**BE NOT AFRAID**. I know that there's 107 files in this PR, but almost
all of it is just find/replacing `TerminalControl` with `Control`.
This is the start of the work to move TermControl into multiple pieces,
for #5000. The PR starts this work by:
* Splits `TerminalControl` into separate lib and dll projects. We'll
want control tests in the future, and for that, we'll need a lib.
* Moves `ICoreSettings` back into the `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`
namespace. We'll have other types in there soon too.
* I could not tell you why this works suddenly. New VS versions? New
cppwinrt version? Maybe we're just better at dealing with mdmerge
bugs these days.
* RENAMES `Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl` to
`Microsoft.Terminal.Control`. This touches pretty much every file in
the sln. Sorry about that (not sorry).
An upcoming PR will move much of the logic in TermControl into a new
`ControlCore` class that we'll add in `Microsoft.Terminal.Core`.
`ControlCore` will then be unittest-able in the
`UnitTests_TerminalCore`, which will help prevent regressions like #9455
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
You're really gonna want to clean the sln first, then merge this into
your branch, then rebuild. It's very likely that old winmds will get
left behind. If you see something like
```
Error MDM2007 Cannot create type
Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.KeyModifiers in read-only metadata
file Microsoft.Terminal.TerminalControl.
```
then that's what happened to you.
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/9345
* [x] CLA signed.
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated - not yet, will be once conceptually approved
* [x] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Introduce optional `suppressApplicationTitle` in to `NewTerminalArgs`.
When set (either to true or false) overrides profile configuration.
Introduce `--suppressApplicationTitle` flag to command line arguments.
When provided for sub=command,
sets the value in the relevant `NewTerminalArgs` to `true`
This makes the settings UI the default settings experience.
As shown below, the following bindings are now default:
- <kbd>ctrl+,</kbd> --> settings ui
- <kbd>ctrl+shift+,</kbd> --> settings.json
- <kbd>ctrl+alt+,</kbd> --> defaults.json
The dropdown settings button aligns with this heuristic:
- click --> settings ui
- shift+click --> settings.json
- alt+click --> defaults.json
- if alt and shift both pressed, open settings.json
#6800 - Settings UI Epic
Finally implements the `newWindow` action. It does so by
`ShellExecute`ing `wt.exe` with commandline args corresponding to the
ones that would create the same `NewTerminalArgs`. This works with #8898
and #9118 to allow new windows (even with `windowingBehavior:
useExisting`)
This is taken from my auto-elevate branch, hence the references to
elevation
References #5000
References projects/5
References #8898
References #9118Closes#1051
This PR is a resurrection of #8522. @Hegunumo has apparently deleted
their account, but the contribution was still valuable. I'm just here to
get it across the finish line.
This PR adds new action for navigating to the next & previous search
results. These actions are unbound by default. These actions can be used
from directly within the search dialog also, to immediately navigate the
results.
Furthermore, if you have a search started, and close the search box,
then press this keybinding, _it will still perform the search_. So you
can just hit <kbd>F3</kbd> repeatedly with the dialog closed to keep
searching new results. Neat!
If you dispatch the action on the key down, then dismiss a selection on
a key up, we'll end up immediately destroying the selection when you
release the bound key. That's annoying. It also bothers @carlos-zamora
in #3758. However, I _think_ we can just only dismiss the selection on a
key up. I _think_ that's fine. It _seems_ fine so far. We've got an
entire release cycle to futz with it.
## Validation Steps Performed
I've played with it all day and it seems _crisp_.
Closes#7695
Co-authored-by: Kiminori Kaburagi <yukawa_hidenori@icloud.com>
Performs a number of minor bugfixes related to the Settings UI:
- b5370a1 Dropdown bug:
- the dropdown would display the keybinding for the first
`openSettings` found. So it would accidentally present and bind the
one for the Settings UI.
- 91eb49e autogenerated name for opening Settings UI:
- the Settings UI keybinding would display "open settings file". This
was updated to say "Open Settings UI".
- 1cadbf4 Profile Page navigation crash:
- the selected item off of a MUX navigation view returns a MUX
NavViewItem (as opposed to WUX)
- dd2f3e5 Hookup delete for Profile page navigation:
- missed a spot where we were manually navigating to the Profile
page. So it wasn't hooked up properly
- 9fea6de Properly cast NavViewItem tags
- When we update the NavigationView's menu items, we were casting the
tags to `Model::Profile` instead of `Editor::ProfileViewModel`.
## References
#6800 - Settings UI epic
Fixes the following bug:
> - [ ] JSON change --> crash
> - open SUI --> open JSON --> edit retro effects in JSON --> save file --> cry because the app crashed
## Additional comments
This was a part of some manual testing I performed on the Settings UI.
More intricate bugs are being reported on #6800 and will be fixed in
their own PR.
