This corrects the path to `Terminal.Core.Unit.Tests.dll` in the `runut`
unit test script and makes the `runft` feature test script capable of
working with _Release_ builds as well as _Debug_ builds.
The path to `Terminal.Core.Unit.Tests.dll` changed when the project was
restructured, and the `runut` script was never updated to reflect that
change. That has now been corrected.
And the `runft` script used to be hard coded to look for tests in the
_Debug_ directory, but it has now been updated to use the
`%_LAST_BUILD_CONF%` environment variable, so it should work for both
_Debug_ and _Release_ builds.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've manually confirmed that the `runut` and `runft` scripts now work as
expected.
Closes#8485
## Summary of the Pull Request
New year, new unittests.
This PR introduces a new project, `TestHostApp`. This project is largely taken from the TAEF samples, and allows us to easily construct a helper executable and `resources.pri` for running TerminalApp unittests.
## References
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#3986
* [x] I work here
* [x] is Tests
* [n/a] Requires documentation to be updated
* [x] **Waiting for an updated version of TAEF to be available**
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Unittesting for the TerminalApp project has been a horrifying process to try getting everything pieced together just right. Dependencies need to get added to manifests, binplaced correctly, and XAML resources need to get compiled together as well. In addition, using a MUX `Application` (as opposed to the Windows.UI.Xaml `Application`) has led to additional problems.
This was always a horrifying house of cards for us. Turns out, the reason this was so horrible is that the test infrastructure for doing what we're doing _literally didn't exist_ when I started doing all that work last year.
So, with help from the TAEF team, I was able to get rid of our entire house of cards, and use a much simpler project to build and run the tests.
Unfortunately, the latest TAEF release has a minor bug in it's build rules, and only publishes the x86 version of a dll we need from them. But, the rest of this PR works for x86, and I'll bump this when that updated version is available. We should be able to review this even in the state it's in.
## Validation Steps Performed
ran the tests yo
## Summary of the Pull Request
Introduces a type that is basically an array (stack allocated, fixed size) that reports size based on how many elements are actually filled (from the front), iterates only the filled ones, and has some basic vector push/pop semantics.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] I work here
* [x] I work here
* [ ] I'd love to roll this out to SomeViewports.... maybe in this commit or a follow on one.
* [ ] We need a TIL tests library and I should test this there.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
The original gist of this was used for `SomeViewports` which was a struct to hold between 0 and 4 viewports, based on how many were left after subtraction (since rectangle subtraction functions in Windows code simply fail for resultants that yield >=2 rectangle regions.)
I figured now that we're TIL-ifying useful common utility things that this would be best suited to a template because I'm certain there are other circumstances where we would like to iterate a partially filled array and want it to not auto-resize-up like a vector would.
## Validation Steps Performed
* [ ] TIL tests added
In #1164 we learned that our CI doesn't support WinRT testing. This made us all sad. Since that merged, we haven't really added any TerminalApp tests, because it's a little too hard. You'd have to uncomment the entire file, and if the list of types changed you'd have to manually update the sxs manifest and appxmanifest.
Since that was all insane, I created a new Terminal App unittesting project without those problems.
1. The project is not named *Unit*Test*, so the CI won't run it, but it will run locally.
2. The project will auto-generate its SxS manifest, using the work from #1987.
3. We'll use the SxS manifest from step 2 to generate an AppxManifest for running packaged tests.
* This is the start of me trying to enable local unittesting again
* We've got a new unittests project that isn't named *unit*test*
* We're manually generating the SxS manifest for it. B/C we need to use it at runtime, we need to manually combine it into one manifest file
* the runas:UAP thing still doesn't work. We'll investigate.
* This shockingly works
but I'm still stuck with:
```
Summary of Errors Outside of Tests:
Error: TAEF: [HRESULT: 0x80270254] Failed to create the test host process for
out of process test execution. (The
IApplicationActivationManager::ActivateApplication call failed while using a
default host. TAEF's ETW logs which are gathered with the /enableEtwLogging
switch should contain events from relevant providers that may help to diagnose
the failure.)
```
* Cleaning this all up for review.
Frankly just pushing to see if it'll work in CI
* Couple things I noticed in the diff from master
* Apply @dhowett-msft's suggestions from code review
* Refactors TerminalApp into two projects:
- TerminalAppLib, which builds a .lib, and includes all the code
- TerminalApp, which builds a dll by linking the lib
* Adds a TerminalApp.Unit.Tests project
- Includes the ability to test cppwinrt types we've authored using a SxS manifest for unpackaged winrt activation
- includes the ability to test types with XAML content using an appxmanifest
* Adds a giant doc explaining how this was all done. Really, just go read that doc, it'll really help you understand what's going on in this PR.
