forked from MirrorHub/synapse
Update some docstrings and comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
772d414975
commit
f8407975e7
1 changed files with 31 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -2040,8 +2040,10 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
|||
auth_events (dict[(str, str)->synapse.events.EventBase]):
|
||||
Map from (event_type, state_key) to event
|
||||
|
||||
What we expect the event's auth_events to be, based on the event's
|
||||
position in the dag. I think? maybe??
|
||||
Normally, our calculated auth_events based on the state of the room
|
||||
at the event's position in the DAG, though occasionally (eg if the
|
||||
event is an outlier), may be the auth events claimed by the remote
|
||||
server.
|
||||
|
||||
Also NB that this function adds entries to it.
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
|
@ -2091,25 +2093,35 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
|||
origin (str):
|
||||
event (synapse.events.EventBase):
|
||||
context (synapse.events.snapshot.EventContext):
|
||||
|
||||
auth_events (dict[(str, str)->synapse.events.EventBase]):
|
||||
Map from (event_type, state_key) to event
|
||||
|
||||
Normally, our calculated auth_events based on the state of the room
|
||||
at the event's position in the DAG, though occasionally (eg if the
|
||||
event is an outlier), may be the auth events claimed by the remote
|
||||
server.
|
||||
|
||||
Also NB that this function adds entries to it.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
defer.Deferred[EventContext]: updated context
|
||||
"""
|
||||
event_auth_events = set(event.auth_event_ids())
|
||||
|
||||
# if the event's auth_events refers to events which are not in our
|
||||
# calculated auth_events, we need to fetch those events from somewhere.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# we start by fetching them from the store, and then try calling /event_auth/.
|
||||
# missing_auth is the set of the event's auth_events which we don't yet have
|
||||
# in auth_events.
|
||||
missing_auth = event_auth_events.difference(
|
||||
e.event_id for e in auth_events.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# if we have missing events, we need to fetch those events from somewhere.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# we start by checking if they are in the store, and then try calling /event_auth/.
|
||||
if missing_auth:
|
||||
# TODO: can we use store.have_seen_events here instead?
|
||||
have_events = yield self.store.get_seen_events_with_rejections(missing_auth)
|
||||
logger.debug("Got events %s from store", have_events)
|
||||
logger.debug("Found events %s in the store", have_events)
|
||||
missing_auth.difference_update(have_events.keys())
|
||||
else:
|
||||
have_events = {}
|
||||
|
@ -2164,15 +2176,23 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
|||
event.auth_event_ids()
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
# FIXME:
|
||||
logger.exception("Failed to get auth chain")
|
||||
|
||||
if event.internal_metadata.is_outlier():
|
||||
# XXX: given that, for an outlier, we'll be working with the
|
||||
# event's *claimed* auth events rather than those we calculated:
|
||||
# (a) is there any point in this test, since different_auth below will
|
||||
# obviously be empty
|
||||
# (b) alternatively, why don't we do it earlier?
|
||||
logger.info("Skipping auth_event fetch for outlier")
|
||||
return context
|
||||
|
||||
# FIXME: Assumes we have and stored all the state for all the
|
||||
# prev_events
|
||||
#
|
||||
# FIXME: what does the fixme above mean? where do prev_events come into
|
||||
# it, why do we care about the state for those events, and what does "have and
|
||||
# stored" mean? Seems erik wrote it in c1d860870b
|
||||
different_auth = event_auth_events.difference(
|
||||
e.event_id for e in auth_events.values()
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -2186,6 +2206,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
|
|||
different_auth,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# now we state-resolve between our own idea of the auth events, and the remote's
|
||||
# idea of them.
|
||||
|
||||
room_version = yield self.store.get_room_version(event.room_id)
|
||||
|
||||
different_events = yield make_deferred_yieldable(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue