terminal/src/cascadia/Remoting/WindowManager.cpp

629 lines
27 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
// Licensed under the MIT license.
#include "pch.h"
#include "WindowManager.h"
#include "MonarchFactory.h"
#include "CommandlineArgs.h"
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
#include "../inc/WindowingBehavior.h"
#include "FindTargetWindowArgs.h"
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
#include "WindowManager.g.cpp"
#include "../../types/inc/utils.hpp"
using namespace winrt;
using namespace winrt::Microsoft::Terminal;
using namespace winrt::Windows::Foundation;
using namespace ::Microsoft::Console;
namespace winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Remoting::implementation
{
WindowManager::WindowManager()
{
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
_monarchWaitInterrupt.create();
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
// Register with COM as a server for the Monarch class
_registerAsMonarch();
// Instantiate an instance of the Monarch. This may or may not be in-proc!
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
bool foundMonarch = false;
while (!foundMonarch)
{
try
{
_createMonarchAndCallbacks();
// _createMonarchAndCallbacks will initialize _isKing
foundMonarch = true;
}
catch (...)
{
// If we fail to find the monarch,
// stay in this jail until we do.
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ExceptionInCtor",
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
}
WindowManager::~WindowManager()
{
// IMPORTANT! Tear down the registration as soon as we exit. If we're not a
// real peasant window (the monarch passed our commandline to someone else),
// then the monarch dies, we don't want our registration becoming the active
// monarch!
CoRevokeClassObject(_registrationHostClass);
_registrationHostClass = 0;
Persist window layout on window close (#10972) This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application close. Done: - Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained. - Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and then save if you are the last window closing. - Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button. - If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved state. - Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can perform to restore its layout and the window size/position information. - This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a different pane selected. Todo: - multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one window. - PR #11083 will save multiple windows. - This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs appear to be focused on opening. Next Steps: - The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as necessary. - Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now. - One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous window (if it is in the saved state). - Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and startupActions. Validation Steps Performed: - The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal -> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows. - That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved session. - Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window closed saves its state. The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to restore the terminal to its saved form. References #8324 This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000 Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
SignalClose();
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
_monarchWaitInterrupt.SetEvent();
// A thread is joinable once it's been started. Basically this just
// makes sure that the thread isn't just default-constructed.
if (_electionThread.joinable())
{
_electionThread.join();
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
}
Persist window layout on window close (#10972) This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application close. Done: - Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained. - Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and then save if you are the last window closing. - Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button. - If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved state. - Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can perform to restore its layout and the window size/position information. - This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a different pane selected. Todo: - multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one window. - PR #11083 will save multiple windows. - This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs appear to be focused on opening. Next Steps: - The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as necessary. - Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now. - One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous window (if it is in the saved state). - Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and startupActions. Validation Steps Performed: - The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal -> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows. - That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved session. - Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window closed saves its state. The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to restore the terminal to its saved form. References #8324 This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000 Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
void WindowManager::SignalClose()
{
if (_monarch)
{
try
{
_monarch.SignalClose(_peasant.GetID());
}
CATCH_LOG()
}
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
void WindowManager::ProposeCommandline(const Remoting::CommandlineArgs& args)
{
// If we're the king, we _definitely_ want to process the arguments, we were
// launched with them!
//
// Otherwise, the King will tell us if we should make a new window
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
_shouldCreateWindow = _isKing;
std::optional<uint64_t> givenID;
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
winrt::hstring givenName{};
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
if (!_isKing)
{
// The monarch may respond back "you should be a new
// window, with ID,name of (id, name)". Really the responses are:
// * You should not create a new window
// * Create a new window (but without a given ID or name). The
// Monarch will assign your ID/name later
// * Create a new window, and you'll have this ID or name
// - This is the case where the user provides `wt -w 1`, and
// there's no existing window 1
const auto result = _monarch.ProposeCommandline(args);
_shouldCreateWindow = result.ShouldCreateWindow();
if (result.Id())
{
givenID = result.Id().Value();
}
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
givenName = result.WindowName();
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// TraceLogging doesn't have a good solution for logging an
// optional. So we have to repeat the calls here:
if (givenID)
{
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ProposeCommandline",
TraceLoggingBoolean(_shouldCreateWindow, "CreateWindow", "true iff we should create a new window"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(givenID.value(), "Id", "The ID we should assign our peasant"),
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
TraceLoggingWideString(givenName.c_str(), "Name", "The name we should assign this window"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
else
{
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ProposeCommandline",
TraceLoggingBoolean(_shouldCreateWindow, "CreateWindow", "true iff we should create a new window"),
TraceLoggingPointer(nullptr, "Id", "No ID provided"),
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
TraceLoggingWideString(givenName.c_str(), "Name", "The name we should assign this window"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
}
else
{
// We're the monarch, we don't need to propose anything. We're just
// going to do it.
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
//
// However, we _do_ need to ask what our name should be. It's
// possible someone started the _first_ wt with something like `wt
// -w king` as the commandline - we want to make sure we set our
// name to "king".
//
// The FindTargetWindow event is the WindowManager's way of saying
// "I do not know how to figure out how to turn this list of args
// into a window ID/name. Whoever's listening to this event does, so
// I'll ask them". It's a convoluted way of hooking the
// WindowManager up to AppLogic without actually telling it anything
// about TerminalApp (or even WindowsTerminal)
auto findWindowArgs{ winrt::make_self<Remoting::implementation::FindTargetWindowArgs>(args) };
_raiseFindTargetWindowRequested(nullptr, *findWindowArgs);
const auto responseId = findWindowArgs->ResultTargetWindow();
if (responseId > 0)
{
givenID = ::base::saturated_cast<uint64_t>(responseId);
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ProposeCommandline_AsMonarch",
TraceLoggingBoolean(_shouldCreateWindow, "CreateWindow", "true iff we should create a new window"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(givenID.value(), "Id", "The ID we should assign our peasant"),
TraceLoggingWideString(givenName.c_str(), "Name", "The name we should assign this window"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
}
else if (responseId == WindowingBehaviorUseName)
{
givenName = findWindowArgs->ResultTargetWindowName();
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ProposeCommandline_AsMonarch",
TraceLoggingBoolean(_shouldCreateWindow, "CreateWindow", "true iff we should create a new window"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(0, "Id", "The ID we should assign our peasant"),
TraceLoggingWideString(givenName.c_str(), "Name", "The name we should assign this window"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
}
else
{
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ProposeCommandline_AsMonarch",
TraceLoggingBoolean(_shouldCreateWindow, "CreateWindow", "true iff we should create a new window"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(0, "Id", "The ID we should assign our peasant"),
TraceLoggingWideString(L"", "Name", "The name we should assign this window"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
}
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
if (_shouldCreateWindow)
{
// If we should create a new window, then instantiate our Peasant
// instance, and tell that peasant to handle that commandline.
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
_createOurPeasant({ givenID }, givenName);
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// Spawn a thread to wait on the monarch, and handle the election
if (!_isKing)
{
_createPeasantThread();
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
_peasant.ExecuteCommandline(args);
}
// Otherwise, we'll do _nothing_.
}
bool WindowManager::ShouldCreateWindow()
{
return _shouldCreateWindow;
}
void WindowManager::_registerAsMonarch()
{
winrt::check_hresult(CoRegisterClassObject(Monarch_clsid,
winrt::make<::MonarchFactory>().get(),
CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER,
REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE,
&_registrationHostClass));
}
void WindowManager::_createMonarch()
{
// Heads up! This only works because we're using
// "metadata-based-marshalling" for our WinRT types. That means the OS is
// using the .winmd file we generate to figure out the proxy/stub
// definitions for our types automatically. This only works in the following
// cases:
//
// * If we're running unpackaged: the .winmd must be a sibling of the .exe
// * If we're running packaged: the .winmd must be in the package root
_monarch = create_instance<Remoting::Monarch>(Monarch_clsid,
CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER);
}
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// NOTE: This can throw! Callers include:
// - the constructor, who performs this in a loop until it successfully
// find a a monarch
// - the performElection method, which is called in the waitOnMonarch
// thread. All the calls in that thread are wrapped in try/catch's
// already.
// - _createOurPeasant, who might do this in a loop to establish us with the
// monarch.
void WindowManager::_createMonarchAndCallbacks()
{
_createMonarch();
// Save the result of checking if we're the king. We want to avoid
// unnecessary calls back and forth if we can.
_isKing = _areWeTheKing();
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ConnectedToMonarch",
TraceLoggingUInt64(_monarch.GetPID(), "monarchPID", "The PID of the new Monarch"),
TraceLoggingBoolean(_isKing, "isKing", "true if we are the new monarch"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
if (_peasant)
{
// Inform the monarch of the time we were last activated
_monarch.HandleActivatePeasant(_peasant.GetLastActivatedArgs());
}
if (!_isKing)
{
return;
}
// Here, we're the king!
//
// This is where you should do any additional setup that might need to be
Persist window layout on window close (#10972) This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application close. Done: - Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained. - Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and then save if you are the last window closing. - Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button. - If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved state. - Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can perform to restore its layout and the window size/position information. - This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a different pane selected. Todo: - multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one window. - PR #11083 will save multiple windows. - This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs appear to be focused on opening. Next Steps: - The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as necessary. - Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now. - One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous window (if it is in the saved state). - Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and startupActions. Validation Steps Performed: - The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal -> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows. - That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved session. - Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window closed saves its state. The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to restore the terminal to its saved form. References #8324 This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000 Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
// done when we become the king. This will be called both for the first
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// window, and when the current monarch dies.
Persist window layout on window close (#10972) This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application close. Done: - Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained. - Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and then save if you are the last window closing. - Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button. - If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved state. - Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can perform to restore its layout and the window size/position information. - This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a different pane selected. Todo: - multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one window. - PR #11083 will save multiple windows. - This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs appear to be focused on opening. Next Steps: - The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as necessary. - Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now. - One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous window (if it is in the saved state). - Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and startupActions. Validation Steps Performed: - The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal -> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows. - That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved session. - Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window closed saves its state. The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to restore the terminal to its saved form. References #8324 This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000 Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
_monarch.WindowCreated({ get_weak(), &WindowManager::_WindowCreatedHandlers });
_monarch.WindowClosed({ get_weak(), &WindowManager::_WindowClosedHandlers });
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
_monarch.FindTargetWindowRequested({ this, &WindowManager::_raiseFindTargetWindowRequested });
_monarch.ShowNotificationIconRequested([this](auto&&, auto&&) { _ShowNotificationIconRequestedHandlers(*this, nullptr); });
_monarch.HideNotificationIconRequested([this](auto&&, auto&&) { _HideNotificationIconRequestedHandlers(*this, nullptr); });
Persist window layout cont. save multiple windows (#11083) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request Continuation of https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/10972 to handle multiple windows, requires that to be merged first. <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Also closes #766 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [x] Schema updated. * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Rough changelog: Normally saving is triggered to occur every 30s, or sooner if a window is created/closed. The existing behavior of saving on last close is maintained to bypass that throttling. The automatic saving allows for crash recovery. Additionally all window layouts will be saved upon taking the `quit` action. For loading we will check if we are the first window, that there are any saved layouts, and if the setting is enabled, and then depending on if we were given command line args or startup actions. - create a new window for each saved layout, or - take the first layout for our self and then a new window for each other layout. This also saves the layout when the quit action is taken. Misc changes - A -s,--saved argument was added to the command line to facilitate opening all of the windows with the right settings. This also means that while a terminal session is running you can do wt -s idx to open a copy of window idx. There isn't a stable ordering of which idx each window gets saved as (it is whatever the iteration order of _peasants is), so it is just a cute hack for now. - All position calculation has been moved up to AppHost this does mean we need to awkwardly pass around positions in a couple of unexpected places, but no solution was perfect. - Renamed "Open tabs from a previous session" to "Open windows from a previous session". (not reflected in video below) - Now save runtime tab color and window names - Only enabled for non-elevated windows - Add some change tracking to ApplicationState <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed ![output](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6185249/131163473-d649d204-a589-41ad-b9d9-c4c0528cb684.gif)
