4 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Josh Soref
|
42f7403bf5
|
ci: update to Spell check to 0.0.17a (#9014)
### Plurals and paste tenses In the past, plurals `foo`+`s` and past tenses `foo`+`ed` were automatically tolerated. This turned out to be a bad design choice on my part. The basic example is that `potatos` would sometimes be treated as a mistake and sometimes not (depending on the presence of `potato`). You can see in this PR, that this logic resulted in `Applys` being accepted as a word along with `AppContainered` -- there's nothing intrinsically wrong w/ the latter, but unfortunately in order to screen out the former, my shortcut just couldn't stick around. This means that the `dictionary`/`expect` files will grow perhaps by a tiny bit, but as you can see, not really by much. This is also why `thereses` (a user) was accepted as a word in the past (therese is in the base dictionary, so `therese` + `s` was acceptable). ### Pull requests When GitHub initially introduced GitHub Actions, the event for `pull_request` was created without enough permission for a tool like this to work properly. I worked around that by using the `schedule` event. In 2020, they introduced a replacement event `pull_request_target` which has enough permission. This means that I can stop relying on the `schedule` event. ### Miscellaneous * I've folded together some `expect/` files since now is as good a time as any. * I've included a hint about `excludes.txt` (I added a similar one for our primary repo recently, and it came up this week in `microsoft/terminal` -- @zadjii-msft) * I've standardized on a default of `.github/actions/spelling` to make the out of the box experience easier for new adopters, so I'm applying that change here -- if you're attached to the old directory name, specifying it is still supported. -- note the directory rename may cause a merge conflict for people with open PRs and changes to the contents, this shouldn't be a big problem. |
||
Michael Niksa
|
5d082ffe67
|
Helix Testing (#6992)
Use the Helix testing orchestration framework to run our Terminal LocalTests and Console Host UIA tests. ## References #### Creates the following new issues: - #7281 - re-enable local tests that were disabled to turn on Helix - #7282 - re-enable UIA tests that were disabled to turn on Helix - #7286 - investigate and implement appropriate compromise solution to how Skipped is handled by MUX Helix scripts #### Consumes from: - #7164 - The update to TAEF includes wttlog.dll. The WTT logs are what MUX's Helix scripts use to track the run state, convert to XUnit format, and notify both Helix and AzDO of what's going on. #### Produces for: - #671 - Making Terminal UIA tests is now possible - #6963 - MUX's Helix scripts are already ready to capture PGO data on the Helix machines as certain tests run. Presuming we can author some reasonable scenarios, turning on the Helix environment gets us a good way toward automated PGO. #### Related: - #4490 - We lost the AzDO integration of our test data when I moved from the TAEF/VSTest adapter directly back to TE. Thanks to the WTTLog + Helix conversion scripts to XUnit + new upload phase, we have it back! ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #3838 * [x] I work here. * [x] Literally adds tests. * [ ] Should I update a testing doc in this repo? * [x] Am core contributor. Hear me roar. * [ ] Correct spell-checking the right way before merge. ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments We have had two classes of tests that don't work in our usual build-machine testing environment: 1. Tests that require interactive UI automation or input injection (a.k.a. require a logged in user) 2. Tests that require the entire Windows Terminal to stand up (because our Xaml Islands dependency requires 1903 or later and the Windows Server instance for the build is based on 1809.) The Helix testing environment solves both of these and is brought to us by our friends over in https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml. This PR takes a large portion of scripts and pipeline configuration steps from the Microsoft-UI-XAML repository and adjusts them for Terminal needs. You can see the source of most of the files in either https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/tree/master/build/Helix or https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/tree/master/build/AzurePipelinesTemplates Some of the modifications in the files include (but are not limited to) reasons like: - Our test binaries are named differently than MUX's test binaries - We don't need certain types of testing that MUX does. - We use C++ and C# tests while MUX was using only C# tests (so the naming pattern and some of the parsing of those names is different e.g. :: separators in C++ and . separators in C#) - Our pipeline phases work a bit differently than MUX and/or we need significantly fewer pieces to the testing matrix (like we don't test a wide variety of OS versions). The build now runs in a few stages: 1. The usual build and run of unit tests/feature tests, packaging verification, and whatnot. This phase now also picks up and packs anything required for running tests in Helix into an artifact. (It also unifies the artifact name between the things Helix needs and the existing build outputs into the single `drop` artifact to make life a little easier.) 