instruction. The extern attribute will be marked with an attribute of the following
shape:
``` csharp
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method)]
public sealed class CallIndirectAttribute : Attribute
{
public CallingConvention CallingConvention { get; }
public CallIndirectAttribute(CallingConvention callingConvention)
{
CallingConvention = callingConvention;
}
}
```
This allows developers to define methods in the following form:
``` csharp
[CallIndirect(CallingConvention.Cdecl)]
static extern int MapValue(string s, void *ptr);
unsafe {
var i = MapValue("42", &int.Parse);
Console.WriteLine(i);
}
```
Restrictions on the method which has the `CallIndirect` attribute applied:
- Cannot have a `DllImport` attribute.
- Cannot be generic.
## Open Issues
### CallingConvention
The `CallIndirectAttribute` as designed uses the `CallingConvention` enum which lacks an entry for
managed calling conventions. The enum either needs to be extended to include this calling convention
or the attribute needs to take a different approach.
## Considerations
### Disambiguating method groups
There was some discussion around features that would make it easier to disambiguate method groups
passed to an address-of expression. For instance potentially adding signature elements to the
syntax:
``` csharp
class Util {
public static void Log() { ... }
public static void Log(string) { ... }
}
unsafe {
// Error: ambiguous Log
void *ptr1 = &Util.Log;
// Use Util.Log();
void *ptr2 = &Util.Log();
}
```
This was rejected because a compelling case could not be made nor could a simple syntax be
envisioned here. Also there is a fairly straight forward work around: simple define another
method that is unambiguous and uses C# code to call into the desired function.
``` csharp
class Workaround {
public static void LocalLog() => Util.Log();
}
unsafe {
void* ptr = &Workaround.LocalLog;
}
```
This becomes even simpler if `static` local functions enter the language. Then the work around
could be defined in the same function that used the ambiguous address-of operation:
``` csharp
unsafe {
static void LocalLog() => Util.Log();
void* ptr = &Workaround.LocalLog;
}
```
### LoadTypeTokenInt32
The original proposal allowed for metadata tokens to be loaded as `int` values at compile time.
Essentially have `tokenof` that has the same arguments as `handleof` but is evaluated at
compile time to an `int` constant.
This was rejected as it causes significant problem for IL rewrites (of which .NET has many). Such
rewriters often manipulate the metadata tables in a way that could invalidate these values. There
is no reasonable way for such rewriters to update these values when they are stored as simple
`int` values.
The underlying idea of having an opaque handle for metadata entries will continue to be explored
by the runtime team.
## Future Considerations
### static local functions
This refers to [the proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/1565) to allow the
`static` modifier on local functions. Such a function would be guaranteed to be emitted as
`static` and with the exact signature specified in source code. Such a function should be a valid
argument to `&` as it contains none of the problems local functions have today.
### NativeCallableAttribute
The CLR has a feature that allows for managed methods to be emitted in such a way that they are
directly callable from native code. This is done by adding the `NativeCallableAttribute` to
methods. Such a method is only callable from native code and hence must contain only blittable
types in the signature. Calling from managed code results in a runtime error.
This feature would pattern well with this proposal as it would allow:
- Passing a function defined in managed code to native code as a function pointer (via address-of)
with no overhead in managed or native code.
- Runtime can introduce use site errors for such functions in managed code to prevent them from
being invoked at compile time.