forked from MirrorHub/synapse
Add developer documentation to explain room DAG concepts like outliers
and state_groups
(#10464)
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6ea32a798
commit
2bae2c632f
3 changed files with 81 additions and 0 deletions
1
changelog.d/10464.doc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/10464.doc
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Add some developer docs to explain room DAG concepts like `outliers`, `state_groups`, `depth`, etc.
|
|
@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
|
|||
- [Single Sign-On]()
|
||||
- [SAML](development/saml.md)
|
||||
- [CAS](development/cas.md)
|
||||
- [Room DAG concepts](development/room-dag-concepts.md)
|
||||
- [State Resolution]()
|
||||
- [The Auth Chain Difference Algorithm](auth_chain_difference_algorithm.md)
|
||||
- [Media Repository](media_repository.md)
|
||||
|
|
79
docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md
Normal file
79
docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|||
# Room DAG concepts
|
||||
|
||||
## Edges
|
||||
|
||||
The word "edge" comes from graph theory lingo. An edge is just a connection
|
||||
between two events. In Synapse, we connect events by specifying their
|
||||
`prev_events`. A subsequent event points back at a previous event.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
A (oldest) <---- B <---- C (most recent)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Depth and stream ordering
|
||||
|
||||
Events are normally sorted by `(topological_ordering, stream_ordering)` where
|
||||
`topological_ordering` is just `depth`. In other words, we first sort by `depth`
|
||||
and then tie-break based on `stream_ordering`. `depth` is incremented as new
|
||||
messages are added to the DAG. Normally, `stream_ordering` is an auto
|
||||
incrementing integer, but backfilled events start with `stream_ordering=-1` and decrement.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
- `/sync` returns things in the order they arrive at the server (`stream_ordering`).
|
||||
- `/messages` (and `/backfill` in the federation API) return them in the order determined by the event graph `(topological_ordering, stream_ordering)`.
|
||||
|
||||
The general idea is that, if you're following a room in real-time (i.e.
|
||||
`/sync`), you probably want to see the messages as they arrive at your server,
|
||||
rather than skipping any that arrived late; whereas if you're looking at a
|
||||
historical section of timeline (i.e. `/messages`), you want to see the best
|
||||
representation of the state of the room as others were seeing it at the time.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Forward extremity
|
||||
|
||||
Most-recent-in-time events in the DAG which are not referenced by any other events' `prev_events` yet.
|
||||
|
||||
The forward extremities of a room are used as the `prev_events` when the next event is sent.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Backwards extremity
|
||||
|
||||
The current marker of where we have backfilled up to and will generally be the
|
||||
oldest-in-time events we know of in the DAG.
|
||||
|
||||
This is an event where we haven't fetched all of the `prev_events` for.
|
||||
|
||||
Once we have fetched all of its `prev_events`, it's unmarked as a backwards
|
||||
extremity (although we may have formed new backwards extremities from the prev
|
||||
events during the backfilling process).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Outliers
|
||||
|
||||
We mark an event as an `outlier` when we haven't figured out the state for the
|
||||
room at that point in the DAG yet.
|
||||
|
||||
We won't *necessarily* have the `prev_events` of an `outlier` in the database,
|
||||
but it's entirely possible that we *might*. The status of whether we have all of
|
||||
the `prev_events` is marked as a [backwards extremity](#backwards-extremity).
|
||||
|
||||
For example, when we fetch the event auth chain or state for a given event, we
|
||||
mark all of those claimed auth events as outliers because we haven't done the
|
||||
state calculation ourself.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## State groups
|
||||
|
||||
For every non-outlier event we need to know the state at that event. Instead of
|
||||
storing the full state for each event in the DB (i.e. a `event_id -> state`
|
||||
mapping), which is *very* space inefficient when state doesn't change, we
|
||||
instead assign each different set of state a "state group" and then have
|
||||
mappings of `event_id -> state_group` and `state_group -> state`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage group edges
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: `state_group_edges` is a further optimization...
|
||||
notes from @Azrenbeth, https://pastebin.com/seUGVGeT
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue