The windows build was still on the old plan from way back when where
we had binaries littered in the build tree and you had to add parts of
your build-tree to the `%PATH%` for the integration tests to work.
This cleans that up and moves all of our scripts that invoke
javascript to be on the same plan. They invoke our specially named
node with a relative path to the JS code we want to run.
We no longer have a node_modules folder in the SDK (since all
packages now come from NPM) so we need to adjust the shell script we
use to launch our runner to use a relative path.
This addresses pulumi/pulumi#446: what we used to call "package" is
now called "project". This has gotten more confusing over time, now
that we're doing real package management.
Also fixespulumi/pulumi#426, while in here.
This improves the failure messages in two circumstances:
1) If the resource monitor RPC connection is missing. This can happen
two ways: either you run a Pulumi program using vanilla Node.js, instead
of the CLI, or you've accidentally loaded the Pulumi SDK more than once.
2) Failure to load the custom Pulumi SDK Node.js extension. This is a new
addition and would happen if you tried running a Pulumi program using a
vanilla Node.js, rather than using the Pulumi CLI.
At one point `pulumi update` was spelled `pulumi push` and we wrote
some help documentation about that. When we changed to `pulumi update`
we did not revise the documentation.
Fixes#925
Our use of parens around the individual clauses of our if condition
seemed to cause Travis to ignore the condition and build
regardless. I've asked Travis about this, but for now, drop them (with
a comment) so we stop building pushes for topic branchs.
We've seen yarn fail from time to time during our integration
tests (usually timeouts talking to the npm registry) so let's add a
few retries to all yarn commands.
When reading a configuration value from standard in and standard in is
not connected to a terminal, read until EOF and then trim a trailing
newline (if present) to get the value
Fixes#822
In order to begin publishing our core SDK package to NPM, we will
need it to be underneath the @pulumi scope so that it may remain
private. Eventually, we can alias pulumi back to it.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi#915.
Resources in the checkpoint file which are pending-delete represent old versions of resources which are no longer part of the active deployment. For purposes of constructing the active resource tree, we should skip these resources.
* experimental: separate language host from node
* Remove langhost details from the NodeJS SDK runtime
* Cleanup
* Work around an issue where Node sometimes loads the same module twice in two different contexts, resulting in two distinct module objects. Some additional cleanup.
* Add some tests
* Fix up the Windows script
* Fix up the install scripts and Windows build
* Code review feedback
* Code review feedback: error capitalization
As it stands, we currently hammer the service's update logs endpoint in
a tight loop while waiting for a deployment to complete. This is not
necessary, and can indeed be deletrious to the user experience: it
appears that this may be exacerbating some mysterious 500 responses from
API gateway.
These changes add a brief sleep in the relevant loop that waits for 5
seconds if the last call produced new log entries or 15 seconds if it
did not.
Fixes#844.
As it stands, we serialize more than is correct when registering
resources: in addition to serializing the RegisterResource RPC, we also
wait for input properties to resolve in the same context. Unfortunately,
this means that we can create cycles in the promise graph when a
resource A is constructed in an earlier turn than some resource B and
one of B's output properties is an input to resource A. These changes
fix this issue by allowing input properties to resolve *before*
serializing the RegisterResource RPC.
Some integration tests had taken a dependency on the ordering of resources in
either the output of the `pulumi` command or the checkpoint file. The
only test that took a dependency on command output was updated s.t. its
resources have exactly one legal topographical sort (and therefore their
ordering is deterministic). The other tests were updated s.t. their
validation did not depend on resource ordering.
Today we don't send any version information with API requests to the service, so we cannot make breaking changes between versions of the backend API while preserving backwards compatibility.
This PR adds a `User-Agent` header with REST requests that sends a CLI version number of "1". If the service were to make a breaking change, it could use this header to determine which response handler to use. (e.g. return a different response for "" or "1" and another for "2".) Obviously we want to avoid being in this situation, but in the event that we need to make a breaking change, we'll need this value.
We send the Pulumi version as well, though the SDK will probably rev much more quickly than the backend API client version.
Fixes#848
We were pretty careful to keep the test directory around if the test ever
exited early due to a panic or error return. But if the test ran to
completion and failed -- for example, if ExtraRuntimeValidation caused the
test to fail -- we would end up deleting the test directory.
Fixes#868
Previously, when uploading a projectm to the service, we would only
upload the folder rooted by the Pulumi.yaml for that project. This
worked well, but it meant that customers needed to structure their
code in a way such that Pulumi.yaml was always as the root of their
project, and if they wanted to share common files between two projects
there was no good solution for doing this.
This change introduces an optional piece of metadata, named context,
that can be added to Pulumi.yaml, which allows controlling the root
folder used for computing the root folder to archive from. When it is
set, it is combined with the location of the Pulumi.yaml file for the
project we are uploading and that folder is uses as the root of what
we upload to the service.
Fixes: #574
The existing logic would flow colorization information into the
engine, so depending on the settings in the CLI, the engine may or may
not have emitted colorized events. This coupling is not great and we
want to start moving to a world where the presentation happens
exclusively at the CLI level.
With this change, the engine will always produce strings that have the
colorization formatting directives (i.e. the directives that
reconquest/loreley understands) and the CLI will apply
colorization (which could mean either running loreley to turn the
directives into ANSI escape codes, or drop them or retain them, for
debuging purposes).
Fixes#742
Our scripts currently copy the package.json that does *not* have
the expanded semver, so its version is simply "${VERSION}", and NPM
is very much not happy with that. We can just stop copying the
package.json explicitly since it's inside of the bin/ directory.
