* Serialize SourceEvents coming from the refresh source
The engine requires that a source event coming from a source be "ready
to execute" at the moment that it is sent to the engine. Since the
refresh source sent all goal states eagerly through its source iterator,
the engine assumed that it was legal to execute them all in parallel and
did so. This is a problem for the snapshot, since the snapshot expects
to be in an order that is a legal topological ordering of the dependency
DAG.
This PR fixes the issue by sending refresh source events one-at-a-time
through the refresh source iterator, only unblocking to send the next
step as soon as the previous step completes.
* Fix deadlock in refresh test
* Fix an issue where the engine "completed" steps too early
By signalling that a step is done before committing the step's results
to the snapshot, the engine was left with a race where dependent
resources could find themselves completely executed and committed before
a resource that they depend on has been committed.
Fixespulumi/pulumi#1726
* Fix an issue with Replace steps at the end of a plan
If the last step that was executed successfully was a Replace, we could
end up in a situation where we unintentionally left the snapshot
invalid.
* Add a test
* CR: pass context.Context as first parameter to Iterate
* CR: null->nil
### First-Class Providers
These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class
providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the
Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply
instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured
differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the
outputs of other resources.
### Provider Plugin Changes
In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider
configuration and configure providers without complete configuration
information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin
interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration
and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and
`DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag
accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`.
These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC
interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then,
these methods are implemented by adapters:
- `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string
or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins
only accept string-typed configuration values.
- `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration
values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is
unknown. The justification for this behavior is given
[here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106)
- `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and
configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any
config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and
the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of
which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is
only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we
can manage with the existing gRPC interface.
### Resource Model Changes
Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's
dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created,
may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other
resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which
are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design
addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not
yet been physically created and therefore have no ID.
All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a
single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be
used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's
provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its
URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider
should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically
sorting the dependency graph.
Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the
invocation via a provider reference.
### Engine Changes
First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine:
- The engine must have some way to map from provider references to
provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's
checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during
the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider
resources.
- In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi
programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine
must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package
referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for
a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data.
The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is
responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In
addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability
to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves
as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the
"provider provider").
The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to
plan setup and the eval source.
During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources
that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of
packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been
computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and
prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that
requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default
provider for its package.
While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration,
resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped
before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider
for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source
synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and
records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected
into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a
default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is
used and no new registration occurs.
### SDK Changes
These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK.
- A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used
to instantiate first-class providers.
- A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply
a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD
operations.
- A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that
control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type
includes a `provider` field that is analogous to
`ResourceOptions.provider`.
This change lets us set runtime specific options in Pulumi.yaml, which
will flow as arguments to the language hosts. We then teach the nodejs
host that when the `typescript` is set to `true` that it should load
ts-node before calling into user code. This allows using typescript
natively without an explicit compile step outside of Pulumi.
This works even when a tsconfig.json file is not present in the
application and should provide a nicer inner loop for folks writing
typescript (I'm pretty sure everyone has run into the "but I fixed
that bug! Why isn't it getting picked up? Oh, I forgot to run tsc"
problem.
Fixes#958
* Protobuf changes to record dependencies for read resources
* Add a number of tests for read resources, especially around replacement
* Place read resources in the snapshot with "external" bit set
Fixespulumi/pulumi#1521. This commit introduces two new step ops: Read
and ReadReplacement. The engine generates Read and ReadReplacement steps
when servicing ReadResource RPC calls from the language host.
* Fix an omission of OpReadReplace from the step list
* Rebase against master
* Transition to use V2 Resources by default
* Add a semantic "relinquish" operation to the engine
If the engine observes that a resource is read and also that the
resource exists in the snapshot as a non-external resource, it will not
delete the resource if the IDs of the old and new resources match.
* Typo fix
* CR: add missing comments, DeserializeDeployment -> DeserializeDeploymentV2, ID check
This change makes it a little easier to do the style of highlighting
we are doing now with the login prompt, cleaning up some of the
padding calculations that were otherwise complicated due to ANSI
escape sequences.
This change makes our login prompt a little "friendlier", especially
important since this will be the first thing a new user sees.
The new message is:
$ pulumi new
We need your Pulumi account to identify you.
Enter your access token from https://app.pulumi.com/account
or hit <ENTER> to log in using your browser :
This change adds some convenience functions and types, to make strongly
typed outputs more pleasant to interact with. It also includes tests
for output generally, in addition to these new functions and types.
The Version field was inadvertently dropped when sending an import
request to the service. Now that we are requiring that the Version field
be set in deployments, this was causing errors.
Calling `bytes.NewBuffer` gives up ownership of the backing memory and creates
a _mutable_ buffer. We don't need that, so let's use `bytes.NewReader` instead.
* Error when loading a deployment that is not a version that the CLI understands
* Add a test for 'pulumi stack import' on a badly-versioned deployment
* Move current deployment version to 'apitype'
* Rebase against master
* CR: emit CLI-friendly error message at the two points outside of the engine calling 'DeserializeDeployment'
An empty preview is not a guarantee that a subsequent update will cause
no changes. As such, we should always offer the user the option to
perform an update even if the preview proposes no changes.
Note that this indirectly fixes#1410 by masking the effects of #1429.
This change supports displaying manifest information for a stack and
changes the way we handle Snapshots in our backend.
Previously, every call to GetStack would synthesize a Snapshot by
taking the set of resources returned from the
`/api/stacks/<owner>/<name>` endpoint, combined with an empty
manfiest (since the service was not returning the manifest).
This wasn't great for two reasons:
1. We didn't have manifest information, so we couldn't display any of
its information (most important the last updated time).
2. This strategy required that the service return all the resources
for a stack anytime GetStack was called. While the CLI did not
often need this detailed information the fact that we forced the
Service to produce it (which in the case of stack managed PPC would
require the service to talk to yet another service) creates a bunch
of work that we end up ignoring.
I've refactored the code such that `backend.Stack`'s `Snapshot()` method
now lazily requests the information from the service such that we can
construct a `Snapshot()` on demand and only pay the cost when we
actually need it.
I think making more of this stuff lazy is the long term direction we
want to follow.
Unfortunately, right now, it means in cases where we do need this data
we end up fetching it twice. The service does it once when we call
GetStack and then we do it again when we actually need to get at the
Snapshot. However, once we land this change, we can update the
service to no longer return resources on the apistack.Stack type. The
CLI no longer needs this property. We'll likely want to continue in a
direction where `apistack.Stack` can be created quickly by the
service (without expensive database queries or fetching remote
resources) and just add additional endpoints that let us get at the
specific information we want in the specific cases when we want it
instead of forcing us to return a bunch of data that we often ignore.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-service#371
* Delete Before Create
This commit implements the full semantics of delete before create. If a
resource is replaced and requires deletion before creation, the engine
will use the dependency graph saved in the snapshot to delete all
resources that depend on the resource being replaced prior to the
deletion of the resource to be replaced.
* Rebase against master
* CR: Simplify the control flow in makeRegisterResourceSteps
* Run Check on new inputs when re-creating a resource
* Fix an issue where the planner emitted benign but incorrect deletes of DBR-deleted resources
* CR: produce the list of dependent resources in dependency order and iterate over the list in reverse
* CR: deps->dependents, fix an issue with DependingOn where duplicate nodes could be added to the dependent set
* CR: Fix an issue where we were considering old defaults and new inputs
inappropriately when re-creating a deleted resource
* CR: save 'iter.deletes[urn]' as a local, iterate starting at cursorIndex + 1 for dependency graph
At some point the summary and preview parameters to
`engine.GetResourcePropertiesDetails` were flipped s.t. we stopped
rendering computed<> and output<> values properly during previews.
We currently display at most two rows for messages that are not
associated with a URN: one for those that arrive before the stack
resource is first observed and one for those that arrive after the stack
resource is first observed. The former is labeled "global"; the latter
is the row associated with the stack resource. These changes remove the
duplication by reassociating the row used for events with no URN that
arrive before the stack resource with the stack resource once it has
been observed.
Fixes#1385.
Our current strategy for the progress display on non-TTYs causes us to
display multiple identical rows for each resource when the row is a
preview or a no-op. This behavior is not particularly useful, and
generally just makes the display noisier than it needs to be.
These changes avoid displaying resource rows without meaningful output
by supressing the display of resource output events that are delivered
during a preview or that correspond to a no-op update.
Fixes#1384.
This changes two things:
1) Eliminates the fact that we had two kinds of previews in our engine.
2) Always initialize the plugin.Events, to ensure that all plugin loads
are persisted no matter the update type (update, refresh, destroy),
and skip initializing it when dryRun == true, since we won't save them.
The PluginEvents will now try to register loaded plugins which,
during a refresh preview, will result in attempting to save mutations
when a token is missing. This change mirrors the changes made to
destroy which avoid it panicing similarly, by simply leaving
PluginEvents unset. Also adds a bit of tracing that was helpful to
me as I debugged through the underlying issues.
Fixes#1377.
* Graceful RPC shutdown: CLI side
* Handle unavailable resource monitor in language hosts
* Fix a comment
* Don't commit package-lock.json
* fix mangled pylint pragma
* Rebase against master and fix Gopkg.lock
* Code review feedback
* Fix a race between closing the callerEventsOpt channel and terminating a goroutine that writes to it
* glog -> logging
During a deployment, we end up making a bunch of PATCH/PUT/POST style
REST requests. For these calls, it should be safe to retry the
operation if there was a hickup during our REST call, so mark them as
retryable.
These changes add support for adding a tracing header to API requests
made to the Pulumi service. Setting the `PULUMI_TRACING_HEADER`
environment variable or enabling debug commands and passing the
`--tracing-header` will change the value sent in this header. Setting
this value to `1` will request that the service enable distributed
tracing for all requests made by a particular CLI invocation.
The newly added `pulumi config refresh` updates your local copy of the
Pulumi.<stack-name>.yaml file to have the same configuration as the
most recent deployment in the cloud.
This can be used in a varirty of ways. One place we plan to use it is
in automation to clean up "leaked" stacks we have in CI. With the
changes you'll now be able to do the following:
```
$ cd $(mktemp -d)
$ echo -e "name: who-cares\nruntime: nodejs" > Pulumi.yaml
$ pulumi stack select <leaked-stack-name>
$ pulumi config refresh -f
$ pulumi destroy --force
```
Having a simpler gesture for the above is something we'll want to do
long term (we should be able to support `pulumi destory <stack-name>`
from a completely empty folder, today you need a Pulumi.yaml file
present, even if the contents don't matter).
But this gets us a little closer to where we want to be and introduces
a helpful primitive in the system.
Contributes to #814
These changes add support for injecting client tracing spans into HTTP
requests to the Pulumi API. The server can then rematerialize these span
references and attach its own spans for distributed tracing.
This change captures the Git committer and author's login and email
addresses, so that we can display them prominently in the service. At
the moment, we only attribute updates to the identity that performed the
update which, in CI scenarios, is often always the same person for an
organization. This makes Pulumi look like a needlessly lonely place.
These changes enable tracing of Pulumi API calls.
The span with which to associate an API call is passed via a
`context.Context` parameter. This required plumbing a
`context.Context` parameter through a rather large number of APIs,
especially in the backend.
In general, all API calls are associated with a new root span that
exists for essentially the entire lifetime of an invocation of the
Pulumi CLI. There were a few places where the plumbing got a bit hairier
than I was willing to address with these changes; I've used
`context.Background()` in these instances. API calls that receive this
context will create new root spans, but will still be traced.
* Initialize a new stack as part of `pulumi new`
* Prompt for values with defaults preselected
* Install dependencies
* Prompt for default config values
This changes the CLI interface in a few ways:
* `pulumi preview` is back! The alternative of saying
`pulumi update --preview` just felt awkward, and it's a common
operation to want to perform. Let's just make it work.
* There are two flags consistent across all update commands,
`update`, `refresh`, and `destroy`:
- `--skip-preview` will skip the preview step. Note that this
does *not* skip the prompt to confirm that you'd like to proceed.
Indeed, it will still prompt, with a little warning text about
the fact that the preview has been skipped.
* `--yes` will auto-approve the updates.
This lands us in a simpler and more intuitive spot for common scenarios.