Adds a "move to previous pane" and "move to next pane" keybinding, which
navigates to the last/first focused pane
We assign pane IDs on creation and maintain a vector of active pane IDs
in MRU order. Navigating panes by MRU then requires specifying which
pane ID we want to focus.
From our offline discussion (thanks @zadjii-msft for the concise
description):
> For the record, the full spec I'm imagining is:
>
> { command": { "action": "focus(Next|Prev)Pane", "order": "inOrder"|"mru", "useSwitcher": true|false } },
>
> and order defaults to mru, and useSwitcher will default to true, when
> there is a switcher. So
>
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane" } },
> { command": { "action": "focusNextPane", "order": "mru" } },
>
> these are the same action. (but right now we don't support the order
> param)
>
> Then there'll be another PR for "focusPane(target=id)"
>
> Then a third PR for "focus(Next|Prev)Pane(order=inOrder)"
> for the record, I prefer this approach over the "one action to rule
> them all" version with both target and order/direction as params,
> because I don't like the confusion of what happens if there's both
> target and order/direction provided.
References #1000Closes#2871
## Summary of the Pull Request
Introduces a new command called `moveTab`
This command has a single mandatory argument with values of `forward` and `backward`
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/3593
* [x] CLA signed.
* [x] Tests added/passed
* [x] Documentation updated here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/pull/198
* [x] Schema updated
* [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already.
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
Went for the straightforward solution of moving the tab and the tabViewItem.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing
* Add a tabColor parameter to the `new-tab` and `split-panes` command
* Add --tabColor to the command line, to allow bootstrapping with tabs
of different colors
Add another field to NewTerminalArgs. Use this field to set
StartingTabColor in Terminal. This color gets overridden by the color
defined by the profile / VT, however can be overridden with the color
picker.
Since the color is the property of the Terminal, when defined for the
tab this color is associated only with the first pane/terminal of the
tab. Additional panes will not inherit this color (to prevent advanced
resolution, where we need to resolve between the inherited color and the
one specified for the pane).
## Validation Steps Performed
* UT for parameters parsing
* Running system with several tabs of different colors.
* Adding custom actions with colors
* Performing operations like split pane, duplicate and so on
Closes#8075
- The number of lines to move upon scroll up scroll down can be defined
in ScrollUp and ScrollDown commands (parameter is called
"rowsToScroll").
- If the number are not provided, use the system default (the one we are
using for mouse scrolls), rather than 1 line.
## Validation Steps Performed
* Manual testing
* Added custom bindings for scroll commands with different values,
verified they and the default appear and behave as expected
* Checked that invalid values are not allowed
Closes#5078
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Add a "Close..." option to the tab context menu, with nested entries to close tabs to the right and close other tabs (actions already available)
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
#1912
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [x] Closes#5524
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
First contribution 🙂
Tried to follow some suggestions from https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/issues/1912#issuecomment-667079311
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
Introduces a new TerminalSettingsModel (TSM) project. This project is
responsible for (de)serializing and exposing Windows Terminal's settings
as WinRT objects.
## References
#885: TSM epic
#1564: Settings UI is dependent on this for data binding and settings access
#6904: TSM Spec
In the process of ripping out TSM from TerminalApp, a few other changes
were made to make this possible:
1. AppLogic's `ApplicationDisplayName` and `ApplicationVersion` was
moved to `CascadiaSettings`
- These are defined as static functions. They also no longer check if
`AppLogic::Current()` is nullptr.
2. `enum LaunchMode` was moved from TerminalApp to TSM
3. `AzureConnectionType` and `TelnetConnectionType` were moved from the
profile generators to their respective TerminalConnections
4. CascadiaSettings' `SettingsPath` and `DefaultSettingsPath` are
exposed as `hstring` instead of `std::filesystem::path`
5. `Command::ExpandCommands()` was exposed via the IDL
- This required some of the warnings to be saved to an `IVector`
instead of `std::vector`, among some other small changes.
6. The localization resources had to be split into two halves.
- Resource file linked in init.cpp. Verified at runtime thanks to the
StaticResourceLoader.
7. Added constructors to some `ActionArgs`
8. Utils.h/cpp were moved to `cascadia/inc`. `JsonKey()` was moved to
`JsonUtils`. Both TermApp and TSM need access to Utils.h/cpp.
A large amount of work includes moving to the new namespace
(`TerminalApp` --> `Microsoft::Terminal::Settings::Model`).
Fixing the tests had its own complications. Testing required us to split
up TSM into a DLL and LIB, similar to TermApp. Discussion on creating a
non-local test variant can be found in #7743.
Closes#885
2020-10-06 09:56:59 -07:00
Renamed from src/cascadia/TerminalApp/ActionArgs.cpp (Browse further)