2021-09-27 23:18:39 +02:00
_monarch.QuitAllRequested({ get_weak(), &WindowManager::_QuitAllRequestedHandlers });
2021-04-29 00:13:28 +02:00
_BecameMonarchHandlers(*this, nullptr);
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
bool WindowManager::_areWeTheKing()
{
const auto ourPID{ GetCurrentProcessId() };
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
const auto kingPID{ _monarch.GetPID() };
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
return (ourPID == kingPID);
}
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
Remoting::IPeasant WindowManager::_createOurPeasant(std::optional<uint64_t> givenID,
const winrt::hstring& givenName)
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
{
auto p = winrt::make_self<Remoting::implementation::Peasant>();
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
if (givenID)
{
p->AssignID(givenID.value());
}
Add support for naming windows with the `-w` parameter (#9300) This finishes the implementation of `--window` to also accept a string as the "name" of the window. So you can say ```sh wt -w foo new-tab wt -w foo split-pane ``` and have both those commands execute in the same window, the one named "foo". This is just slightly more ergonomic than manually using the IDs of windows. In the future, I'll be working on renaming windows, and displaying these names. > #### `--window,-w <window-id>` > Run these commands in the given Windows Terminal session. This enables opening > new tabs, splits, etc. in already running Windows Terminal windows. > * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. > * If `window-id` is a negative number, or the reserved name `new`, run the > commands in a _new_ Terminal window. > * If `window-id` is the ID or name of an existing window, then run the > commandline in that window. > * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID or name of an existing window, create a new > window. That window will be assigned the ID or name provided in the > commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. > * If `window-id` is omitted, then obey the value of `windowingBehavior` when > determining which window to run the command in. Before this PR, I think we didn't actually properly support assigning the id with `wt -w 12345`. If `12345` didn't exist, it would make a new window, but just assign it the next id, not assign it 12345. ## References * #4472, #8135 * https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5 ## Validation Steps Performed Ran tests Messed with naming windows, working as expected. Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-51431478
2021-03-17 20:28:01 +01:00
// If the name wasn't specified, this will be an empty string.
p->WindowName(givenName);
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
_peasant = *p;
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// Try to add us to the monarch. If that fails, try to find a monarch
// again, until we find one (we will eventually find us)
while (true)
{
try
{
_monarch.AddPeasant(_peasant);
break;
}
catch (...)
{
try
{
// Wrap this in it's own try/catch, because this can throw.
_createMonarchAndCallbacks();
}
catch (...)
{
}
}
}
Persist window layout cont. save multiple windows (#11083) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request Continuation of https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/10972 to handle multiple windows, requires that to be merged first. <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Also closes #766 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [x] Schema updated. * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Rough changelog: Normally saving is triggered to occur every 30s, or sooner if a window is created/closed. The existing behavior of saving on last close is maintained to bypass that throttling. The automatic saving allows for crash recovery. Additionally all window layouts will be saved upon taking the `quit` action. For loading we will check if we are the first window, that there are any saved layouts, and if the setting is enabled, and then depending on if we were given command line args or startup actions. - create a new window for each saved layout, or - take the first layout for our self and then a new window for each other layout. This also saves the layout when the quit action is taken. Misc changes - A -s,--saved argument was added to the command line to facilitate opening all of the windows with the right settings. This also means that while a terminal session is running you can do wt -s idx to open a copy of window idx. There isn't a stable ordering of which idx each window gets saved as (it is whatever the iteration order of _peasants is), so it is just a cute hack for now. - All position calculation has been moved up to AppHost this does mean we need to awkwardly pass around positions in a couple of unexpected places, but no solution was perfect. - Renamed "Open tabs from a previous session" to "Open windows from a previous session". (not reflected in video below) - Now save runtime tab color and window names - Only enabled for non-elevated windows - Add some change tracking to ApplicationState <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed ![output](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6185249/131163473-d649d204-a589-41ad-b9d9-c4c0528cb684.gif)
2021-09-27 23:18:39 +02:00
_peasant.GetWindowLayoutRequested({ get_weak(), &WindowManager::_GetWindowLayoutRequestedHandlers });
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_CreateOurPeasant",
TraceLoggingUInt64(_peasant.GetID(), "peasantID", "The ID of our new peasant"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
Attempt to make the monarch more thread safe. (#11189) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References #11083 #11143 <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [ ] Closes #xxx * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments While testing the save/quit features a number of issues were found that were caused by poor synchronization on the monarch, resulting in various unexpected crashes. Because this uses std collections, and I didn't see any builtin winrt multithreaded containers I went with the somewhat heavy-handed mutex approach. e.g. - https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/11083#issuecomment-916218353 - https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/11083#issuecomment-916220521 - https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/11143/#discussion_r704738433 This also makes it so that on quit peasants don't try to become the monarch, and the monarch closes their peasant last to prevent elections from happening. <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed Create many windows (hold down ctrl-shift-n) then use the quit action from peasants/the monarch to make sure everything closes properly.
