This introduces a spec for keyboard selection. This enables the user to create and update a selection without the use of a mouse or stylus.
## References
Contributes to #715
### ⇒ [doc link](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/dev/migrie/s/1032-elevation-qol/doc/specs/%235000%20-%20Process%20Model%202.0/%231032%20-%20Elevation%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Improvements.md) ⇐
## Summary of the Pull Request
Despite my best efforts to mix elevation levels in a single Terminal window, it seems that there's no way to do that safely. With the dream of mixed elevation dead, this spec outlines a number of quality-of-life improvements we can make to the Terminal today. These should make using the terminal in elevated scenarios better, since we can't have M/E.
### Abstract
> For a long time, we've been researching adding support to the Windows Terminal
> for running both unelevated and elevated (admin) tabs side-by-side, in the same
> window. However, after much research, we've determined that there isn't a safe
> way to do this without opening the Terminal up as a potential
> escalation-of-privilege vector.
>
> Instead, we'll be adding a number of features to the Terminal to improve the
> user experience of working in elevated scenarios. These improvements include:
>
> * A visible indicator that the Terminal window is elevated ([#1939])
> * Configuring the Terminal to always run elevated ([#632])
> * Configuring a specific profile to always open elevated ([#632])
> * Allowing new tabs, panes to be opened elevated directly from an unelevated
> window
> * Dynamic profile appearance that changes depending on if the Terminal is
> elevated or not. ([#1939], [#8311])
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #1032, #632
* [x] References: #5000, #4472, #2227, #7240, #8135, #8311
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
### Why are these two separate documents?
I felt that the spec that is currently in review in #7240 and this doc should remain separate, yet closely related documents. #7240 is more about showing how this large set of problems discussed in #5000 can all be solved technically, and how those solutions can be used together. It establishes that none of the proposed solutions for components of #5000 will preclude the possibility of other components being solved. What it does _not_ do however is drill too deeply on the user experience that will be built on top of those architectural changes.
This doc on the other hand focuses more closely on a pair of scenarios, and establishes how those scenarios will work technically, and how they'll be exposed to the user.
Docs have been updated (for bug fixes/features)
docs update => proper capitalisation would be better. 👍: Github
## PR Checklist
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
### Other information:
Signed-off-by: Ayushman Singh Chauhan <ascb508@gmail.com>
#### ⚠️ this pr targets #9977
## Summary of the Pull Request
This adds support for part of the `monitor` property for `globalSummon`. It also goes a little off-spec:
```json
"monitor": "any"|"toCurrent"|"toMouse"
```
* `monitor`: This controls the monitor that the window will be summoned from/to
- `"any"`: Summon the MRU window, regardless of which monitor it's currently on.
- `"toCurrent"`/omitted: (_default_): Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor with the current **foreground** window.
- [**NEW**] `"toMouse"`: Summon the MRU window **TO** the monitor where the **mouse** cursor is.
When I was playing with this, It felt like `toMouse` was always what I wanted, not `toCurrent`. We can always just comment that out if we think that's contentious - I'm aware I didn't originally spec that.
## References
* Original thread: #653
* Spec: #9274
* megathread: #8888
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/projects/5#card-60325291
* [x] I work here
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Requires documentation to be updated 😢
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I made `toMouse` the default because it felt better. fite-me.jpg
## Validation Steps Performed
my ever evolving blob:
```jsonc
{ "keys": "ctrl+`", "command": { "action": "quakeMode" } },
{ "keys": "ctrl+1", "command": { "action": "globalSummon" } },
// { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "toCurrent" } },
// { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "toggleVisibility": false } },
// { "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 2000 } },
{ "keys": "ctrl+2", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "any" } },
// { "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "onCurrent" } },
{ "keys": "ctrl+3", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse" } },
// { "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "desktop": "any" } },
{ "keys": "ctrl+4", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "monitor": "toMouse", "dropdownDuration": 500 } },
{ "keys": "ctrl+5", "command": { "action": "globalSummon", "dropdownDuration": 500 } },
```
### ⇒ [doc link](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/dev/migrie/s/653-quake-mode/doc/specs/%23653%20-%20Quake%20Mode/%23653%20-%20Quake%20Mode.md) ⇐
## Summary of the Pull Request
After reading through 114+ comments in #653 and related issues, I think I've finally wrapped my head around all the possible scenarios for quake mode. <!-- Speak now or forever hold your peace. --> This also includes "minimize to tray", because the two are a powerful combination. With the work already prototyped in [`dev/migrie/f/653-QUAKE-MODE`](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/tree/dev/migrie/f/653-QUAKE-MODE), [I'm starting to believe](https://j.gifs.com/58vKNx.gif) that we could actually land this in 2.0.