I found the flag --force to be a strange name for skipping a preview,
since that name is usually reserved for operations that might be harmful
and yet you're coercing a tool to do it anyway, knowing there's a chance
you're going to shoot yourself in the foot.
I also found that what I almost always want in the situation where
--force was being used is to actually just run a preview and have the
confirmation auto-accepted. Going straight to --force isn't the right
thing in a CI scenario, where you actually want to run a preview first,
just to ensure there aren't any issues, before doing the update.
In a sense, there are four options here:
1. Run a preview, ask for confirmation, then do an update (the default).
2. Run a preview, auto-accept, and then do an update (the CI scenario).
3. Just run a preview with neither a confirmation nor an update (dry run).
4. Just do an update, without performing a preview beforehand (rare).
This change enables all four workflows in our CLI.
Rather than have an explosion of flags, we have a single flag,
--preview, which can specify the mode that we're operating in. The
following are the values which correlate to the above four modes:
1. "": default (no --preview specified)
2. "auto": auto-accept preview confirmation
3. "only": only run a preview, don't confirm or update
4. "skip": skip the preview altogether
As part of this change, I redid a bit of how the preview modes
were specified. Rather than booleans, which had some illegal
combinations, this change introduces a new enum type. Furthermore,
because the engine is wholly ignorant of these flags -- and only the
backend understands them -- it was confusing to me that
engine.UpdateOptions stored this flag, especially given that all
interesting engine options _also_ accepted a dryRun boolean. As of
this change, the backend.PreviewBehavior controls the preview options.
The service has no good way to preview a destroy operation for a stack
managed by a PPC. Until it does, just behave as if --force was passed
to the CLI in this case (i.e. skip the preview).
Fixes#1301
When linking back to the service, use the newer, simpler, URLs for a
stack: `https://pulumi.com/<owner>/<stack-name>` instead of
`https://pulumi.com/<owner>/-/-/<stack-name>`
Refactoring to support "preview" and "update" as part of the same
operation interacted poorly with deploying into a PPC via the service.
Per Pat, this is the quickest fix that gets us off the floor.
Part of #1301
This changes three minor UX things in the CLI's update flow:
1. Use bright blue for column headers, since the dark blue is nearly
invisible on a black background.
2. Move the operation symbol to the far left, as a sort of "bullet
point" for each line of output. This was how they initial symbols
were designed and this helps to glance at the summary to see what's
going on.
3. Shorten some of the column headers that didn't add extra clarity.
Pat ran into a weird error when trying to do some development agains
the testing cloud:
```
$ pulumi logout
$ pulumi login --cloud-url [test-cloud-url]
Logged into [test-cloud-url]
$ pulumi stack ls
Enter your Pulumi access token from https://pulumi.com/account:
```
In his case, we did not have `current` set in our credentials.json
file (likely due to him calling `pulumi logout` at some point) but we
did have stored credentials for that cloud. When he logged in the CLI
noticed we could reuse the stored credentials but did not update the
the current setting to set the current cloud.
While investigating, I also noticed that `logout` did not always do
the right thing when you were logged into a different backend than
pulumi.com
* Refactor the SnapshotManager interface
Lift snapshot management out of the engine by delegating it to the
SnapshotManager implementation in pkg/backend.
* Add a event interface for plugin loads and use that interface to record plugins in the snapshot
* Remove dead code
* Add comments to Events
* Add a number of tests for SnapshotManager
* CR feedback: use a successful bit on 'End' instead of having a separate 'Abort' API
* CR feedback
* CR feedback: register plugins one-at-a-time instead of the entire state at once
- Show Emojis on non-Windows platforms, instead of just macOS
- Change help text for `pulumi logs` to clarify the logs are specific
to a stack, not a project
- Display stack name when showing logs
- Have preamble text show to users for engine operations read a little
nicer
We were generating incorrect URLs for stacks on the new identity
model. When we don't have a repository in our ProjectIdentifier, the
URL's in the service use "-" for the repository and project names.
* Re-introduce interface for snapshot management
Snapshot management was done through the Update interface; this commit
splits it into a separate interface
* Put the SnapshotManager instance onto the engine context
* Remove SnapshotManager from planContext and updateActions now that it can be accessed by engine Context
PPCs are no longer a central concept to our model, but instead a
feature that that pulumi.com provides to some organizations. Let's
remove most mentions of PPCs except for cases where we really need to
talk about them (e.g. when a stack is actually hosted in a PPC instead
of just via the normal pulumi.com service)
Also remove some "in the Pulumi Cloud" messages from the CLI, as using
the Pulumi Cloud is now the only real way to use pulumi.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-service#1117
The cloud backend would fail if `nil` was passed in as the options to
use when creating a stack. However, we passed nil in places where we
allow the user to create stacks interacively. I noticed this while
dogfooding.
In the cloud backend, treat a `nil` opts as if the default set of
options was passed.
hese changes plumb basic support for cancellation through the engine.
Two types of cancellation are supported for all engine operations:
- Cancellation, which waits for the operation to drive itself to a safe
point before the operation returns, and
- Termination, which does not wait for the operation to drive itself
to a safe opint for the operation returns.
When updating local or managed stacks, a single ^C triggers cancellation
of any running operation; a second ^C will trigger termination.
Fixes#513, #1077.
This command cancels a stack's currently running update, if any. It can
be used to recover from the scenario in which an update is aborted
without marking the running update as complete. Once an update has been
cancelled, it is likely that the affected stack will need to be repaired
via an pair of export/import commands before future updates can succeed.
This is part of #1077.
This change implements a `pulumi refresh` command. It operates a bit
like `pulumi update`, and friends, in that it supports `--preview` and
`--diff`, along with the usual flags, and will update your checkpoint.
It works through substitution of the deploy.Source abstraction, which
generates a sequence of resource registration events. This new
deploy.RefreshSource takes in a prior checkpoint and will walk it,
refreshing the state via the associated resource providers by invoking
Read for each resource encountered, and merging the resulting state with
the prior checkpoint, to yield a new resource.Goal state. This state is
then fed through the engine in the usual ways with a few minor caveats:
namely, although the engine must generate steps for the logical
operations (permitting us to get nice summaries, progress, and diffs),
it mustn't actually carry them out because the state being imported
already reflects reality (a deleted resource has *already* been deleted,
so of course the engine need not perform the deletion). The diffing
logic also needs to know how to treat the case of refresh slightly
differently, because we are going to be diffing outputs and not inputs.
Note that support for managed stacks is not yet complete, since that
requires updates to the service to support a refresh endpoint. That
will be coming soon ...
This change introduces support for using the cloud backend when
`pulumi init` has not been run. When this is the case, we use the new
identity model, where a stack is referenced by an owner and a stack
name only.
There are a few things going on here:
- We add a new `--owner` flag to `pulumi stack init` that lets you
control what account a stack is created in.
- When listing stacks, we show stacks owned by you and any
organizations you are a member of. So, for example, I can do:
* `pulumi stack init my-great-stack`
* `pulumi stack init --owner pulumi my-great-stack`
To create a stack owned by my user and one owned by my
organization. When `pulumi stack ls` is run, you'll see both
stacks (since they are part of the same project).
- When spelling a stack on the CLI, an owner can be optionally
specified by prefixing the stack name with an owner name. For
example `my-great-stack` means the stack `my-great-stack` owned by
the current logged in user, where-as `pulumi/my-great-stack` would
be the stack owned by the `pulumi` organization
- `--all` can be passed to `pulumi stack ls` to see *all* stacks you
have access to, not just stacks tied to the current project.
Long term, a stack name alone will not be sufficent to address a
stack. Introduce a new `backend.StackReference` interface that allows
each backend to give an opaque stack reference that can be used across
operations.
This change removes the need to `pulumi init` when targeting the local
backend. A fair amount of the change lays the foundation that the next
set of changes to stop having `pulumi init` be used for cloud stacks
as well.
Previously, `pulumi init` logically did two things:
1. It created the bookkeeping directory for local stacks, this was
stored in `<repository-root>/.pulumi`, where `<repository-root>` was
the path to what we belived the "root" of your project was. In the
case of git repositories, this was the directory that contained your
`.git` folder.
2. It recorded repository information in
`<repository-root>/.pulumi/repository.json`. This was used by the
cloud backend when computing what project to interact with on
Pulumi.com
The new identity model will remove the need for (2), since we only
need an owner and stack name to fully qualify a stack on
pulumi.com, so it's easy enough to stop creating a folder just for
that.