2021-09-21 23:21:45 +02:00
// If the peasant asks us to quit we should not try to act in future elections.
_peasant.QuitRequested([weakThis{ get_weak() }](auto&&, auto&&) {
if (auto wm = weakThis.get())
{
wm->_monarchWaitInterrupt.SetEvent();
}
});
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
return _peasant;
}
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// Method Description:
// - Attempt to connect to the monarch process. This might be us!
// - For the new monarch, add us to their list of peasants.
// Arguments:
// - <none>
// Return Value:
// - true iff we're the new monarch process.
// NOTE: This can throw!
bool WindowManager::_performElection()
{
_createMonarchAndCallbacks();
// Tell the new monarch who we are. We might be that monarch!
_monarch.AddPeasant(_peasant);
// This method is only called when a _new_ monarch is elected. So
// don't do anything here that needs to be done for all monarch
// windows. This should only be for work that's done when a window
// _becomes_ a monarch, after the death of the previous monarch.
return _isKing;
}
void WindowManager::_createPeasantThread()
{
// If we catch an exception trying to get at the monarch ever, we can
// set the _monarchWaitInterrupt, and use that to trigger a new
// election. Though, we wouldn't be able to retry the function that
// caused the exception in the first place...
_electionThread = std::thread([this] {
_waitOnMonarchThread();
});
}
void WindowManager::_waitOnMonarchThread()
{
// This is the array of HANDLEs that we're going to wait on in
// WaitForMultipleObjects below.
// * waits[0] will be the handle to the monarch process. It gets
// signalled when the process exits / dies.
// * waits[1] is the handle to our _monarchWaitInterrupt event. Another
// thread can use that to manually break this loop. We'll do that when
// we're getting torn down.
HANDLE waits[2];
waits[1] = _monarchWaitInterrupt.get();
const auto peasantID = _peasant.GetID(); // safe: _peasant is in-proc.
bool exitThreadRequested = false;
while (!exitThreadRequested)
{
// At any point in all this, the current monarch might die. If it
// does, we'll go straight to a new election, in the "jail"
// try/catch below. Worst case, eventually, we'll become the new
// monarch.
try
{
// This might fail to even ask the monarch for it's PID.
wil::unique_handle hMonarch{ OpenProcess(PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS,
FALSE,
static_cast<DWORD>(_monarch.GetPID())) };
// If we fail to open the monarch, then they don't exist
// anymore! Go straight to an election.
if (hMonarch.get() == nullptr)
{
const auto gle = GetLastError();
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_FailedToOpenMonarch",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(gle, "lastError", "The result of GetLastError"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
exitThreadRequested = _performElection();
continue;
}
waits[0] = hMonarch.get();
auto waitResult = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, waits, FALSE, INFINITE);
switch (waitResult)
{
case WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 0: // waits[0] was signaled, the handle to the monarch process
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_MonarchDied",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
// Connect to the new monarch, which might be us!
// If we become the monarch, then we'll return true and exit this thread.
exitThreadRequested = _performElection();
break;
case WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1: // waits[1] was signaled, our manual interrupt
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_MonarchWaitInterrupted",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
exitThreadRequested = true;
break;
case WAIT_TIMEOUT:
// This should be impossible.
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_MonarchWaitTimeout",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
exitThreadRequested = true;
break;
default:
{
// Returning any other value is invalid. Just die.
const auto gle = GetLastError();
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_WaitFailed",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
TraceLoggingUInt64(gle, "lastError", "The result of GetLastError"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
ExitProcess(0);
}
}
}
catch (...)
{
// Theoretically, if window[1] dies when we're trying to get
// it's PID we'll get here. If we just try to do the election
// once here, it's possible we might elect window[2], but have
// it die before we add ourselves as a peasant. That
// _performElection call will throw, and we wouldn't catch it
// here, and we'd die.
// Instead, we're going to have a resilient election process.
// We're going to keep trying an election, until one _doesn't_
// throw an exception. That might mean burning through all the
// other dying monarchs until we find us as the monarch. But if
// this process is alive, then there's _someone_ in the line of
// succession.