### Abstract
> Many existing terminals support a feature whereby a user can press a keybinding
> anywhere in the OS, and summon their terminal application. Oftentimes the act of
> summoning this window is accompanied by a "dropdown" animation, where the window
> slides in to view from the top of the screen. This global summon action is often
> referred to as "quake mode", a reference to the videogame Quake who's console
> slid in from the top.
>
> This spec addresses both of the following two issues:
> * "Quake Mode" ([#653])
> * "Minimize to tray" ([#5727])
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #653, #5727
* [x] References: #5000, #4472, #2227, #7240, #8135
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
This is the spec for #597
I am proposing the `tabWidthMode` feature be added first, then `tabWidthMin` and `tabWidthMax` be added in a later release.
PR: #3876
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Spec for #3062
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [x] Is documentation
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [x] I work here
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Read the spec
### ⇒ [doc link](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/dev/migrie/s/4472-window-management/doc/specs/%235000%20-%20Process%20Model%202.0/%234472%20-%20Windows%20Terminal%20Session%20Management.md) ⇐
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is a more detailed spec for two parts of the "Process Model 2.0" work that's being tracked in #5000. In particular, this spec focuses on the management of Windows Terminal windows, including opening new tabs in existing windows.
Largely, the reader is expected to have already read the spec in progress in #7240, and already be familiar with the concept of "Monarch" and "Peasant" windows as introduced by that spec. For that reason, ⚠ **THIS PR IS TARGETING THE BRANCH FOR #7240** ⚠.
### Abstract
> This document is intended to serve as an addition to the [Process Model 2.0
> Spec]. That document provides a big-picture overview of changes to the entirety
> of the Windows Terminal process architecture, including both the split of
> window/content processes, as well as the introduction of monarch/peasant
> processes. The focus of that document was to identify solutions to a set of
> scenarios that were closely intertwined, and establish these solutions would
> work together, without preventing any one scenario from working. What that
> document did not do was prescribe specific solutions to the given scenarios.
>
> This document offers a deeper dive on a subset of the issues in [#5000], to
> describe specifics for managing multiple windows with the Windows Terminal. This
> includes features such as:
>
> * Run `wt` in the current window ([#4472])
> * Single Instance Mode ([#2227])
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #4472, Specs #2227
* [x] References: #5000, #4472, #2227, #7240
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
### Why are these two separate documents?
I felt that the spec that is currently in review in #7240 and this doc should remain separate, yet closely related documents. #7240 is more about showing how this large set of problems discussed in #5000 can all be solved technically, and how those solutions can be used together. It establishes that none of the proposed solutions for components of #5000 will preclude the possibility of other components being solved. What it does _not_ do however is drill too deeply on the user experience that will be built on top of those architectural changes.
This doc on the other hand focuses more closely on a pair of scenarios, and establishes how those scenarios will work technically, and how they'll be exposed to the user.
### TODO:
* [x] A thought - How will we handle arguments like `--fullscreen`, `--initialSize r,c`? They only apply when creating a new window, right?
* [x] When a `wt -s 1 split-pane` command is executed, we'll need to make sure to not _also_ create a new tab
### ⇒ [doc link](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/dev/migrie/s/5000/doc/specs/%235000%20-%20Process%20Model%202.0/%235000%20-%20Process%20Model%202.0.md) ⇐
## Summary of the Pull Request
This spec is _exceptionally long_, and is currently a work in progress. There are a few more things I'd like to have experimentally verified (though, I'm fairly certain they _will_ work, with the right combination of flags and such). Additionally, a few sections have remaining TODOs before the spec is finished. However, this spec is already fairly long, and I want to give people as much time to get their eyes on it as possible.
### Abstract
>
> The Windows Terminal currently exists as a single process per window, with one
> connection per terminal pane (which could be an additional conpty process and
> associated client processes). This model has proven effective for the simple
> windowing we've done so far. However, in order to support scenarios like
> dragging tabs into other windows, or having one top-level window with different
> elevation levels within it, this single process model will not be sufficient.
>
> This spec outlines changes to the Terminal process model in order to enable the
> following scenarios:
>
> * Tab Tearoff/ Reattach ([#1256])
> * Run `wt` in the current window ([#4472])
> * Single Instance Mode ([#2227])
> * Quake Mode ([#653])
> * Mixed Elevation ([#1032] & [#632])
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #5000
* [x] References: #1256, #4472, #2227, #653, #1032, #632, #492
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is a spec for "pane navigation", as we've already got a bit of an implementation in #8183. We've also had a heated discussion in Teams, and I wanted to capture a bit of that in a more formal doc. I suppose that "informal Teams chat" didn't work out in the end 😆.
Also, this is @PankajBhojwani's feature so I'm gonna let him drive. I mostly wrote this to test out a new spec template.
After discussion, we landed on proposal D, with a minor change of `last` to `prev`. This is how it was in #8183 before I started meddling 😝
## PR Checklist
* [x] spec for #2871
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This is not my best spec ever - again, mostly just trying to spawn discussion, and prototype the new spec template.
## Summary of the Pull Request
I think we all agree that the current spec template doesn't always work. I
thought this layout might be better for the kinds of settings discussions we
have (more and more frequently now).
This is largely for discussion with the team - if there are other things we want
added, changed, or if we just want to merge this in with the primary spec
template, I'm all ears.
## References
* An example of using this spec: #8375
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Proto-extensions spec
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Is documentation
* [x] I work here
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
This introduces an addendum to the Terminal Settings Model spec that
covers inheritance and fallback. Basically, settings objects will now
have a reference to a parent object. If the settings object does not
have a setting defined, it will ask its parent to resolve the value. A
parent is set using the `Clone()` function. `Copy()` is used to copy the
value and structure of the settings model, whereas `Clone()` is used to
copy a reference to the settings model and build an inheritance tree.
## References
#6904 - Terminal Settings Model Spec
#1564 - Settings UI
## Summary of the Pull Request
This introduces a spec for (what I like to call) winrt TerminalSettings. Basically, we need to move over some of the code that resides in TerminalApp that relates to the settings model, then expose some of the settings objects as winrt objects. Doing so will allow us to access/modify settings across different project layers (a must-have for the Settings UI).
## References
#885 - winrt Terminal Settings issue
#1564 - spec for most of the backend work for Settings UI
* This is a mini-spec for how I see this working
* good bot
* These were some typos
* Addd a future consideration about the command palette and commands
* Update spec to reflect discussion with Carlos
* update spec to reflect investigations in Command Palette Addenda 1
* add references to #6899, and minor bits of review feedback
* add `remainingProfiles` as a way of adding all the user's other profiles quickly to the menu as well
* clarify why we're not doing it in the profiles list
* no two commits do not contain a misspelling of separate
## Summary of the Pull Request
⚠️ This spec has been moved from #6902. That version was branched off the new tab menu customization, and had a terribly convoluted git history. After discussion with the team, we've decided that it's best that this spec is merged atomically _first_, and used as the basis for #5888, as opposed to the other way around.
> This document is intended to serve as an addition to the [Command Palette Spec],
> as well as the [New Tab Menu Customization Spec].
>
> As we come to rely more on actions being a mechanism by which the user defines
> "do something in the Terminal", we'll want to make it even easier for users to
> re-use the actions that they've already defined, as to reduce duplicated json as
> much as possible. This spec proposes a mechanism by which actions could be
> uniquely identifiable, so that the user could refer to bindings in other
> contexts without needing to replicate an entire json blob.
>
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #6899
* [x] References: #1571, #1912, #3337, #5025, #5524, #5633
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
[Command Palette Spec]: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/specs/%232046%20-%20Command%20Palette.md
[New Tab Menu Customization Spec]: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/specs/%231571%20-%20New%20Tab%20Menu%20Customization.md
Co-authored-by: Mike Griese <zadjii@gmail.com>
## Summary of the Pull Request
This spec is a subset of #5772, but specific to per-profile tab colors. We've had enough requests for that in the last few days that I want to pull that feature out into it's own spec, so we can get that approved and implemented in a future-proof way.
