These changes implement `GetRequiredPlugins` for Go using a registry
mechanism and an alternate entry point for `pulumi.Run`. Packages that
require plugins are expected to register themselves with the Pulumi SDK.
When `pulumi.Run` is used and the `PULUMI_PLUGINS` envvar is truthy, the
program will dump a JSON-encoded description of its required plugins to
stdout. The language host then uses this description to respond to
It's not entirely clear why gRPC doesn't already report these cleanly as unimplemented, but for now we'll explicitly implement them to avoid any spurious warnings.
Fixes#4028.
The original version of this code caused inconsistencies in the event
loop associated with a given thread. These changes elimintate the event
loop shenanigans the mocks were trying to play by updating _sync_await
to create an event loop if none exists in the current thread.
It's possible that this will cause problems if the tests run on a
different thread than the original program, as the tests are likely to
end up waiting on outputs created by the program, which is not supported
in Python.
Also adds test coverage of the mocking/testing support in Python.
These changes implement `GetRequiredPlugins` for Go using a registry
mechanism and an alternate entry point for `pulumi.Run`. Packages that
require plugins are expected to register themselves with the Pulumi SDK.
When `pulumi.Run` is used and the `PULUMI_PLUGINS` envvar is truthy, the
program will dump a JSON-encoded description of its required plugins to
stdout. The language host then uses this description to respond to
`GetRequiredPlugins`.
* started transformations for go sdk
* added first basic test
* added second test with child
* added RegisterStackTransformation
* added a couple tests to lifecycle_test
* update CHANGELOG and test
* included TODO for #3846
We upgraded to `ts-node@^8.0.0` 2.5 months ago as part of https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/3627, though it seems it wasn't really necessary to make that update for the purposes of the PR - updating the default TypeScript version.
The `8.0.0` series of `ts-node` unfortunately dropped all of it's caching support, due to what appear to be some corner-case correctness issues with the cache. We have not seen reports of those issues for Pulumi, and have much more experience with the `7.0.0` series overall (2 years vs. 2 months). The performance difference between `7.0.0` and `8.0.0` of ts-node for Pulumi is massive - it adds 4-4.5s to each of `pulumi preview` and `pulumi up` even on a trivial program.
As a result, for now we will revert back to `ts-node@^7.0.0`. In the future, we may want to look into our own caching layer or alternative to `ts-node` to ensure we get the behaviour and performance we expect.
Part of #3671.
These changes add support for mocking the resource monitor to the NodeJS
and Python SDKs. The proposed mock interface is a simplified version of
the standard resource monitor that allows an end-user to replace the
usual implementations of ReadResource/RegisterResource and Invoke with
their own. This can be used in unit tests to allow for precise control
of resource outputs and invoke results.
This updates the protocol buffers generation script in the SDK to use
the main Pulumi Build Container instead of a custom Docker image.
Note there are some path differences owing to the manner in which the
tools are installed in the Build Container, however the actual tool
instantiations are very similar.
These changes add a new method to the resource provider gRPC interface,
`GetSchema`, that allows consumers of these providers to extract
JSON-serialized schema information for the provider's types, resources,
and functions.
In preparation for publishing a separate module of the Go SDK for Pulumi
on which providers can depend, we should reduce the dependency footprint
so as to cause end users as few issues as possible with transitive
dependency versioning.
This commit removes all use of `github.com/pkg/errors` from the Go SDK
to that end, replacing it with the standard `errors` package and `fmt`
for error formatting where appropriate. We use the new (as of Go 1.13)
"%w" syntax for wrapping errors, so this code is no longer compatible
with Go 1.12.
Set an option to increase the memory limit on protobuf
parsing so that we can handle larger gRPC payloads.
Co-authored-by: Evan Boyle <EvanBoyle@users.noreply.github.com>
The provider plugin protocol is to write a port number followed by `\n`. We must guarantee we do that even on Windows, so must avoid Python `print` statements which implicitly rewrite newlines to platform specific character sequences.
Fixes#3807.
* Do not allocate outputs for nested prompt values.
Currently, `outupt`/`all` in the NodeJS SDK work recursively, allocating
outputs for every value at every depth, then collecting the component
promises into a top-level output. In the case of prompt values, these
nested outputs are not necessary, and allocating them can create massive
amounts of garbage. This appears to be the cause of
https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes/issues/963.
- Do not set top-level properties that were not provided
- Check for nil after awaiting inputs
- Check for interface-typed values, which can be produced by `Any`
- Pass a settable value to `awaitInputs` in `Any`
Also:
- Cleaned up existing tags so they're consistently at the bottom of doc comments where they should be
- Cleaned up some unused imports while I was taking a pass over the files
- Marked one function `@deprecated` that should be deprecated
For example, pulumi.String also implements pulumi.StringPtr. This is
consistent with the output of the code generator, and makes optional
inputs much more ergonomic.
This assert is not correct in the case of pointer input types, in
particular `pulumi.stringPtr`. Though these types are not assignable,
they are convertible.
The redesign is focused around providing better static typings and
improved ease-of-use for the Go SDK. Most of the redesign revolves
around three pivots:
- Strongly-typed inputs, especially for nested types
- Struct-based resource and invoke APIs
- Ease-of-use of Apply
1. Strongly-typed inputs
Input is the type of a generic input value for a Pulumi resource.
This type is used in conjunction with Output to provide polymorphism
over strongly-typed input values.
The intended pattern for nested Pulumi value types is to define an
input interface and a plain, input, and output variant of the value
type that implement the input interface.
For example, given a nested Pulumi value type with the following shape:
```
type Nested struct {
Foo int
Bar string
}
```
We would define the following:
```
var nestedType = reflect.TypeOf((*Nested)(nil)).Elem()
type NestedInput interface {
pulumi.Input
ToNestedOutput() NestedOutput
ToNestedOutputWithContext(context.Context) NestedOutput
}
type Nested struct {
Foo int `pulumi:"foo"`
Bar string `pulumi:"bar"`
}
type NestedInputValue struct {
Foo pulumi.IntInput `pulumi:"foo"`
Bar pulumi.StringInput `pulumi:"bar"`
}
func (NestedInputValue) ElementType() reflect.Type {
return nestedType
}
func (v NestedInputValue) ToNestedOutput() NestedOutput {
return pulumi.ToOutput(v).(NestedOutput)
}
func (v NestedInputValue) ToNestedOutputWithContext(ctx context.Context) NestedOutput {
return pulumi.ToOutputWithContext(ctx, v).(NestedOutput)
}
type NestedOutput struct { *pulumi.OutputState }
func (NestedOutput) ElementType() reflect.Type {
return nestedType
}
func (o NestedOutput) ToNestedOutput() NestedOutput {
return o
}
func (o NestedOutput) ToNestedOutputWithContext(ctx context.Context) NestedOutput {
return o
}
func (o NestedOutput) Foo() pulumi.IntOutput {
return o.Apply(func (v Nested) int {
return v.Foo
}).(pulumi.IntOutput)
}
func (o NestedOutput) Bar() pulumi.StringOutput {
return o.Apply(func (v Nested) string {
return v.Bar
}).(pulumi.StringOutput)
}
```
The SDK provides input and output types for primitives, arrays, and
maps.
2. Struct-based APIs
Instead of providing expected output properties in the input map passed
to {Read,Register}Resource and returning the outputs as a map, the user
now passes a pointer to a struct that implements one of the Resource
interfaces and has appropriately typed and tagged fields that represent
its output properties.
For example, given a custom resource with an int-typed output "foo" and
a string-typed output "bar", we would define the following
CustomResource type:
```
type MyResource struct {
pulumi.CustomResourceState
Foo pulumi.IntOutput `pulumi:"foo"`
Bar pulumi.StringOutput `pulumi:"bar"`
}
```
And invoke RegisterResource like so:
```
var resource MyResource
err := ctx.RegisterResource(tok, name, props, &resource, opts...)
```
Invoke arguments and results are also provided via structs, but use
plain-old Go types for their fields:
```
type MyInvokeArgs struct {
Foo int `pulumi:"foo"`
}
type MyInvokeResult struct {
Bar string `pulumi:"bar"`
}
var result MyInvokeResult
err := ctx.Invoke(tok, MyInvokeArgs{Foo: 42}, &result, opts...)
```
3. Ease-of-use of Apply
All `Apply` methods now accept an interface{} as the callback type.
The provided callback value must have one of the following signatures:
func (v T) U
func (v T) (U, error)
func (ctx context.Context, v T) U
func (ctx context.Context, v T) (U, error)
T must be assignable from the ElementType of the Output. If U is a type
that has a registered Output type, the result of the Apply will be the
corresponding Output type. Otherwise, the result of the Apply will be
AnyOutput.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/2149.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3488.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3487.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/issues/248.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3492.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3491.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3562.
PEP 561 specifies that packages which contain either inline type hints
or type stubs should indicate their support for type hints via
including a file named `py.typed` in the root of the package. Since
Pulumi already includes inline type hints, adding `py.typed` to the
Python SDK simply allows these hints to be used by mypy.
Fix the following warning and turn on "treat warnings as errors" for our .NET projects.
```
Deployment/InvokeOptions.cs(6,60): warning CS1574: XML comment has cref attribute 'InvokeAsync{T}(string,
```
The test files are currently included in the npm package, and we have packages that depend on the test files currently, so when installing the linkable `@pulumi/pulumi` package locally, don't delete the tests.
Codepaths which could result in a hang will print a message to the console indicating the problem, along with a link to documentation on how to restructure code to best address it.
`StackReference.getOutputSync` and `requireOutputSync` have been deprecated as they may cause hangs on some combinations of Node and certain OS platforms. `StackReference.getOutput` and `requireOutput` should be used instead.
Fixes building grpc package with gcc8 and newer
Fixes building grpc package for node 13.x
Matches minor grpc release (1.24.x) to version used by dotnet sdk
Earlier changes to the get-version script were not adopted by the Python
SDK Makefile. This caused package publishing to skip uploads due to
missing versions.
- Use a mutex + condition variable instead of a channel for
synchronizaiton in order to allow multiple calls to resolve/reject
- Properly handle outputs that are resolved to other outputs, especially
if those outputs are not of exactly type Output
- Remove the Value() methods that allowed prompt access to output values
- Add variants of `Apply` that take a context parameter
- Ensure that resource outputs properly incorporate their resource as
a dependency
- Make `Output` a plain struct. Uninitialized outputs will be treated as
resolved and unknown. This makes conversions between output
types more ergonomic.
Contributes to #3492.
A user who calls `StreamInvoke` probably expects the `AsyncIterable`
that is returned to gracefully terminate. This is currently not the
case.
Where does something like this go wrong? A better question might be
where any of this went right, because several days later, after
wandering into civilization from the great Wilderness of Bugs, I must
confess that I've forgotten if any of it had.
`AsyncIterable` is a pull-based API. `for await (...)` will continuously
call `next` ("pull") on the underlying `AsyncIterator` until the
iterable is exhausted. But, gRPC's streaming-return API is _push_ based.
That is to say, when a streaming RPC is called, data is provided by
callback on the stream object, like:
call.on("data", (thing: any) => {... do thing ...});
Our goal in `StreamInvoke` is to convert the push-based gRPC routines
into the pull-based `AsyncIterable` retrun type. You may remember your
CS theory this is one of those annoying "fundamental mismatches" in
abstraction. So we're off to a good start.
Until this point, we've depended on a library,
`callback-to-async-iterator` to handle the details of being this bridge.
Our trusting nature and innocent charm has mislead us. This library is
not worthy of our trust. Instead of doing what we'd like it to do, it
returns (in our case) an `AsyncIterable` that will never complete.
Yes,, this `AsyncIterable` will patiently wait for eternity, which
honestly is kind of poetic when you sit down in a nice bath and think
about that fun time you considered eating your computer instead of
finishing this idiotic bug.
Indeed, this is the sort of bug that you wonder where it even comes
from. Our query libraries? Why aren't these `finally` blocks executing?
Is our language host terminating early? Is gRPC angry at me, and just
passive-aggrssively not servicing some of my requests? Oh god I've been
up for 48 hours, why is that wallpaper starting to move? And by the way,
a fun interlude to take in an otherwise very productive week is to try
to understand the gRPC streaming node client, which is code-gen'd, but
which also takes the liberty of generating itself at runtime, so that
gRPC is code-gen'ing a code-gen routine, which makes the whole thing
un-introspectable, un-debuggable, and un-knowable. That's fine, I didn't
need to understand any of this anyway, thanks friends.
But we've come out the other side knowing that the weak link in this
very sorry chain of incredibly weak links, is this dependency.
This commit removes this dependency for a better monster: the one we
know.
It is at this time that I'd like to announce that I am quitting my job
at Pulumi. I thank you all for the good times, but mostly, for taking
this code over for me.
These changes restore a more-correct version of the behavior that was
disabled with #3014. The original implementation of this behavior was
done in the SDKs, which do not have access to the complete inputs for a
resource (in particular, default values filled in by the provider during
`Check` are not exposed to the SDK). This lack of information meant that
the resolved output values could disagree with the typings present in
a provider SDK. Exacerbating this problem was the fact that unknown
values were dropped entirely, causing `undefined` values to appear in
unexpected places.
By doing this in the engine and allowing unknown values to be
represented in a first-class manner in the SDK, we can attack both of
these issues.
Although this behavior is not _strictly_ consistent with respect to the
resource model--in an update, a resource's output properties will come
from its provider and may differ from its input properties--this
behavior was present in the product for a fairly long time without
significant issues. In the future, we may be able to improve the
accuracy of resource outputs during a preview by allowing the provider
to dry-run CRUD operations and return partially-known values where
possible.
These changes also introduce new APIs in the Node and Python SDKs
that work with unknown values in a first-class fashion:
- A new parameter to the `apply` function that indicates that the
callback should be run even if the result of the apply contains
unknown values
- `containsUnknowns` and `isUnknown`, which return true if a value
either contains nested unknown values or is exactly an unknown value
- The `Unknown` type, which represents unknown values
The primary use case for these APIs is to allow nested, properties with
known values to be accessed via the lifted property accessor even when
the containing property is not fully know. A common example of this
pattern is the `metadata.name` property of a Kubernetes `Namespace`
object: while other properties of the `metadata` bag may be unknown,
`name` is often known. These APIs allow `ns.metadata.name` to return a
known value in this case.
In order to avoid exposing downlevel SDKs to unknown values--a change
which could break user code by exposing it to unexpected values--a
language SDK must indicate whether or not it supports first-class
unknown values as part of each `RegisterResourceRequest`.
These changes also allow us to avoid breaking user code with the new
behavior introduced by the prior commit.
Fixes#3190.
After creating an initial Pulumi .NET project, it will be natural for some folks (who are unfamiliar with Pulumi) to try to run it via `dotnet run`, as that's how you'd typically run a .NET Core program. Doing so today fails with:
```
Unhandled exception. System.InvalidOperationException: Environment did not contain: PULUMI_MONITOR
at Pulumi.Deployment..ctor()
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Func`1 func)
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Func`1 func)
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Action action)
at Program.Main() in /Users/user/temp/quickstart/Program.cs:line 9
at Program.<Main>()
```
Instead, provide a more descriptive error message indicating that the pulumi CLI should be used to run the program. We return the same error as we do for Node.js and Python.
```
Unhandled exception. System.InvalidOperationException: Program run without the Pulumi engine available; re-run using the `pulumi` CLI
at Pulumi.Deployment..ctor()
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Func`1 func)
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Func`1 func)
at Pulumi.Deployment.RunAsync(Action action)
at Program.Main() in /Users/user/temp/quickstart/Program.cs:line 9
at Program.<Main>()
```
