* Allow resource IDs to change on reresh steps
This is a requirement for us to be able to move forward with
versions of the Terraform Azurerm provider. In v1.32.1, there was
a state migration that changed the ID format of the azure table
storage resource
We used to have a check in place for old ID being equal to new ID.
This has been changed now and we allow the change of ID to happen
in the RefreshStep
* Update pkg/resource/deploy/step.go
Co-Authored-By: Pat Gavlin <pat@pulumi.com>
If we don't process and report the stderr of `npm install`, the output
is "orphaned" during error condition, and only something like "exit code
1" is reported.
- Ensure that type assertions are guarded, and that incorrectly-typed
properties return errors rather than panicking
- Expand the asset/archive tests in the Node SDK to ensure that eventual
archives and assets serialize and deserialize correctly
Fixes#2836.
Fixes#3016.
These changes add support for passing `ignoreChanges` paths to resource
providers. This is intended to accommodate providers that perform diffs
between resource inputs and resource state (e.g. all Terraform-based
providers, the k8s provider when using API server dry-runs). These paths
are specified using the same syntax as the paths used in detailed diffs.
In addition to passing these paths to providers, the existing support
for `ignoreChanges` in inputs has been extended to accept paths rather
than top-level keys. It is an error to specify a path that is missing
one or more component in the old or new inputs.
Fixes#2936, #2663.
This command will cause `pulumi policy publish` to behave in much the
same way `pulumi up` does -- if the policy program is in TypeScript, we
will use ts-node to attempt to compile in-process before executing, and
fall back to plain-old node.
We accomplish this by moving `cmd/run/run.ts` into a generic helper
package, `runtime/run.ts`, which slightly generalizes the use cases
supported (notably, allowing us to exec some program outside of the
context of a Pulumi stack).
This new package is then called by both `cmd/run/index.ts` and
`cmd/run-policy-pack/index.ts`.
* Plumbing the custom timeouts from the engine to the providers
* Plumbing the CustomTimeouts through to the engine and adding test to show this
* Change the provider proto to include individual timeouts
* Plumbing the CustomTimeouts from the engine through to the Provider RPC interface
* Change how the CustomTimeouts are sent across RPC
These errors were spotted in testing. We can now see that the timeout
information is arriving in the RegisterResourceRequest
```
req=&pulumirpc.RegisterResourceRequest{
Type: "aws:s3/bucket:Bucket",
Name: "my-bucket",
Parent: "urn:pulumi:dev::aws-vpc::pulumi:pulumi:Stack::aws-vpc-dev",
Custom: true,
Object: &structpb.Struct{},
Protect: false,
Dependencies: nil,
Provider: "",
PropertyDependencies: {},
DeleteBeforeReplace: false,
Version: "",
IgnoreChanges: nil,
AcceptSecrets: true,
AdditionalSecretOutputs: nil,
Aliases: nil,
CustomTimeouts: &pulumirpc.RegisterResourceRequest_CustomTimeouts{
Create: 300,
Update: 400,
Delete: 500,
XXX_NoUnkeyedLiteral: struct {}{},
XXX_unrecognized: nil,
XXX_sizecache: 0,
},
XXX_NoUnkeyedLiteral: struct {}{},
XXX_unrecognized: nil,
XXX_sizecache: 0,
}
```
* Changing the design to use strings
* CHANGELOG entry to include the CustomTimeouts work
* Changing custom timeouts to be passed around the engine as converted value
We don't want to pass around strings - the user can provide it but we want
to make the engine aware of the timeout in seconds as a float64
A resource can be imported by setting the `import` property in the
resource options bag when instantiating a resource. In order to
successfully import a resource, its desired configuration (i.e. its
inputs) must not differ from its actual configuration (i.e. its state)
as calculated by the resource's provider.
There are a few interesting state transitions hiding here when importing
a resource:
1. No prior resource exists in the checkpoint file. In this case, the
resource is simply imported.
2. An external resource exists in the checkpoint file. In this case, the
resource is imported and the old external state is discarded.
3. A non-external resource exists in the checkpoint file and its ID is
different from the ID to import. In this case, the new resource is
imported and the old resource is deleted.
4. A non-external resource exists in the checkpoint file, but the ID is
the same as the ID to import. In this case, the import ID is ignored
and the resource is treated as it would be in all cases except for
changes that would replace the resource. In that case, the step
generator issues an error that indicates that the import ID should be
removed: were we to move forward with the replace, the new state of
the stack would fall under case (3), which is almost certainly not
what the user intends.
Fixes#1662.
Thse changes make a subtle but critical adjustment to the process the
Pulumi engine uses to determine whether or not a difference exists
between a resource's actual and desired states, and adjusts the way this
difference is calculated and displayed accordingly.
Today, the Pulumi engine get the first chance to decide whether or not
there is a difference between a resource's actual and desired states. It
does this by comparing the current set of inputs for a resource (i.e.
the inputs from the running Pulumi program) with the last set of inputs
used to update the resource. If there is no difference between the old
and new inputs, the engine decides that no change is necessary without
consulting the resource's provider. Only if there are changes does the
engine consult the resource's provider for more information about the
difference. This can be problematic for a number of reasons:
- Not all providers do input-input comparison; some do input-state
comparison
- Not all providers are able to update the last deployed set of inputs
when performing a refresh
- Some providers--either intentionally or due to bugs--may see changes
in resources whose inputs have not changed
All of these situations are confusing at the very least, and the first
is problematic with respect to correctness. Furthermore, the display
code only renders diffs it observes rather than rendering the diffs
observed by the provider, which can obscure the actual changes detected
at runtime.
These changes address both of these issues:
- Rather than comparing the current inputs against the last inputs
before calling a resource provider's Diff function, the engine calls
the Diff function in all cases.
- Providers may now return a list of properties that differ between the
requested and actual state and the way in which they differ. This
information will then be used by the CLI to render the diff
appropriately. A provider may also indicate that a particular diff is
between old and new inputs rather than old state and new inputs.
Fixes#2453.
@keen99 pointed out that newer versions of golangci-lint were failing
due to some spelling errors. This change fixes them up. We have also
now have a work item to track moving to a newer golangci-lint tool in
the future.
Fixes#2841
The Kubernetes provider wanted to return Unimplemented for both
DiffConfig and CheckConfig. However, due to an interaction between the
package we used to construct the error we are returning and the
package we are using to actually construct the gRPC server for the
provider, we ended up in a place where the provider would actually end
up returning an error with code "Unknown", and the /text/ of the
message included information about it being due to the RPC not being
implemented.
So, when we try to call Diff/Check config on the provider, detect this
case as well and treat messages of this shape as if the provider just
returned "Unimplemented".
In 3621c01f4b, we implemented
CheckConfig/DiffConfig incorrectly. We should have explicilty added
the handlers (to supress the warnings we were getting) but returned an
error saying the RPC was not implemented. Instead, we just returned
success but passed back bogus data. This was "fine" at the time
because nothing called these methods.
Now that we are actually calling them, returning incorrect values
leads to errors in grpc. To deal with this we do two things:
1. Adjust the implementations in the dynamic provider to correctly
return not implemented. This allows us to pick up the default engine
behavior going forward.
2. Add some code in CheckConfig/DiffConfig that handle the gRPC error
that is returned when calling methods on the dynamic provider and fall
back to the legacy behavior. This means updating your CLI will not
cause issues for existing resources where the SDK has not been
updated.
For provider plugins, the gRPC interfaces expect that a URN would be
included as part of the DiffConfig/CheckConfig request, which means we
need to flow this value into our Provider interface.
This change does that.
Providers from plugins require that configuration value be
strings. This means if we are passing a secret string to a
provider (for example, trying to configure a kubernetes provider based
on some secret kubeconfig) we need to be careful to remove the
"secretness" before actually making the calls into the provider.
Failure to do this resulted in errors saying that the provider
configuration values had to be strings, and of course, the values
logically where, they were just marked as secret strings
Fixes#2741
We adopt a new algoritm for annotating secrets, which works as
follows:
If the source and destinations are both property maps, annotate their
secrets deeply.
Otherwise, if there is an property in both the input and output arrays
with the same name and the value in the inputs has secrets /anywhere/
in it, mark the output itself a secret.
This means, for example, an array in the inputs with a secret value as
one of the elmenets will mean in the outputs the entire array value is
marked as a secret. This is done because arrays often are treated as
sets by providers and so we really shouldn't consider ordering. It
also means that if a value is added to the array as part of the
operation we still mark the new array as an output even though the
values may not be indentical to the inputs.