> This spec describes a way to specify tab colors in a profile in a way that will
> be forward compatible with theming the Terminal. This spec will be largely
> dedicated to the design of a single setting, but within the context of theming.
>
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs: #1337
* [x] References: #5772
* [x] I work here
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_\*<sup>\*</sup><sub>\*</sub> read the spec <sub>\*</sub><sup>\*</sup>\*_
## Summary of the Pull Request
This proposes a change to how Terminal will scroll in response to newly
generated output. The Terminal will scroll upon receiving new output if
the viewport is at the bottom of the scroll history and no selection is
active.
This spec also explores the possibility of making this response
configurable with a `snapOnOutput` profile setting. It also discusses
the possibility of adding a scroll lock keybinding action.
## PR Checklist
* [X] Spec for #980
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is another iteration on the Command Palette spec, from #5674. These were some ideas that were tossed around by @DHowett, @cinnamon-msft and myself, formalized here. I proposed this as an addendum to the original spec, since I think the first made sense atomically, and this only makes sense as a set of changes to the original. I didn't want to go hacking up the original doc to add this set of changes.
**There are two proposals in this spec - they should be viewed as two atomic units. They can be accepted or rejected independently. I'm suggesting we approve both. They work _together_. I'm realizing now that this is worded confusingly, and it's on me to fix that.**
## PR Checklist
* [x] Another spec in the #2046 / #5400 saga
* [x] I work here
* [x] _is a doc_
> ## Abstract
>
> This document is intended to serve as an addition to the [Command Palette Spec].
> While that spec is complete in it's own right, subsequent discussion revealed
> additional ways to improve the functionality and usability of the command
> palette. This document builds largely on the topics already introduced in the
> original spec, so readers should first familiarize themselves with that
> document.
>
> One point of note from the original document was that the original specification
> was entirely too verbose when defining both keybindings and commands for
> actions. Consider, for instance, a user that wants to bind the action "duplicate
> the current pane". In that spec, they need to add both a keybinding and a
> command:
>
> ```json
> {
> "keybindings": [
> { "keys": [ "ctrl+alt+t" ], "command": { "action": "splitPane", "split":"auto", "splitMode": "duplicate" } },
> ],
> "commands": [
> { "name": "Duplicate Pane", "action": { "action": "splitPane", "split":"auto", "splitMode": "duplicate" }, "icon": null },
> ]
> }
> ```
>
> These two entries are practically the same, except for two key differentiators:
> * the keybinding has a `keys` property, indicating which key chord activates the
> action.
> * The command has a `name` property, indicating what name to display for the
> command in the Command Palette.
>
> What if the user didn't have to duplicate this action? What if the user could
> just add this action once, in their `keybindings` or `commands`, and have it
> work both as a keybinding AND a command?
>
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is the spec for the Advanced Tab Switcher. This would allow the user to navigate through a vertical list of tabs through a UI, similar to those found in VSCode and Visual Studio.
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#1502: Feature Request: Advanced Tab Switcher
#973: Ctrl+Tab toggling between two tabs
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Spec for #1502
* [x] CLA signed.
## Summary of the Pull Request
This PR aims to move the command palette spec out of the draft state and into a finalized state for inclusion in the 2.0 version of the Windows Terminal.
Notably, I've added sections regarding the ability to run `wt` commandlines using the Command Palette UI, something we hadn't considered in the original draft, because `wt` commandlines didn't land for like _4 months_ after this first draft.
## References
* #2046 - the original command palette thread
* #2193 - the original draft PR
* #5400 - the new command palette megathread for WT 2.0, which I'll be updating with follow-up tasks as we work on implementing this.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs #2046
* [x] I work here
* [x] Is documentation
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_read the spec_
The spec introduces a keybinding argument of 'target' to be able to open a specific settings file. When the Settings UI gets implemented, it will also become an option.
Alternative designs were presented but the 'target' model was decided on.
## Summary of the Pull Request
We have a number of bugs in the Terminal that all have the same singular root cause - VT input does not carry the same fidelity that Win32 input does. For Win32 applications there are certain keystrokes that simply cannot be represented with VT sequences.
This is my proposal for how we'll handle all these cases. I'm proposing a _new VT sequence_, which will enable the Terminal to send input with all of the information that an `INPUT_RECORD` might have, to conpty. There, conpty will be able to send input to the client application with the same fidelity they're used to, enabling these keys to work for those applications once again.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs #4999
* [x] I work here
* [x] is a spec
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
_read the spec_
_This is literally just #1357, but moved to the `drafts/` folder_. Since
@dsafa doesn't have the time to finish this on their own, we'll take it
from here for 2.0 ☺️
## Summary of the Pull Request
Adds a spec describing jumplist integration and adding profiles to the jumplist. Includes details about previous investigations into adding the jumplist.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs #576
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [n/a] Tests added/passed
* [x] Requires documentation to be updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #576
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Details in the spec.
## Validation Steps Performed
N/A
Co-authored-by: Brandon Chong <brndnchong@gmail.com>
* Add a spec for the Command Palette
specs #2046.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
* * Add note from Carlos about UIA
* Add a note about nested commands
* fix Michael's comments
* Move to `doc/specs/`
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) <duhowett@microsoft.com>
* Add updates from Dustin
esp. considering keybindings args, localization
* add notes about expanding profiles, localization
* move this spec to the drafts folder
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) <duhowett@microsoft.com>
This is the spec that goes into what we do with HTML copy once we set the
default copy behavior to plain text.
Specs #4191
Co-authored-by: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon Liang <57155886+leonMSFT@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit introduces a github action to check our spelling and fixes
the following misspelled words so that we come up green.
It also renames TfEditSes to TfEditSession, because Ses is not a word.
currently, excerpt, fallthrough, identified, occurred, propagate,
provided, rendered, resetting, separate, succeeded, successfully,
terminal, transferred, adheres, breaks, combining, preceded,
architecture, populated, previous, setter, visible, window, within,
appxmanifest, hyphen, control, offset, powerpoint, suppress, parsing,
prioritized, aforementioned, check in, build, filling, indices, layout,
mapping, trying, scroll, terabyte, vetoes, viewport, whose
Generated by https://github.com/jsoref/spelling `f`; to maintain your repo, please consider `fchurn`
I generally try to ignore upstream bits. I've accidentally included some items from the `deps/` directory. I expect someone will give me a list of items to drop, I'm happy to drop whole files/directories, or to split the PR into multiple items (E.g. comments/locals/public).
Closes#4294
## Summary of the Pull Request
This is the spec for adding commandline arguments to the Windows Terminal. This includes design work for a powerful future version of the commandline args for the Terminal, as well as a way that system could be implemented during 1.0 to provide basic functionality, while creating commandlines that will work without modification in (a future Windows Terminal version).
## References
Referenced in the course of this spec:
* #607 Feature Request: wt.exe supports command line arguments (profile, command, directory, etc.)
* #1060 Add "open Windows terminal here" into right-click context menu
* #576 Feature Request: Task Bar jumplist should show items from profile
* #1357 Draft spec for adding profiles to the Windows jumplist
* #2080 Spec for tab tear off and default app
* #632 [Question] Configuring Windows Terminal profile to always launch elevated
* #2068 New window key binding not working
## PR Checklist
* [x] Specs #607
* [x] I work here
* [x] _it's a spec_
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Read the spec.
-----------------------------------------------------
* Let's commit this bewfore I go hog-wild on new-window
* new-window vs new-tab discussion
* Well, this is ready for a review
* -P -> -% for --percent
* Big note on powershell
of course, powershell has to use `;` as the command seperator
* Minor typos
* This is a lot of feedback from PR
bigly, it's focus-pane and focus-tab
* Add notes on implementation, based on investigation
* Apply suggestions from @miniksa
* some updates after actually implementing the thing
* some minor things from PR
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) <duhowett@microsoft.com>
* comments from dustin's latest review
* more comments from dustin
* mostly just typos
Co-authored-by: Dustin L. Howett (MSFT) <duhowett@microsoft.com>
Ikko Ashimine
Carlos Zamora
Mike Griese
Kayla Cinnamon
PankajBhojwani
Ayushman Singh Chauhan
Michael Niksa
Dustin L. Howett
WSLUser
Leon Liang
Kayla Cinnamon
Josh Soref
Ted Hudek
Kaiyu Wang
