This commit renames `Base64::s_Decode` into `Base64::Decode` and improves its
average performance on short strings of less than 200 characters by 4.5x.
This is achieved by implementing a classic base64 decoder that reads 4
characters at a time and produces 3 output bytes. Furthermore a small
128 byte lookup table is used to quickly map characters to values.
## PR Checklist
* [x] I work here
* [x] Tests added/passed
## Validation Steps Performed
* Run WSL in Windows Terminal
* Run `printf "\033]52;c;aHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL21pY3Jvc29mdC90ZXJtaW5hbC9wdWxsLzExNDY3\a"`
* Clipboard contains `https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/11467` ✔️
Co-authored-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? -->
## Summary of the Pull Request
Upgrade check-spelling to [v0.0.18](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/releases/tag/v0.0.18)
<!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? -->
## References
<!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting-->
## PR Checklist
* [ ] Closes #xxx
* [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA
* [ ] Tests added/passed
* [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx
* [ ] Schema updated.
* [ ] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx
<!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here -->
## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
I've replaced the `dictionary` directory with `allow` and `reject`. When terminal got check-spelling, I didn't have a way to do `allow`/`reject` (but they were added a while ago). With this release, the bot will complain about items that are in user managed files that wouldn't be valid, this is mostly `-`s in dictionary files, but it also includes numbers `0`..`9` and `_`. If a specific token needs to be accepted but not its sub-elements, the item should be added to `patterns.txt` instead (`D2DERR_SHADER_COMPILE_FAILED` is an example).
With this version, check-spelling defaults to only considering tokens with at least 3 letters. It's possible to tune it back to 2 (or even 1), but in testing, the 2 character tokens have ended up not being worthwhile. (This can be [adjusted](https://github.com/check-spelling/check-spelling/wiki/Configuration#shortest_word) if it turns out that people manage to misspell two character tokens often enough to justify checking them.)
<!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well -->
## Validation Steps Performed
I ran a number of passes of the spell checker in https://github.com/check-spelling/terminal/actions (note: I tend to delete this repository, so this link may be dead at some point, and action run logs expire).
This adds [`XamlStyler.Console`] to our solution, and calls it when we
format the code, to also format
our .xaml files.
* `XamlStyler.Console` is a dotnet tool so it needs to be restored with
`dotnet tool restore`
* I've added a set of rules to approximately follow [@cmaneu's XAML guidelines].
Those guidelines also recommend things based on the code-behind, which
this tool can't figure out, but also _don't matter that much_.
* There's an extra step to strip BOMs from the output, since Xaml Styler
adds a BOM by default. Some had them before and others didn't. BOMs
have been nothing but trouble though.
[`XamlStyler.Console`]: https://github.com/Xavalon/XamlStyler
[@cmaneu's XAML guidelines]: https://github.com/cmaneu/xaml-coding-guidelines
This adds "paste filtering" & "bracketed paste mode" to the Windows
Terminal.
I've moved the paste handling code in `TerminalControl` to
`Microsoft::Console::Util` to be able to easily test it, and the paste
transformer from `TerminalControl` to `TerminalCore`.
Supersedes #7508
References #395 (overall bracketed paste support request)
Tests added. Manually tested.
### Plurals and paste tenses
In the past, plurals `foo`+`s` and past tenses `foo`+`ed` were
automatically tolerated. This turned out to be a bad design choice on my
part.
The basic example is that `potatos` would sometimes be treated as a
mistake and sometimes not (depending on the presence of `potato`).
You can see in this PR, that this logic resulted in `Applys` being
accepted as a word along with `AppContainered` -- there's nothing
intrinsically wrong w/ the latter, but unfortunately in order to screen
out the former, my shortcut just couldn't stick around. This means that
the `dictionary`/`expect` files will grow perhaps by a tiny bit, but as
you can see, not really by much.
This is also why `thereses` (a user) was accepted as a word in the past
(therese is in the base dictionary, so `therese` + `s` was acceptable).
### Pull requests
When GitHub initially introduced GitHub Actions, the event for
`pull_request` was created without enough permission for a tool like
this to work properly. I worked around that by using the `schedule`
event. In 2020, they introduced a replacement event
`pull_request_target` which has enough permission. This means that I can
stop relying on the `schedule` event.
### Miscellaneous
* I've folded together some `expect/` files since now is as good a time
as any.
* I've included a hint about `excludes.txt` (I added a similar one for
our primary repo recently, and it came up this week in
`microsoft/terminal` -- @zadjii-msft)
* I've standardized on a default of `.github/actions/spelling` to make
the out of the box experience easier for new adopters, so I'm applying
that change here -- if you're attached to the old directory name,
specifying it is still supported. -- note the directory rename may
cause a merge conflict for people with open PRs and changes to the
contents, this shouldn't be a big problem.
2021-02-03 11:17:38 -08:00
Renamed from .github/actions/spell-check/excludes.txt (Browse further)