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ExceptionInWaitThread",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
bool foundNewMonarch = false;
while (!foundNewMonarch)
{
try
{
exitThreadRequested = _performElection();
// It doesn't matter if we're the monarch, or someone
// else is, but if we complete the election, then we've
// registered with a new one. We can escape this jail
// and re-enter society.
foundNewMonarch = true;
}
catch (...)
{
// If we fail to acknowledge the results of the election,
// stay in this jail until we do.
TraceLoggingWrite(g_hRemotingProvider,
"WindowManager_ExceptionInNestedWaitThread",
TraceLoggingUInt64(peasantID, "peasantID", "Our peasant ID"),
Set keyword flags on all tracelog events (#10098) Set keyword flags on all events so those sharing a provider with telemetry do not fire unless tracing is enabled ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #10093 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests passed * [x] Documentation added in `til.h` about how keywords work and at the only other site of keywords we define in the Host project tracing files. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments I initially thought that we would need to split providers here to accomplish this... but @DHowett helped me realize that might be a lot of additional metadata and bloat binary size. So with help from a friend from fundamentals, I realized that we could use Keywords to differentiate here. We can no longer define 0 keywords as that represents an any/all scenario. Every `TraceLoggingWrite` event now needs a keyword. When our events have a keyword, they're not included in any trace. Additionally, when we have an explicit keyword to check that is different from the ones used for the telemetry pipeline, we can ensure that we only do "hard work" to generate debug trace data when an "ALL" type listener like TraceView or Windows Performance Recorder with our profiles is listening to these providers for ALL keyworded events. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] - Built with full release build config to confirm performance is worse than dev builds BECAUSE of the telemetry event collector camping our provider and triggering full trace event generation on shared providers. - [x] - Built with full release build config to enable statistics collection and validated trace event collection is excluded and trace event short-circuits work with this change. - [x] - Checked that TraceView still sees both telemetry and tracing events - [x] - Checked that WPR with our .wprp profile sees both telemetry and tracing events
2021-05-15 01:14:26 +02:00
TraceLoggingLevel(WINEVENT_LEVEL_VERBOSE),
TraceLoggingKeyword(TIL_KEYWORD_TRACE));
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
}
}
}
}
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
Remoting::Peasant WindowManager::CurrentWindow()
{
return _peasant;
}
Add support for running a commandline in another WT window (#8898) ## Summary of the Pull Request **If you're reading this PR and haven't signed off on #8135, go there first.** ![window-management-000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18356694/103932910-25199380-50e8-11eb-97e3-594a31da62d2.gif) This provides the basic parts of the implementation of #4472. Namely: * We add support for the `--window,-w <window-id>` argument to `wt.exe`, to allow a commandline to be given to another window. * If `window-id` is `0`, run the given commands in _the current window_. * If `window-id` is a negative number, run the commands in a _new_ Terminal window. * If `window-id` is the ID of an existing window, then run the commandline in that window. * If `window-id` is _not_ the ID of an existing window, create a new window. That window will be assigned the ID provided in the commandline. The provided subcommands will be run in that new window. * If `window-id` is omitted, then create a new window. ## References * Spec: #8135 * Megathread: #5000 * Project: projects/5 ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #4472 * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [ ] Requires documentation to be updated - **sure does** ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Note that `wt -w 1 -d c:\foo cmd.exe` does work, by causing window 1 to change There are limitations, and there are plenty of things to work on in the future: * [ ] We don't support names for windows yet * [ ] We don't support window glomming by default, or a setting to configure what happens when `-w` is omitted. I thought it best to lay the groundwork first, then come back to that. * [ ] `-w 0` currently just uses the "last activated" window, not "the current". There's more follow-up work to try and smartly find the actual window we're being called from. * [ ] Basically anything else that's listed in projects/5. I'm cutting this PR where it currently is, because this is already a huge PR. I believe the remaining tasks will all be easier to land, once this is in. ## Validation Steps Performed I've been creating windows, and closing them, and running cmdlines for a while now. I'm gonna keep doing that while the PR is open, till no bugs remain. # TODOs * [x] There are a bunch of `GetID`, `GetPID` calls that aren't try/caught 😬 - [x] `Monarch.cpp` - [x] `Peasant.cpp` - [x] `WindowManager.cpp` - [x] `AppHost.cpp` * [x] If the monarch gets hung, then _you can't launch any Terminals_ 😨 We should handle this gracefully. - Proposed idea: give the Monarch some time to respond to a proposal for a commandline. If there's no response in that timeframe, this window is now a _hermit_, outside of society entirely. It can't be elected Monarch. It can't receive command lines. It has no ID. - Could we gracefully recover from such a state? maybe, probably not though. - Same deal if a peasant hangs, it could end up hanging the monarch, right? Like if you do `wt -w 2`, and `2` is hung, then does the monarch get hung waiting on the hung peasant? - After talking with @miniksa, **we're gonna punt this from the initial implementation**. If people legit hit this in the wild, we'll fix it then.
