Fix inconsistencies in event validation for m.room.create events (#13087)

* Extend the auth rule checks for `m.room.create` events

... and move them up to the top of the function. Since the no auth_events are
allowed for m.room.create events, we may as well get the m.room.create event
checks out of the way first.

* Add a test for create events with prev_events
This commit is contained in:
Richard van der Hoff 2022-06-17 14:56:46 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent d3d84685ce
commit e16ea87d0f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 88 additions and 25 deletions

1
changelog.d/13087.bugfix Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Fix some inconsistencies in the event authentication code.

View file

@ -141,6 +141,15 @@ async def check_state_independent_auth_rules(
Raises:
AuthError if the checks fail
"""
# Implementation of https://spec.matrix.org/v1.2/rooms/v9/#authorization-rules
# 1. If type is m.room.create:
if event.type == EventTypes.Create:
_check_create(event)
# 1.5 Otherwise, allow
return
# Check the auth events.
auth_events = await store.get_events(
event.auth_event_ids(),
@ -180,29 +189,6 @@ async def check_state_independent_auth_rules(
auth_dict[(auth_event.type, auth_event.state_key)] = auth_event_id
# Implementation of https://matrix.org/docs/spec/rooms/v1#authorization-rules
#
# 1. If type is m.room.create:
if event.type == EventTypes.Create:
# 1b. If the domain of the room_id does not match the domain of the sender,
# reject.
sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender)
room_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.room_id)
if room_id_domain != sender_domain:
raise AuthError(
403, "Creation event's room_id domain does not match sender's"
)
# 1c. If content.room_version is present and is not a recognised version, reject
room_version_prop = event.content.get("room_version", "1")
if room_version_prop not in KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS:
raise AuthError(
403,
"room appears to have unsupported version %s" % (room_version_prop,),
)
return
# 3. If event does not have a m.room.create in its auth_events, reject.
creation_event = auth_dict.get((EventTypes.Create, ""), None)
if not creation_event:
@ -324,6 +310,41 @@ def _check_size_limits(event: "EventBase") -> None:
raise EventSizeError("event too large")
def _check_create(event: "EventBase") -> None:
"""Implementation of the auth rules for m.room.create events
Args:
event: The `m.room.create` event to be checked
Raises:
AuthError if the event does not pass the auth rules
"""
assert event.type == EventTypes.Create
# 1.1 If it has any previous events, reject.
if event.prev_event_ids():
raise AuthError(403, "Create event has prev events")
# 1.2 If the domain of the room_id does not match the domain of the sender,
# reject.
sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender)
room_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.room_id)
if room_id_domain != sender_domain:
raise AuthError(403, "Creation event's room_id domain does not match sender's")
# 1.3 If content.room_version is present and is not a recognised version, reject
room_version_prop = event.content.get("room_version", "1")
if room_version_prop not in KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS:
raise AuthError(
403,
"room appears to have unsupported version %s" % (room_version_prop,),
)
# 1.4 If content has no creator field, reject.
if EventContentFields.ROOM_CREATOR not in event.content:
raise AuthError(403, "Create event lacks a 'creator' property")
def _can_federate(event: "EventBase", auth_events: StateMap["EventBase"]) -> bool:
creation_event = auth_events.get((EventTypes.Create, ""))
# There should always be a creation event, but if not don't federate.

View file

@ -109,6 +109,47 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
)
)
def test_create_event_with_prev_events(self):
"""A create event with prev_events should be rejected
https://spec.matrix.org/v1.3/rooms/v9/#authorization-rules
1: If type is m.room.create:
1. If it has any previous events, reject.
"""
creator = f"@creator:{TEST_DOMAIN}"
# we make both a good event and a bad event, to check that we are rejecting
# the bad event for the reason we think we are.
good_event = make_event_from_dict(
{
"room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID,
"type": "m.room.create",
"state_key": "",
"sender": creator,
"content": {
"creator": creator,
"room_version": RoomVersions.V9.identifier,
},
"auth_events": [],
"prev_events": [],
},
room_version=RoomVersions.V9,
)
bad_event = make_event_from_dict(
{**good_event.get_dict(), "prev_events": ["$fakeevent"]},
room_version=RoomVersions.V9,
)
event_store = _StubEventSourceStore()
get_awaitable_result(
event_auth.check_state_independent_auth_rules(event_store, good_event)
)
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
get_awaitable_result(
event_auth.check_state_independent_auth_rules(event_store, bad_event)
)
def test_random_users_cannot_send_state_before_first_pl(self):
"""
Check that, before the first PL lands, the creator is the only user
@ -564,8 +605,8 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
# helpers for making events
TEST_ROOM_ID = "!test:room"
TEST_DOMAIN = "example.com"
TEST_ROOM_ID = f"!test_room:{TEST_DOMAIN}"
def _create_event(