Commit graph

20 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
joeduffy 7c7f6d3ed7 Bring back preview, swizzle some flags
This changes the CLI interface in a few ways:

* `pulumi preview` is back!  The alternative of saying
  `pulumi update --preview` just felt awkward, and it's a common
  operation to want to perform.  Let's just make it work.

* There are two flags consistent across all update commands,
  `update`, `refresh`, and `destroy`:

    - `--skip-preview` will skip the preview step.  Note that this
      does *not* skip the prompt to confirm that you'd like to proceed.
      Indeed, it will still prompt, with a little warning text about
      the fact that the preview has been skipped.

    * `--yes` will auto-approve the updates.

This lands us in a simpler and more intuitive spot for common scenarios.
2018-05-06 13:55:39 -07:00
joeduffy 6ad785d5c4 Revise the way previews are controlled
I found the flag --force to be a strange name for skipping a preview,
since that name is usually reserved for operations that might be harmful
and yet you're coercing a tool to do it anyway, knowing there's a chance
you're going to shoot yourself in the foot.

I also found that what I almost always want in the situation where
--force was being used is to actually just run a preview and have the
confirmation auto-accepted.  Going straight to --force isn't the right
thing in a CI scenario, where you actually want to run a preview first,
just to ensure there aren't any issues, before doing the update.

In a sense, there are four options here:

1. Run a preview, ask for confirmation, then do an update (the default).
2. Run a preview, auto-accept, and then do an update (the CI scenario).
3. Just run a preview with neither a confirmation nor an update (dry run).
4. Just do an update, without performing a preview beforehand (rare).

This change enables all four workflows in our CLI.

Rather than have an explosion of flags, we have a single flag,
--preview, which can specify the mode that we're operating in.  The
following are the values which correlate to the above four modes:

1. "": default (no --preview specified)
2. "auto": auto-accept preview confirmation
3. "only": only run a preview, don't confirm or update
4. "skip": skip the preview altogether

As part of this change, I redid a bit of how the preview modes
were specified.  Rather than booleans, which had some illegal
combinations, this change introduces a new enum type.  Furthermore,
because the engine is wholly ignorant of these flags -- and only the
backend understands them -- it was confusing to me that
engine.UpdateOptions stored this flag, especially given that all
interesting engine options _also_ accepted a dryRun boolean.  As of
this change, the backend.PreviewBehavior controls the preview options.
2018-05-06 13:55:04 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi fd3ddda917
Disable interactive mode for a CI/CD server. (#1297) 2018-04-30 15:27:53 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi 3b13803c71
Add a hidden --no-interactive flag so that we can reduce interactive noise when running jenkins. (#1262) 2018-04-24 14:23:08 -07:00
Chris Smith 6a0718bcff
Revert adding HEAD commit info to update env (#1257) 2018-04-23 14:01:28 -07:00
Chris Smith 4651419f7f
Add Commit message, committer, and author to update env (#1249)
* Add Commit message, committer, and author to update env

* Remove low value comments
2018-04-23 11:39:14 -07:00
Matt Ellis bac02f1df1 Remove the need to pulumi init for the local backend
This change removes the need to `pulumi init` when targeting the local
backend. A fair amount of the change lays the foundation that the next
set of changes to stop having `pulumi init` be used for cloud stacks
as well.

Previously, `pulumi init` logically did two things:

1. It created the bookkeeping directory for local stacks, this was
stored in `<repository-root>/.pulumi`, where `<repository-root>` was
the path to what we belived the "root" of your project was. In the
case of git repositories, this was the directory that contained your
`.git` folder.

2. It recorded repository information in
`<repository-root>/.pulumi/repository.json`. This was used by the
cloud backend when computing what project to interact with on
Pulumi.com

The new identity model will remove the need for (2), since we only
need an owner and stack name to fully qualify a stack on
pulumi.com, so it's easy enough to stop creating a folder just for
that.

However, for the local backend, we need to continue to retain some
information about stacks (e.g. checkpoints, history, etc). In
addition, we need to store our workspace settings (which today just
contains the selected stack) somehere.

For state stored by the local backend, we change the URL scheme from
`local://` to `local://<optional-root-path>`. When
`<optional-root-path>` is unset, it defaults to `$HOME`. We create our
`.pulumi` folder in that directory. This is important because stack
names now must be unique within the backend, but we have some tests
using local stacks which use fixed stack names, so each integration
test really wants its own "view" of the world.

For the workspace settings, we introduce a new `workspaces` directory
in `~/.pulumi`. In this folder we write the workspace settings file
for each project. The file name is the name of the project, combined
with the SHA1 of the path of the project file on disk, to ensure that
multiple pulumi programs with the same project name have different
workspace settings.

This does mean that moving a project's location on disk will cause the
CLI to "forget" what the selected stack was, which is unfortunate, but
not the end of the world. If this ends up being a big pain point, we
can certianly try to play games in the future (for example, if we saw
a .git folder in a parent folder, we could store data in there).

With respect to compatibility, we don't attempt to migrate older files
to their newer locations. For long lived stacks managed using the
local backend, we can provide information on where to move things
to. For all stacks (regardless of backend) we'll require the user to
`pulumi stack select` their stack again, but that seems like the
correct trade-off vs writing complicated upgrade code.
2018-04-18 04:53:49 -07:00
Matt Ellis 6f0bc7eb46 Call pulumi stack rm --yes in some tests
Our normal lifecycle tests always call pulumi stack rm, but some of
the tests that used the more barebones framework did not do so. This
was "ok" in the past, since all bookkeeping data about a stack was
stored next to the Pulumi program itself and we deleted that folder
once the test passed.

