Whenever an update fails partially, it gives the engine back some state
bag of outputs that should be persisted to the snapshot. When saving
this state, we shouldn't save the inputs that triggered the update that
failed, since the resource that exists will never have been updated
successfully with those inputs.
Instead of saving the new inputs on partial failed updates, this commit
saves the old inputs and the new outputs. The new outputs will likely
need to be refreshed to be useful, but the old inputs will be correct
from the perpsective of the Pulumi program that generated the last
successful update.
Fixespulumi/pulumi#2011
This adds an option, --suppress-outputs, to many commands, to
avoid printing stack outputs for stacks that might contain sensitive
information in their outputs (like key material, and whatnot).
Fixespulumi/pulumi#2028.
This change adds GitLab CI support, by sniffing out the right
variables (equivalent to what we already do for Travis).
I've also restructured the code to share more logic with our
existing CI detection code, now moved to the pkg/util/ciutil
package, and will be fleshing this out more in the days to come.
There is a seldom-used capability in our CLI, the ability to pass
-m to specify an update message, which we will then show prominently.
At the same time, we already scrape some interesting information from
the Git repo from which an update is performed, like the SHA hash,
committer, and author information. We explicitly didn't want to scrape
the entire message just in case someone put sensitive info inside of it.
It seems safe -- indeed, appealing -- to use just the title portion
as the default update message when no other has been provided (the
majority case). We'll work on displaying it in a better way, but this
strengthens our GitOps/CI/CD story.
Fixespulumi/pulumi#2008.
It's not good practice to dirty up the stdout stream with messages
like this. In fact, I questioned whether we should be emitting
*anything* here, but given that this is often used in unattended
environments, coupled with the fact that it's easy to accidentally set
this and then wonder why `pulumi login` is silently returning, led
me to keep it in (for now, at least).
The preview will proceed as if the operations had not been issued (i.e.
we will not speculate on a new state for the stack). This is consistent
with our behavior prior to the changes that added pending operations to
the checkpoint.
This change stops attempting to pop a web browser in non-interactive
sessions. Instead, the PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN environment variable must
be set. Otherwise, any attempt to use the CLI will yield
$ pulumi --non-interactive preview
error: PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN must be set for login during non-interactive CLI sessions
This is the behavior we want for Docker-based invocations of the CLI,
and so is part of pulumi/pulumi#1991.
The diff display code was not expecting that it would be possible for
resource properties to transition from being an archive to being an
asset, or the other way around. This commit prints out a reasonable diff
if this situation occurs instead of crashing.
* Process deletions conservatively in parallel
This commit allows the engine to conservatively delete resources in
parallel when it is sure that it is legal to do so. In the absence of a
true data-flow oriented step scheduler, this approach provides a
significant improvement over the existing serial deletion mechanism.
Instead of processing deletes serially, this commit will partition the
set of condemned resources into sets of resources that are known to be
legally deletable in parallel. The step executor will then execute those
independent lists of steps one-by-one until all steps are complete.
* CR: Make ResourceSet a normal map
* Only use the dependency graph if we can trust it
* Reverse polarity of pendingDeletesAreReplaces
* CR: un-export a few types
* CR: simplify control flow in step generator when scheduling
* CR: parents are dependencies, fix loop index
* CR: Remove ParentOf, add new test for parent dependencies
API calls agains the Pulumi service may start setting a new header,
`X-Pulumi-Warning`. The value of this header should be presented to
the user as a warning.
The Service will use this to provide additional information to the
user without having the CLI have to know about every specific warning
path.
Since I was digging around over the weekend after the change to move
away from light black, and the impact it had on less important
information showing more prominently than it used to, I took a step
back and did a deeper tidying up of things. Another side goal of this
exercise was to be a little more respectful of terminal width; when
we could say things with fewer words, I did so.
* Stylize the preview/update summary differently, so that it stands
out as a section. Also highlight the total changes with bold -- it
turns out this has a similar effect to the bright white colorization,
just without the negative effects on e.g. white terminals.
* Eliminate some verbosity in the phrasing of change summaries.
* Make all heading sections stylized consistently. This includes
the color (bright magenta) and the vertical spacing (always a newline
separating headings). We were previously inconsistent on this (e.g.,
outputs were under "---outputs---"). Now the headings are:
Previewing (etc), Diagnostics, Outputs, Resources, Duration, and Permalink.
* Fix an issue where we'd parent things to "global" until the stack
object later showed up. Now we'll simply mock up a stack resource.
* Don't show messages like "no change" or "unchanged". Prior to the
light black removal, these faded into the background of the terminal.
Now they just clutter up the display. Similar to the elision of "*"
for OpSames in a prior commit, just leave these out. Now anything
that's written is actually a meaningful status for the user to note.
* Don't show the "3 info messages," etc. summaries in the Info column
while an update is ongoing. Instead, just show the latest line. This
is more respectful of width -- I often find that the important
messages scroll off the right of my screen before this change.
For discussion:
- I actually wonder if we should eliminate the summary
altogether and always just show the latest line. Or even
blank it out. The summary feels better suited for the
Diagnostics section, and the Status concisely tells us
how a resource's update ended up (failed, succeeded, etc).
- Similarly, I question the idea of showing only the "worst"
message. I'd vote for always showing the latest, and again
leaving it to the Status column for concisely telling the
user about the final state a resource ended up in.
* Stop prepending "info: " to every stdout/stderr message. It adds
no value, clutters up the display, and worsens horizontal usage.
* Lessen the verbosity of update headline messages, so we now instead
of e.g. "Previewing update of stack 'x':", we just say
"Previewing update (x):".
* Eliminate vertical whitespace in the Diagnostics section. Every
independent console.out previously was separated by an entire newline,
which made the section look cluttered to my eyes. These are just
streams of logs, there's no reason for the extra newlines.
* Colorize the resource headers in the Diagnostic section light blue.
Note that this will change various test baselines, which I will
update next. I didn't want those in the same commit.
Now that we're showing SpecUnimportant as regular text, the extra
"Previewing"/"Updating" line that we show really stands out as being
superfluous. For example, we previously said:
Updating stack 'docker-images'
Performing changes:
...
This change eliminates that second line, so we just have:
Updating stack 'docker-images':
...
Recently, we eliminated bright black text, which IMHO makes the
"same" lines really stand out more than we want them to. This is
partly just due to the heavyweight nature of the "*" character,
which we precede every line with. This has the effect of making it
toughter to scan the update to see what's going to happen. The goal
of SpecUnimportant (bright black) was that we wanted to draw less
attention to certain elements of the CLI text -- and have them fade
into the background (apparently it was too successful at this ;-))
So, this change eliminates the "*" prefix for same operations
altogether. It reads better to my eyes and keeps the original intent.
- Attempting to read an archive with an unknown type now returns an
error
- Attempting to read a path archive that is neither a known archive
format or a directory now returns an error
Fixes#1529.
Fixes#1953.
Add two command-line options to the test framework, "-dirs" and
"list-dirs". The former accepts a regex that is used to select which
integration tests to run. The latter lists available integration tests
without running them.
* Protobuf changes
* Move management of root resource state to engine
This commit fixes a persistent side-by-side issue in the NodeJS SDK by
moving the management of root resource state to the engine. Doing so
adds two new endpoints to the Engine gRPC service: 1) GetRootResource
and 2) SetRootResource, which get and set the root resource
respectively.
* Rebase against master, regenerate proto
* Have backend.ListStacks return a new StackSummary interface
* Update filestake backend to use new type
* Update httpstate backend to use new type
* Update commands to use new type
* lint
* Address PR feedback
* Lint
In order to present a message with a link to a user's access tokens in
the service, we have to convert the API server's URL to the URL for
the console. We understand how to do this for servers that look like
our servers (i.e. their host name is `api.<whatever>`), but in general
we can't do this.