-------------------------
These are some previous commit messages. They may be helpful to future readers.
* Start adding unittests for json parsing, end up creating a TerminalAppLib project to make a lib. See #1042
* VS automatically did this for me
* This is a dead end
I tried including the idl-y things into the lib, but that way leads insanity
If you want to make a StaticLibrary, then suddenly the winrt toolchain forgets
that ProjectReferences can have winmd's in them, so it won't be able to
compile any types from the referenced projects. If you instead try to manually
reference the types, you'll get duplicate types up the wazoo, which of course
is insane, since we're referencing them the _one_ time
* Yea just follow #1042 on github for status
So current state:
1. If you try to add a `Reference` to all of MUX.Markup, TerminalControl and
TerminalSettings, then mdmerge will complain about all the types from
TerminalSettings being defined twice. In this magic scenario, the
dependencies of TerminalControl are used directly for some reason:
```
12> Load input metadata file ...OpenConsole\x64\Debug\TerminalSettings\Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.winmd.
12> Load input metadata file ...OpenConsole\x64\Debug\TerminalControl\Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.winmd.
12> Load input metadata file ...OpenConsole\x64\Debug\TerminalControl\Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalConnection.winmd.
12> Load input metadata file ...OpenConsole\x64\Debug\TerminalControl\Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.winmd.
12> Load input metadata file ...OpenConsole\x64\Debug\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Markup\Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Markup.winmd.
```
2. If you don't add a `Reference` TerminalControl, then it'll complain about
being unable to find the type TitleChangedEventArgs, which is defined in
TerminalControl.
3. If you don't add a `Reference` TerminalSettings, then it'll complain about
being unable to find the type KeyChord and other types from
TerminalSettings. In this scenario, it doesn't recurse on the other
dependencies from TerminalControl for whatever reason.
4. If you instead try to add all 3 as a `ProjectReference`, then it'll
complain about being unable to find TitleChangedEventArgs, as in 2.
Presumably, it;ll have troubles with the other types too, as none of the 3
are actually included in the midlrt.rsp file.
5. If you add all 3 as a `ProjectReference`, then also add TerminalControl as
a `Reference`, you'll get a `MIDL2011: [msg] unresolved type declaration
Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Markup.XamlApplication`
6. If you add all 3 as a `ProjectReference`, then also add TerminalControl AND
MUX.Markup as a `Reference`, you'll get the same result as 3.
* what if we just don't idl
This seems to compile
* This compiles but I broke the MUX resources
look at the App.xaml change. in this changelist. That's what's broken right now. Lets fix that!
* lets do this
If I leave the MUX nuget out of the project, I'll get a compile error in
App.xaml:
```
...OpenConsole\src\cascadia\TerminalApp\App.xaml(21,40): XamlCompiler error WMC0001: Unknown type 'XamlControlsResources' in XML namespace 'using:Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Controls'
```
If I add it back to the project, it works
* Some cleanup from the previous commit
* This is busted again.
Doing a clean build didn't work.
A clean rebuild of the project, paired with some removal of dead code
revealed a problem with what I have so far.
TerminalAppLib depends on the generation of two headers,
`AppKeyBindings.g.h` and `App.g.h`, as those define some of bits of the
winrt types. They're needed to be able to compile the implementations.
Presumably that's not getting generated by the lib project, because the dll
project is the one to generate that file.
So we need to move the idl's to the lib project. This created maddness,
because of course the Duplicate Type thing. The solution to that is to
actually mark the winrt DLLs that we're chaining up through us as
```
<Private>false</Private>
<CopyLocalSatelliteAssemblies>false</CopyLocalSatelliteAssemblies>
```
This will prevent them from getting double-included.
This still doesn't work however, since
```
app.cpp(40): error C2039: 'XamlMetaDataProvider': is not a member of 'winrt::TerminalApp'
error C3861: 'XamlMetaDataProvider': identifier not found
```
So we need to figure that out. The dll project is still generating the right
header, so lets look there.
* Move the xaml stuff to the lib
This compiles, but when we launch, we fail to load the tabviewcontrol
resources again. So that's not what you want. Why is it not included?
* It works again!
* Use the pri, xbf files from TerminalAppLib, not TerminalApp
* Manually make TerminalApp include a reference to TerminalAppLib's
TerminalApp.winmd. This will force the build to copy TerminalApp.winmd to
TerminalApp/, which WindowsTerminal needs to be able to ProjectReference the
TerminalApp project (it's expecting it to have a winmd)
* Remove the module.g.cpp from TerminalApp, and move to TerminalAppLib. The
dll doesn't do any codegen anymore.
* Agressively clean up these files
* Clean up unnecessary includes in the dll pch.h
* This does NOT work.
The WindowsxamlManager call crashes. I'm thinking it has to do with activation
of winrt types from a dll.
Email out to @Austin-Lamb to see if he can assist
* This gets our cppwinrt types working, but xaml islands is still broken
* Split the tests apart, so they aren't insane
* These are the magic words to make xaml islands work
* All this witchcraft is necessary to make XAML+MUX work right
* Clean this up a bit and add comments
* Create an enormous doc explaining this madness
* Unsure how this got changed.
* Trying to get the CI build to work again.
This resolves the MUX issue. We need to manually include it, because their package's target doesn't mark it as CopyLocalSatelliteAssemblies=false, Private=false.
However, the TerminalApp project is still able to magically reason that the TerminalAppLib project should be included in the MdMerge step, because it think's it's a `GetCppWinRTStaticProjectReferences` reference.
* Update cppwinrt to the latest version - this fixes the MSBuild
* I still need to re-add the KeyModifiers checks from TermControl. I think
this update broke `operator&` for that enum.
* There needs to be some cleanup obviously
* The doc should be updated as well
* Clean up changes from cppwinrt update
* Try doing this, even though it seems wrong
* Lets try this (press x to doubt)
* Clean up vcxproj file, and remove appxmanifest change from previous commit
* Update to the latest TAEF release, maybe that'll work
* Let's try a prerelease version, shall we?
* Add notes about TAEF package, comment out tests
* Format the code
* Hopefully fix the arm64 and x86 builds
also a typo
* Fix PR nits
* Fix some bad merge conflicts
* Some cleanup from the merge
* Well I was close to getting the merge right
* I believe this will fix CI
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Carlos Zamora <carlos.zamora@microsoft.com>
* These definitely need to be fixed
* Try version detecting in the test
IDK if this will build, I'm letting the CI try while I clean rebuild locally
* Try blindly updating to the newest nuget version
* Revert "Try blindly updating to the newest nuget version"
This reverts commit b72bd9eb73.
* We're just going to see if these work in CI with this change
* Comment the tests back out. Windows Server 2019 is 10.0.17763.557
* Remove the nuget package
We don't need this package anymore now that we're hosting it
* Okay this _was_ important
This commit switches the GUIDs for default profiles from being randomly generated to being version 5 UUIDs. More info in #870.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#870
* [x] CLA signed
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Requires documentation to be updated (#883)
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
This commit has a number of changes that seem ancillary, but they're general goodness. Let me explain:
* I've added a whole new Types test library with only two tests in
* Since UUIDv5 generation requires SHA1, we needed to take a dependency on bcrypt
* I honestly don't think we should have to link bcrypt in conhost, but LTO should take care of that
* I considered adding a new Terminal-specific Utils/Types library, but that seemed like a waste
* The best way to link bcrypt turned out to be in line with a discussion @miniksa and I had, where we decided we both love APISets and think that the console should link against them exclusively... so I've added `onecore_apiset.lib` to the front of the link line, where it will deflect the linker away from most of the other libs automagically.
```
StartGroup: UuidTests::TestV5UuidU8String
Verify: AreEqual(uuidExpected, uuidActual)
EndGroup: UuidTests::TestV5UuidU8String [Passed]
StartGroup: UuidTests::TestV5UuidU16String
Verify: AreEqual(uuidExpected, uuidActual)
EndGroup: UuidTests::TestV5UuidU16String [Passed]
```
* fix for historySize=32767 hang (except for historySize=0 case); tests still in progress
* tests run and almost pass - failure is a real bug in my change
* fixed bug that caused tests to fail, but it seems another bug causes the app to crash with a zero row count
* fix the additional bug (at a higher layer) mentioned in previous commit description
* Fix chk build assertion failures in new tests
It seems C++/WinRT doesn't like it when you implement a Windows Runtime
interface but then create instances of the implementing class
with function-call lifetime (aka stack allocation). That makes sense
given that WinRT objects are COM objects, but in my defense I was following
this example where they are just fine instantiating the `App` object
on the stack:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/cpp-and-winrt-apis/author-apis#if-youre-not-authoring-a-runtime-class
* tabs to spaces
* CR feedback
* fix minor CR feedback (incorrect test log message)