2021-02-10 12:28:09 +01:00
void WindowManager::_raiseFindTargetWindowRequested(const winrt::Windows::Foundation::IInspectable& sender,
const winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Remoting::FindTargetWindowArgs& args)
{
_FindTargetWindowRequestedHandlers(sender, args);
}
2021-04-29 00:13:28 +02:00
bool WindowManager::IsMonarch()
{
return _isKing;
}
void WindowManager::SummonWindow(const Remoting::SummonWindowSelectionArgs& args)
{
// We should only ever get called when we are the monarch, because only
// the monarch ever registers for the global hotkey. So the monarch is
// the only window that will be calling this.
_monarch.SummonWindow(args);
}
void WindowManager::SummonAllWindows()
{
if constexpr (Feature_NotificationIcon::IsEnabled())
{
_monarch.SummonAllWindows();
}
}
Windows::Foundation::Collections::IVectorView<winrt::Microsoft::Terminal::Remoting::PeasantInfo> WindowManager::GetPeasantInfos()
{
// We should only get called when we're the monarch since the monarch
// is the only one that knows about all peasants.
return _monarch.GetPeasantInfos();
}
Persist window layout on window close (#10972) This commit adds initial support for saving window layout on application close. Done: - Add user setting for if tabs should be maintained. - Added events to track the number of open windows for the monarch, and then save if you are the last window closing. - Saves layout when the user explicitly hits the "Close Window" button. - If the user manually closed all of their tabs (through the tab x button or through closing all panes on the tab) then remove any saved state. - Saves in the ApplicationState file a list of actions the terminal can perform to restore its layout and the window size/position information. - This saves an action to focus the correct pane, but this won't actually work without #10978. Note that if you have a pane zoomed, it does still zoom the correct pane, but when you unzoom it will have a different pane selected. Todo: - multiple windows? Right now it can only handle loading/saving one window. - PR #11083 will save multiple windows. - This also sometimes runs into the existing bug where multiple tabs appear to be focused on opening. Next Steps: - The business logic of when the save is triggered can be adjusted as necessary. - Right now I am taking the pragmatic approach and just saving the state as an array of objects, but only ever populate it with 1, that way saving multiple windows in the future could be added without breaking schema compatibility. Selfishly I'm hoping that handling multiple windows could be spun off into another pr/feature for now. - One possible thing that can maybe be done is that the commandline can be augmented with a "--saved ##" attribute that would load from the nth saved state if it exists. e.g. if there are 3 saved windows, on first load it can spawn three wt --saved {0,1,2} that would reopen the windows? This way there also exists a way to load a copy of a previous window (if it is in the saved state). - Is the application state something that is planned to be public/user editable? In theory the user could since it is just json, but I don't know what it buys them over just modifying their settings and startupActions. Validation Steps Performed: - The happy path: open terminal -> set setting to true -> close terminal -> reopen and see tabs. Tested with powershell/cmd/wsl windows. - That closing all panes/tabs on their own will remove the saved session. - Open multiple windows, close windows and confirm that the last window closed saves its state. The generated file stores a sequence of actions that will be executed to restore the terminal to its saved form. References #8324 This is also one of the items on microsoft/terminal#5000 Closes #766
2021-09-09 00:44:53 +02:00
uint64_t WindowManager::GetNumberOfPeasants()
{
if (_monarch)
{
try
{
return _monarch.GetNumberOfPeasants();
}
CATCH_LOG()
}
return 0;
}
// Method Description:
// - Ask the monarch to show a notification icon.
// Arguments:
// - <none>
// Return Value:
// - <none>
winrt::fire_and_forget WindowManager::RequestShowNotificationIcon()
{
co_await winrt::resume_background();
_peasant.RequestShowNotificationIcon();
}
// Method Description:
// - Ask the monarch to hide its notification icon.