For providers which do not natively support secrets (which is all of
them today), we annotate output values coming back from the provider
if there is a coresponding secret input in the inputs we passed in.
This logic was not tearing into rich objects, so if you passed a
secret as a member of an array or object into a resource provider, we
would lose the secretness on the way back.
Because of the interaction with Check (where we call Check and then
take the values returned by the provider as inputs for all calls to
Diff/Update), this would apply not only to the Output values of a
resource but also the Inputs (because the secret metadata would not
flow from the inputs of check to the outputs).
This change augments our logic which transfers secrets metadata from
one property map to another to handle these additional cases.
When a provider does not natively understand secrets, we need to pass
inputs as raw values, as to not confuse it.
This leads to a not great experience by default, where we pass raw
values to `Check` and then use the results as the inputs to remaining
operations. This means that by default, we don't end up retaining
information about secrets in the checkpoint, since the call to `Check`
erases all of our information about secrets.
To provide a nicer experience we were don't lose information about
secrets even in cases where providers don't natively understand them,
we take property maps produced by the provider and mark any values in
them that are not listed as secret as secret if the coresponding input
was a secret.
This ensures that any secret property values in the inputs are
reflected back into the outputs, even for providers that don't
understand secrets natively.
A new `Secret` property value is introduced, and plumbed across the
engine.
- When Unmarshalling properties /from/ RPC calls, we instruct the
marshaller to retain secrets, since we now understand them in the
rest of the engine.
- When Marshalling properties /to/ RPC calls, we use or tracked data
to understand if the other side of the connection can accept
secrets. If they can, we marshall them in a similar manner to assets
where we have a special object with a signiture specific for secrets
and an underlying value (which is the /plaintext/ value). In cases
where the other end of the connection does not understand secrets,
we just drop the metadata and marshal the underlying value as we
normally would.
- Any secrets that are passed across the engine events boundary are
presently passed as just `[secret]`.
- When persisting secret values as part of a deployment, we use a rich
object so that we can track the value is a secret, but right now the
underlying value is not actually encrypted.
In previous commits, we have changed the language plugin protocol to
allow the host to communicate that the plugin is meant to boot in "query
mode." In nodejs, this involves not doing things like registering the
default stack resource. This commit will implement this functionality.
This commit re-uses an error reporting mechanism previously used when
the plugin loader fails to locate a plugin that is compatible with the
requested plugin version. In addition to specifying what version we
attempted to load, it also outputs a command that will install the
missing plugin.
These changes take advantage of the newly-added support for returning
inputs from Read to update a resource's inputs as part of a refresh.
As a consequence, the Pulumi engine will now properly detect drift
between the actual state of a resource and the desired state described
by the program and generate appropriate update or replace steps.
As part of these changes, a resource's old inputs are now passed to the
provider when performing a refresh. The provider can take advantage of
this to maintain the accuracy of any additional data or metadata in the
resource's inputs that may need to be updated during the refresh.
This is required for the complete implementation of
https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/pull/349. Without access to
the old inputs for a resource, TF-based providers would lose all
information about default population during a refresh.
If a provider returns information about the top-level properties that
differ, use those keys to filter the diffs that are rendered to the
user.
Fixes#2453.
We previously logged the number of replaces and changes returned from a call to Diff, but not the actual properties that were forcing replace. Several times we've had to debug issues with unexpected replaces being proposed, and this information is very useful to have access to.
Changes the verbose logging to include the property names for both replaces and changes instead of just the count.
- Add support for per-property dependencies to the Go SDK
- Add tests for first-class secret rejection in the checkpoint and RPC
layers and language SDKs
This implements the new algorithm for deciding which resources must be
deleted due to a delete-before-replace operation.
We need to compute the set of resources that may be replaced by a
change to the resource under consideration. We do this by taking the
complete set of transitive dependents on the resource under
consideration and removing any resources that would not be replaced by
changes to their dependencies. We determine whether or not a resource
may be replaced by substituting unknowns for input properties that may
change due to deletion of the resources their value depends on and
calling the resource provider's Diff method.