However, for the local backend, we need to continue to retain some
information about stacks (e.g. checkpoints, history, etc). In
addition, we need to store our workspace settings (which today just
contains the selected stack) somehere.
For state stored by the local backend, we change the URL scheme from
`local://` to `local://<optional-root-path>`. When
`<optional-root-path>` is unset, it defaults to `$HOME`. We create our
`.pulumi` folder in that directory. This is important because stack
names now must be unique within the backend, but we have some tests
using local stacks which use fixed stack names, so each integration
test really wants its own "view" of the world.
For the workspace settings, we introduce a new `workspaces` directory
in `~/.pulumi`. In this folder we write the workspace settings file
for each project. The file name is the name of the project, combined
with the SHA1 of the path of the project file on disk, to ensure that
multiple pulumi programs with the same project name have different
workspace settings.
This does mean that moving a project's location on disk will cause the
CLI to "forget" what the selected stack was, which is unfortunate, but
not the end of the world. If this ends up being a big pain point, we
can certianly try to play games in the future (for example, if we saw
a .git folder in a parent folder, we could store data in there).
With respect to compatibility, we don't attempt to migrate older files
to their newer locations. For long lived stacks managed using the
local backend, we can provide information on where to move things
to. For all stacks (regardless of backend) we'll require the user to
`pulumi stack select` their stack again, but that seems like the
correct trade-off vs writing complicated upgrade code.
This field indicates the schema of the serialized deployment. This field
behaves identically to the `Version` field of
`PatchUpdateCheckpointRequest`.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046
And make the deployment an opaque JSON message. The verison field
indicates the schema of the deployment. A missing version field will
behave as if the version was set to `1`. A version of `1` indicates that
the serialized deployment has the `DeploymentV1` schema.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046.
This makes two minor tweaks to the login prompt:
1. Change the text so that it hyperlinks in most terminals, including
iTerm, in a way that doesn't include excess characters.
2. Disable echoing of the token.
* Lift snapshot management out of the engine
This PR is a prerequisite for parallelism by addressing a major problem
that the engine has to deal with when performing parallel resource
construction: parallel mutation of the global snapshot. This PR adds
a `SnapshotManager` type that is responsible for maintaining and
persisting the current resource snapshot. It serializes all reads and
writes to the global snapshot and persists the snapshot to persistent
storage upon every write.
As a side-effect of this, the core engine no longer needs to know about
snapshot management at all; all snapshot operations can be handled as
callbacks on deployment events. This will greatly simplify the
parallelization of the core engine.
Worth noting is that the core engine will still need to be able to read
the current snapshot, since it is interested in the dependency graphs
contained within. The full implications of that are out of scope of this
PR.
Remove dead code, Steps no longer need a reference to the plan iterator that created them
Fixing various issues that arise when bringing up pulumi-aws
Line length broke the build
Code review: remove dead field, fix yaml name error
Rebase against master, provide implementation of StackPersister for cloud backend
Code review feedback: comments on MutationStatus, style in snapshot.go
Code review feedback: move SnapshotManager to pkg/backend, change engine to use an interface SnapshotManager
Code review feedback: use a channel for synchronization
Add a comment and a new test
* Maintain two checkpoints, an immutable base and a mutable delta, and
periodically merge the two to produce snapshots
* Add a lot of tests - covers all of the non-error paths of BeginMutation and End
* Fix a test resource provider
* Add a few tests, fix a few issues
* Rebase against master, fixed merge
We've seen failures in CI where DNS lookups fail which cause our
operations against the service to fail, as well as other sorts of
timeouts.
Add a set of helper methods in a new httputil package that helps us do
retries on these operations, and then update our client library to use
them when we are doing GET requests. We also provide a way for non GET
requests to be retried, and use this when updating a lease (since it
is safe to retry multiple requests in this case).
This change does three major things:
1. Removes the ability to be logged into multiple clouds at the same
time. Previously, we supported being logged into multiple clouds at
the same time and the CLI would fan out requests and join responses
when needed. In general, this was only useful for Pulumi employees
that wanted run against multiple copies of the service (say production
and staging) but overall was very confusing (for example in the old
world a stack with the same identity could appear twice (since it was
in two backends) which the CLI didn't handle very well).