As part of removing `pulumi init` workspace tracking will move to
~/.pulumi/workspaces and so we'd like to have a gesture that actually
removes the stack, which will cause the workspace file to be removed
as well, instead of littering ~/.pulumi/workspaces with tests.
2018-04-18 03:29:19 -07:00
CyrusNajmabadi f2b9bd4b13
Remove the explicit 'pulumi preview' command. (#1170)
Old command still exists, but tells you to run "pulumi update --preview".
2018-04-13 22:26:01 -07:00
Matt Ellis d3240fdc64 Require pulumi login before commands that need a backend
This change does three major things:

1. Removes the ability to be logged into multiple clouds at the same
time. Previously, we supported being logged into multiple clouds at
the same time and the CLI would fan out requests and join responses
when needed. In general, this was only useful for Pulumi employees
that wanted run against multiple copies of the service (say production
and staging) but overall was very confusing (for example in the old
world a stack with the same identity could appear twice (since it was
in two backends) which the CLI didn't handle very well).

2. Stops treating the "local" backend as a special thing, from the
point of view of the CLI. Previouly we'd always connect to the local
backend and merge that data with whatever was in clouds we were
connected to. We had gestures like `--local` in `pulumi stack init`
that meant "use the local mode". Instead, to use the local mode now
you run `pulumi login --cloud-url local://` and then you are logged in
the local backend. Since you can only ever be logged into a single
backend, we can remove the `--local` and `--remote` flags from `pulumi
stack init`, it just now requires you to be logged in and creates a
stack in whatever back end you were logged into. When logging into the
local backend, you are not prompted for an access key.

3. Prompt for login in places where you have to log in, if you are not
already logged in.
2018-04-05 10:19:41 -07:00
Luke Hoban 5ede33e03d
Run tests against managed stacks backend instead of FnF (#1092)
Tests now target managed stacks instead of local stacks.

The existing logged in user and target backend API are used unless PULUMI_ACCES_TOKEN is defined, in which case tests are run under that access token and against the PULUMI_API backend.

For developer machines, we will now need to be logged in to Pulumi to run tests, and whichever default API backend is logged in (the one listed as current in ~/.pulumi/credentials.json) will be used. If you need to override these, provide PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN and possibly PULUMI_API.

For Travis, we currently target the staging service using the Pulumi Bot user.

We have decided to run tests in the pulumi organization. This can be overridden for local testing (or in Travis in the future) by defining PULUMI_API_OWNER_ORGANIZATION and using an access token with access to that organization.

Part of pulumi/home#195.
2018-04-02 21:34:54 -07:00
Pat Gavlin a23b10a9bf
Update the copyright end date to 2018. (#1068)
Just what it says on the tin.
2018-03-21 12:43:21 -07:00
Joe Duffy abbac13655
Assume --remote when --cloud-url is set (#1060)
If you use --cloud-url, as in

    $ pulumi stack init foo --cloud-url https://x.io

we would silently fall back to logic that creates local stacks.

I realize all of this will get better with the new stack identity
model, however in the meantime, let's infer that the user wanted
--remote when --cloud-url is non-"".
2018-03-18 12:44:00 -07:00
Justin Van Patten ac58f151b4
Change default of where stack is created (#971)
If currently logged in, `stack init` creates a managed stack. Otherwise, it creates a local
stack. This avoids the need to specify `--local` when not using the service.

As today, `--local` can be passed, which will create a local stack regardless of being logged
in or not.

A new flag, `--remote`, has been added, which can be passed to indicate a managed stack,
used to force an error if not logged into the service.
2018-02-26 11:00:16 -08:00
Justin Van Patten ed9716f6ef
Create backups of all local stack checkpoint files (#949)
Backup copies of local stack checkpoints are now saved to the
user's home directory (`~/.pulumi/backups`) by default.

This enables users to recover after accidentally deleting their
local `.pulumi` directory (e.g. via `git clean`).

The behavior can be disabled by setting the
PULUMI_DISABLE_CHECKPOINT_BACKUPS environment variable, which
we use to disable backups when running all tests other than the
test for this functionality.
2018-02-20 21:05:57 -08:00
joeduffy b59b8f2e6e Fix cloud tests 2017-12-03 06:34:06 -08:00
Matt Ellis 07b4d9b36b Add Pulumi.com backend, unify cobra Commands
As part of the unification it became clear where we did not support
features that we had for the local backend. I opened issues and added
comments.
2017-11-02 11:19:00 -07:00
Chris Smith fc82e71f21 Update Stack tests 2017-11-02 11:19:00 -07:00
Pat Gavlin 6be6b9a854 Fix the "stack select" test.
PR #501 regressed this test due to a change in its error message. We
should consider updating the rest of the `stack` commands to use a
similar message (rather than the "file not found" they currently emit).
2017-10-30 23:24:09 -07:00
Chris Smith defe0038ca
Add integration tests for pulumi CLI (#493)
This PR adds integration tests for exercising `pulumi init` and the `pulumi stack *` commands. The only functional change is merging in https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/492 , which I found while writing the tests and (of course 😁 ) wrote a regression for.

To do this I introduce a new test driver called `PulumiProgram`. This is different from the one found in the `testing/integration`package in that it doesn't try to prescribe a workflow. It really just deals in executing commands, and confirming strings are in the output.

While it doesn't hurt to have more tests for `pulumi`, my motivation here was so that I could reuse these to ensure I keep the same behavior for my pending PR that implements Cloud-enabled variants of some of these commands.
2017-10-30 15:17:13 -07:00