This is perhaps clearer when described by example. Consider the
following dependency graph:
A
__|__
B C
| _|_
D E F
In this graph, all of B, C, D, E, and F transitively depend on A. It may
be the case, however, that changes to the specific properties of any of
those resources R that would occur if a resource on the path to A were
deleted and recreated may not cause R to be replaced. For example, the
edge from B to A may be a simple dependsOn edge such that a change to
B does not actually influence any of B's input properties. In that case,
neither B nor D would need to be deleted before A could be deleted.
In order to make the above algorithm a reality, the resource monitor
interface has been updated to include a map that associates an input
property key with the list of resources that input property depends on.
Older clients of the resource monitor will leave this map empty, in
which case all input properties will be treated as depending on all
dependencies of the resource. This is probably overly conservative, but
it is less conservative than what we currently implement, and is
certainly correct.
After #2088, we began calling `Diff` on providers that are not configured
due to unknown configuration values. This hit an assertion intended to
detect exactly this scenario, which was previously unexpected.
These changes adjust `Diff` to indicate that a Diff is unavailable and
return an error message that describes why. The step generator then
interprets the diff as indicating a normal update and issues the error
message to the diagnostic stream.
Fixes#2223.
We run the same suite of changes that we did on gometalinter. This
ended up catching a few new issues, some of which were addressed and
some of which were baselined.
In preparation for some workspace restructuring, I decided to scratch a
few itches of my own in the code:
* Change project's RuntimeInfo field to just Runtime, to match the
serialized name in JSON/YAML.
* Eliminate the no-longer-used Context and NoDefaultIgnores fields on
project, and all of the associated legacy PPC-related code.
* Eliminate the no-longer-used IgnoreFile constant.
* Remove a bunch of "// nolint: lll" annotations, and simply format
the structures with comments on dedicated lines, to avoid overly
lengthy lines and lint suppressions.
* Mark Dependencies and InitErrors as `omitempty` in the JSON
serialization directives for CheckpointV2 files. This was done for
the YAML directives, but (presumably accidentally) omitted for JSON.
Go 1.10 made some breaking changes to the headers in archive/tar [1] and
archive/zip [2], breaking the expected values in tests. In order to keep
tests passing with both, wherever a hardcoded hash is expect we switch
on `runtime.Version()` to select whether we want the Go 1.9 (currently
supported Go version) or later version of the hash.
Eventually these switches should be removed in favour of using the later
version only, so they are liberally commented to explain the reasoning.
[1]: https://golang.org/doc/go1.10#archive/tar
[2]: https://golang.org/doc/go1.10#archive/zip
Providers with unknown properties are currently considered to require
replacement. This was intended to indicate that we could not be sure
whether or not replacement was reqiuired. Unfortunately, this was not a
good user experience, as replacement would never be required at runtime.
This caused quite a bit of confusion--never proposing replacement seems
to be the better option.
* Protobuf changes
* Move management of root resource state to engine
This commit fixes a persistent side-by-side issue in the NodeJS SDK by
moving the management of root resource state to the engine. Doing so
adds two new endpoints to the Engine gRPC service: 1) GetRootResource
and 2) SetRootResource, which get and set the root resource
respectively.
* Rebase against master, regenerate proto
We signal provider cancellation by hangning a goroutine off of the plan
executor's parent context. To ensure clean shutdown, this goroutine also
listens on a channel that closes once the plan has finished executing.
Unfortunately, we were closing this channel too early, and the close was
racing with the cancellation signal. These changes ensure that the
channel closes after the plan has fully completed.
Fixes#1906.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-kubernetes#185.
This commit reverts most of #1853 and replaces it with functionally
identical logic, using the notion of status message-specific sinks.
In other words, where the original commit implemented ephemeral status
messages by adding an `isStatus` parameter to most of the logging
methdos in pulumi/pulumi, this implements ephemeral status messages as a
parallel logging sink, which emits _only_ ephemeral status messages.
The original commit message in that PR was:
> Allow log events to be marked "status" events
>
> This commit will introduce a field, IsStatus to LogRequest. A "status"
> logging event will be displayed in the Info column of the main
> display, but will not be printed out at the end, when resource
> operations complete.
>
> For example, for complex resource initialization, we'd like to display
> a series of intermediate results: [1/4] Service object created, for
> example. We'd like these to appear in the Info column, but not at the
> end, where they are not helpful to the user.