2. Stops treating the "local" backend as a special thing, from the
point of view of the CLI. Previouly we'd always connect to the local
backend and merge that data with whatever was in clouds we were
connected to. We had gestures like `--local` in `pulumi stack init`
that meant "use the local mode". Instead, to use the local mode now
you run `pulumi login --cloud-url local://` and then you are logged in
the local backend. Since you can only ever be logged into a single
backend, we can remove the `--local` and `--remote` flags from `pulumi
stack init`, it just now requires you to be logged in and creates a
stack in whatever back end you were logged into. When logging into the
local backend, you are not prompted for an access key.
3. Prompt for login in places where you have to log in, if you are not
already logged in.
As part of the new identity model, we're going to use tagging on
stacks to record metadata, let's create a bag for that, as well as a
few well known tag names that map to metadata we know we'll want to set.
This change adds a Pulumi Cloud Console URL at the end of an update
that went through the Pulumi Cloud API. This is very basic, and is
meant to be just the beginning of adding more cross-linking to the
service. I'm still thinking through the phrasing to use here.
This endpoint is relatively expensive, as it returns a large amount of
data for each stack (essentially the stack's entire checkpoint). We
currently call this endpoint in a few places that really just need
information about a single stack. In these places we should simply
interact with that stack directly.
After these changes, there is only one call to the `stacks` endpoint on
the startup path: `upgradeConfigurationFiles` loops over all of the
stacks in each backend and attempts to upgrade each stack's
configuration. Once we no longer need to do this we will not be hitting
the `stacks` endpoint on each CLI invocation.
This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for
doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081):
* The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update
functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the
way we can plug in new sources of resource information during
planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh
is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which
will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same
way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort.
This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to
take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating
a source specific to the kind of plan being requested.
Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by
the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling
things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic
and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need.
* Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations.
This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some
reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some
`if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource.
I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at
least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant.
* Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own
pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work.
* I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I
suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed
generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At
least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide
whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as
a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards.
* I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like
comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
We previously locked our dependency on google.golang.org/grpc to 1.7.2 due to issues we had seen on 1.8.x as noted in #701. However, this has prevented us using some other dependencies which require newer grpc. A test in this repo and AWS showed no problems with the latest 1.10.x versions of the library in our tests.
We'll go ahead and remove this constraint and allow grpc to float forward. If we see issues again, we'll use that repro case to investigate an alternative fix in our code.
Resolves#701.
These changes add the API types and cloud backend code necessary to
interact with service-managed stacks (i.e. stacks that do not have
PPC-managed deployments). The bulk of these changes are unremarkable:
the API types are straightforward, as are most of the interactions with
the new APIs. The trickiest bits are token and log management.
During an update to a managed stack, the CLI must continually renew the
token used to authorize the operations on that stack that comprise the
update. Once a token has been renewed, the old token should be
discarded. The CLI supports this by running a goroutine that is
responsible for both periodically renewing the token for an update and
servicing requests for the token itself from the rest of the backend.
In addition to token renewal, log output must be captured and uploaded
to the service during an update to a managed stack. Implementing this in
a reasonable fashion required a bit of refactoring in order to reuse
what already exists for the local backend. Each event-specific `Display`
function was replaced with an equivalent `Render` function that returns
a string rather than writing to a stream. This approach was chosen
primarily to avoid dealing with sheared colorization tags, which would
otherwise require clients to fuse log lines before colorizing. We could
take that approach in the future.
These changes refactor direct interactions with the Pulumi API out of
the cloud backend and into a subpackage, `pkg/backend/cloud/client`.
This package exposes a slightly higher-level API that takes care of
calculating paths, performing HTTP calls, and occasionally wrapping
multiple physical calls into a single logical call (notably the creation
of an update and the upload of its program).
This is primarily intended as preparation for some of the changes
suggested in the feedback for #1067.
