This refactors the engine so all of the APIs on it are instance
methods on the type instead of raw methods that float around and use
data from a global engine.
A mechcanical change as we remove the global `E` and then make
anything that interacted with that in pkg/engine to be an instance
method and the dealing with the fallout.
Instead of talking directly to stdout or stderr via methods on fmt,
indirect through an Engine type (presently a global, but soon to
change) to allow control of where the streams actually end up.
Prevously, we would throw raw args arrays across the interface and the
engine would do some additional parsing. Clean this up so we don't do
that and all the parsing stays in `lumi`
The plan is to take all the logic that actually implements the
commands exposed by `lumi` into a helper type that can be used by both
`lumi` and the Pulumi Service. This is step one, which was to decouple
the implementation of these commands from the command line parsing and
CLI interface they are presented to the user from.
We were passing along the entire args array to the implementation of
most commands, but the only place this was used was to pass one piece
of information to the compiler we create in one case. Let's get
explicit about the stuff we share from the CLI layer into the
implementation of the commands and make this stuff well typed instead
of a bag of strings.
Just use the args local directly instead of using the reference from
envCmdInfo. Doing this will make it easier to remove the Args field of
envCmdInfo, which I want to refactor to be more specific to the
boundary between the CLI and Planning/Deploying.
Previous logic had assumed arrays were treated like objects
in the runtime (like in ECMAScript), but they are a unique
value kind in current Lumi runtime, so must be handled separately.
Adds an `ExtraRuntimeValidation` hook to the test harness.
This runs after the test app is deployed, and can be used to test publically
exposed endpoints on the example to validate additional runtime correctness
of the Lumi app under test.
This changes a few things in the CLI, mostly just prettying it up:
* Label all steps more clearly with the kind of step. Also
unify the way we present this during planning and deployment.
* Summarize the changes that *did not* get made just as clearly
as those that did. In other words, stuff like this:
info: 2 resources changed:
+1 resource created
-1 resource deleted
5 resources unchanged
and
info: no resources required
5 resources unchanged
* Always print output properties when they are pertinent.
This includes creates, replacements, and updates.
* Show replacement creates and deletes very distinctly. The
create parts show up minty green and the delete parts show up
rosey red. These are the "physical" steps, compared to the
"logical" step of replacement (which remains marigold).
I still don't love where we are here. The asymmetry between
planning and deployment bugs me, and could be surprising.
("Hey, my deploy doesn't look like my plan!") I don't know
what developers will want to see here and I feel like in
general we are spewing far too much into the CLI to make it
even useful for anything but diagnosing failures afterwards.
I propose that we should do a deep dive on this during the
CLI epic, pulumi/pulumi-service#2.
This resolvespulumi/pulumi-fabric#305.
This change runs the examples integration tests for every test
run. They used to be split out because the AWS tests take so long,
but now those are in their own separate package. Running the
integration tests here more frequently will prevent breaking the
most basic Lumi CLI commands and capabilities.
This change tests that a plan and deploy immediately following another
deploy, when no edits have taken place, correctly results in no action.
I also cleaned up a few things in the code, like using fmt.Printf rather
than fmt.Fprintf(os.Stdout, ...), to clean up error paths, giving the
package a slightly shorter name, and adding missing copyright headers.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-fabric#310.
At the moment, we permit resources to carry a name, which the
engine uses as part of URN creation. Unfortunately, the property
"name" has a very high chance of conflicting with meaningful
user-authored properties. And furthermore this sort of name,
although key to creating URNs which are core to how the overall
system performs deployments and manages resources, are seldom
used programmatically in Lumi programs. As a result, it's a real
nuisance that we stole the good name.
This change renames that property from "name" to "urnName". This
not only has a lower likelihood of conflicting, but it also looks
reasonable sitting alongside the "urn" property. In fact, in some
future universe, after some of the upcoming runtime changes, we
may not even need the name property on the objects whatsoever.
I had originally toyed with the idea of eliminating the Resource
versus NamedResource distinction. This is certainly simpler and
remains a possibility. I didn't do that right now, however, because
the flexibility of letting resource providers name resources however
they see fit still seems possibly useful. For example, we keep
talking about whether functions can be auto-named based on hashes.
Until we've run those conversations to ground, I'd hate to do some
work that just needs to be undone in order to enable a scenario that
has a non-trivial likelihood of us wanting to explore.
We are now freely flowing computed and output properties across the
RPC boundary with providers. As such, we need to tolerate them in
a few more places. Namely, mapping to and from regular non-resource
property values, and also when copying RPC resource state back onto
live runtime objects.
If certain early errors occurred, like failing to find a default module
or main entrypoint, we never properly invoked OnDone (or, sometimes,
OnStart, for that matter). This meant that callers like the eval source
in the deployment engine could end up missing signals; in this particular
case, it led to a failure to signal a rendezvous synchronization object,
which itself led to a hang.
The fix is simple: make sure to call the On* methods in the right places.
I've added tests to probe the interesting paths, including failures.
This fixespulumi/pulumi-fabric#281.
We are renaming Lumi to Pulumi Fabric. This change simply renames the
pulumi/lumi repo to pulumi/pulumi-fabric, without the CLI tools and other
changes that will follow soon afterwards.
We are now on our fourth vendoring tool: Govendor. This appears to
be about 10X faster than Dep, fails less frequently, and has a rich,
well documented set of commands (that make far more intuitive sense
to me, particularly when compared to Dep). I could never really get
Godep to work with vendor/ correctly, whereas Govendor did the trick
right away. Lastly, Terraform uses it, so we'll probably have fewer
headaches in that department also.
This changes the RPC interfaces between Lumi and provider ever so
slightly, so that we can track default properties explicitly. This
is required to perform accurate diffing between inputs provided by
the developer, inputs provided by the system, and outputs. This is
particularly important for default values that may be indeterminite,
such as those we use in the bridge to auto-generate unique IDs.
Otherwise, we fail to reapply defaults correctly, and trick the
provider into thinking that properties changed when they did not.
This is a small step towards pulumi/lumi#306, in which we will defer
even more responsibility for diffing semantics to the providers.
Report an error when Lumi runtime compilation fails.
Also adds a reusable install_release.sh script to use
for installing Lumi package releases, plus expansion
of symlinks in package Makefiles.
This change copies the NPM package files to the installation directory
so that the result is a valid NPM package. This is a temporary workaround
until (😨) the day that we actually publish/consume real NPM packages...