// Arguments:
// - <none>
// Return Value:
// - <none>
winrt::fire_and_forget WindowManager::RequestHideNotificationIcon()
{
auto strongThis{ get_strong() };
co_await winrt::resume_background();
_peasant.RequestHideNotificationIcon();
}
// Method Description:
// - Ask the monarch to quit all windows.
// Arguments:
// - <none>
// Return Value:
// - <none>
winrt::fire_and_forget WindowManager::RequestQuitAll()
{
auto strongThis{ get_strong() };
co_await winrt::resume_background();
_peasant.RequestQuitAll();
}
bool WindowManager::DoesQuakeWindowExist()
{
return _monarch.DoesQuakeWindowExist();
}
void WindowManager::UpdateActiveTabTitle(winrt::hstring title)
{
winrt::get_self<implementation::Peasant>(_peasant)->ActiveTabTitle(title);
}
Persist window layout cont. save multiple windows (#11083) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request Continuation of https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/10972 to handle multiple windows, requires that to be merged first. <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Also closes #766 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [x] Schema updated. * [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments Rough changelog: Normally saving is triggered to occur every 30s, or sooner if a window is created/closed. The existing behavior of saving on last close is maintained to bypass that throttling. The automatic saving allows for crash recovery. Additionally all window layouts will be saved upon taking the `quit` action. For loading we will check if we are the first window, that there are any saved layouts, and if the setting is enabled, and then depending on if we were given command line args or startup actions. - create a new window for each saved layout, or - take the first layout for our self and then a new window for each other layout. This also saves the layout when the quit action is taken. Misc changes - A -s,--saved argument was added to the command line to facilitate opening all of the windows with the right settings. This also means that while a terminal session is running you can do wt -s idx to open a copy of window idx. There isn't a stable ordering of which idx each window gets saved as (it is whatever the iteration order of _peasants is), so it is just a cute hack for now. - All position calculation has been moved up to AppHost this does mean we need to awkwardly pass around positions in a couple of unexpected places, but no solution was perfect. - Renamed "Open tabs from a previous session" to "Open windows from a previous session". (not reflected in video below) - Now save runtime tab color and window names - Only enabled for non-elevated windows - Add some change tracking to ApplicationState <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed ![output](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6185249/131163473-d649d204-a589-41ad-b9d9-c4c0528cb684.gif)
2021-09-27 23:18:39 +02:00
Windows::Foundation::Collections::IVector<winrt::hstring> WindowManager::GetAllWindowLayouts()
{
if (_monarch)
{
try
{
return _monarch.GetAllWindowLayouts();
}
CATCH_LOG()
}
return nullptr;
}
Add `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` (#8607) Adds a `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll` to our solution. This DLL will be responsible for all the Monarch/Peasant work that's been described in #7240 & #8135. This PR does _not_ implement the Monarch/Peasant architecture in any significant way. The goal of this PR is to just to establish the project layout, and the most basic connections. This should make reviewing the actual meat of the implementation (in a later PR) easier. It will also give us the opportunity to include some of the basic weird things we're doing (with `CoRegisterClass`) in the Terminal _now_, and get them selfhosted, before building on them too much. This PR does have windows registering the `Monarch` class with COM. When windows are created, they'll as the Monarch if they should create a new window or not. In this PR, the Monarch will always reply "yes, please make a new window". Similar to other projects in our solution, we're adding 3 projects here: * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.lib`: the actual implementation, as a static lib. * `Microsoft.Terminal.Remoting.dll`: The implementation linked as a DLL, for use in `WindowsTerminal.exe`. * `Remoting.UnitTests.dll`: A unit test dll that links with the static lib. There are plenty of TODOs scattered about the code. Clearly, most of this isn't implemented yet, but I do have more WIP branches. I'm using [`projects/5`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5) as my notation for TODOs that are too small for an issue, but are part of the whole Process Model 2.0 work. ## References * #5000 - this is the process model megathread * #7240 - The process model 2.0 spec. * #8135 - the window management spec. (please review me, I have 0/3 signoffs even after the discussion we had 😢) * #8171 - the Monarch/peasant sample. (please review me, I have 1/2) ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes nothing, this is just infrastructure * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
2021-01-07 23:59:37 +01:00
}