This takes the existing `apitype.Checkpoint` type and renames it to
`apitype.CheckpointV1` locking in the shape. In addition, we introduce
a `apitype.VersionedCheckpoint` type, which holds a version number and
a json document representing a checkpoint at that version. Now, when
reading a checkpoint, the CLI can determine if it's in a format it
understands, and fail gracefully if it is not.
While the CLI understands the older checkpoint version, it always
writes the newest version format, meaning that if you manage a
fire-and-forget stack with this version of the CLI, it will be
un-readable by previous versions.
Stacks managed by Pulumi.com are not impacted by this change.
Fixes: #887
* Improve error messages output by the CLI
This fixes a couple known issues with the way that we present errors
from the Pulumi CLI:
1. Any errors from RPC endpoints were bubbling up as they were to
the top-level, which was unfortunate because they contained
RPC-specific noise that we don't want to present to the user. This
commit unwraps errors from resource providers.
2. The "catastrophic error" message often got printed twice
3. Fatal errors are often printed twice, because our CLI top-level
prints out the fatal error that it receives before exiting. A lot of
the time this error has already been printed.
4. Errors were prefixed by PU####.
* Feedback: Omit the 'catastrophic' error message and use a less verbose error message as the final error
* Code review feedback: interpretRPCError -> resourceStateAndError
* Code review feedback: deleting some commented-out code, error capitalization
* Cleanup after rebase
This adds a `pulumi new` command which makes it easy to quickly
automatically create the handful of needed files to get started building
an empty Pulumi project.
Usage:
```
$ pulumi new typescript
```
Or you can leave off the template name, and it will ask you to choose
one:
```
$ pulumi new
Please choose a template:
> javascript
python
typescript
```
We were not colorizing a summary in one case. Also, there were
codepaths that would print to the console without first calling
spinner.Reset(), so the spinner would not be cleared from the screen.
The engine now emits events with richer metadata during the
ResourceOutputs and ResourcePre callbacks. The CLI can then use this
information to decide if it should display the event or not and how
much of the event to display.
Options dealing with what to display and how to display it have moved
into the CLI and the engine now emits all information for each event.
The engine now unconditionally emits a new type of event, a
PreludeEvent, which contains the configuration for a stack as well as
an indication if the stack is being previewed or updated. The
responsibility for interpreting the --show-config flag on the command
line is now handled by the CLI, which uses this to decide if it should
print the configuration or not, and then writes the "Previewing
changes" or "Deploying chanages" header.
This API was introduced to aid the refactoring, but it isn't something
we want to support long term. Remove it and for a few places, push
passing config.Key around more, instead of converting to the old type
eagerly.
config.Key has become a pair of namespace and name. Because the whole
world has not changed yet, there continues to be a way to convert
between a tokens.ModuleMember and config.Key, however now sometime the
conversion from tokens.ModuleMember can fail (when the module member
is not of the form `<package>:config:<name>`).
Right now, config.Key is a type alias for tokens.ModuleMember. I did a
pass over the codebase such that we use config.Key everywhere it
looked like the value did not leak to some external process (e.g a
resource provider or a langhost).
Doing this makes it a little clearer (hopefully) where code is
depending on a module member structure (e.g. <package>:config:<value>)
instead of just an opaque type.
By using untyped deployment structures via `json.RawMessage`, we can
support round-tripping between old CLI clients and newer servers, without
dropping possibly-important information on the floor. I hadn't realized
this design goal with the original system, and after talking to @pgavlin,
I better realized the intent and that we want to preserve this.
The filenames we used to store history data locally only had second
level precision. On my machine, the test history test is able to run
multiple `pulumi update` commands in the same second, which causes a
newer history file to overwrite an older one.
This change moves to using a nanosecond precision timestamp when
writing config. In addition, the CLI was trying to sort the updates
that came back from the backend (instead of just trusting them to be
in newest first order, as we documented) so I removed that code as
well.
Migrate configuration from the old model to the new model. The
strategy here is that when we first run `pulumi` we enumerate all of
the stacks from all of the backends we know about and for each stack
get the configuration values from the project and workspace and
promote them into the new file. As we do this, we remove stack
specific config from the workspace and Pulumi.yaml file.
If we are able to upgrade all the stacks we know about, we delete all
global configuration data in the workspace and in Pulumi.yaml as well.
We have a test that ensures upgrades continue to work.