Rewrite the code such that we only print a message about how to find
your access tokens (and offer browser based login) only in cases where
we are able to construct a URL to the console.
Fixes#1930
* Revert "Don't show stack outputs when update fails (#1916)"
This reverts commit e3f89e82aa.
* Be more precise about printing outputs
This commit prints outputs only if they are known to be complete. This
avoids massive red diffs during previews and when component resources
fail to call registerResourceOutputs.
* CR: Clean up large boolean expression and comment
* CR: boolean compromise
* Retire pending deletions at start of plan
Instead of letting pending deletions pile up to be retired at the end of
a plan, this commit eagerly disposes of any pending deletions that were
pending at the end of the previous plan. This is a nice usability win
and also reclaims an invariant that at most one resource with a given
URN is live and at most one is pending deletion at any point in time.
* Rebase against master
* Fix a test issue arising from shared snapshots
* CR feedback
* plan -> replacement
* Use ephemeral statuses to communicate deletions
* Close cancellation source before closing events
The cancellation source logs cancellation messages to the engine event
channel, so we must first close the cancellation source before closing
the channel.
* CR: Fix race in shutdown of signal goroutine
* Don't show stack outputs when update fails
It is basically guaranteed that stack outputs are going to be
meaningless if a plan fails, so this commmit doesn't display them if an
error has occured.
* CR: expand on comment
We signal provider cancellation by hangning a goroutine off of the plan
executor's parent context. To ensure clean shutdown, this goroutine also
listens on a channel that closes once the plan has finished executing.
Unfortunately, we were closing this channel too early, and the close was
racing with the cancellation signal. These changes ensure that the
channel closes after the plan has fully completed.
Fixes#1906.
Fixespulumi/pulumi-kubernetes#185.
* Validate type tokens before using them
When registering or reading a resource, we take the type token given to
us from the language host and assume that it's valid, which resulted in
assertion failures in various places in the engine. This commit
validates the format of type tokens given to us from the language host
and issues an appropriate error if it's not valid.
Along the way, this commit also improves the way that fatal exceptions
are rendered in the Node language host.
* Pre-allocate an exception for ReadResource
* Fix integration test
* CR Feedback
This commit is a lower-impact change that fixes the bugs associated with
invalid types on component resources and only checks that a type is
valid on custom resources.
* CR Take 2: Fix up IsProviderType instead of fixing call sites
* Please gometalinter
It is possible for the inputs of a "same" resource to have changed even
if the contents of the input bags are different if the resource's
provider deems the physical change to be semantically irrelevant.
Previously `new` was operating under the assumption that it was always
going to be creating a new project/stack, and would always prompt for
these values. However, we want to be able to use `new` to pull down the
source for an existing stack. This change adds a `--stack` flag to `new`
that can be used to specify an existing stack. If the specified stack
already exists, we won't prompt for the project name/description, and
instead just use the existing stack's values. If `--stack` is specified,
but doesn't already exist, it will just use that as the stack name
(instead of prompting) when creating the stack. `new` also now handles
configuration like `up <url>`: if the stack is a preconfigured empty
stack (i.e. it was created/configured in the Pulumi Console via Pulumi
Button or New Project), we will use the existing stack's config without
prompting. Otherwise we will prompt for config, and just like `up
<url>`, we'll use the existing stack's config values as defaults when
prompting, or if the stack didn't exist, use the defaults from the
template.
Previously `up <url>`'s handling of the project name/description wasn't
correct: it would always automatically use the values from the template
without prompting. Now, just like `new`:
- When updating an existing stack, it will not prompt, and just use the
existing stack's values.
- When creating a new stack, it will prompt for the project
name/description, using the defaults from the template.
This PR consolidates some of the `new`/`up` implementation so it shares
code for this functionality. There's definitely opportunities for a lot
more code reuse, but that cleanup can happen down the line if/when we
have the cycles.
* Don't close eventChannel when panicking
The state of the system is completely unknown when panicking and in
general it's not safe to infer whether or not it is safe to close a
channel when in this tate.
* CR feedback
* Spelling