2. The Helix preparation build runs that picks up those artifacts, generates all the scripts required for Helix to understand the test modules/functions from our existing TAEF tests, packs it all up, and queues it on the Helix pool. 3. Helix generates a VM for our testing environment and runs all the TAEF tests that require it. The orchestrator at helix.dot.net watches over this and tracks the success/fail and progress of each module and function. The scripts from our MUX friends handle installing dependencies, making the system quiet for better reliability, detecting flaky tests and rerunning them, and coordinating all the log uploads (including for the subruns of tests that are re-run.) 4. A final build phase is run to look through the results with the Helix API and clean up the marking of tests that are flaky, link all the screenshots and console output logs into the AzDO tests panel, and other such niceities. We are set to run Helix tests on the Feature test policy of only x64 for now. Additionally, because the set up of the Helix VMs takes so long, we are *NOT* running these in PR trigger right now as I believe we all very much value our 15ish minute PR turnaround (and the VM takes another 15 minutes to just get going for whatever reason.) For now, they will only run as a rolling build on master after PRs are merged. We should still know when there's an issue within about an hour of something merging and multiple PRs merging fast will be done on the rolling build as a batch run (not one per). In addition to setting up the entire Helix testing pipeline for the tests that require it, I've preserved our classic way of running unit and feature tests (that don't require an elaborate environment) directly on the build machines. But with one bonus feature... They now use some of the scripts from MUX to transform their log data and report it to AzDO so it shows up beautifully in the build report. (We used to have this before I removed the MStest/VStest wrapper for performance reasons, but now we can have reporting AND performance!) See https://dev.azure.com/ms/terminal/_build/results?buildId=101654&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab for an example. I explored running all of the tests on Helix but.... the Helix setup time is long and the resources are more expensive. I felt it was better to preserve the "quick signal" by continuing to run these directly on the build machine (and skipping the more expensive/slow Helix setup if they fail.) It also works well with the split between PR builds not running Helix and the rolling build running Helix. PR builds will get a good chunk of tests for a quick turn around and the rolling build will finish the more thorough job a bit more slowly. ## Validation Steps Performed - [x] Ran the updated pipelines with Pull Request configuration ensuring that Helix tests don't run in the usual CI - [x] Ran with simulation of the rolling build to ensure that the tests now running in Helix will pass. All failures marked for follow on in reference issues. |
||
Mike Griese
|
a3a9df82b5
|
Add setTabColor and openTabColorPicker actions (#6567)
## Summary of the Pull Request Adds a pair of `ShortcutAction`s for setting the tab color. * `setTabColor`: This changes the color of the current tab to the provided color, or can be used to clear the color. * `openTabColorPicker`: This keybinding immediately activates the tab color picker for the currently focused tab. ## References ## PR Checklist * [x] scratches my own itch * [x] I work here * [x] Tests added/passed * [x] https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/69 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments ## Validation Steps Performed * hey look there are tests * Tested with the following: ```json // { "command": "setTabColor", "keys": [ "alt+c" ] }, { "keys": "ctrl+alt+c", "command": { "action": "setTabColor", "color": "#123456" } }, { "keys": "alt+shift+c", "command": { "action": "setTabColor", "color": null} }, { "keys": "alt+c", "command": "openTabColorPicker" }, ``` |
||
|
Josh Soref
|
cc472c267b
|
ci: spelling: update to 0.0.16a; update advice (#5922)
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request Updates the check spelling action to [0.0.16-a](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/releases/tag/0.0.16-alpha) * update advice -- [sample]( |
Renamed from .github/actions/spell-check/whitelist/alphabet.txt (Browse further)